Re: C++ Boost GitHub URL in ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake
CentOS 7 On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:06 PM Benson Muite wrote: > Hi Rares, > What operating system are you using? > Benson > On 9/28/21 7:38 AM, Rares Vernica wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm still struggling to build Arrow with Parquet. I compiled Thrift > myself > > but I'm running into dependency issues with Boost. > > > > It looks like the Boost download URL provided in > ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake > > here > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/ef4e92982054fcc723729ab968296d799d3108dd/cpp/cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake#L405 > > links to GitHub Releases https://github.com/boostorg/boost/releases. The > > .tar.gz provided there does not contain the Boost headers. > > > > Cheers, > > Rares > > > >
Re: C++ Boost GitHub URL in ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake
Hi Rares, What operating system are you using? Benson On 9/28/21 7:38 AM, Rares Vernica wrote: Hello, I'm still struggling to build Arrow with Parquet. I compiled Thrift myself but I'm running into dependency issues with Boost. It looks like the Boost download URL provided in ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake here https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/ef4e92982054fcc723729ab968296d799d3108dd/cpp/cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake#L405 links to GitHub Releases https://github.com/boostorg/boost/releases. The .tar.gz provided there does not contain the Boost headers. Cheers, Rares
C++ Boost GitHub URL in ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake
Hello, I'm still struggling to build Arrow with Parquet. I compiled Thrift myself but I'm running into dependency issues with Boost. It looks like the Boost download URL provided in ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake here https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/ef4e92982054fcc723729ab968296d799d3108dd/cpp/cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake#L405 links to GitHub Releases https://github.com/boostorg/boost/releases. The .tar.gz provided there does not contain the Boost headers. Cheers, Rares
Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 5.5.0 RC1
+1 (binding) Tested on x86_64-apple-darwin with: dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 5.5.0 1 On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 5:31 PM Wayne Xia wrote: > > +1 > > I get this after running the script: > > /tmp/arrow-5.5.0.GVUu0 > + TEST_SUCCESS=yes > + echo 'Release candidate looks good!' > Release candidate looks good! > > Thanks! > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:57 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > > version 5.5.0. > > > > This release candidate is based on commit: > > 4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23 [1] > > > > The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. > > > > The changelog is located at [3]. > > > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, > > and vote on the release. There is a script [4] that automates some of > > the verification. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... > > > > [1]: > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23 > > [2]: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-5.5.0-rc1 > > [3]: > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23/CHANGELOG.md > > [4]: > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > >
Re: [VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
+1 -Jon On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 2:26 PM Mauricio Vargas wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Neal Richardson > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Neal > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:54 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM Andy Grove > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Benjamin Kietzman > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 23:08 Micah Kornfield > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ,+1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, September 26, 2021, Sutou Kouhei > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of > > > > > > > the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of > > > > > > > Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community > > > > > > > uses [1][2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a summary of the process: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for > > > > > > > planned features and bug fixes so that we have > > > > > > > visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a > > > > > > > PR shows up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (This is for the Apache way.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Release on demand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like DataFusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia > > > > > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Julia implementation uses separated version > > > > > > > scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version > > > > > > > but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use > > > > > > > 6.0.0.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > > > > > > > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after > > > > > > > the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in > > > > > > > apache/arrow.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See also discussions about this: [3][4] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the > > > > > > > Julia community to proceed with the work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal > > > > > > > [ ] 0 : No opinion > > > > > > > [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_ > > > > > > > UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/ > > > > > > > dev/release/README.md > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801 > > > > > > > a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > [4] > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d5 > > > > > > > 3076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > kou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > — > *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda* > Site: pacha.dev > Blog: pacha.dev/blog
Re: [VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
+1 On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Neal Richardson wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Neal > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:54 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM Andy Grove > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Benjamin Kietzman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 23:08 Micah Kornfield > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > ,+1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, September 26, 2021, Sutou Kouhei > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of > > > > > > the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of > > > > > > Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community > > > > > > uses [1][2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a summary of the process: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for > > > > > > planned features and bug fixes so that we have > > > > > > visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a > > > > > > PR shows up. > > > > > > > > > > > > (This is for the Apache way.) > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Release on demand > > > > > > > > > > > > Like DataFusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia > > > > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Julia implementation uses separated version > > > > > > scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version > > > > > > but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use > > > > > > 6.0.0.) > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > > > > > > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after > > > > > > the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in > > > > > > apache/arrow.) > > > > > > > > > > > > See also discussions about this: [3][4] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the > > > > > > Julia community to proceed with the work. > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal > > > > > > [ ] 0 : No opinion > > > > > > [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_ > > > > > > UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/ > > > > > > dev/release/README.md > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801 > > > > > > a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > [4] > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d5 > > > > > > 3076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > kou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- — *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda* Site: pacha.dev Blog: pacha.dev/blog
