Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2
Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot with XenServer 6.2. Upgrade went smoothly, systemvm upgraded well so far I've only found 2 missing label in the UI: ( label.add.isolated.guest.network, label.password.reset.confirm). We need make sure to provide the systemvm template with the commit: 805704721fbbbcce7aecfaa8aa214cfc8ab3bdfc which should provide a working management VPN to Guest Network and VPC. I'm still testing over the weekend... For the Release-Notes, this jira filter: 12329800 does list 4.5.0 new features and Improvement, from it there is not much to say for the RN, but considering the huge amount of bug fixes contained in 4.5.0, does anyone have insight on new stuff in this release to spice up the What's new section? thanks On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It definitely wouldn't break my heart if we had until Monday close of business (say, Pacific Time) to vote. I haven't been able to focus as much on testing this build as I would have liked and could use the weekend. On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Please note the RC2 works fine on fresh installations but failed on upgrade for a packaging related issue (fixable manually CLOUDSTACK-7316, this has been fixed on 4.5 now). Before voting I want to confirm if anyone can reproduce the following: - Register new 4.5 template, upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.5.0 RC2 and destroy old systemvms - New secondary storage VM starts but agent status gets stuck in connecting state sometimes. After this I'm unable to register new templates though starting VMs using existing templates work. - Rapid logs are seen: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8183 (I'm not sure how to fix this, still exploring) - Likely an environment issue, console proxy did not work in advance zone for me though it worked for me in basic zone On Tuesday 27 January 2015 09:53 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150127T0405;hb=4.5-RC20150127T0405 Commit: dbfb78d4b8ad074f602540002e8678432d258bb5 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... ===
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing fixed. When will the next RC be cut? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 31 January, 2015 13:57:33 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing fixed. When will the next RC be cut? Lucian I've already cut RC2 that should include the kvmclock fixes. --David
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Actually, there are two sections in that doc that specify different Libvirt versions (depending on what you need to do): * 0.9.4 * 0.9.11 (maybe this version has to be compiled from source?) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment ::
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I am able to manually create a VM on KVM using an ISO. I just can't create a VM via CloudStack due to that exception. On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
Re: RBD snapshot format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/2015 04:43 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: Hi Wido, I didn't see the format information for snapshots stored in the database, so I'm assuming it references the associated volume format. Yes, it is. I assume the cleanest way to get around that would be to have a separate format field for snapshots, but that wouldn't really make sense just for this one use case. Another way would be to just have the restore (create template from snapshot, etc.) function always assume QCOW2 for RBD snapshots, but that's dirty, and would cause problems for existing snapshots. That would be dirty, since I don't think we can actually know if a snapshpot was from a RBD volume when it's on SS. Maybe qemu-img can detect the input format? That way we don't have to specify it. It seems like the best method would be to have the restore function look at the actual file to get the format information instead of pulling it from the database, though I'm not sure if that's even possible. I think that would be the best option indeed. Does anyone else have any thoughts or suggestions? Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: On 01/29/2015 10:05 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: Hi Wido, The relevant code for this is in: I saw that the destination format is set to QCOW2 for createTemplateFromVolume, but in backupSnapshot it's set to use the format of the source image destFile.setFormat(snapshotDisk.getFormat()); I believe just changing the backupSnapshot code to the use QCOW2 destFile.setFormat(PhysicalDiskFormat.QCOW2); will work fine. I can submit a patch for that, but I wanted to make sure there wasn't some other reason for the RAW output first. No, that won't work. Because the management server will then still think it's in RAW format and store that in the database. It has been a long time since I looked at this. I know I did some work in this area and made some patches. Wido Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: On 01/29/2015 05:16 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: I was doing some testing earlier this week on a KVM cluster, and