Re: Can we kill the wiki?

[Jonathan Haddad]

If there was a single instance of collaborative design in the wiki I would
agree with you.

Google docs have been used a bit recently and have worked well.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:17 AM Edward Capriolo 
wrote:

> Wikis are still good for collaberative design etc. Its a burden to edit the
> docs and its not the place for all info.
>
> On Friday, March 17, 2017, Murukesh Mohanan 
> wrote:
>
> > I wonder if the recent influx has anything to do with GSoC. The student
> > application period begins in a few days. I don't see any Cassandra issues
> > on the GSoC ideas list, though.
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 at 10:40 Anthony Grasso  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 to killing the wiki as well. If that is not possible, we should at
> least
> > put a note on there saying it is deprecated and point people to the new
> > docs.
> >
> > On 18 March 2017 at 08:09, Jonathan Haddad  > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to killing the wiki.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM Blake Eggleston  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that
> > > they
> > > > would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting
> > > regular
> > > > requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these
> > > folks
> > > > to the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just
> > > > removing it entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted
> docs.
> > > I'd
> > > > prefer we just remove it myself, makes things less confusing for
> > > newcomers.
> > > >
> > > > Does that seem reasonable to everyone?
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Murukesh Mohanan,
> > Yahoo! Japan
> >
>
>
> --
> Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than
> usual.
>

Re: Can we kill the wiki?

[Edward Capriolo]

Wikis are still good for collaberative design etc. Its a burden to edit the
docs and its not the place for all info.

On Friday, March 17, 2017, Murukesh Mohanan 
wrote:

> I wonder if the recent influx has anything to do with GSoC. The student
> application period begins in a few days. I don't see any Cassandra issues
> on the GSoC ideas list, though.
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 at 10:40 Anthony Grasso  >
> wrote:
>
> +1 to killing the wiki as well. If that is not possible, we should at least
> put a note on there saying it is deprecated and point people to the new
> docs.
>
> On 18 March 2017 at 08:09, Jonathan Haddad  > wrote:
>
> > +1 to killing the wiki.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM Blake Eggleston  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that
> > they
> > > would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting
> > regular
> > > requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these
> > folks
> > > to the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just
> > > removing it entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted docs.
> > I'd
> > > prefer we just remove it myself, makes things less confusing for
> > newcomers.
> > >
> > > Does that seem reasonable to everyone?
> >
>
> --
>
> Murukesh Mohanan,
> Yahoo! Japan
>


-- 
Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than
usual.

Re: Can we kill the wiki?

[Murukesh Mohanan]

I wonder if the recent influx has anything to do with GSoC. The student
application period begins in a few days. I don't see any Cassandra issues
on the GSoC ideas list, though.

On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 at 10:40 Anthony Grasso 
wrote:

+1 to killing the wiki as well. If that is not possible, we should at least
put a note on there saying it is deprecated and point people to the new
docs.

On 18 March 2017 at 08:09, Jonathan Haddad  wrote:

> +1 to killing the wiki.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM Blake Eggleston 
> wrote:
>
> > With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that
> they
> > would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting
> regular
> > requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these
> folks
> > to the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just
> > removing it entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted docs.
> I'd
> > prefer we just remove it myself, makes things less confusing for
> newcomers.
> >
> > Does that seem reasonable to everyone?
>

-- 

Murukesh Mohanan,
Yahoo! Japan

Re: Can we kill the wiki?

[Anthony Grasso]

+1 to killing the wiki as well. If that is not possible, we should at least
put a note on there saying it is deprecated and point people to the new
docs.

On 18 March 2017 at 08:09, Jonathan Haddad  wrote:

> +1 to killing the wiki.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM Blake Eggleston 
> wrote:
>
> > With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that
> they
> > would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting
> regular
> > requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these
> folks
> > to the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just
> > removing it entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted docs.
> I'd
> > prefer we just remove it myself, makes things less confusing for
> newcomers.
> >
> > Does that seem reasonable to everyone?
>

Re: Can we kill the wiki?

[Jonathan Haddad]

+1 to killing the wiki.

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM Blake Eggleston 
wrote:

> With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that they
> would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting regular
> requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these folks
> to the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just
> removing it entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted docs. I'd
> prefer we just remove it myself, makes things less confusing for newcomers.
>
> Does that seem reasonable to everyone?

Can we kill the wiki?

[Blake Eggleston]

With CASSANDRA-8700, docs were moved in tree, with the intention that they 
would replace the wiki. However, it looks like we’re still getting regular 
requests to edit the wiki. It seems like we should be directing these folks to 
the in tree docs and either disabling edits for the wiki, or just removing it 
entirely, and replacing it with a link to the hosted docs. I'd prefer we just 
remove it myself, makes things less confusing for newcomers.

Does that seem reasonable to everyone?