Re: [dev-biblio] python-uno bridge status?
On 10/15/05, Robert Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) Importing binary packages often failed, even if they were > distributed with the OOo python (eg socket, regular expressions, etc) > Joerg's response was: The std library is not my problem. I've been learning that the "not my problem" response means one needs to find the person above them that controls the purse strings. > Not sure if this has been fixed or not. This would be good to know; what, if anything, has improved with 2.0. Bruce - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev-biblio] python-uno bridge status?
>I wonder what his justification was for saying that. As far as I know pyUNO is >being used in many production environments. My justifications: 1) You still can't have a distribution with more than one python file. For example, I can't have a python script that includes another file that isn't in the python std library. This came up again just last week. 2) It's compiled specifically against the python that ships with OOo, which means to get around (1) you need to install any modules to the main OOo site-packages, which is non trivial. 3) Importing binary packages often failed, even if they were distributed with the OOo python (eg socket, regular expressions, etc) Joerg's response was: The std library is not my problem. Not sure if this has been fixed or not. I can come up with more, if desired, but that's enough in my opinion for me to declare it 'not usable for non-trivial projects'. Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev-biblio] python-uno bridge status?
On Fri October 14 2005 12:03, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > For those of you doing any work with Python, could you perhaps update > me on the status of the Python support in OOo, particularly with > respect to the UNO bridge? Rob has reported it was basically unusable > awhile back. Am just wondering if that has improved with 2.0, or if we > need to do some work to promote getting that fixed. I wonder what his justification was for saying that. As far as I know pyUNO is being used in many production environments. -- CPH : openoffice.org contributor Maybe your question has been answered already? http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev-biblio] python-uno bridge status?
For those of you doing any work with Python, could you perhaps update me on the status of the Python support in OOo, particularly with respect to the UNO bridge? Rob has reported it was basically unusable awhile back. Am just wondering if that has improved with 2.0, or if we need to do some work to promote getting that fixed. Bruce - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
