Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
Also looks like this is causing issues with Avatica and bouncycastle on JDK 11: [ [1;31mERROR [m] error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk15on/1.55/bcprov-jdk15on-1.55.jar; invalid manifest format Kevin Risden On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Risden wrote: > Agree about this might be a JDK bug. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200530 > > and followed up by > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204494 > > I checked the Netty Manifest file and it uses /r/n. > > This should be fixed in build 18 and was broken in build 17. > > Kevin Risden > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Christian Beikov < > christian.bei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think this might actually be a JDK bug. Let's wait a bit for a new EA >> release. >> >> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen, >> >> *Christian Beikov* >> Am 12.06.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Julian Hyde: >> >>> What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add >>> them to my nightly build scripts. >>> >>> I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK. >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can look into this if it helps. Kevin Risden On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov < christian.bei...@gmail.com> wrote: Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest > format when reading. Also see other reports here: > > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 > * > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowN > ame=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 > > Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that > use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > > *Christian Beikov* > Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: > >> Hello everyone >> >> Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 >> on >> travis >> As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok >> e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 >> >> could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this? >> >> > >> >
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
Agree about this might be a JDK bug. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200530 and followed up by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204494 I checked the Netty Manifest file and it uses /r/n. This should be fixed in build 18 and was broken in build 17. Kevin Risden On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Christian Beikov < christian.bei...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this might actually be a JDK bug. Let's wait a bit for a new EA > release. > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > *Christian Beikov* > Am 12.06.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Julian Hyde: > >> What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them >> to my nightly build scripts. >> >> I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK. >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: >>> >>> We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can >>> look into this if it helps. >>> >>> Kevin Risden >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov >> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest format when reading. Also see other reports here: * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 * https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowN ame=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, *Christian Beikov* Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: > Hello everyone > > Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 > on > travis > As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok > e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 > > could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this? > > >
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
I think this might actually be a JDK bug. Let's wait a bit for a new EA release. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, *Christian Beikov* Am 12.06.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Julian Hyde: What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to my nightly build scripts. I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK. Julian On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can look into this if it helps. Kevin Risden On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov wrote: Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest format when reading. Also see other reports here: * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 * https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, *Christian Beikov* Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: Hello everyone Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
PS Can someone please log a JIRA case for this. At the very least we need to modify HISTORY.md to say which ES versions are supported with each JDK. If we can make a code fix, even better. > On Jun 12, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to > my nightly build scripts. > > I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK. > > Julian > > > >> On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: >> >> We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can >> look into this if it helps. >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov >> wrote: >> >>> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest >>> format when reading. Also see other reports here: >>> >>> * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 >>> * >>> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 >>> >>> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that >>> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. >>> >>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen, >>> >>> *Christian Beikov* >>> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: Hello everyone Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this? >>> >>> >
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
What would be the command-line arguments to achieve this? I will add them to my nightly build scripts. I already skip certain Guava versions based on JDK. Julian > On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: > > We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can > look into this if it helps. > > Kevin Risden > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov > wrote: > >> Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest >> format when reading. Also see other reports here: >> >> * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 >> * >> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 >> >> Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that >> use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. >> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen, >> >> *Christian Beikov* >> Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: >>> Hello everyone >>> >>> Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on >>> travis >>> As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok >>> e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 >>> >>> could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this? >>> >> >>
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
We might want to skip JDK11 with ES 2.x. 2.x is EOL from Elastic. I can look into this if it helps. Kevin Risden On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:54 Christian Beikov wrote: > Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest > format when reading. Also see other reports here: > > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 > * > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 > > Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that > use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > *Christian Beikov* > Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: > > Hello everyone > > > > Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on > > travis > > As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok > > e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 > > > > could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this? > > > >
Re: Calcite travis jdk11 failed while compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis
Seems the latest Java 11 build will be stricter about the manifest format when reading. Also see other reports here: * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535774 * https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-51871?workflowName=JNJira+%2B+In-Review&stepId=1 Not sure if there is anything you can do. I'd assume other tests that use e.g. Netty would fail compilation as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, *Christian Beikov* Am 12.06.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin: Hello everyone Just I have an issue related to compilation of calcite-elasticsearch2 on travis As I see it relates only jdk11 while with others compiles ok e.g. https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/391198921 could anyone please share knowledge how to overcome this?