RE: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Kazuaki Ishizaki
I have seen this failure multiple times. However, it is not addressed yet.
https://travis-ci.community/t/s390x-no-space-left-on-device/8953

It is fine with me until we see more stable results.

Regards,
Kazuaki Ishizaki



From:   Wes McKinney 
To: dev 
Date:   2020/07/03 05:32
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build



Just looking at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__travis-2Dci.org_github_apache_arrow_builds=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg=d0xgWL-o-XoU1IbNYu0qkgPOn6pka3XNoJI2sqeVL4M=cj0Lxl90H9X5cBy4T9Khl4Vw4J0uAdSTySKnVrh-iRw=
 
 the
failure rate on master (which should be green > 95% of the time) is
really high. I'm going to open a patch adding to allow_failures until
we see this become less flaky

On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:39 AM Antoine Pitrou  wrote:
>
>
> In my experience, both the s390x and ARM builds are flaky on Travis-Ci,
> for reasons which seem unrelated to Arrow.  The infrastructure seems a
> bit unreliable.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 02/07/2020 à 15:15, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > I would be interested to know the empirical reliability of the s390x
> > Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of
> > the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it
> > should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it
> > perioidically to make sure it's passing some of the time including
> > near releases. Thoughts?
> >






Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Wes McKinney
Just looking at https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/arrow/builds the
failure rate on master (which should be green > 95% of the time) is
really high. I'm going to open a patch adding to allow_failures until
we see this become less flaky

On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:39 AM Antoine Pitrou  wrote:
>
>
> In my experience, both the s390x and ARM builds are flaky on Travis-Ci,
> for reasons which seem unrelated to Arrow.  The infrastructure seems a
> bit unreliable.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 02/07/2020 à 15:15, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > I would be interested to know the empirical reliability of the s390x
> > Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of
> > the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it
> > should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it
> > perioidically to make sure it's passing some of the time including
> > near releases. Thoughts?
> >


Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Antoine Pitrou


In my experience, both the s390x and ARM builds are flaky on Travis-Ci,
for reasons which seem unrelated to Arrow.  The infrastructure seems a
bit unreliable.

Regards

Antoine.


Le 02/07/2020 à 15:15, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> I would be interested to know the empirical reliability of the s390x
> Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of
> the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it
> should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it
> perioidically to make sure it's passing some of the time including
> near releases. Thoughts?
>