Cassandra storage and jdk version?
Hi Folks, I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra. See docs here: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html Builds available from here: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/ The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime version it's now 1.7. So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite? Cheers -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?
On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra. > See docs here: > http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html > Builds available from here: > https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/ Will take a look! What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment, performance, memory, etc.? > > The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime > version it's now 1.7. > So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite? No problem here. - Brett -- Brett Porter @brettporter http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?
On 1 April 2014 11:57, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra. >> See docs here: >> http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html >> Builds available from here: >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/ > > Will take a look! > > What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment, performance, > memory, etc.? Less memory usage :-) as we do not run anymore internally the Jackrabbit stack. Deployment is just a matter of configuring 2 files. Having that dynamic need huge/complicated refactoring! I need to investigate a bit to improve a bit performance. (some stuff can be done with simply using cql queries) but that's not too bad :-) An idea I have in mind is to propose an alternate file storage in Cassandra to have a real scalable architecture (local storage could act as cache especially for released artifacts) > >> >> The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime >> version it's now 1.7. >> So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite? > > No problem here. I was just started a discussion here and will probably start a more official vote soon. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter @brettporter > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: [VOTE] Apache Archiva 1.3.7
+1 On 30 March 2014 15:30, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Archiva 1.3.7. This is an update to > those still on 1.3.x that has an updated version of Struts for some of their > latest fixes. > > (The announcement will still recommend users upgrade to 2.0.1 when they can). > > The release artifacts are at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/archiva/1.3.7/ > Specifically, > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/archiva/1.3.7/src/apache-archiva-1.3.7-src.zip > with signature > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/archiva/1.3.7/src/apache-archiva-1.3.7-src.zip.asc > > Site available here: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/1.3.7/ > > Staging repository: > https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/archiva-releases-stage-1.3/ > > The SVN tag is r1583096, > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/tags/archiva-1.3.7/ > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > > Regards, > Brett > > -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