noticed that when using S3 for secondary storage snapshots on RBD primary storage take a lot longer than they do with NFS primary storage. I think this is due to the NFS snapshots being output/uploaded in QCOW2 format, while RBD snapshots are output in RAW format. It appears that even when using sparse RAW files they are uploaded to S3 with the 'allocated' size instead of the sparse size. The problem here lies in the code in CloudStack. Since the source volume is in RAW format, the snapshot also becomes QCOW2. I remember that I wrote some patches for this, you might want to look in the Git history. My question is: Is there a good reason for RBD snapshots to be output as RAW instead of QCOW2? It appears that QCOW2 templates are automatically converted when deploying them as RBD, so that shouldn't be a problem. The only downside I can think of would be having to convert the RAW RBD data to QCOW2 as an extra step when creating snapshots, but even that seems like it would take less time than uploading the RAW images to S3. Thoughts? Like I said, I think I wrote patches for this. Qemu-img is used to convert the RAW RBD into the snapshot, so QCOW2 should be no problem as output format. But the code in CloudStack seems to assume that the snapshot volume is always the same format as the source. Wido P.S.: I'm on vacation in Norway at the moment, so I'm pretty laggy with replying. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUzc2zAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCLFAP/0FuGqOTlo4DW40tP4v70zQ5 cjF1s9rg9Afd4OGc6KmcG2OxR/A68xMuHxJCPwVZjFlcNLMEWx8goxmJd9qLQaMM es1xHynmSO3owhA9d7bRhvfL4M9mf/w/oSn1IQZ5l9v7bJX9y5iGuPkMPlBT5yej yFWA92AAEVgne1J/E4JvoZbDoyAYVecrDPmFD8oP/9R2I7MlUr5134aShBIhJPM/ UgsY06dKfAWI2cW5vZxzw4haNTk68BMgjp6IBkirHqLL1wZa7R83c8/ygXsbvStJ z5bLrxtLtwy6d3utjwJkfdtdnAfuiqZFOKdgxvhlS30Q0Y2XGLXfA3+DLVGmDBF5 xksxiAvhpvxkJIMYZx5icFJmNVu5NiaNn6yKRTkJzA687emF4fSjn1pgTHMp+hhB gkZcYiazrrdFU0ibFkQMNWhT80Pc9spcJEMFkX32GnXTK8EOR7hqRpGrS1LLQjnk XrukOOOjlHnQnRS8kTP9y2Rr5zBUnB6kVwd8DYCJGYdQUPlHaMOGPC9che7HzmFg qzNPHm/WakWotlAldYOPFzmoV16jzF+j6lpgnREZMTq3DNVk6fRH4vzjIvlWzsbF Rrq+7KbNxYc0SJfmTBh0jV/Zpm85ed0kYzXBnekq8ryItF1e2P5t4zoVcC7XHb9n Y2Qvi+YYYZPW6fYIiznr =TcvA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone ::
Re: Adding a new rewrite rule on ssvm apache
config_ssl.sh script is run as part of cloud service start and it restores apache config from the original file (dont know why its done this way) I added the rewrite rules before returning from config_apache2_conf in this script and now I can see them. Thanks for your help Daan. ~Rajani On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: As per the logic in cloud-early-config, patch* function, it will always copy as long as the md5 changes. I think, something is overwriting it again. But, couldn't figure out what and from where. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 16:15 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Are there option-changes that would force a copy of the apache conf files? I don't think these will be copied irrespectively from the systemvm.iso as they will be installed on the template image as well. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: On the current master for 4.6. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 15:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rajani, which version? (dumb question, I know) I am not sure how it is used and whether it is overridden. I know this is a field the vr re-write for redundant-vpc touches on. Ian and WIlder are working on that but no code for the VR has been merged to master yet. Just dome of the Mananger bit. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Hi all, I am trying to add new rewrite rules to ssvm apache. I added them in the default-ssl file under ssvm patches. This file is in the systemvm.iso but isn't getting overwritten in the actual location(/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl) and hence the new rewrite rules aren't working. Anyone knows the right way to add them?Maybe I am looking at the wrong file? Thanks, -- Sent from Windows Phone -- Daan -- Sent from Windows Phone -- Daan -- Sent from Windows Phone
Re: Any Plan of Distributed VR Within cloudstack?
Awesome. look forward the relase and hope to make contribuation. On Jan 31, 2015 7:28 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Yitao, We, at Schuberg Philis, are currently working on the implementation of Redundant VPCs. We are now on the test phase and the first open demo of it will take place in London, 12th February, during the Cloudstack European User Group meeting ( http://shapeblue.com/events/cloudstack-european-user-group-3/) Once the work is pushed towards master we will put some documentation on the Apache CS wiki and ando get the community involved with the development. After the 12th Feb I will send more details about the status and what we are using. Cheers, Wilder On 30 Jan 2015, at 01:16, Yitao Jiang willier...@gmail.commailto: willier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,guys I just want to know is there any plan to develop distributed vr feature, and What's the progress now? --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io