Re: [VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
+1 (binding) Neal On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:54 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM Andy Grove wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Benjamin Kietzman > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 23:08 Micah Kornfield > > wrote: > > > > > > > ,+1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Sunday, September 26, 2021, Sutou Kouhei > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of > > > > > the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of > > > > > Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. > > > > > > > > > > The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community > > > > > uses [1][2]. > > > > > > > > > > Here is a summary of the process: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform > > > > > > > > > > Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for > > > > > planned features and bug fixes so that we have > > > > > visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a > > > > > PR shows up. > > > > > > > > > > (This is for the Apache way.) > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > 2. Release on demand > > > > > > > > > > Like DataFusion. > > > > > > > > > > Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia > > > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > > > The Julia implementation uses separated version > > > > > scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version > > > > > but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use > > > > > 6.0.0.) > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > > > > > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after > > > > > the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in > > > > > apache/arrow.) > > > > > > > > > > See also discussions about this: [3][4] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the > > > > > Julia community to proceed with the work. > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal > > > > > [ ] 0 : No opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_ > > > > > UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/ > > > > > dev/release/README.md > > > > > [3] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801 > > > > > a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > [4] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d5 > > > > > 3076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -- > > > > > kou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 5.5.0 RC1
+1 I get this after running the script: /tmp/arrow-5.5.0.GVUu0 + TEST_SUCCESS=yes + echo 'Release candidate looks good!' Release candidate looks good! Thanks! On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:57 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > version 5.5.0. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23 [1] > > The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. > > The changelog is located at [3]. > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, > and vote on the release. There is a script [4] that automates some of > the verification. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... > > [1]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23 > [2]: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-5.5.0-rc1 > [3]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/4c9d6d3d4e95d1daa750c93f82dd504a36890c23/CHANGELOG.md > [4]: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >
Re: [JIRA] New "Compute IR" component
I don't think so. You probably need some amount of permissions (which ones I don't know). Le 27/09/2021 à 14:02, Phillip Cloud a écrit : Thanks Antoine. For future reference, can anyone add these labels? On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:39 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello, I've added a JIRA component called "Compute IR". Please use accordingly for all compute IR-related issues. Regards Antoine.
Re: [JIRA] New "Compute IR" component
Thanks Antoine. For future reference, can anyone add these labels? On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:39 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > I've added a JIRA component called "Compute IR". Please use > accordingly for all compute IR-related issues. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > >
[JIRA] New "Compute IR" component
Hello, I've added a JIRA component called "Compute IR". Please use accordingly for all compute IR-related issues. Regards Antoine.
Re: [VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM Andy Grove wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Benjamin Kietzman > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 23:08 Micah Kornfield > wrote: > > > > > ,+1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sunday, September 26, 2021, Sutou Kouhei > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of > > > > the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of > > > > Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. > > > > > > > > The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community > > > > uses [1][2]. > > > > > > > > Here is a summary of the process: > > > > > > > > 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform > > > > > > > > Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for > > > > planned features and bug fixes so that we have > > > > visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a > > > > PR shows up. > > > > > > > > (This is for the Apache way.) > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > 2. Release on demand > > > > > > > > Like DataFusion. > > > > > > > > Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia > > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > The Julia implementation uses separated version > > > > scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version > > > > but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use > > > > 6.0.0.) > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > > > > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after > > > > the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in > > > > apache/arrow.) > > > > > > > > See also discussions about this: [3][4] > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the > > > > Julia community to proceed with the work. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal > > > > [ ] 0 : No opinion > > > > [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_ > > > > UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/ > > > > dev/release/README.md > > > > [3] > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801 > > > > a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > [4] > > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d5 > > > > 3076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > > > kou > > > > > > > > > >
