Re: Win32 ordinal binding concerns

[Jeff Trawick]

"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Bill and others interested,
> 
> Please look at the current 2.0 library and executable binaries
> in the depends.exe utility.  You will observe only one module is
> bound by ordinal, and that is ws2_32.dll (which is a MS problem.)

Is this to say that the linker binds on the symbol name instead of the
ordinal number?
-- 
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
   http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
 Born in Roswell... married an alien...

RE: Win32 ordinal binding concerns

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jeff Trawick
> 
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Bill and others interested,
> > 
> > Please look at the current 2.0 library and executable binaries
> > in the depends.exe utility.  You will observe only one module is
> > bound by ordinal, and that is ws2_32.dll (which is a MS problem.)
> 
> Is this to say that the linker binds on the symbol name instead of the
> ordinal number?

Heck yeah :-)