Unable to edit CFP proposal(s)

[Rohit Yadav]

Dear Linux Foundation event organizers,

We're unable to edit/add submissions for CloudStack Collaboration Europe
2014. On the website it says CFP will close on 25th June, please allow us
to edit/add submissions. Thanks.

You may see this thread for reference:

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> I tried to submit just now but cannot find ccceu as event. Shouold I
> choose cloudopen or apachecon?
>
>
 On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submitted few proposals for our upcoming European Collab14 but I'm
> unable
> > to edit them. The CFP page [1] says the "CFP close date" is 25th June
> 2014,
> > since today is 22nd can someone allow people to edit their proposals?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe/program/cfp
> >
> > Regards.
>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav,
Committer, Apache CloudStack

Re: DevCloud replacement

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Ian,

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Hey Rohit,
>
> Quick question for you about the ttylinux_vhd image.
>
> I'm just about to push some changes to allow for an advanced cloud
> configuration. While doing some final tests I found myself unable to
> resolve domains in VMs I brought up.
>

It's very old (I don't know who made it, I just reused it from the first
DevCloud by Edison) and based on old linux 2.x, sometimes it fails to get
IP from dhcp (VR). Let's refresh it.


>
> On inspecting my resolv.conf on a ttylinux based machine I noticed the
> following:
> search citrite.net
> nameserver 10.216.4.31
> nameserver 10.216.4.34
> nameserver 10.9.47.59
> nameserver 172.16.2.66
> search cs2cloud.internal
> nameserver 10.1.1.1
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
>
> The first block of nameservers are taken precedence, from what I can tell
> they are hard coded into your image.
>
> Is there any easy way I could re-generate a ttylinux image without them?
>

Yes, you may get the iso and make a vhd yourself: (use pc-486 or
appropriate)
http://www.ttylinux.net/Documents/User_Guide.html

I idea was to build a very small linux image, I also recommend playing with:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
http://www.tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html (I've used this, installed
linux distro fits in 10MB :)

Regards.



>
> Thanks.
>

Re: DevCloud replacement

[Ian Duffy]

Hey Rohit,

Quick question for you about the ttylinux_vhd image.

I'm just about to push some changes to allow for an advanced cloud
configuration. While doing some final tests I found myself unable to
resolve domains in VMs I brought up.

On inspecting my resolv.conf on a ttylinux based machine I noticed the
following:
search citrite.net
nameserver 10.216.4.31
nameserver 10.216.4.34
nameserver 10.9.47.59
nameserver 172.16.2.66
search cs2cloud.internal
nameserver 10.1.1.1
nameserver 8.8.8.8

The first block of nameservers are taken precedence, from what I can tell
they are hard coded into your image.

Is there any easy way I could re-generate a ttylinux image without them?

Thanks.

Re: Unable to edit CFP proposal(s)

[Daan Hoogland]

I tried to submit just now but cannot find ccceu as event. Shouold I
choose cloudopen or apachecon?

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted few proposals for our upcoming European Collab14 but I'm unable
> to edit them. The CFP page [1] says the "CFP close date" is 25th June 2014,
> since today is 22nd can someone allow people to edit their proposals?
>
> [1]
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe/program/cfp
>
> Regards.



-- 
Daan

Unable to edit CFP proposal(s)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

I submitted few proposals for our upcoming European Collab14 but I'm unable
to edit them. The CFP page [1] says the "CFP close date" is 25th June 2014,
since today is 22nd can someone allow people to edit their proposals?

[1]
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe/program/cfp

Regards.

Re: Unable to delete virtual router

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi,

I found this bug still open
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007

Is there any way around to create vm in same Network, with same VLAN ID. OR
Destroy existing Network.
Right now I am using shared network  offering to create guest network.

Regards,
Tejas



On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Tejas Gadaria 
wrote:

> I found the log on management server,
>
> 2014-06-21 17:25:28,750 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
> Timer:ctx-bc6cacf1) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any
> management server
> 2014-06-21 17:25:31,809 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
> (catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1) ===START===  192.168.160.192 -- GET
> command=deleteNetwork&id=099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75&response=json&sessionkey=svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo%3D&_=1403351731747
> 2014-06-21 17:25:31,946 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1 ctx-190760ce) submit async job-160, details:
> AsyncJobVO {id:160, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: None,
> instanceId: null, cmd:
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd, cmdInfo:
> {"id":"099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75","response":"json","sessionkey":"svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo\u003d","cmdEventType":"NETWORK.DELETE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1403351731747","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"562"},
> cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
> result: null, initMsid: 64342918221735, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
> null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
> 2014-06-21 17:25:31,947 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Add job-160 into job monitoring
> 2014-06-21 17:25:31,948 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:160, userId: 2,
> accountId: 2, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd:
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd, cmdInfo:
> {"id":"099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75","response":"json","sessionkey":"svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo\u003d","cmdEventType":"NETWORK.DELETE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1403351731747","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"562"},
> cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
> result: null, initMsid: 64342918221735, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
> null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
> 2014-06-21 17:25:31,949 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
> (catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1 ctx-190760ce) ===END===  192.168.160.192 --
> GET
> command=deleteNetwork&id=099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75&response=json&sessionkey=svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo%3D&_=1403351731747
> 2014-06-21 17:25:32,041 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416 ctx-190760ce) Network is not implemented:
> Ntwk[207|Guest|17]
> 2014-06-21 17:25:32,044 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416 ctx-190760ce) Network is not not in the
> correct state to be destroyed: Implementing
> 2014-06-21 17:25:32,100 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Complete async job-160, jobStatus: FAILED,
> resultCode: 530, result:
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{"uuidList":[],"errorcode":530,"errortext":"Failed
> to delete network"}
> 2014-06-21 17:25:32,152 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Done executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd for job-160
>
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Tejas Gadaria 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created Redundant virtual router.
>> Right now no vms are running on that, but I am not to delete VR.
>>
>>
>

Re: Review Request 22554: CLOUDSTACK-6909 - fix marvin's handling of SMB credentials for storage

[Santhosh Edukulla]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/#review46363
---



tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py


Why we need to have multiple dictionaries for details in config, look for 
details option under secondary storage json object. 

We can have a similar details structure here for primary storage as well.



tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py


There is no details structure equivalent mentioned under 
configGenerator.py, please check. It can be dynamically added, but its good to 
provide the class declaration as per config. Check secondary storage class and 
respective details.



tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py


Do a lower() comparison, it will help even otherwise with different cases.


- Santhosh Edukulla


On June 13, 2014, 4:53 p.m., John Dilley wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/
> ---
> 
> (Updated June 13, 2014, 4:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6909
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6909
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Fix marvin's handling of details field for primary and secondary storage to 
> cope with SMB credentials. This allows Hyper-V to work.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py 22b78ab 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Tested deploydataCenter with this JSON:
> 
> {
>"dbSvr":{
>   "dbSvr":"10.220.137.39",
>   "passwd":"cloud",
>   "db":"cloud",
>   "port":3306,
>   "user":"cloud"
>},
>"zones":[
>   {
>  "name":"XenRT-Zone-0",
>  "guestcidraddress":"192.168.200.0/24",
>  "dns1":"10.220.160.11",
>  "physical_networks":[
> {
>"XRT_VLANRangeSize":10,
>"name":"AdvPhyNetwork",
>"providers":[
>   {
>  "broadcastdomainrange":"ZONE",
>  "name":"VirtualRouter"
>   },
>   {
>  "broadcastdomainrange":"ZONE",
>  "name":"VpcVirtualRouter"
>   },
>   {
>  "broadcastdomainrange":"ZONE",
>  "name":"InternalLbVm"
>   }
>],
>"broadcastdomainrange":"Zone",
>"vlan":"3000-3009",
>"traffictypes":[
>   {
>  "typ":"Guest"
>   },
>   {
>  "typ":"Management"
>   },
>   {
>  "typ":"Public"
>   }
>],
>"isolationmethods":[
>   "VLAN"
>]
> }
>  ],
>  "ipranges":[
> {
>"startip":"10.220.164.0",
>"endip":"10.220.164.9",
>"netmask":"255.255.240.0",
>"XRT_GuestIPRangeSize":10,
>"gateway":"10.220.160.1"
> }
>  ],
>  "networktype":"Advanced",
>  "pods":[
> {
>"XRT_PodIPRangeSize":10,
>"name":"XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0",
>"endip":"10.220.164.39",
>"startip":"10.220.164.30",
>"netmask":"255.255.240.0",
>"clusters":[
>   {
>  "XRT_HyperVHostIds":"0",
>  "clustername":"XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0-Cluster-0",
>  "hypervisor":"hyperv",
>  "primaryStorages":[
> {
>"url":"cifs://10.220.163.45/storage/primary",
>"name":"XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0-Primary-Store",
>"details":[
>   {
>  "user":"Administrator"
>   },
>   {
>  "password":"xenroot01T"
>   },
>   {
>  "domain":"XSQA"
>   }
>]
> }
>  ],
>  "clustertype":"CloudManaged",
>  "hosts":[
> {
>"ur

