[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-3434) .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17577259#comment-17577259 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-3434: --- Commit 82ee7eacec1a77f82bd65494d7b35f65bfca2b6d in avro's branch refs/heads/branch-1.11 from KhrystynaPopadyuk [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=avro.git;h=82ee7eace ] AVRO-3434: support logical schemas in reflect reader and writer (#1718) * avro-3434 support logical schemas in reflect reader and writer * avro-3434 add apache licence to files * avro-3434 update unit tests (cherry picked from commit 7fd454e4a0880e928d7fbc417895a4ab4e4ad3cf) > .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer > --- > > Key: AVRO-3434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434 > Project: Apache Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: csharp >Reporter: Khrystyna Popadyuk >Assignee: Khrystyna Popadyuk >Priority: Blocker > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.12.0 > > Time Spent: 3.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Hi, > I am working on a .NET/C# project that uses Kafka with Avro > serialization/deserialization in an event streaming platform. > .NET Apache.Avro nuget package contains two different set of classes for > serialization/deserialization: - SpecificReader, SpecificWriter - > ReflectReader, ReflectWriter. We have chosen ReflectReader/Writer > ([https://avro.apache.org/docs/current/api/csharp/html/md_src_apache_main_Reflect_README.html]) > so we can use POCO classes to represent a message. > I noticed that ReflectReader/Writer does not support LogicalSchema. There are > default converters and Avro field attribute instead (they are extendable and > flexible). > My questions are: > * is it intentional to not support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer? > * does it mean that we should not mix services that use LogicalSchema (third > party or just written on Java, Python or other languages) with ones that use > ReflectReader/Writer? > > Thanks, > Khrystyna -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-3434) .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17577214#comment-17577214 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-3434: --- Commit 7fd454e4a0880e928d7fbc417895a4ab4e4ad3cf in avro's branch refs/heads/master from KhrystynaPopadyuk [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=avro.git;h=7fd454e4a ] AVRO-3434: support logical schemas in reflect reader and writer (#1718) * avro-3434 support logical schemas in reflect reader and writer * avro-3434 add apache licence to files * avro-3434 update unit tests > .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer > --- > > Key: AVRO-3434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434 > Project: Apache Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: csharp >Reporter: Khrystyna Popadyuk >Assignee: Khrystyna Popadyuk >Priority: Blocker > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 3h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Hi, > I am working on a .NET/C# project that uses Kafka with Avro > serialization/deserialization in an event streaming platform. > .NET Apache.Avro nuget package contains two different set of classes for > serialization/deserialization: - SpecificReader, SpecificWriter - > ReflectReader, ReflectWriter. We have chosen ReflectReader/Writer > ([https://avro.apache.org/docs/current/api/csharp/html/md_src_apache_main_Reflect_README.html]) > so we can use POCO classes to represent a message. > I noticed that ReflectReader/Writer does not support LogicalSchema. There are > default converters and Avro field attribute instead (they are extendable and > flexible). > My questions are: > * is it intentional to not support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer? > * does it mean that we should not mix services that use LogicalSchema (third > party or just written on Java, Python or other languages) with ones that use > ReflectReader/Writer? > > Thanks, > Khrystyna -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-3434) .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17552523#comment-17552523 ] Khrystyna Popadyuk commented on AVRO-3434: -- PR is ready for review https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/1718 > .NET/#C: Support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer > --- > > Key: AVRO-3434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3434 > Project: Apache Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: csharp >Reporter: Khrystyna Popadyuk >Priority: Blocker > > Hi, > I am working on a .NET/C# project that uses Kafka with Avro > serialization/deserialization in an event streaming platform. > .NET Apache.Avro nuget package contains two different set of classes for > serialization/deserialization: - SpecificReader, SpecificWriter - > ReflectReader, ReflectWriter. We have chosen ReflectReader/Writer > ([https://avro.apache.org/docs/current/api/csharp/html/md_src_apache_main_Reflect_README.html]) > so we can use POCO classes to represent a message. > I noticed that ReflectReader/Writer does not support LogicalSchema. There are > default converters and Avro field attribute instead (they are extendable and > flexible). > My questions are: > * is it intentional to not support LogicalSchema for ReflectReader/Writer? > * does it mean that we should not mix services that use LogicalSchema (third > party or just written on Java, Phyton or other languages) with ones that use > ReflectReader/Writer? > > Thanks, > Khrystyna -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
