Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi, https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl has been transferred to https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia . Thanks to everyone who helped with this process. -- kou In <20211223.114544.60102279684253469@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:45:44 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > I share the current status. > > We've finished CLA related tasks. See > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265 fro > details. > > I've filled all items in IP clearance form: > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html > > And I've started IP clearance vote on gene...@incubator.apache.org: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9xck9j8qdrhvw363vjl6qkk2g8t4l6b > > I'll ask INFRA to transfer JuliaData/Arrow.jl to > apache/arrow-julia after the vote is passed. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:51:33 -0700, > Jacob Quinn wrote: > >> Thanks kou, >> >> I think I've got all the details summarized in [this issue]( >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265) where we'll track >> progress on the required CLAs. I've also reached out to the >> individuals directly about signing the CLAs. >> >> -Jacob >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >>> Hi Jacob, >>> >>> Thanks for helping this! >>> >>> I'm filling IP clearance form: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml >>> >>> (I think that we can see it at >>> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html >>> soon.) >>> >>> Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP >>> clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because >>> the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is >>> 2021-11-02.) >>> >>> Here are TODO items: >>> >>> 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. >>> >>> 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for >>> ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is >>> required to authorize their contributions under their >>> individual CLA. >>> >>> I think that people who commit after >>> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html >>> (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: >>> >>> $ git shortlog -sn >>> 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 >>> 53 Jacob Quinn >>> 16 Jarrett Revels >>> 10 Curtis Vogt >>> 8 Eric Hanson >>> 2 Douglas Bates >>> 2 ExpandingMan >>> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >>> 1 Damien Drix >>> 1 Denis Barucic >>> 1 Jon Alm Eriksen >>> 1 KronosTheLate >>> 1 Nick Robinson >>> 1 Pietro Vertechi >>> 1 Simeon Schaub >>> 1 Tanmay Mohapatra >>> 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard >>> >>> According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 >>> we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: >>> >>> 53 Jacob Quinn >>> 16 Jarrett Revels >>> 10 Curtis Vogt >>> 8 Eric Hanson >>> 2 Douglas Bates >>> 2 ExpandingMan >>> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >>> >>> And we can also remove people who commit before >>> (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because >>> they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: >>> >>> $ git shortlog -sn >>> 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 >>> | cat >>>103 ExpandingMan >>> 53 Jacob Quinn >>> 4 David Anthoff >>> 2 Jacob Adenbaum >>> 2 Spencer Lyon >>> 1 Graham Stark >>> 1 John Myles White >>> 1 Michael Savastio >>> 1 TheCedarPrince >>> >>> So here is the target list: >>> >>> 16 Jarrett Revels >>> 10 Curtis Vogt >>> 8 Eric Hanson >>> 2 Douglas Bates >>> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >>> >>> Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? >>> FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: >>> >>> https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 >>> >>> And could you also remind >>> >>> 53 Jacob Quinn >>> 16 Jarrett Revels >>> 10 Curtis Vogt >>> 8 Eric Hanson >>> 2 Douglas Bates >>> 2 ExpandingMan >>> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >>> >>> that the TODO item 2.? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou >>> >>> In >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >>> and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, >>> Jacob Quinn wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks kou, >>> > >>> > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl >>> > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever >>> is >>> > needed. >>> > >>> > -Jacob >>> > >>> > On Wed, Nov
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi, I share the current status. We've finished CLA related tasks. See https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265 fro details. I've filled all items in IP clearance form: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html And I've started IP clearance vote on gene...@incubator.apache.org: https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9xck9j8qdrhvw363vjl6qkk2g8t4l6b I'll ask INFRA to transfer JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia after the vote is passed. Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:51:33 -0700, Jacob Quinn wrote: > Thanks kou, > > I think I've got all the details summarized in [this issue]( > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265) where we'll track > progress on the required CLAs. I've also reached out to the > individuals directly about signing the CLAs. > > -Jacob > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi Jacob, >> >> Thanks for helping this! >> >> I'm filling IP clearance form: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml >> >> (I think that we can see it at >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html >> soon.) >> >> Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP >> clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because >> the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is >> 2021-11-02.) >> >> Here are TODO items: >> >> 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. >> >> 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for >> ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is >> required to authorize their contributions under their >> individual CLA. >> >> I think that people who commit after >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html >> (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: >> >> $ git shortlog -sn >> 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> 1 Damien Drix >> 1 Denis Barucic >> 1 Jon Alm Eriksen >> 1 KronosTheLate >> 1 Nick Robinson >> 1 Pietro Vertechi >> 1 Simeon Schaub >> 1 Tanmay Mohapatra >> 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard >> >> According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 >> we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: >> >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> And we can also remove people who commit before >> (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because >> they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: >> >> $ git shortlog -sn >> 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 >> | cat >>103 ExpandingMan >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 4 David Anthoff >> 2 Jacob Adenbaum >> 2 Spencer Lyon >> 1 Graham Stark >> 1 John Myles White >> 1 Michael Savastio >> 1 TheCedarPrince >> >> So here is the target list: >> >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? >> FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: >> >> https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 >> >> And could you also remind >> >> 53 Jacob Quinn >> 16 Jarrett Revels >> 10 Curtis Vogt >> 8 Eric Hanson >> 2 Douglas Bates >> 2 ExpandingMan >> 2 Kristoffer Carlsson >> >> that the TODO item 2.? >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, >> Jacob Quinn wrote: >> >> > Thanks kou, >> > >> > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl >> > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever >> is >> > needed. >> > >> > -Jacob >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on >> >> gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there >> >> is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository >> >> feature [2]. >> >> >> >> Let's start IP clearance process against >> >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's >> >> transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is >> >> passed. >> >> >> >> Are there any people who help this process? I think that we >> >> need to fill IP clearance form based
