Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-14 Thread Kevin Risden
Also looks like this is causing issues with Avatica and bouncycastle on JDK
11:

[ [1;31mERROR [m] error reading
/root/.m2/repository/org/bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk15on/1.55/bcprov-jdk15on-1.55.jar;
invalid manifest format



Kevin Risden

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Risden  wrote:

> Agree about this might be a JDK bug.
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200530
>
> and followed up by
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204494
>
> I checked the Netty Manifest file and it uses /r/n.
>
> This should be fixed in build 18 and was broken in build 17.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Christian Beikov <
> christian.bei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think this might actually be a JDK bug. Let's wait a bit for a new EA
>> release.
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>> 
>> *Christian Beikov*
>> Am 12.06.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Julian Hyde:
>>
>>> What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add
>>> them to my nightly build scripts.
>>>
>>> I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden  wrote:

 We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can
 look into this if it helps.

 Kevin Risden

 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov <
 christian.bei...@gmail.com>
 wrote:

 Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest
> format when reading. Also see other reports here:
>
>   * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
>   *
> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowN
> ame=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1
>
> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that
> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> 
> 
> *Christian Beikov*
> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:
>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2
>> on
>> travis
>> As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
>> e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921
>>
>> could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?
>>
>>
>
>>
>


Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Christian Beikov
I think this might actually be a JDK bug. Let's wait a bit for a new EA 
release.



Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

*Christian Beikov*
Am 12.06.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Julian Hyde:

What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to my 
nightly build scripts.

I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK.

Julian




On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden  wrote:

We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can
look into this if it helps.

Kevin Risden

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov 
wrote:


Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest
format when reading. Also see other reports here:

  * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
  *
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1

Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that
use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

*Christian Beikov*
Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:

Hello everyone

Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
travis
As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921

could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?







Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Julian Hyde
PS Can someone please log a JIRA case for this. At the very least we need to 
modify HISTORY.md to say which ES versions are supported with each JDK. If we 
can make a code fix, even better.

> On Jun 12, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> 
> What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to 
> my nightly build scripts.
> 
> I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK.
> 
> Julian
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden  wrote:
>> 
>> We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can
>> look into this if it helps.
>> 
>> Kevin Risden
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest
>>> format when reading. Also see other reports here:
>>> 
>>> * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
>>> *
>>> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1
>>> 
>>> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that
>>> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.
>>> 
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>>> 
>>> *Christian Beikov*
>>> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:
 Hello everyone
 
 Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
 travis
 As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
 e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921
 
 could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?
 
>>> 
>>> 
> 



Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Julian Hyde
What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to my 
nightly build scripts.

I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK.

Julian



> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden  wrote:
> 
> We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can
> look into this if it helps.
> 
> Kevin Risden
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov 
> wrote:
> 
>> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest
>> format when reading. Also see other reports here:
>> 
>>  * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
>>  *
>> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1
>> 
>> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that
>> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.
>> 
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>> 
>> *Christian Beikov*
>> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:
>>> Hello everyone
>>> 
>>> Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
>>> travis
>>> As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
>>> e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921
>>> 
>>> could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?
>>> 
>> 
>> 



Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Kevin Risden
We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can
look into this if it helps.

Kevin Risden

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov 
wrote:

> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest
> format when reading. Also see other reports here:
>
>   * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
>   *
> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1
>
> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that
> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> 
> *Christian Beikov*
> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:
> > Hello everyone
> >
> > Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
> > travis
> > As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
> > e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921
> >
> > could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?
> >
>
>


Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Christian Beikov
Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest 
format when reading. Also see other reports here:


 * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774
 * 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review=1

Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that 
use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

*Christian Beikov*
Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin:

Hello everyone

Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
travis
As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921

could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?





Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis

2018-06-12 Thread Sergey Nuyanzin
Hello everyone

Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on
travis
As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok
e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921

could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey