Re: [DISCUSSION] Interfaces for index frame work
Hi Nice feature, +1. -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Interfaces-for-index-frame-work-tp13274p20217.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSSION] Interfaces for index frame work
+1 - Best Regards David Cai -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Interfaces-for-index-frame-work-tp13274p20218.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSSION] About data backward compatibility
I agree with Ravindra, now is the time to implement migration tool. - Best Regards David Cai -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-About-data-backward-compatibility-tp20183p20219.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSSION] About data backward compatibility
+1 Option2 is better. Multiple formats will make user and developer confuse, should integrate ASAP. On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, David CaiQiang wrote: > I agree with Ravindra, now is the time to implement migration tool. > > > > - > Best Regards > David Cai > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev- > mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-About-data-backward- > compatibility-tp20183p20219.html > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list > archive at Nabble.com. >
