Re: API: listUsageRecords

[Ramzi Youssefi]

Hi Praveen,

thank you for your reply!
I was checking in the database for usage data and I realised that all usage
tables are empty. I think this is because I'm using the simulator, which
only mocks some virtual machines and storage devices (among others).

It would be great if I could at least have a json file with some data
examples. Do you know where I can find something like this?

Thanks!

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Praveen B  wrote:

> Hi Ramzi,
>
> A couple of checks for troubleshooting your usage data issue
> 1) Check whether  usage data is generated for the selective range
> - You can validate this by going through usage log located in
> /var/log/cloudstack/usage/usage.log file OR check data in usage
>DB tables. To make it simple, always check for latest data.
>
> 2) If you have an other cloudstack instance, execute same API call on
> it to confirm whether API parameters are correct or not.
> I am not sure about simulator whether it can generate and show
> usage data or not. Give us the API call that you used.
>
> listUsageRecords API is programmed in a way that it can be executed by only
> admins. Users may not be able to execute it.
> Since you are calling this API through billing module, can you try to use
> admin's keys for all users in the code and see if normal users also can
> list usage data?
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Ramzi Youssefi 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello dear developers,
> >
> > I'm developing a billing module for Cloudstack and I'm having troubles in
> > two points:
> > 1.- When I call the API I just a receive a response without data (maybe
> > because I'm using the simulator?). Maybe I'm using the wrong call?
> > (startdate and enddate are set)
> >
> > 2.- The idea is that the client can query their usage data but the API
> > won't work for users. Only root and domain admin. Is there any way to
> make
> > possible that the users can call the API?
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
> > --
> > Ramzi Youssefi
> > Görlitzer Str. 49
> > 01099 Dresden, Germany.
> > Cell: +49 173 1965465
> > Email: ryouss...@gmail.com
> >
>



-- 
Ramzi Youssefi
Görlitzer Str. 49
01099 Dresden, Germany.
Cell: +49 173 1965465
Email: ryouss...@gmail.com

[VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Ian Duffy]

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
proposing the donation of gstack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

[VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Ian Duffy]

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Nux!]

Hello Easter bunny, this is great news! :)

+1 from me 

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Ian Duffy" 
> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
> Cc: "Sebastien Goasguen" , "Darren Brogan" 
> 
> Sent: Sunday, 5 April, 2015 10:14:07
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

> Hi All,
> 
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
> 
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> 
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Nux!]

+1 

Thanks!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Ian Duffy" 
> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
> Cc: "Darren Brogan" , "Sebastien Goasguen" 
> 
> Sent: Sunday, 5 April, 2015 10:12:39
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

> Hi All,
> 
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
> 
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> 
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/remaining xenserver resources re...

[wilderrodrigues]

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/146

Refactor/remaining xenserver resources rebase

XenServer 6.2 running under our VMWare zone
CloudStack Management Server running on MacBook Pro
MySql running on MackBook Pro
Storage Type: Local

Integration Tests

Source: https://github.com/wilderrodrigues/cloudstack_integration_tests

test_accounts.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers.py
test_redundant_vpc.py
test_vpc_routers.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_vpc_offerings.py
test_vpc_vpn.py


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack 
refactor/remaining_xenserver_resources-REBASE

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/146.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #146


commit bcee7281c6e961a726a0543ebeb939694d05a819
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-02T21:31:52Z

Started refctoring the remaining XenServer resources

   - Just cleaning the formating

commit 240bcb8120d709897baaade2d4e2cb29c5c482f9
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T09:52:53Z

Refactoring the GetGPUStatsCommand wrapper in order to cope with new design

   - Unit tests added: 100% coverage

commit 858b87f01c079f48ed557864be4842d6becaa55c
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T12:39:35Z

Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageCommand wrapper in order to cope with new 
design
   - Unit tests added: 30.1% coverage
   - It's a bit difficult to test the Xen API classes due to their static 
nature

commit c5a2f926e010a77d0cd61485747e199789a23e74
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T13:30:35Z

Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageReceiveCommand wrapper in order to cope 
with new design
   - Unit tests added: 65% coverage
   - It's a bit difficult to test the Xen API classes due to their static 
nature

commit d5414d26b48ef5da0a5906d39b7e785c13e286a4
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T14:13:09Z

Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageSendCommand wrapper in order to cope with 
new design
   - Unit tests added: 47.2% coverage
   - It's a bit difficult to test the Xen API classes due to their static 
nature

commit f6e162afe437eb1aed9dad74e5abebed9225f5d8
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T14:29:08Z

Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageCompleteCommand wrapper in order to cope 
with new design
   - Unit tests added: 50% coverage
   - It's a bit difficult to test the Xen API classes due to their static 
nature

commit 02d1cdd49a1d7e7d2f4493cfeafd97b35eff92a0
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T14:57:07Z

Refactoring the MigrateVolumeCommand wrapper in order to cope with new 
design
   - Unit tests added: 43.1% coverage
   - It's a bit difficult to test the Xen API classes due to their static 
nature

commit 1c7feab07d61797455b42b85dd217dc1b1cd5bca
Author: wilderrodrigues 
Date:   2015-04-03T15:23:16Z

Refactoring the NetworkUsageCommand wrapper in order to cope with new design
   - Unit tests added: 100% coverage




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/remaining xenserver resources re...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/146


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1081

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[wrodrigues] Started refctoring the remaining XenServer resources

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the GetGPUStatsCommand wrapper in order to cope with 
new design

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageCommand wrapper in order to cope 
with new design

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageReceiveCommand wrapper in order 
to cope with new design

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageSendCommand wrapper in order to 
cope with new design

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the MigrateWithStorageCompleteCommand wrapper in order 
to cope with new design

[wrodrigues] Refactoring the MigrateVolumeCommand wrapper in order to cope with 
new design

[wrodrigues] This closes #146

--
[...truncated 10423 lines...]
> Running query: drop database if exists `cloud_usage`
> Running query: create database `cloud_usage`
> Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` 
identified by 'cloud'
> Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`%` 
identified by 'cloud'
> Initializing database=cloudbridge with host=localhost port=3306 
username=cloud password=cloud
> Running query: drop database if exists `cloudbridge`
> Running query: create database `cloudbridge`
> Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` 
identified by 'cloud'
> Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` 
identified by 'cloud'
> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing SQL file at 

> Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ 
cloud-developer ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ 
cloud-developer ---
[INFO] Installing 
 
to 
/var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] 
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 1:52.570s
[INFO] Finished at: Sun Apr 05 07:47:20 EDT 2015
[INFO] Final Memory: 45M/198M
[INFO] 
[WARNING] The requested profile "simulator" could not be activated because it 
does not exist.
[simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-developer ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties 
(default) @ cloud-developer ---
[WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: 

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[sebgoa]

+1 of course

On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Nux!  wrote:

> +1 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ian Duffy" 
>> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
>> Cc: "Darren Brogan" , "Sebastien Goasguen" 
>> 
>> Sent: Sunday, 5 April, 2015 10:12:39
>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
>> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>> 
>> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
>> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
>> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>> 
>> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>> 
>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
>> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Wilder Rodrigues]

+1 for sure!

Cheers,
Wilder

Sent from my iPhone

> On 05 Apr 2015, at 15:00, sebgoa  wrote:
> 
> +1 of course
> 
>> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Nux!  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Ian Duffy" 
>>> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
>>> Cc: "Darren Brogan" , "Sebastien Goasguen" 
>>> 
>>> Sent: Sunday, 5 April, 2015 10:12:39
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack
>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
>>> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>>> 
>>> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
>>> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
>>> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>>> 
>>> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>> 
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
>>> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack
> 

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[David Nalley]

+1 - of course please make sure that it goes through the IP Clearance
process. (I am sure this is planned, but wasn't explicitly stated)

--David

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[David Nalley]

+1

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

CS project page: missing release dates

[Milamber]

Hello,

On this page, a lot a CloudStack version are missing.
http://projects.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html

The doap_CloudStack.rdf file must be update on subversion cloudstack
tree (and publish)

in attach, the missing entries (except 4.5.0)

Milamber

Index: doap_CloudStack.rdf
===
--- doap_CloudStack.rdf	(revision 1671389)
+++ doap_CloudStack.rdf	(working copy)
@@ -58,6 +58,76 @@
   
 
 
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-11-21
+4.4.2
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-10-23
+4.4.1
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-07-26
+4.4.0
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2015-01-09
+4.3.2
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-09-10
+4.3.1
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-03-25
+4.3.0
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2014-01-10
+4.2.1
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2013-10-01
+4.2.0
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2013-08-06
+4.1.1
+  
+
+
+  
+Apache CloudStack
+2013-06-04
+4.1.0
+  
+
+
   
 Apache CloudStack
 2013-04-24

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Mike Tutkowski]

+1

On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Mike Tutkowski]

+1

On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Ian Duffy]

David - yes, vote is required before putting up the IP clearance documents.