Re: Unable to delete virtual router

[Tejas Gadaria]

I found the log on management server,

2014-06-21 17:25:28,750 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:ctx-bc6cacf1) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any
management server
2014-06-21 17:25:31,809 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1) ===START===  192.168.160.192 -- GET
command=deleteNetwork&id=099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75&response=json&sessionkey=svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo%3D&_=1403351731747
2014-06-21 17:25:31,946 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1 ctx-190760ce) submit async job-160, details:
AsyncJobVO {id:160, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: None,
instanceId: null, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd, cmdInfo:
{"id":"099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75","response":"json","sessionkey":"svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo\u003d","cmdEventType":"NETWORK.DELETE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1403351731747","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"562"},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 64342918221735, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-06-21 17:25:31,947 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Add job-160 into job monitoring
2014-06-21 17:25:31,948 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:160, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd, cmdInfo:
{"id":"099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75","response":"json","sessionkey":"svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo\u003d","cmdEventType":"NETWORK.DELETE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1403351731747","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"562"},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 64342918221735, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-06-21 17:25:31,949 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-631429c1 ctx-190760ce) ===END===  192.168.160.192 --
GET
command=deleteNetwork&id=099ff395-9196-43ab-a1e2-cd368dbe3c75&response=json&sessionkey=svge6Qrqq9nR4yPm9TYMn1UgvSo%3D&_=1403351731747
2014-06-21 17:25:32,041 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416 ctx-190760ce) Network is not implemented:
Ntwk[207|Guest|17]
2014-06-21 17:25:32,044 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416 ctx-190760ce) Network is not not in the
correct state to be destroyed: Implementing
2014-06-21 17:25:32,100 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Complete async job-160, jobStatus: FAILED,
resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{"uuidList":[],"errorcode":530,"errortext":"Failed
to delete network"}
2014-06-21 17:25:32,152 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-7:ctx-a9e7a416) Done executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.DeleteNetworkCmd for job-160


Regards,
Tejas



On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Tejas Gadaria 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created Redundant virtual router.
> Right now no vms are running on that, but I am not to delete VR.
>
>

Unable to delete virtual router

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi,

I have created Redundant virtual router.
Right now no vms are running on that, but I am not to delete VR.

Re: Review Request 22830: Fixed resource leaks, invalid value comparisons, null dereferences, invalid result set loop

[daan Hoogland]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22830/#review46361
---

Ship it!


1c80185170235eca6ac26c72b4145b1b46313ed1

- daan Hoogland


On June 20, 2014, 7:23 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22830/
> ---
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2014, 7:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and daan Hoogland.
> 
> 
> Bugs: coverity
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/coverity
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Fixed resource leaks,invalid value comparisons,null dereferences, invalid 
> result set loop comparison. 
> All these issues were fixed in master branch
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseCreator.java 91ef318 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseIntegrityChecker.java c20a418 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java f508df2 
>   framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/crypt/EncryptionSecretKeyChanger.java 
> 58584f9 
>   framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/Merovingian2.java 89f9e61 
>   framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/ScriptRunner.java 6614527 
>   framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/TransactionLegacy.java f50cbe2 
>   server/src/com/cloud/test/IPRangeConfig.java 1d56471 
>   usage/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageSanityChecker.java 50f6fe5 
>   utils/src/com/cloud/utils/crypt/EncryptionSecretKeySender.java 086e8a8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22830/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Built the code post the changes, ran a deploy data center.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Santhosh Edukulla
> 
>