Re: [01/50] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 1290e10
Hey hey, On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:50 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at 50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, ) We have passed feature freeze for 4.5.0, so I am confused as why this was merged. Is there a reason not to revert all of this? This was the request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16 And JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7143 We all get emails from Github PR (just re-checked) so you may find them on the ML. Yes, GH PR is exactly like the Review Board emails in this particular aspect. My question is why is this merged into master rather than a feature branch, and why no [MERGE] email as per: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Branch+Merge+Expectations Hmm, I hadn’t seen that before; don’t think it’s linked from the “how to contribute” stuff. Sorry. Or is this something a committer is to do? Can we change the rules? Because I’d guess the [MERGE] e-mail serves exactly the same role as a pull request: widely announcing a branch is ready to merge in and providing a trigger point for discussion. It’s also interesting to consider whether you need a feature branch at all in the local repository for branches that were first developed (and tested) remotely. After all the only remaining thing you will do to that branch is to merge it in. The original feature branch is https://github.com/schubergphilis/CloudStack/tree/feature/systemvm-refactor which has existed for a few months and was discussed here a few times (well I sent e-mail about it, there wasn’t much discussion…), with https://github.com/schubergphilis/CloudStack/tree/feature/systemvm-refactor-for-upstream as the re-re-rebased version of all that. This is all github standard (best?) practice, to the point that you cannot even create pull requests that result in the creation of new branches. I.e. if you look at https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/compare/feature/systemvm-refactor-for-upstream and you click the “edit” in the top row, you can’t even suggest merging to a new branch, there’s only existing ones listed. Of course the committer doing the actual upstreaming can make a different choice, but, why would you? As for whether to take this for 4.5.0, of course the risk is not 0, but its pretty darn low. I also think by typical community rules just about none of the commits in the pull request are a new feature. Longer term the point of these changes is a quality increase by being just slightly more precise and deliberate in a few places. If you think they don’t accomplish that you should definitely pull it out, but then I’d like to hear what’s wrong! If you pull it out, please do consider something more limited like https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/commit/74c381540ebaf940bbbf471b580303488aa9c5b4 which avoids putting master version of the systemvm code into branch builds. I would also _really_ like to see a virtualbox systemvm.box out of the official 4.5.0 build so that we can easily use our systemvm component tests for regression testing the changes we’ll have for 4.5.1/4.6.0. If you back this out it’ll be annoying bit twiddling to make one manually. cheers! Leo
Re: SystemVM file name changes
Hey Ian,
On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:04 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
I noticed the filename of the generated systemvms changed on
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
They now include a [0-9]* before the hypervisor name representing the build
number.
That’s one of the things coming out of the 1290e10 merge.
Why do we do this? Its annoying for external resources linking to the last
successful build.
The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds.
In RPM terms, given just a random binary RPM found on a random system
* it should be possible to unambiguously determine the source RPM from which it
was built
* it should be possible to determine who or what built it, and when
* it should be possible to trace the source RPM back to the exact version
control revision
* it should be possible to determine easily whether that binary is the same as
another one on another machine / in another repository that has the same
identifiers
In RPM land, the jenkins $BUILD_NUMBER should go into the RPM Release field and
not into the RPM Version field. But in this case we don’t have RPM, or spec
files, so there is only the filename to accomplish the same (which is why the
branch name is also in there), and it has to be in this spot or cloudstack gets
a bit confused.
What we do in our integration environment is to apply just a bit of logic to
parse out the version number from the file name. I.e. to get an RPM from
jenkins see fetch-rpms.sh included below, or to fetch the most recent systemvm
from a directory listing see download-template.sh also included below. Would
something like that work for you?
If not, the logic for creating the version is in build.sh:
version_tag=
if [ ! -z ${version} ]; then
if [ ! -z ${BUILD_NUMBER} ]; then
version=${version}.${BUILD_NUMBER}
fi
version_tag=-${version}
elif [ ! -z ${BUILD_NUMBER} ]; then
version=${BUILD_NUMBER}
version_tag=-${BUILD_NUMBER}”
fi
So we can change that, or we can unset BUILD_NUMBER in the jenkins build prior
to invocation. What do you think?
It would be much better to exclusively use yum/maven repositories and their
logic to centralize this kind of logic server-side, or at least to be creating
and updating symlinks to ‘latest’. That’s a work in progress...
cheers,
Leo
download-templates.sh
=
#!/bin/bash
#
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
# distributed with this work for additional information
# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
# License); you may not use this file except in compliance
# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
# software distributed under the License is distributed on an
# AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
# Download systemvm templates onto secondary storage
set -e
echo $@ | grep debug /dev/null DEBUG=1
echo $@ | grep trace /dev/null TRACE=1
function source_common() {
local SOURCE=${BASH_SOURCE[0]}
DIR=$( cd -P $( dirname ${SOURCE} ) pwd )
source ${DIR}/common.sh
}
source_common
NFS_HOST=${1:-localhost}
NFS_SECONDARY_EXPORT=${2:-/storage/secondary}
MOUNT_PATH=${3:-/mnt/secondary}
BASE_URL=${4:-https://artifacts.schubergphilis.com/artifacts/cloudstack};
TEMPLATE=${5:-systemvmtemplate}
DB_HOST=${6:-localhost}
DB_USER=${7:-root}
DB_PASSWORD=${8:-}
function find_template() {
if ! `echo ${TEMPLATE} | egrep '^[a-zA-Z0-9]+-[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)*$'`; then
# (apache) directory listing
# find only links
# filter by template name
# find only xen template
# strip suffix
# take the first (newest) one
newest_first=?C=M;O=D
TEMPLATE=$(curl ${BASE_URL}/${newest_first} | \
egrep -o 'href=[^]+' | \
egrep ${TEMPLATE} | \
egrep -o [^/\]+-xen\.vhd\.bz2 | \
sed 's/-xen.vhd.bz2//' |\
head -n 1)
if [[ ${TEMPLATE} == ]]; then
error No possible match found for ${TEMPLATE} at ${BASE_URL}
fi
log INFO Using template ${TEMPLATE}
fi
}
function install_xen_template() {
XEN_URL=${BASE_URL}/${TEMPLATE}-xen.vhd.bz2
# KVM_URL=${BASE_URL}/${TEMPLATE}-kvm.vhd.bz2
[ -d ${MOUNT_PATH} ] || mkdir ${MOUNT_PATH}
mount -t nfs ${NFS_HOST}:${NFS_SECONDARY_EXPORT} ${MOUNT_PATH} || true
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt \
-F \
-m ${MOUNT_PATH} \
-h xenserver \
-u ${XEN_URL} \
-o ${DB_HOST} \
-r ${DB_USER} \
-d ${DB_PASSWORD}
}
function main() {
find_template
install_xen_template
}
# we only run main() if not source-d
return 2/dev/null || main
fetch-rpms.sh
Revering commit commit 093fa6f0a53bd031a09e4042c3aa25860bc947e5
Hey Anthony, TransactionContextInterceptor is still used in the GenericDaoBase causing the following error when starting cloudstack: 2014-09-23 22:10:38.962:WARN::Nested in org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Caught: null: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.customSearchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:464) at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.customSearch(GenericDaoBase.java:515) at com.cloud.upgrade.dao.VersionDaoImpl.getCurrentVersion(VersionDaoImpl.java:127) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:424) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.checkIntegrity(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:65) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55) at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:167) at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51) at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:339) at org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:143) I’ve reverted the commit commit 093fa6f0a53bd031a09e4042c3aa25860bc947e5 Author: Anthony Xu anthony...@citrix.com Date: Tue Sep 23 16:48:14 2014 -0700 removed unused class ramework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/TransactionContextInterceptor.java This could have been caught by running the simulator tests. You can make jenkins run them for you by creating a branch called either hotfix/something or bugfix/something and push that branch. Jenkins will pick that up with job http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/simulator-hotfix-trigger/ Cheers, Hugo
Review Request 25989: CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP mib file for snp-alerts plugin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25989/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7620 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7620 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added SNMP mib file for snp-alerts plugin Diffs - plugins/alert-handlers/snmp-alerts/CS-ROOT-MIB.mib PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25989/diff/ Testing --- validates the MIB file using http://www.simpleweb.org/ietf/mibs/validate/ Thanks, Anshul Gangwar
Re: Review Request 25989: CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP mib file for snp-alerts plugin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25989/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7620 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7620 Repository: cloudstack-git Description (updated) --- Added SNMP mib file for snmp-alerts plugin Diffs - plugins/alert-handlers/snmp-alerts/CS-ROOT-MIB.mib PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25989/diff/ Testing --- validates the MIB file using http://www.simpleweb.org/ietf/mibs/validate/ Thanks, Anshul Gangwar
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #431
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/431/changes Changes: [htrippaers] CID-1240106 Remove unused variable [htrippaers] CID-1240107 Remove unused variable [htrippaers] Fix for CID-1232333, CID-1232334, CID-1232335, CID-1232336 and -- [...truncated 8938 lines...] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2:16.017s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 24 03:52:37 EDT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 40M/153M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer --- log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. WARNING: Provided file does not exist: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override Initializing database=simulator with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `simulator` Running query: create database `simulator` Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/hypervisor_capabilities.simulator.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.187s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 24 03:53:01 EDT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 40M/177M [INFO] [simulator-singlerun] $ /bin/bash -x /tmp/hudson5622629275748815465.sh + jps -l + grep -q Launcher + rm -f xunit.xml + rm -rf /tmp/MarvinLogs + echo Check for initialization of the management server Check for initialization of the management server + COUNTER=0 + SERVER_PID=2461 + mvn -P systemvm,simulator -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run + '[' 0 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=1 + '[' 1 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=2 + '[' 2 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=3 + '[' 3 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up'
[BLOCKED] Management server not starting
The management server is not starting on current master builds - apparently due to a DB error. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7621 has been filed for this, CCing Pierre-Luc Dion as the author of some DB schema changes that are potential candidates for causing the problem... Alex
Re: SystemVM file name changes
The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds.
In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org I would disagree with this. Only
two build jobs are ever kept. When a time arises when you need to figure
out what commit your systemvm was based of I'd be willing to bet that job
has been cleared out of jenkins ages ago.
In RPM land, the jenkins $BUILD_NUMBER should go into the RPM Release
field and not into the RPM Version field. But in this case we don’t have
RPM, or spec files
Isn't this what we use /etc/cloudstack-release for?
You could include extra information in there if you wish, version, branch,
git sha1, etc. which would give great traceability.
The supplied download-template script is dependant on having a local
nexus/artifactory that can do searching on published build artifacts. In
the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org the system vms are not uploaded to
nexus/artifactory and just kept on the jenkins box.
The RPM one grabs a zip of all RPM is the last successful build. The zip
filename doesn't contain any version information.
Changing this causes 404s for people example:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201409.mbox/browser
On 24 September 2014 07:37, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey Ian,
On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:04 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
I noticed the filename of the generated systemvms changed on
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
They now include a [0-9]* before the hypervisor name representing the
build
number.
That’s one of the things coming out of the 1290e10 merge.
Why do we do this? Its annoying for external resources linking to the
last
successful build.
The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds.
In RPM terms, given just a random binary RPM found on a random system
* it should be possible to unambiguously determine the source RPM from
which it was built
* it should be possible to determine who or what built it, and when
* it should be possible to trace the source RPM back to the exact version
control revision
* it should be possible to determine easily whether that binary is the
same as
another one on another machine / in another repository that has the same
identifiers
In RPM land, the jenkins $BUILD_NUMBER should go into the RPM Release
field and not into the RPM Version field. But in this case we don’t have
RPM, or spec files, so there is only the filename to accomplish the same
(which is why the branch name is also in there), and it has to be in this
spot or cloudstack gets a bit confused.
What we do in our integration environment is to apply just a bit of logic
to parse out the version number from the file name. I.e. to get an RPM from
jenkins see fetch-rpms.sh included below, or to fetch the most recent
systemvm from a directory listing see download-template.sh also included
below. Would something like that work for you?
If not, the logic for creating the version is in build.sh:
version_tag=
if [ ! -z ${version} ]; then
if [ ! -z ${BUILD_NUMBER} ]; then
version=${version}.${BUILD_NUMBER}
fi
version_tag=-${version}
elif [ ! -z ${BUILD_NUMBER} ]; then
version=${BUILD_NUMBER}
version_tag=-${BUILD_NUMBER}”
fi
So we can change that, or we can unset BUILD_NUMBER in the jenkins build
prior to invocation. What do you think?
It would be much better to exclusively use yum/maven repositories and
their logic to centralize this kind of logic server-side, or at least to be
creating and updating symlinks to ‘latest’. That’s a work in progress...
cheers,
Leo
download-templates.sh
=
#!/bin/bash
#
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
# distributed with this work for additional information
# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
# License); you may not use this file except in compliance
# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
# software distributed under the License is distributed on an
# AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
# Download systemvm templates onto secondary storage
set -e
echo $@ | grep debug /dev/null DEBUG=1
echo $@ | grep trace /dev/null TRACE=1
function source_common() {
local SOURCE=${BASH_SOURCE[0]}
DIR=$( cd -P $( dirname ${SOURCE} ) pwd )
source ${DIR}/common.sh
}
source_common
NFS_HOST=${1:-localhost}
NFS_SECONDARY_EXPORT=${2:-/storage/secondary}
MOUNT_PATH=${3:-/mnt/secondary}
BASE_URL=${4:-https://artifacts.schubergphilis.com/artifacts/cloudstack};
Re: FTP connection tracking modules missing in VR after upgrade to 4.3.1; Which release will contain the fix?
Thank you for your efforts Rohit Yadav. So i just download the files from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/ install them by hand, reboot the management server, destroy the routers and wait for them to be recreated? What other commits are there in this shapshot? Is it dangerous to use this snapshot build? Can other bugs be introduced? Do you know maybe when official 4.3.2 will be released? Regards, F. On 23 Sep 2014, at 13:33, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi France, On 22-Sep-2014, at 1:09 pm, France mailingli...@isg.si wrote: Hi guys, i have upgraded from 4.1.1 to 4.3.1 over the weekend. Amongst other regressions i have found this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7517 So it looks like it is already well known bug and already has a fix. What can _we_ do to get the fix for 4.3 releases on our production system? I’ve cherry-picked it to 4.3 branch, you may build from source to get this fix. Or, use the rpms from jenkins build. Is anyone willing to build a RPM including this fix? I see it was fixed only in 4.5. Taking into account what a small fix it is and how important it is, maybe include it in 4.4.1 release also, because it is still not released? Also why not add it along with other fixes to 4.3 and release 4.3.2? In my personal opinion, ACS has way too few bugfix releases, and lot’s of people have to build their own packages because of that. RPMs and DEB from latest 4.3 branch will be made available by Jenkins here: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3 Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: conf values for 4.4 from master
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Daan,
These are already added for 4.4's schema-430to440.sql (and your second mail
is the same as the first case of first mail...)
The last line is no issue indeed. the lines 797 and 798 from master are
not in the 4.4 branch:
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component, name,
value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced', 'DEFAULT',
'NetworkOrchestrationService', 'router.redundant.vrrp.interval', '1',
'seconds between VRRP broadcast. It would 3 times broadcast fail to trigger
fail-over mechanism of redundant router', '1') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
category='Advanced';
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component, name,
value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced', 'DEFAULT',
'NetworkOrchestrationService', 'router.aggregation.command.each.timeout',
'3', 'timeout in seconds for each Virtual Router command being aggregated.
The final aggregation command timeout would be determined by this timeout *
commands counts ', '3') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE category='Advanced';
these two lines where added by you to the file schema-430to440.sql in
master but not in 4.4
--
Daan
Re: cloudstack 4.4 access return 404 after cloudstack-management restart
H devs, please review the below report by Ning Wang. I found this behaivior in our integration test environment at Schuberg Philis as well. I have not found the root cause yet, so any pointers are welcome. I don't think Ian's suspicion off the machine specifications are valid. It looks like a java class protection level or packaging issue to me. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Ning Wang wangning...@gmail.com wrote: thanks for your reply! !1765 # free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem:129022 112989 16032 0 51641 33961 -/+ buffers/cache: 27387 101634 Swap:0 0 0 On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: How much ram do you have? On 23 Sep 2014 19:21, Ning Wang wangning...@gmail.com wrote: is there someone enconter this,please help! Thanks!!! 1,the browser shows: HTTP Status 404 - ___ type Status report message description The requested resource () is not available. Apache Tomcat/6.0.24 2,the log in /var/log/cloudstack/management/catalina.out: INFO: Deploying module: jaxws-1.5.6 - file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/modules/axis2-jaxws-mar-1.5.6.mar Sep 23, 2014 2:03:17 PM org.apache.axis2.deployment.ModuleDeployer deploy INFO: Deploying module: addressing-1.5.6 - file:/usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/webapps/awsapi/WEB-INF/lib/axis2-1.5.6.jar Sep 23, 2014 2:03:19 PM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader loadClass INFO: Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already. Could not load org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextTimerTask$1. The eventual following stack trace is caused by an error thrown for debugging purposes as well as to attempt to terminate the thread which caused the illegal access, and has no functional impact. java.lang.IllegalStateException at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1369) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1329) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextTimerTask.run(ManagedContextTimerTask.java:27) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:555) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505) Exception in thread Timer-2 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/cloudstack/managed/context/ManagedContextTimerTask$1 at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextTimerTask.run(ManagedContextTimerTask.java:27) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:555) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextTimerTask$1 at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1483) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1329) ... 3 more Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.apache.axis2.deployment.ServiceDeployer deploy INFO: Deploying Web service: cloud-ec2.aar - file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/services/cloud-ec2.aar Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.apache.axis2.deployment.ServiceDeployer deploy INFO: Deploying Web service: version-1.5.6.aar - file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/services/version-1.5.6.aar Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.apache.axis2.util.OnDemandLogger warn WARNING: No transportReceiver for org.apache.axis2.transport.http.AxisServletListener found. An instance for HTTP will be configured automatically. Please update your axis2.xml file! Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor init INFO: JSR-330 'javax.inject.Inject' annotation found and supported for autowiring Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol start INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-7080 Sep 23, 2014 2:03:22 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start INFO: Server startup in 39687 ms -- Daan
Re: Review Request 25837: Additional Guest OS support for vGPU Test Automation
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25837/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2014, 10:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark, John Dilley, and Sanjay Tripathi. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Additional Guest OS support for vGPU Test Automation Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/test_deploy_vgpu_vm.py 081ab4b tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py bebcab9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25837/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Testing is done with Win7,Win8 and Win2012 templates with XS 65 tools installed. All the testcases are passed Thanks, sailaja mada
Re: [ACS441] merge request: hotfix/4.4-7574
how does this pertain to windows on xen. It looks like a pure- and baremetal thing. I did merge! On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Hi Dahn, can you merge this branch into 4.4, I've test creation of windows 8.1, 2012r2 and centos6.5 on xenserver. Thanks, Pierre-Luc -- Daan
Review Request 25991: user vm can get a gateway ip when gateway ip is a part of the guest ip range.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25991/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7536 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7536 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- user vm can get a gateway ip when gateway ip is a part of the guest ip range. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7536 Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java df6ce45 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25991/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: [BLOCKED] Management server not starting
This is fixed by reverting the commit 093fa6f0a53bd031a09e4042c3aa25860bc947e5 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2503aaafef5280ce20e319c77623f9709d85151a MS is now starting with no issues. -Harikrishna On 24-Sep-2014, at 2:25 pm, Alex Brett alex.br...@citrix.com wrote: The management server is not starting on current master builds - apparently due to a DB error. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7621 has been filed for this, CCing Pierre-Luc Dion as the author of some DB schema changes that are potential candidates for causing the problem... Alex
Re: Review Request 25530: CLOUDSTACK-7534: ResetVM for VM with attached datadisk fails when enable.ha.storage.migration is false
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/#review54406 --- commit c55bc0b2d11be4820a24af426e23da3db54a0cb1 - Kishan Kavala On Sept. 11, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/ --- (Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 11:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7534 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7534 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-7534: ResetVM for VM with attached datadisk fails when enable.ha.storage.migration is false Separate global config to enable/disable Storage Migration during normal deployment Introduced a configuration parameter named enable.storage.migration Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineProfile.java 29f3164 engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java afc6f63 server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java 310f361 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: Review Request 25530: CLOUDSTACK-7534: ResetVM for VM with attached datadisk fails when enable.ha.storage.migration is false
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/#review54405 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kishan Kavala On Sept. 11, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/ --- (Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 11:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7534 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7534 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-7534: ResetVM for VM with attached datadisk fails when enable.ha.storage.migration is false Separate global config to enable/disable Storage Migration during normal deployment Introduced a configuration parameter named enable.storage.migration Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineProfile.java 29f3164 engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/VolumeOrchestrator.java afc6f63 server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java 310f361 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25530/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: Review Request 25768: changing value of cpu/mem.overprovisioning.factor for xen cluster is not affecting total memory at zone level
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25768/#review54407 --- Ship it! Commit 476733cb92634c8494fe64762d7fbc178292a754 - Kishan Kavala On Sept. 18, 2014, 10:40 a.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25768/ --- (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 10:40 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7571 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7571 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7571 Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java 9cae045 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25768/diff/ Testing --- Tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #432
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/432/changes Changes: [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-7534: ResetVM for VM with attached datadisk fails when enable.ha.storage.migration is false -- [...truncated 8933 lines...] [INFO] Final Memory: 42M/158M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer --- log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. WARNING: Provided file does not exist: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override Initializing database=simulator with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `simulator` Running query: create database `simulator` Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/hypervisor_capabilities.simulator.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 23.563s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 24 07:33:50 EDT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 40M/181M [INFO] [simulator-singlerun] $ /bin/bash -x /tmp/hudson2533624105079268180.sh + jps -l + grep -q Launcher + rm -f xunit.xml + rm -rf /tmp/MarvinLogs + echo Check for initialization of the management server Check for initialization of the management server + COUNTER=0 + SERVER_PID=9968 + mvn -P systemvm,simulator -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run + '[' 0 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=1 + '[' 1 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=2 + '[' 2 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=3 + '[' 3 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=4 + '[' 4 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 + COUNTER=5 + '[' 5 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server node 127.0.0.1 is up' jetty-output.out + sleep 5 +
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #433
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/433/changes Changes: [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-7571 changing value of cpu/mem.overprovisioning.factor for xen cluster is not affecting total memory at zone level -- [...truncated 8940 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2:03.406s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 24 08:06:34 EDT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 42M/175M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer --- log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. WARNING: Provided file does not exist: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override Initializing database=simulator with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `simulator` Running query: create database `simulator` Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/hypervisor_capabilities.simulator.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 17.848s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 24 08:06:55 EDT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 43M/184M [INFO] [simulator-singlerun] $ /bin/bash -x /tmp/hudson2896558900789755787.sh + jps -l + grep -q Launcher + rm -f xunit.xml + rm -rf /tmp/MarvinLogs + echo Check for initialization of the management server Check for initialization of the management server + COUNTER=0 + SERVER_PID=16966 + mvn -P systemvm,simulator -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run + '[' 0 -lt 44 ']' + grep -q 'Management server
Re: FTP connection tracking modules missing in VR after upgrade to 4.3.1; Which release will contain the fix?
Hi, On 24-Sep-2014, at 12:04 pm, France mailingli...@isg.si wrote: Thank you for your efforts Rohit Yadav. So i just download the files from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/ install them by hand, reboot the management server, destroy the routers and wait for them to be recreated? What other commits are there in this shapshot? Is it dangerous to use this snapshot build? Can other bugs be introduced? You’ll have to look it up using the job that created the snapshots/debs/rpms. Using snapshot builds can be unreliable so should be avoided. Do you know maybe when official 4.3.2 will be released? Not sure. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: SystemVM file name changes
On Sep 24, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds. In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org I would disagree with this. Only two build jobs are ever kept. When a time arises when you need to figure out what commit your systemvm was based of I'd be willing to bet that job has been cleared out of jenkins ages ago. In RPM land, the jenkins $BUILD_NUMBER should go into the RPM Release field and not into the RPM Version field. But in this case we don’t have RPM, or spec files Isn't this what we use /etc/cloudstack-release for? You could include extra information in there if you wish, version, branch, git sha1, etc. which would give great traceability. Sounds like a plan. I’ll see about submitting a patch tonight. The issue is that /etc/cloudstack-release is parsed in a location or two (I forget the details) so it kind-of has to match existing regexes. The supplied download-template script is dependant on having a local nexus/artifactory that can do searching on published build artifacts. In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org the system vms are not uploaded to nexus/artifactory and just kept on the jenkins box. Aren’t they published to S3 somewhere? It’d probably be better if users fetch systemvms from S3……though one wonders why users need to fetch systemvms built from master at all… Changing this causes 404s for people example: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201409.mbox/browser Hmm. We can’t have too many people badgering jenkins like this I guess. So let’s improve on that! In the meantime... export BUILD_NUMBER= at the right place in the relevant build job should fix the immediate issue... cheers, Leo
Regarding commit 7f440854f7bcd41a1bd6581c0239cde2e98261b7
Hi Daan, I am looking into bug [1] which reports that the vmsync functionality is broken on master. If a vm deployed by cloudstack is stopped directly on the hypervisor, its state is not updated in cloudstack. I see that in commit 7f440854f7bcd41a1bd6581c0239cde2e98261b7, a change was made to retry retrieving the resource status (PingCommand) to deal with network glitches. However, there is an issue with the commit and it has caused a regression with the vmsync functionality. Now, by default, the PingTask is not checking for the status of the resource. This breaks vmsync for all direct connected agents, which includes xenserver, hyper-v etc. I'll be submitting a fix for this issue. Do let me know if you have any concerns with it. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7598 Regards, Devdeep
Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Hi guys, i want to migrate away from realhostip.com. I have set up DNS service in no time, but am having problems importing certificates to ACS 3.4.1. I created my own CA like this: cd /etc/pki/CA touch index.txt echo 1000 serial openssl genrsa -aes256 -out /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem 4096 chmod 400 /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem nano -w /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf openssl req -new -x509 -days 63650 -key /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem -sha256 -extensions v3_ca -out /etc/pki/CA/certs/ca.cert.pem Signed my own keys and converted them to pkcs8 format like this: cd /etc/pki/CA openssl genrsa -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem 4096 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem openssl req -sha256 -new -key private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem -out certs/vse.somedomain.tld.csr.pem openssl ca -keyfile private/ca.key.pem -cert certs/ca.cert.pem -extensions usr_cert -notext -md sha256 -days 63649 -in certs/vse.somedomain.tld.csr.pem -out certs/vse.somedomain.tld.cert.pem openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -in private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 openssl pkcs8 -in private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 But when trying to import it via GUI: infrastructure - SSL Certificate: Certificate from vse.somedomain.tld.cert.pem PKCS8 from private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 DNS domain suffix to: *.somedomain.tld But it fails with: Failed to update SSL Certificate. Please help me upload the new certificate. Catalina.out shows no error. I have no idea what else to check. Thank you. F.
[DB-CHANGE] Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7624 to 9eb8656
Devs and testers,
I am going to apply a fix by Hugo that deals with an encrypted value that
is to large for the configuration.value field. If you wish to keep running
with your data make sure take appropriate action on this.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:25 PM, h...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7624 [created] 9eb86560c
CLOUDSTACK-7624 The value field of the configuration table is not big
enough for some values
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/9eb86560
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/tree/9eb86560
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/diff/9eb86560
Branch: refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/CLOUDSTACK-7624
Commit: 9eb86560c9b83456be9ee32e8b713b213baed7bb
Parents: 7d11381
Author: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
Authored: Wed Sep 24 17:24:23 2014 +0200
Committer: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
Committed: Wed Sep 24 17:24:23 2014 +0200
--
.../apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java | 4 ++--
setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob/9eb86560/framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java
--
diff --git
a/framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java
b/framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java
index d7edfe0..cda96c9 100644
---
a/framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java
+++
b/framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigurationVO.java
@@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ public class ConfigurationVO implements Configuration {
@Column(name = name)
private String name;
-@Column(name = value, length = 4095)
+@Column(name = value, length = 8191)
private String value;
-@Column(name = default_value, length = 4095)
+@Column(name = default_value, length = 8191)
private String defaultValue;
@Column(name = description, length = 1024)
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob/9eb86560/setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql
--
diff --git a/setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql
b/setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql
index d1ea8d3..337d575 100644
--- a/setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql
+++ b/setup/db/db/schema-440to441.sql
@@ -178,3 +178,6 @@ INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor`
(uuid,hypervisor_type, hypervis
INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type,
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined)
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.2.5', 'CentOS 6 (64-bit)', 228, now(), 0);
INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type,
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined)
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.2.5', 'Windows 8 (64-bit)', 229, now(), 0);
INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type,
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined)
VALUES (UUID(),'Xenserver', '6.2.5', 'Windows Server 2012 (64-bit)', 168,
now(), 0);
+
+-- Fix CLOUDSTACK-7624
+ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`configuration` MODIFY default_value varchar(8191),
MODIFY value varchar(8191);
--
Daan
Re: SystemVM file name changes
Aren’t they published to S3 somewhere? It’d probably be better if users fetch systemvms from S3…… Both not a clue what the S3 urls are though. though one wonders why users need to fetch systemvms built from master at all… Ease of access for running from the latest master branch I'd imagine. On 24 September 2014 15:21, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote: On Sep 24, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds. In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org I would disagree with this. Only two build jobs are ever kept. When a time arises when you need to figure out what commit your systemvm was based of I'd be willing to bet that job has been cleared out of jenkins ages ago. In RPM land, the jenkins $BUILD_NUMBER should go into the RPM Release field and not into the RPM Version field. But in this case we don’t have RPM, or spec files Isn't this what we use /etc/cloudstack-release for? You could include extra information in there if you wish, version, branch, git sha1, etc. which would give great traceability. Sounds like a plan. I’ll see about submitting a patch tonight. The issue is that /etc/cloudstack-release is parsed in a location or two (I forget the details) so it kind-of has to match existing regexes. The supplied download-template script is dependant on having a local nexus/artifactory that can do searching on published build artifacts. In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org the system vms are not uploaded to nexus/artifactory and just kept on the jenkins box. Aren’t they published to S3 somewhere? It’d probably be better if users fetch systemvms from S3……though one wonders why users need to fetch systemvms built from master at all… Changing this causes 404s for people example: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201409.mbox/browser Hmm. We can’t have too many people badgering jenkins like this I guess. So let’s improve on that! In the meantime... export BUILD_NUMBER= at the right place in the relevant build job should fix the immediate issue... cheers, Leo
Re: cloudstack 4.4 access return 404 after cloudstack-management restart
thanks all! the last lines of management-server.log: !2438 # tail -50 management-server.log 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.ExtensionRegistry] (main:null) Registering extension [Baremetal Manager] in [Api Commands Registry] 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.RegistryLifecycle] (main:null) Registered com.cloud.baremetal.manager.BaremetalManagerImpl@58b5c43 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.ExtensionRegistry] (main:null) Registering extension [ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl] in [Api Commands Registry] 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.RegistryLifecycle] (main:null) Registered org.apache.cloudstack.discovery.ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl@5ca3eca9 2014-09-23 21:55:07,514 INFO [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Running system integrity checker com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrityChecker@3837eb50 2014-09-23 21:55:07,514 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) Grabbing lock to check for database integrity. 2014-09-23 21:55:07,516 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) Performing database integrity check 2014-09-23 21:55:07,526 DEBUG [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) No duplicate hosts with the same local storage found in database 2014-09-23 21:55:07,527 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.VersionDaoImpl] (main:null) Checking to see if the database is at a version before it was the version table is created 2014-09-23 21:55:07,530 INFO [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Running system integrity checker org.apache.cloudstack.utils.identity.ManagementServerNode@68374cdf 2014-09-23 21:55:11,573 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackAccountDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_72cea584 2014-09-23 21:55:11,577 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.OfferingDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_7d914de 2014-09-23 21:55:11,577 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SMetaDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_248004d6 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.UserCredentialsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c581cff5 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultipartMetaDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_be88795 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackConfigurationDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_33b417b3 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.BucketPolicyDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_8b4e8178 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SObjectItemDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_6f613941 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MHostMountDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c4646d50 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MHostDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_364c8f91 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultiPartUploadsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_f1c134be 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SBucketDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c2fd7189 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SAclDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_35ec4a05 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultiPartPartsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_bdbb5f40 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackSvcOfferingDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_bd114ba3 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SHostDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_5edf05db 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SObjectDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_45b975cc 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackUserDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_4107fb26 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.service.core.ec2.EC2Engine_EnhancerByCloudStack_98465a7c 2014-09-23 21:55:11,624 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.service.controller.s3.ServiceProvider_EnhancerByCloudStack_c376f4f1 2014-09-23 21:55:11,692 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Starting com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackAccountDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_72cea584 2014-09-23 21:55:11,692 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Starting
SystemVM SSH Keys
Hello, I just realized, upon setting up CloudStack, I am without system VM ssh keys. Is there a script and/or something I can do to get this generated? - Mo
What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack?
OWASP has some security-related modules which would be great to incorporate into CloudStack: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_Encoder_Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_JSON_Sanitizer These are BSD licensed. What is the process for bundling them into CloudStack? Legal review, etc.?
Re: cloudstack 4.4 access return 404 after cloudstack-management restart
Ning Wang, Can you try the latest version of 4.4? Hugo made a fix to a db issue and I am curious if it is related. On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Ning Wang wangning...@gmail.com wrote: thanks all! the last lines of management-server.log: !2438 # tail -50 management-server.log 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.ExtensionRegistry] (main:null) Registering extension [Baremetal Manager] in [Api Commands Registry] 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.RegistryLifecycle] (main:null) Registered com.cloud.baremetal.manager.BaremetalManagerImpl@58b5c43 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.ExtensionRegistry] (main:null) Registering extension [ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl] in [Api Commands Registry] 2014-09-23 21:55:07,389 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.l.r.RegistryLifecycle] (main:null) Registered org.apache.cloudstack.discovery.ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl@5ca3eca9 2014-09-23 21:55:07,514 INFO [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Running system integrity checker com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrityChecker@3837eb50 2014-09-23 21:55:07,514 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) Grabbing lock to check for database integrity. 2014-09-23 21:55:07,516 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) Performing database integrity check 2014-09-23 21:55:07,526 DEBUG [c.c.u.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:null) No duplicate hosts with the same local storage found in database 2014-09-23 21:55:07,527 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.VersionDaoImpl] (main:null) Checking to see if the database is at a version before it was the version table is created 2014-09-23 21:55:07,530 INFO [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Running system integrity checker org.apache.cloudstack.utils.identity.ManagementServerNode@68374cdf 2014-09-23 21:55:11,573 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackAccountDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_72cea584 2014-09-23 21:55:11,577 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.OfferingDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_7d914de 2014-09-23 21:55:11,577 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SMetaDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_248004d6 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.UserCredentialsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c581cff5 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultipartMetaDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_be88795 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackConfigurationDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_33b417b3 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.BucketPolicyDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_8b4e8178 2014-09-23 21:55:11,578 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SObjectItemDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_6f613941 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MHostMountDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c4646d50 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MHostDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_364c8f91 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultiPartUploadsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_f1c134be 2014-09-23 21:55:11,579 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SBucketDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_c2fd7189 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SAclDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_35ec4a05 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.MultiPartPartsDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_bdbb5f40 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackSvcOfferingDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_bd114ba3 2014-09-23 21:55:11,580 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SHostDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_5edf05db 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.SObjectDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_45b975cc 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.persist.dao.CloudStackUserDaoImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_4107fb26 2014-09-23 21:55:11,581 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.service.core.ec2.EC2Engine_EnhancerByCloudStack_98465a7c 2014-09-23 21:55:11,624 INFO [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring
Re: What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack?
Can you share with us what you’re trying to do with it? On 24-Sep-2014, at 8:10 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: OWASP has some security-related modules which would be great to incorporate into CloudStack: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_Encoder_Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_JSON_Sanitizer These are BSD licensed. What is the process for bundling them into CloudStack? Legal review, etc.? Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [ACS441] merge request: hotfix/4.4-7574
Same here wrt OS name, did quick search to find the relevant enum from Vmware docs, but could not find one. Hence wondered if we even support it. Will do a more thorough search and probably submit a merge request if found. Amogh On 9/23/14 7:15 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I guest so, but I don't know the OS name to define in VMware :-S I don't have a VMware system in hand. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Do we claim support for these OS on vmware too? Amogh On 9/23/14 5:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Hi Dahn, can you merge this branch into 4.4, I've test creation of windows 8.1, 2012r2 and centos6.5 on xenserver. Thanks, Pierre-Luc
Re: What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack?
Demitrius, I second Rohits request. That said the BSD license is on the A-list at [1] so no problem there. We must agree it makes technical sense to include them. There must be attribution in the LICENSE file. they should be maven central includable so we don't have to put them in our source tree. and that's it. [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Can you share with us what you’re trying to do with it? On 24-Sep-2014, at 8:10 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: OWASP has some security-related modules which would be great to incorporate into CloudStack: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_Encoder_Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_JSON_Sanitizer These are BSD licensed. What is the process for bundling them into CloudStack? Legal review, etc.? Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [ACS441] merge request: hotfix/4.4-7574
wow, be quick about it. I just baked a trial release candidate :P On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Same here wrt OS name, did quick search to find the relevant enum from Vmware docs, but could not find one. Hence wondered if we even support it. Will do a more thorough search and probably submit a merge request if found. Amogh On 9/23/14 7:15 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I guest so, but I don't know the OS name to define in VMware :-S I don't have a VMware system in hand. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Do we claim support for these OS on vmware too? Amogh On 9/23/14 5:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Hi Dahn, can you merge this branch into 4.4, I've test creation of windows 8.1, 2012r2 and centos6.5 on xenserver. Thanks, Pierre-Luc -- Daan
Re: [ACS441] merge request: hotfix/4.4-7574
it is on branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100 and has commit-id 620ad650bdda23cabdf4c9dc480072c02c59a2d1 btw, On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: wow, be quick about it. I just baked a trial release candidate :P On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Same here wrt OS name, did quick search to find the relevant enum from Vmware docs, but could not find one. Hence wondered if we even support it. Will do a more thorough search and probably submit a merge request if found. Amogh On 9/23/14 7:15 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I guest so, but I don't know the OS name to define in VMware :-S I don't have a VMware system in hand. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Do we claim support for these OS on vmware too? Amogh On 9/23/14 5:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Hi Dahn, can you merge this branch into 4.4, I've test creation of windows 8.1, 2012r2 and centos6.5 on xenserver. Thanks, Pierre-Luc -- Daan -- Daan
Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Hi, Couple of things : 1. The error will be logged to the cloudstack management server log file (management-server.log) and would really help to know what it is. 2. While uploading the certificate, the domain_suffix should be somedomain.tld and not *.somedomain.tld (the asterisk is only for global config so that cloudstack can distinguish between HTTP and HTTPS modes) Thanks Amogh On 9/24/14 7:40 AM, France mailingli...@isg.si wrote: Hi guys, i want to migrate away from realhostip.com. I have set up DNS service in no time, but am having problems importing certificates to ACS 3.4.1. I created my own CA like this: cd /etc/pki/CA touch index.txt echo 1000 serial openssl genrsa -aes256 -out /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem 4096 chmod 400 /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem nano -w /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf openssl req -new -x509 -days 63650 -key /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem -sha256 -extensions v3_ca -out /etc/pki/CA/certs/ca.cert.pem Signed my own keys and converted them to pkcs8 format like this: cd /etc/pki/CA openssl genrsa -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem 4096 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem openssl req -sha256 -new -key private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem -out certs/vse.somedomain.tld.csr.pem openssl ca -keyfile private/ca.key.pem -cert certs/ca.cert.pem -extensions usr_cert -notext -md sha256 -days 63649 -in certs/vse.somedomain.tld.csr.pem -out certs/vse.somedomain.tld.cert.pem openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -in private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pem -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 openssl pkcs8 -in private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 -out private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.encrypted.pkcs8 chmod 400 private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 But when trying to import it via GUI: infrastructure - SSL Certificate: Certificate from vse.somedomain.tld.cert.pem PKCS8 from private/vse.somedomain.tld.key.pkcs8 DNS domain suffix to: *.somedomain.tld But it fails with: Failed to update SSL Certificate. Please help me upload the new certificate. Catalina.out shows no error. I have no idea what else to check. Thank you. F.
Jenkins build is back to normal : simulator-singlerun #434
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/434/changes
Re: Regarding commit 7f440854f7bcd41a1bd6581c0239cde2e98261b7
Devdeep,
Guess I made a booboo. It should have read like this , agree?
cmd = resource.getCurrentStatus(_id);
while ( cmd == null ++retried
_HostPingRetryCount.value())
{
cmd = resource.getCurrentStatus(_id);
Thread.sleep(1000*_HostPingRetryTimer.value());
}
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi Daan,
I am looking into bug [1] which reports that the vmsync functionality is
broken on master. If a vm deployed by cloudstack is stopped directly on the
hypervisor, its state is not updated in cloudstack. I see that in commit
7f440854f7bcd41a1bd6581c0239cde2e98261b7, a change was made to retry
retrieving the resource status (PingCommand) to deal with network glitches.
However, there is an issue with the commit and it has caused a regression
with the vmsync functionality. Now, by default, the PingTask is not
checking for the status of the resource. This breaks vmsync for all direct
connected agents, which includes xenserver, hyper-v etc.
I'll be submitting a fix for this issue. Do let me know if you have any
concerns with it.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7598
Regards,
Devdeep
--
Daan
RE: What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack?
Both these are at Maven Central. CloudStack cross-site scripting defenses should be improved. The project doesn't have mature encoder/sanitization for JSON and HTML so these might be useful for those purposes. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:07 PM To: dev Subject: Re: What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack? Demitrius, I second Rohits request. That said the BSD license is on the A-list at [1] so no problem there. We must agree it makes technical sense to include them. There must be attribution in the LICENSE file. they should be maven central includable so we don't have to put them in our source tree. and that's it. [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Can you share with us what you’re trying to do with it? On 24-Sep-2014, at 8:10 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: OWASP has some security-related modules which would be great to incorporate into CloudStack: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_Encoder_Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_JSON_Sanitizer These are BSD licensed. What is the process for bundling them into CloudStack? Legal review, etc.? Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: conf values for 4.4 from master
Sorry I don't understand why you cannot find them in 4.4. As I pointed out
before, here are the two lines in 4.4 release, in schema-430to440.sql.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql;h=cd4ba3603f2d1ff67d973afef8caf9be005a4965;hb=c9672d8b5710e597bca3a81a7b06dc90c7f5b1f7#l1660
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component,
name, value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced',
'DEFAULT', 'NetworkOrchestrationService',
'router.redundant.vrrp.interval', '1', 'seconds between VRRP
broadcast. It would 3 times broadcast fail to trigger fail-over
mechanism of redundant router', '1') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
category='Advanced';
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql;h=cd4ba3603f2d1ff67d973afef8caf9be005a4965;hb=c9672d8b5710e597bca3a81a7b06dc90c7f5b1f7#l1670
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component,
name, value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced',
'DEFAULT', 'NetworkOrchestrationService',
'router.aggregation.command.each.timeout', '3', 'timeout in seconds
for each Virtual Router command being aggregated. The final
aggregation command timeout would be determined by this timeout *
commands counts ', '3') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE category='Advanced';
--Sheng
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Daan,
These are already added for 4.4's schema-430to440.sql (and your second
mail
is the same as the first case of first mail...)
The last line is no issue indeed. the lines 797 and 798 from master are
not in the 4.4 branch:
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component, name,
value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced', 'DEFAULT',
'NetworkOrchestrationService', 'router.redundant.vrrp.interval', '1',
'seconds between VRRP broadcast. It would 3 times broadcast fail to trigger
fail-over mechanism of redundant router', '1') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
category='Advanced';
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component, name,
value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced', 'DEFAULT',
'NetworkOrchestrationService', 'router.aggregation.command.each.timeout',
'3', 'timeout in seconds for each Virtual Router command being aggregated.
The final aggregation command timeout would be determined by this timeout *
commands counts ', '3') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE category='Advanced';
these two lines where added by you to the file schema-430to440.sql in
master but not in 4.4
--
Daan
4.5 build failing inconsistently while executing SAMLUtilsTest
Hi All. 4.5 build failing inconsistently while running SAMLUtilsTest, if we re-run the build it works fine, anyone observed this Defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7626 created for this. Regards, Rayees
Re: SystemVM file name changes
On Sep 24, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: Aren’t they published to S3 somewhere? It’d probably be better if users fetch systemvms from S3…… Both not a clue what the S3 urls are though. Based on http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3f6b7b36-32a2-4f11-aeff-36a400d67...@gmail.com%3E It ought to be https://s3.amazonaws.com/systemvm-templates.cloudstack.org/master/32/systemvmtemplate-master-xen.vhd.bz2 https://s3.amazonaws.com/systemvm-templates.cloudstack.org/master/64/systemvm64template-master-xen.vhd.bz2 and so forth but I’m getting permission denied. Hugo, any idea? Isn't this what we use /etc/cloudstack-release for? You could include extra information in there if you wish, version, branch, git sha1, etc. which would give great traceability. Sounds like a plan. I’ll see about submitting a patch tonight. The issue is that /etc/cloudstack-release is parsed in a location or two (I forget the details) so it kind-of has to match existing regexes. Grmbl is all I have to say. In the meantime... export BUILD_NUMBER= at the right place in the relevant build job should fix the immediate issue... Did this. Next builds _should_ be back to their old urls. g’night! Leo
system vm ssh keys
Is there a backend script I could run to regenerate the SsH keys for the system vms. It seems somehow when I built this, those didn't get populated. During the installation I ran into issue, perhaps that is the reason behind this. Either way, help would be appreciated. Mo
Review Request 26008: CLOUDSTACK-7627: Automated Remote Access VPN on VPC Test Cases
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26008/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sangeetha hariharan, sanjeev n, Santhosh
Edukulla, and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Summary (updated)
-
CLOUDSTACK-7627: Automated Remote Access VPN on VPC Test Cases
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7627
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7627
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description (updated)
---
Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC.
I successfully automated the following components:
1.VPN Client Installation on Linux
2.Component that efficiently verifies Remote VPN Access between client and the
Server.
3.Developed a component that automates VPN Client Configuration and services.
4.Test Cases of the Feature
5.Tested the Code multiple times on XenServer and fixed the bugs.
Diffs (updated)
-
test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py PRE-CREATION
tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py bebcab9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26008/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
Testing Done on Two Configurations: XenServer and VMWare
XenServer Test Results:
Test case 01 : Enable VPN for Public IP Address on the VPC ... === TestName:
test_01_RemoteAccessVPN_VPC_EnableVPNAndConnecttoVM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 02 : Remote a VPN User ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_RemoveVPNUser |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 03 : Add a Different VPN User and Test Access with already existing
VPN User ... === TestName: test_03_VPC_AddDifferentVPNUser | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
Test case 04 : Add a Previously Removed VPN User from the VPC and Test the VPN
Connectivity ... === TestName:
test_04_VPC_AddPreviouslyRemovedVPNUserTestConnectivity | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 05 : Disable the VPN Service on the VPC ... === TestName:
test_05_VPC_DisableVPNServiceOnVPC | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 06 : Enabled Previously Dsiabled VPN Access to VPC. ... === TestName:
test_06_VPC_EnablePreviouslyDisabledVPNAccesstoVPC | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 07 : Create Nine VPN Users to test the remote.vpn.user.limit=8
Configuration parameter ... === TestName:
test_07_ConfigParam_TestRemoteVPNUserLimit | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
Ran 7 tests in 851.687s
OK
VMWare Test Results:
=== TestName: None | Status : EXCEPTION ===
SKIP: Only XenServer VPNClient Template is ready currently. KVM,VMWare or
Hyper-V VPN Client Templates are not ready. Skipping the test suite for those
configurations
begin captured stdout -
=== TestName: None | Status : EXCEPTION ===
- end captured stdout --
begin captured logging
CSLog: DEBUG: Obtain the Admin's API Client
CSLog: DEBUG: Get the dictionary information that will be used during CCP
tests, from test_data.py present on the Client
CSLog: DEBUG: Payload: {'apiKey':
u'fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQ',
'command': 'listDomains', 'signature': '5BHLOjDELImWRpvI/16LQ/TrLRM=',
'response': 'json'}
CSLog: DEBUG: Sending GET Cmd : listDomains===
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.220.135.90
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQcommand=listDomainsresponse=jsonsignature=5BHLOjDELImWRpvI%2F16LQ%2FTrLRM%3D
HTTP/1.1 200 159
CSLog: DEBUG: Response : [{path : u'ROOT', haschild : False, id :
u'42ebae70-4375-11e4-86a1-66733ba24ed8', name : u'ROOT', level : 0}]
CSLog: DEBUG: Payload: {'apiKey':
u'fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQ',
'name': u'XenRT-Zone-0', 'command': 'listZones', 'signature':
'MH3voxNCEMIMA3deggb/EVxAog8=', 'response': 'json'}
CSLog: DEBUG: Sending GET Cmd : listZones===
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.220.135.90
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?response=jsonapiKey=fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQcommand=listZonesname=XenRT-Zone-0signature=MH3voxNCEMIMA3deggb%2FEVxAog8%3D
HTTP/1.1 200 416
CSLog: DEBUG: Response : [{localstorageenabled : False, name : u'XenRT-Zone-0',
guestcidraddress : u'192.168.200.0/24', tags : [], zonetoken :
u'd8f55583-777e-3f86-9a97-8b35a24bd558', dns1 : u'10.220.247.5',
securitygroupsenabled : False, allocationstate : u'Enabled', internaldns1 :
u'10.220.112.11', dhcpprovider : u'VirtualRouter', networktype : u'Advanced',
id : u'60a2c7cc-0f4f-4114-978a-f67b0aa9d25c'}]
CSLog: CRITICAL: EXCEPTION: None:
Re: Review Request 26008: CLOUDSTACK-7627: Automated Remote Access VPN on VPC Test Cases
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26008/
---
(Updated Sept. 25, 2014, 12:15 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, sangeetha hariharan, sanjeev n, Santhosh
Edukulla, and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7627
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7627
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description (updated)
---
Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC.
I successfully automated the following components:
1.VPN Client Installation on Linux
2.Component that efficiently verifies Remote VPN Access between client and the
Server.
3.Developed a component that automates VPN Client Configuration and services.
4.Test Cases of the Feature
5.Tested the Code multiple times on XenServer.
6.Tested the Code multiple times on VMWare (To test Skipping of Test Cases)
Diffs
-
test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py PRE-CREATION
tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py bebcab9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26008/diff/
Testing
---
Testing Done on Two Configurations: XenServer and VMWare
XenServer Test Results:
Test case 01 : Enable VPN for Public IP Address on the VPC ... === TestName:
test_01_RemoteAccessVPN_VPC_EnableVPNAndConnecttoVM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 02 : Remote a VPN User ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_RemoveVPNUser |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 03 : Add a Different VPN User and Test Access with already existing
VPN User ... === TestName: test_03_VPC_AddDifferentVPNUser | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
Test case 04 : Add a Previously Removed VPN User from the VPC and Test the VPN
Connectivity ... === TestName:
test_04_VPC_AddPreviouslyRemovedVPNUserTestConnectivity | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 05 : Disable the VPN Service on the VPC ... === TestName:
test_05_VPC_DisableVPNServiceOnVPC | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 06 : Enabled Previously Dsiabled VPN Access to VPC. ... === TestName:
test_06_VPC_EnablePreviouslyDisabledVPNAccesstoVPC | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test case 07 : Create Nine VPN Users to test the remote.vpn.user.limit=8
Configuration parameter ... === TestName:
test_07_ConfigParam_TestRemoteVPNUserLimit | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
Ran 7 tests in 851.687s
OK
VMWare Test Results:
=== TestName: None | Status : EXCEPTION ===
SKIP: Only XenServer VPNClient Template is ready currently. KVM,VMWare or
Hyper-V VPN Client Templates are not ready. Skipping the test suite for those
configurations
begin captured stdout -
=== TestName: None | Status : EXCEPTION ===
- end captured stdout --
begin captured logging
CSLog: DEBUG: Obtain the Admin's API Client
CSLog: DEBUG: Get the dictionary information that will be used during CCP
tests, from test_data.py present on the Client
CSLog: DEBUG: Payload: {'apiKey':
u'fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQ',
'command': 'listDomains', 'signature': '5BHLOjDELImWRpvI/16LQ/TrLRM=',
'response': 'json'}
CSLog: DEBUG: Sending GET Cmd : listDomains===
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.220.135.90
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQcommand=listDomainsresponse=jsonsignature=5BHLOjDELImWRpvI%2F16LQ%2FTrLRM%3D
HTTP/1.1 200 159
CSLog: DEBUG: Response : [{path : u'ROOT', haschild : False, id :
u'42ebae70-4375-11e4-86a1-66733ba24ed8', name : u'ROOT', level : 0}]
CSLog: DEBUG: Payload: {'apiKey':
u'fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQ',
'name': u'XenRT-Zone-0', 'command': 'listZones', 'signature':
'MH3voxNCEMIMA3deggb/EVxAog8=', 'response': 'json'}
CSLog: DEBUG: Sending GET Cmd : listZones===
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.220.135.90
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?response=jsonapiKey=fGs23pVVge8K-HxeQCo3WBCria7hJs5JZW_j7cKnX1mMpbBKH8JwNCxcWHxBgA-slwW0d1YJHJKbCX_Doc3-GQcommand=listZonesname=XenRT-Zone-0signature=MH3voxNCEMIMA3deggb%2FEVxAog8%3D
HTTP/1.1 200 416
CSLog: DEBUG: Response : [{localstorageenabled : False, name : u'XenRT-Zone-0',
guestcidraddress : u'192.168.200.0/24', tags : [], zonetoken :
u'd8f55583-777e-3f86-9a97-8b35a24bd558', dns1 : u'10.220.247.5',
securitygroupsenabled : False, allocationstate : u'Enabled', internaldns1 :
u'10.220.112.11', dhcpprovider : u'VirtualRouter', networktype : u'Advanced',
id : u'60a2c7cc-0f4f-4114-978a-f67b0aa9d25c'}]
CSLog: CRITICAL: EXCEPTION: None: ['Traceback (most recent call
Re: What is process for bundling third-party code with CloudStack?
Process is to submit a patch - get that approved. Make sure that the bundling information is documented in NOTICE. --David On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: OWASP has some security-related modules which would be great to incorporate into CloudStack: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_Encoder_Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_JSON_Sanitizer These are BSD licensed. What is the process for bundling them into CloudStack? Legal review, etc.?