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Thanks kou, I think I've got all the details summarized in [this issue]( https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl/issues/265) where we'll track progress on the required CLAs. I've also reached out to the individuals directly about signing the CLAs. -Jacob On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > Thanks for helping this! > > I'm filling IP clearance form: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml > > (I think that we can see it at > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html > soon.) > > Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP > clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because > the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is > 2021-11-02.) > > Here are TODO items: > > 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. > > 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for > ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is > required to authorize their contributions under their > individual CLA. > > I think that people who commit after > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html > (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: > > $ git shortlog -sn > 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 > 53 Jacob Quinn > 16 Jarrett Revels > 10 Curtis Vogt > 8 Eric Hanson > 2 Douglas Bates > 2 ExpandingMan > 2 Kristoffer Carlsson > 1 Damien Drix > 1 Denis Barucic > 1 Jon Alm Eriksen > 1 KronosTheLate > 1 Nick Robinson > 1 Pietro Vertechi > 1 Simeon Schaub > 1 Tanmay Mohapatra > 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard > > According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, > https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 > we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: > > 53 Jacob Quinn > 16 Jarrett Revels > 10 Curtis Vogt > 8 Eric Hanson > 2 Douglas Bates > 2 ExpandingMan > 2 Kristoffer Carlsson > > And we can also remove people who commit before > (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because > they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: > > $ git shortlog -sn > 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 > | cat >103 ExpandingMan > 53 Jacob Quinn > 4 David Anthoff > 2 Jacob Adenbaum > 2 Spencer Lyon > 1 Graham Stark > 1 John Myles White > 1 Michael Savastio > 1 TheCedarPrince > > So here is the target list: > > 16 Jarrett Revels > 10 Curtis Vogt > 8 Eric Hanson > 2 Douglas Bates > 2 Kristoffer Carlsson > > Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? > FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: > > https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 > > And could you also remind > > 53 Jacob Quinn > 16 Jarrett Revels > 10 Curtis Vogt > 8 Eric Hanson > 2 Douglas Bates > 2 ExpandingMan > 2 Kristoffer Carlsson > > that the TODO item 2.? > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, > Jacob Quinn wrote: > > > Thanks kou, > > > > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl > > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever > is > > needed. > > > > -Jacob > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on > >> gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there > >> is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository > >> feature [2]. > >> > >> Let's start IP clearance process against > >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's > >> transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is > >> passed. > >> > >> Are there any people who help this process? I think that we > >> need to fill IP clearance form based on > >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > >> . > >> > >> > >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf > >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> kou > >> > >> In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512@clear-code.com> > >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > repository > >> and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), > >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Jacob, > >> > > >> > It's a good idea if we can do this. > >> > > >> > Does anyone know where we can ask this? > >> > > >> > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? > >> > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > >> > INFRA JIRA? > >> >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi Jacob, Thanks for helping this! I'm filling IP clearance form: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.xml (I think that we can see it at https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library2.html soon.) Could you stop merging any pull requests until this IP clearance is finished? (I think that it's acceptable because the last commit of https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl is 2021-11-02.) Here are TODO items: 1. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. 2. Remind active committers that they are responsible for ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is required to authorize their contributions under their individual CLA. I think that people who commit after https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-julia-library.html (8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134) are target: $ git shortlog -sn 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134..1447cb2b13b728729f9a89760ac07a848e31e599 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson 1 Damien Drix 1 Denis Barucic 1 Jon Alm Eriksen 1 KronosTheLate 1 Nick Robinson 1 Pietro Vertechi 1 Simeon Schaub 1 Tanmay Mohapatra 1 Étienne Tétreault-Pinard According to the discussion in Ballista's IP clearance process, https://lists.apache.org/thread/k0k7x3rrg56nk8s2c1tvrrv76zl2b1m4 we can remove people who has only 1 commit from the target list: 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson And we can also remove people who commit before (including) 8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 because they signed CLA in the previous IP clearance: $ git shortlog -sn 16b729db74d78ecb010efab855c9e46c8052f59e..8583da8a84a9e355affb42654dcd8c765bcc3134 | cat 103 ExpandingMan 53 Jacob Quinn 4 David Anthoff 2 Jacob Adenbaum 2 Spencer Lyon 1 Graham Stark 1 John Myles White 1 Michael Savastio 1 TheCedarPrince So here is the target list: 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 Kristoffer Carlsson Jacob, could you ask them to sign CLA for the TODO item 1.? FYI: Ballista used a GitHub issue for this: https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista/issues/646#issuecomment-806820971 And could you also remind 53 Jacob Quinn 16 Jarrett Revels 10 Curtis Vogt 8 Eric Hanson 2 Douglas Bates 2 ExpandingMan 2 Kristoffer Carlsson that the TODO item 2.? Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:43:32 -0700, Jacob Quinn wrote: > Thanks kou, > > I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl > contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever is > needed. > > -Jacob > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on >> gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there >> is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository >> feature [2]. >> >> Let's start IP clearance process against >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's >> transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is >> passed. >> >> Are there any people who help this process? I think that we >> need to fill IP clearance form based on >> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html >> . >> >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512@clear-code.com> >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >> > Hi Jacob, >> > >> > It's a good idea if we can do this. >> > >> > Does anyone know where we can ask this? >> > >> > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? >> > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > INFRA JIRA? >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA >> > >> > Or ...? >> > >> > >> > It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's >> > codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as >> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger >> > . >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > kou >> > >> > In >> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, >> > Jacob Quinn wrote: >> > >> >> Hi kou, >> >> >> >> I'm looking into the next steps and
