Re: JSP Precompilation

2011-07-22 Thread jeanphilippe1.caruana

On 21/07/2011 21:24, Christopher Coco wrote:

Hi all,


Hi


So far here's what I have as a project extension (it uses the user's 
TOMCAT_HOME to build a dependency graph, as well as makes some other 
assumptions):

https://gist.github.com/921897


Thanks for sharing this, I wanted to do something like this myself but 
couldn't find time for that.

Could you post (here) some example of use ?
What artifacts should be in JASPER list ?

thanks

-- Jean-Philippe Caruana


















IMPORTANT.Les informations contenues dans ce message electronique y compris les 
fichiers attaches sont strictement confidentielles
et peuvent etre protegees par la loi.
Ce message electronique est destine exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) 
mentionne(s) ci-dessus.
Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur ou s il ne vous est pas destine, veuillez immediatement le signaler  a l expediteur et effacer ce message 
et tous les fichiers eventuellement attaches.

Toute lecture, exploitation ou transmission des informations contenues dans ce 
message est interdite.
Tout message electronique est susceptible d alteration.
A ce titre, le Groupe France Telecom decline toute responsabilite notamment s 
il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
De meme, il appartient au destinataire de s assurer de l absence de tout virus.

IMPORTANT.This e-mail message and any attachments are strictly confidential and 
may be protected by law. This message is
intended only for the named recipient(s) above.
If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), 
please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message.
Any unauthorized view, usage or disclosure ofthis message is prohibited.
Since e-mail messages may not be reliable, France Telecom Group shall not be 
liable for any message if modified, changed or falsified.
Additionally the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.




Re: JSP Precompilation

2011-07-21 Thread Peter Donald
Hi,

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Christopher Coco cac...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm wondering if anyone has picked up this thread:


 http://old.nabble.com/buildr-pre-compile-JSP-for-war--td17109370.html#a17109370


Not that I am aware of.

It's more than 3 years old, but Buildr still seems to be lacking this
 functionality. I wrote a JSP pre-compiler specific for my company, but would
 be willing to try to abstract it. Again, being new to Ruby and Buildr, I'm
 trying to figure out the best way to integrate this functionality. It's java
 specific, and I had thought that a c

ouple of possibilities could be to
 a.) extend the java compiler functionality (though jsp compilation seems
 like a stretch here),
 b.) to extend the WAR packaging functionality (where I'm leaning),
 c.) separate it completely like the scala plugin (make this is more
 robust?),
 d.) or even just drop it in as an add-on (not sure the pros/cons).

 I'm looking for some views or opinions on a best approach. Any thoughts?


My approach has always bee d) where possible - it allows you to rapidly
evolve the plugin and share it between all the different projects that use
it. It also makes it easy to write tests and validate it easily. If the
plugin gets general enough and well tested enough you can always donate it
back to this project. This is the approach I took with various plugins. For
example [1] is a plugin I developed outside as an extension that eventually
folded back into buildr while [2] is something that I never get around to
cleaning up. You will notice that many of the extensions I have made
actually call out to ant tasks or directly call command line apps. I think
this is a perfectly reasonable way to approach things.

[1] https://github.com/realityforge/buildr-bnd
[2] https://github.com/realityforge/buildr-ipojo

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald