Ivy Jenkins build

2011-06-06 Thread Matt Benson
Why do we only do a 'clean jar'?  Shouldn't we be running unit tests
at least?  Isn't that kind of the point of CI?  Perhaps 'clean
coverage-report'?

Matt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: Ivy Jenkins build

2011-06-06 Thread Matt Benson
FYI I experimented with running these targets; build completed
successfully in 3.x minutes.  I'm not going to revert my change unless
someone presents a good reason to do so.

Matt

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Matt Benson  wrote:
> Why do we only do a 'clean jar'?  Shouldn't we be running unit tests
> at least?  Isn't that kind of the point of CI?  Perhaps 'clean
> coverage-report'?
>
> Matt
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: Ivy Jenkins build

2011-06-06 Thread Maarten Coene
Matt,

the junit tests were running in another separate project:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-tests/

Maarten




From: Matt Benson 
To: Ant Developers List 
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2011 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: Ivy Jenkins build

FYI I experimented with running these targets; build completed
successfully in 3.x minutes.  I'm not going to revert my change unless
someone presents a good reason to do so.

Matt

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Matt Benson  wrote:
> Why do we only do a 'clean jar'?  Shouldn't we be running unit tests
> at least?  Isn't that kind of the point of CI?  Perhaps 'clean
> coverage-report'?
>
> Matt
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org