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Thanks kou, I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think I know all the Arrow.jl contributors personally, so I'm happy to reach out to them for whatever is needed. -Jacob On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on > gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there > is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository > feature [2]. > > Let's start IP clearance process against > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's > transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is > passed. > > Are there any people who help this process? I think that we > need to fill IP clearance form based on > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > . > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512@clear-code.com> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > Hi Jacob, > > > > It's a good idea if we can do this. > > > > Does anyone know where we can ask this? > > > > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? > > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org > > > > INFRA JIRA? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA > > > > Or ...? > > > > > > It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's > > codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in > > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as > > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger > > . > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > kou > > > > In > > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > repository and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, > > Jacob Quinn wrote: > > > >> Hi kou, > >> > >> I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use > the > >> Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( > >> > https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository > ), > >> since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing > github > >> actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect from > the > >> existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the commit/git > >> history already in place. > >> > >> Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP > >> clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we can > >> leverage this functionality from github? > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Jacob, > >>> > >>> Could you open a pull request to import > >>> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on > >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like > >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> -- > >>> kou > >>> > >>> In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624@clear-code.com> > >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > repository > >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), > >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've > >>> > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: > >>> > > >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml > >>> > > >>> > I needed to use > >>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the > >>> > first push. I couldn't use > >>> > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > -- > >>> > kou > >>> > > >>> > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> > >>> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > >>> repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), > >>> > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from > >>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: > >>> >> > >>> >> * PMC: arrow > >>> >> * Repository name: julia > >>> >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git > >>> >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia > >>> >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks, > >>> >> -- > >>> >> kou > >>> >> > >>> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> > >>> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > repository > >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), > >>> >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> Hi, > >>> >>> > >>> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding > >>> >>> votes and no -1 votes. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > >>> >>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi, Sorry for not working on this. I asked this on gene...@incubator.apache.org [1] and got a reply that there is a project that use the GitHub's transfer repository feature [2]. Let's start IP clearance process against https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl and use the GitHub's transfer repository feature after the IP clearance is passed. Are there any people who help this process? I think that we need to fill IP clearance form based on https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html . [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nqbzkp4owt43l66283d55302mjrjkzf [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/15fx1j0zdnwmxxr0zo1mjf34gjwkxxly Thanks, -- kou In <20211013.053514.2154036949522056512@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:35:14 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > It's a good idea if we can do this. > > Does anyone know where we can ask this? > > gene...@incubator.apache.org ? > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org > > INFRA JIRA? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA > > Or ...? > > > It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's > codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger > . > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, > Jacob Quinn wrote: > >> Hi kou, >> >> I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use the >> Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( >> https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository), >> since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing github >> actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect from the >> existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the commit/git >> history already in place. >> >> Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP >> clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we can >> leverage this functionality from github? >> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >>> Hi Jacob, >>> >>> Could you open a pull request to import >>> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou >>> >>> In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624@clear-code.com> >>> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >>> > >>> > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've >>> > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: >>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml >>> > >>> > I needed to use >>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the >>> > first push. I couldn't use >>> > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -- >>> > kou >>> > >>> > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> >>> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >>> repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), >>> > Sutou Kouhei wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from >>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: >>> >> >>> >> * PMC: arrow >>> >> * Repository name: julia >>> >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git >>> >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia >>> >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >>> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> -- >>> >> kou >>> >> >>> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> >>> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >>> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), >>> >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >>> >>> votes and no -1 votes. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >>> >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> >>> kou >>> >>> >>> >>> In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> >>> >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and >>> process" on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >>> >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >>> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi Jacob, It's a good idea if we can do this. Does anyone know where we can ask this? gene...@incubator.apache.org ? https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org INFRA JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA Or ...? It seems that we can use existing GitHub repository's codebase for IP clearance. Some items listed in https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ does so such as https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger . Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:24:36 -0600, Jacob Quinn wrote: > Hi kou, > > I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use the > Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( > https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository), > since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing github > actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect from the > existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the commit/git > history already in place. > > Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP > clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we can > leverage this functionality from github? > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi Jacob, >> >> Could you open a pull request to import >> https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624@clear-code.com> >> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> > >> > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've >> > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml >> > >> > I needed to use >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the >> > first push. I couldn't use >> > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > kou >> > >> > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> >> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new >> repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), >> > Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: >> >> >> >> * PMC: arrow >> >> * Repository name: julia >> >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git >> >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia >> >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> >> kou >> >> >> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> >> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository >> and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), >> >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >> >>> votes and no -1 votes. >> >>> >> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> -- >> >>> kou >> >>> >> >>> In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> >> >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and >> process" on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >> >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >>> >> Hi, >> >> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of >> Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. >> >> The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community >> uses [1][2]. >> >> Here is a summary of the process: >> >> 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform >> >> Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for >> planned features and bug fixes so that we have >> visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a >> PR shows up. >> >> (This is for the Apache way.) >> >> [1] >> >> 2. Release on demand >> >> Like DataFusion. >> >> Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia >> implementation. >> >> The Julia implementation uses separated version >> scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version >> but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use >> 6.0.0.) >> >> [2] >> >> We'll
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi kou, I'm looking into the next steps and wondering if it's possible to use the Github mechanism of "transferring a repository" ( https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository), since that could simplify a lot of things. It would retain existing github actions CI and other repository settings, auto-generate a redirect from the existing JuliaData/Arrow.jl repo, and completely preserve the commit/git history already in place. Do we know if this is a possibility? I realize we'd need to do the IP clearance before transferring, which is fine; just wondering if we can leverage this functionality from github? On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:19 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > Could you open a pull request to import > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624@clear-code.com> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > > > > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've > > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml > > > > I needed to use > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the > > first push. I couldn't use > > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > kou > > > > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> > > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new > repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), > > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: > >> > >> * PMC: arrow > >> * Repository name: julia > >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git > >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia > >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> kou > >> > >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> > >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), > >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding > >>> votes and no -1 votes. > >>> > >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> -- > >>> kou > >>> > >>> In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> > >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and > process" on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), > >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >>> > Hi, > > This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of > the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of > Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. > > The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community > uses [1][2]. > > Here is a summary of the process: > > 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform > > Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for > planned features and bug fixes so that we have > visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a > PR shows up. > > (This is for the Apache way.) > > [1] > > 2. Release on demand > > Like DataFusion. > > Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia > implementation. > > The Julia implementation uses separated version > scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version > but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use > 6.0.0.) > > [2] > > We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after > the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in > apache/arrow.) > > See also discussions about this: [3][4] > > > Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the > Julia community to proceed with the work. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal > [ ] 0 : No opinion > [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit > [2] > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md > [3] >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi Jacob, Could you open a pull request to import https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl on https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia like https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8547 ? Thanks, -- kou In <20211003.140948.2107475918212883624@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > > I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've > fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml > > I needed to use > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the > first push. I couldn't use > g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository > and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've created apache/arrow-julia from >> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: >> >> * PMC: arrow >> * Repository name: julia >> * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git >> * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia >> * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> >> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and >> process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >>> votes and no -1 votes. >>> >>> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou >>> >>> In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> >>> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" >>> on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >>> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >>> Hi, This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community uses [1][2]. Here is a summary of the process: 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for planned features and bug fixes so that we have visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a PR shows up. (This is for the Apache way.) [1] 2. Release on demand Like DataFusion. Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia implementation. The Julia implementation uses separated version scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use 6.0.0.) [2] We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in apache/arrow.) See also discussions about this: [3][4] Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the Julia community to proceed with the work. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal [ ] 0 : No opinion [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md [3] https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E [4] https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d53076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E Thanks, -- kou
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi, > * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org I should have used git...@arrow.apache.org for this. I've fixed this by pushing .asf.yaml to apache/arrow-julia: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/.asf.yaml I needed to use https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/arrow-julia.git for the first push. I couldn't use g...@github.com:apache/arrow-julia.git . Thanks, -- kou In <20211003.134022.661649063345488310@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:40:22 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > I've created apache/arrow-julia from > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: > > * PMC: arrow > * Repository name: julia > * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git > * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia > * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> > "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and > process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding >> votes and no -1 votes. >> >> I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> >> "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" >> on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), >> Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >>> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of >>> Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. >>> >>> The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community >>> uses [1][2]. >>> >>> Here is a summary of the process: >>> >>> 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform >>> >>> Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for >>> planned features and bug fixes so that we have >>> visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a >>> PR shows up. >>> >>> (This is for the Apache way.) >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> 2. Release on demand >>> >>> Like DataFusion. >>> >>> Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia >>> implementation. >>> >>> The Julia implementation uses separated version >>> scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version >>> but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use >>> 6.0.0.) >>> >>> [2] >>> >>> We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >>> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after >>> the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in >>> apache/arrow.) >>> >>> See also discussions about this: [3][4] >>> >>> >>> Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the >>> Julia community to proceed with the work. >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal >>> [ ] 0 : No opinion >>> [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit >>> [2] >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md >>> [3] >>> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >>> [4] >>> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d53076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process
Hi, I've created apache/arrow-julia from https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html with: * PMC: arrow * Repository name: julia * Generated name: arrow-jlia.git * Repository description: Apache Arrow Julia * Commit notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org * GitHub notification list: comm...@arrow.apache.org Thanks, -- kou In <20211003.132505.1038511014845186183@clear-code.com> "[RESULT][VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" on Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:25:05 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > The vote carries with 8 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 non-binding > votes and no -1 votes. > > I'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance > process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow-julia. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <20210927.115838.114416636593478@clear-code.com> > "[VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process" > on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:58:38 +0900 (JST), > Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This vote is to determine if the Arrow PMC is in favor of >> the Julia community moving the Julia implementation of >> Apache Arrow out of apache/arrow into apache/arrow-julia. >> >> The Julia community uses a process like the Rust community >> uses [1][2]. >> >> Here is a summary of the process: >> >> 1. Use GitHub instead of JIRA for issue management platform >> >> Note: Contributors will be required to write issues for >> planned features and bug fixes so that we have >> visibility and opportunities for collaboration before a >> PR shows up. >> >> (This is for the Apache way.) >> >> [1] >> >> 2. Release on demand >> >> Like DataFusion. >> >> Release for apache/arrow doesn't include the Julia >> implementation. >> >> The Julia implementation uses separated version >> scheme. (apache/arrow uses 6.0.0 as the next version >> but the next Julia implementation release doesn't use >> 6.0.0.) >> >> [2] >> >> We'll create apache/arrow-julia and start IP clearance >> process to import JuliaData/Arrow.jl to apache/arrow after >> the vote is passed. (We don't use julia/arrow/ in >> apache/arrow.) >> >> See also discussions about this: [3][4] >> >> >> Please vote whether to accept the proposal and allow the >> Julia community to proceed with the work. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 : Accept the proposal >> [ ] 0 : No opinion >> [ ] -1 : Reject proposal because... >> >> >> [1] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TyrUP8_UWXqk97a8Hvb1d0UYWigch0HAephIjW7soSI/edit >> [2] >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/dev/release/README.md >> [3] >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6d91286686d92837fbe21dd042801a57e3a7b00b5903ea90a754ac7b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> [4] >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r0df7f44f7e1ed7f6e4352d34047d53076208aa78aad308e30b58f83a%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou
