Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Correct. On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 5:24 PM Rui Wang wrote: > > Ok to confirm, as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4937 is > marked as resolved, there is no blocker from Avatica side for 1.29.0 > release? > > > -Rui > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:47 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > > > Given the conversation around the log4j cve, it seems like we may need an > > Avatica release afterall... > > > > Let's see how that discussion resolves. > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:47 PM Rui Wang wrote: > > > > > Ack thanks! > > > > > > If there is no objection until the end of this week I will just go for > > the > > > 1.29.0 release process. > > > > > > > > > -Rui > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > > > CALCITE-4152 is a big performance improvement to Avatica with > > > > SPNEGO/Kerberos, but not at all about correctness/datatypes that > > Calcite > > > > needs. > > > > > > > > I'd agree with Julian. > > > > > > > > On 12/8/21 7:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > > Probably not. > > > > > > > > > > * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable > > > > Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 > > > weeks > > > > ago) > > > > > * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more > > > > explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) > > > > > * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) > > > > > > > > > * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable > > > > SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) > > > > > * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 > > weeks > > > > ago) > > > > > * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, > > MILLENIUM > > > > return wrong results (8 weeks ago) > > > > > * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi community, > > > > >> > > > > >> Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -Rui > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Ok to confirm, as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4937 is marked as resolved, there is no blocker from Avatica side for 1.29.0 release? -Rui On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:47 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > Given the conversation around the log4j cve, it seems like we may need an > Avatica release afterall... > > Let's see how that discussion resolves. > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:47 PM Rui Wang wrote: > > > Ack thanks! > > > > If there is no objection until the end of this week I will just go for > the > > 1.29.0 release process. > > > > > > -Rui > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > CALCITE-4152 is a big performance improvement to Avatica with > > > SPNEGO/Kerberos, but not at all about correctness/datatypes that > Calcite > > > needs. > > > > > > I'd agree with Julian. > > > > > > On 12/8/21 7:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > Probably not. > > > > > > > > * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable > > > Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 > > weeks > > > ago) > > > > * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more > > > explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) > > > > * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) > > > > > > > * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable > > > SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) > > > > * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 > weeks > > > ago) > > > > * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, > MILLENIUM > > > return wrong results (8 weeks ago) > > > > * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) > > > > > > > > > > >> On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi community, > > > >> > > > >> Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -Rui > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Given the conversation around the log4j cve, it seems like we may need an Avatica release afterall... Let's see how that discussion resolves. On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:47 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Ack thanks! > > If there is no objection until the end of this week I will just go for the > 1.29.0 release process. > > > -Rui > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > CALCITE-4152 is a big performance improvement to Avatica with > > SPNEGO/Kerberos, but not at all about correctness/datatypes that Calcite > > needs. > > > > I'd agree with Julian. > > > > On 12/8/21 7:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Probably not. > > > > > > * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable > > Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 > weeks > > ago) > > > * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more > > explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) > > > * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) > > > > > * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable > > SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) > > > * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 weeks > > ago) > > > * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, MILLENIUM > > return wrong results (8 weeks ago) > > > * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) > > > > > > > >> On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi community, > > >> > > >> Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? > > >> > > >> > > >> -Rui > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Ack thanks! If there is no objection until the end of this week I will just go for the 1.29.0 release process. -Rui On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Elser wrote: > CALCITE-4152 is a big performance improvement to Avatica with > SPNEGO/Kerberos, but not at all about correctness/datatypes that Calcite > needs. > > I'd agree with Julian. > > On 12/8/21 7:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Probably not. > > > > * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable > Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 weeks > ago) > > * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more > explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) > > * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) > > > * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable > SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) > > * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 weeks > ago) > > * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, MILLENIUM > return wrong results (8 weeks ago) > > * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) > > > > >> On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: > >> > >> Hi community, > >> > >> Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? > >> > >> > >> -Rui > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
CALCITE-4152 is a big performance improvement to Avatica with SPNEGO/Kerberos, but not at all about correctness/datatypes that Calcite needs. I'd agree with Julian. On 12/8/21 7:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: Probably not. * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 weeks ago) * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 weeks ago) * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, MILLENIUM return wrong results (8 weeks ago) * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: Hi community, Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? -Rui
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Probably not. * 4cf769f8e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Disable Travis job that uses Calcite master until [CALCITE-4877] is fixed (4 weeks ago) * 434cf002f - [CALCITE-4877] Make the exception information more explicit for instantiate plugin. (5 weeks ago) * 57c254f24 - [CALCITE-4840] Make README easier to scan (6 weeks ago) * c3a919234 - [CALCITE-4152] Upgrade Avatica to use the configurable SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago) * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 weeks ago) * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, MILLENIUM return wrong results (8 weeks ago) * ef277ff34 - Update website for Avatica 1.19.0 release (8 weeks ago) > On Dec 8, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Rui Wang wrote: > > Hi community, > > Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? > > > -Rui
[DISCUSS] Do we need a Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0 release?
Hi community, Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0? -Rui
