[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-72) Use atlas.rest.address on server

2015-07-15 Thread Jonathan Maron (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14628062#comment-14628062
 ] 

Jonathan Maron commented on ATLAS-72:
-

I disagree with this approach since it is simply confusing from a management 
perspective (i.e. a user on Ambari).  What would it mean to set enableTLS to 
true, while specifying a http URI for this setting?  I imagine you'll say that 
we now eliminate the enableTLS flag, but I would venture to say that, from a 
management interface, the ability to enable or disable SSL with a switch is 
preferable and much clearer.  I imagine we could play some games with 
configuration property dependencies (setting SSL to true on an interface would 
automatically change the rest address' transport scheme) but I believe that's 
somewhat confusing  as well and runs contrary to the management experience with 
other services.



> Use atlas.rest.address on server
> 
>
> Key: ATLAS-72
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Shwetha G S
>
> On server, there are separate configs for should enable ssl, and port. 
> Instead, it can use the client side config atlas.rest.address to derive ssl, 
> port and host to bind to



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-72) Use atlas.rest.address on server

2015-07-16 Thread Erik Bergenholtz (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14629737#comment-14629737
 ] 

Erik Bergenholtz commented on ATLAS-72:
---

There are [at least] 3 factors that should be considered:

1. User Experience
2. Consistency with other components to eliminate/reduce confusion (related to 
#1)
3. Manageability


> Use atlas.rest.address on server
> 
>
> Key: ATLAS-72
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Shwetha G S
>
> On server, there are separate configs for should enable ssl, and port. 
> Instead, it can use the client side config atlas.rest.address to derive ssl, 
> port and host to bind to



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-72) Use atlas.rest.address on server

2015-07-20 Thread Shwetha G S (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14633439#comment-14633439
 ] 

Shwetha G S commented on ATLAS-72:
--

{quote}
from a management interface, the ability to enable or disable SSL with a switch 
is preferable and much clearer
{quote}
Ambari is just one way of deploying atlas.  Atlas can be deployed directly 
using atlas_start.py. In this case, user has to hand-code the configs and 
lesser configs the better, less prone to error. 
On ambari UI, you can always expose different controls to enable ssl, set host 
and port. But all of them can map to single config in the backend

> Use atlas.rest.address on server
> 
>
> Key: ATLAS-72
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-72
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Shwetha G S
>
> On server, there are separate configs for should enable ssl, and port. 
> Instead, it can use the client side config atlas.rest.address to derive ssl, 
> port and host to bind to



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)