All contributors have signed and submitted a CLA to asf. Will do out the
rest of the process if/when voting passes.
On 5 Apr 2015 15:07, "David Nalley"  wrote:

> +1 - of course please make sure that it goes through the IP Clearance
> process. (I am sure this is planned, but wasn't explicitly stated)
>
> --David
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> > proposing the donation of gstack [2].
> >
> > I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> > accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> > into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> >
> > VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> > [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Sebastien Goasguen]

+1

> On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski  
> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
> 
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> 
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike Tutkowski
> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud™
> 

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Alex Huang]

+1

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:58 AM Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

> +1
>
> > On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> > proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
> >
> > I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> > accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> > into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> >
> > VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> > [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Tutkowski
> > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud™
> >
>
>

Re: CS project page: missing release dates

[Sebastien Goasguen]

> On Apr 5, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Milamber  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On this page, a lot a CloudStack version are missing.
> http://projects.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
> 
> The doap_CloudStack.rdf file must be update on subversion cloudstack
> tree (and publish)
> 
> in attach, the missing entries (except 4.5.0)
> 
> Milamber
> 

Can’t you apply the patch, since you are a member ? or is that a PMC only thing 
?

> 

Re: CS project page: missing release dates

[Milamber]

On 05/04/2015 18:03, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Milamber  wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On this page, a lot a CloudStack version are missing.
>> http://projects.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
>>
>> The doap_CloudStack.rdf file must be update on subversion cloudstack
>> tree (and publish)
>>
>> in attach, the missing entries (except 4.5.0)
>>
>> Milamber
>>
> Can’t you apply the patch, since you are a member ? or is that a PMC only 
> thing ?

Done.

I've try with success to commit on Cloudstack svn tree (I suppose that
is my new member status).
I think that was a PMC task ("web site update"), the ASF member don't
have special rights on the management of project (pmc). I'm a special
case with my member + commiter CS roles :-)


>
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

+1

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Alex Huang  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:58 AM Sebastien Goasguen 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> > > proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
> > >
> > > I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> > > accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> > > into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
> > >
> > > VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> > > [2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud™
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: CS project page: missing release dates

[Sebastien Goasguen]

> On Apr 5, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Milamber  wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/04/2015 18:03, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>> On Apr 5, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Milamber  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> On this page, a lot a CloudStack version are missing.
>>> http://projects.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
>>> 
>>> The doap_CloudStack.rdf file must be update on subversion cloudstack
>>> tree (and publish)
>>> 
>>> in attach, the missing entries (except 4.5.0)
>>> 
>>> Milamber
>>> 
>> Can’t you apply the patch, since you are a member ? or is that a PMC only 
>> thing ?
> 
> Done.
> 
> I've try with success to commit on Cloudstack svn tree (I suppose that
> is my new member status).
> I think that was a PMC task ("web site update"), the ASF member don't
> have special rights on the management of project (pmc). I'm a special
> case with my member + commiter CS roles :-)

might be a good excuse to make you cloudstack PMC ?


> 
> 
>> 
>>> 

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Erik Weber]

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
>
+1

How does gstack (and ec2stack) handle CloudStack versioning? Do they self
discover API calls, or are they related to specific CloudStack versions?

-- 
Erik

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Erik Weber]

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of ec2stack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>

+1

-- 
Erik

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Ian Duffy]

Erik - Both were wrote to support 4.x. As far as I'm aware there is
suppose to be no breaking API changes between .x versions. (its been
awhile so excuse my lack of examples) but in some cases we noticed
small formatting or rendering differences in older 4.x versions, we
attempted to accommodate these as much as possible. I'm not aware of
any clever way to do this other than fix them as we see them. very
much so open to suggestions.

While writing it we tested against exoscale which was 4.0.2 at the
time. We also tested against the 4.2 simulator and based the test
cases of 4.2 simulator replies. Feel free to check out
https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack/tree/master/tests/data to see
what exactly we test.

I hope this answers your concerns.

On 5 April 2015 at 21:35, Erik Weber  wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
>> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>>
>> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
>> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
>> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>>
>> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>>
>>
> +1
>
> How does gstack (and ec2stack) handle CloudStack versioning? Do they self
> discover API calls, or are they related to specific CloudStack versions?
>
> --
> Erik

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Erik Weber]

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Erik - Both were wrote to support 4.x. As far as I'm aware there is
> suppose to be no breaking API changes between .x versions. (its been
> awhile so excuse my lack of examples) but in some cases we noticed
> small formatting or rendering differences in older 4.x versions, we
> attempted to accommodate these as much as possible. I'm not aware of
> any clever way to do this other than fix them as we see them. very
> much so open to suggestions.
>
> While writing it we tested against exoscale which was 4.0.2 at the
> time. We also tested against the 4.2 simulator and based the test
> cases of 4.2 simulator replies. Feel free to check out
> https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack/tree/master/tests/data to see
> what exactly we test.
>
> I hope this answers your concerns.
>
>
Thanks for the info, it does :-)

-- 
Erik

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 Yes!

> On 05-Apr-2015, at 2:42 pm, Ian Duffy  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> proposing the donation of gstack [2].
>
> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on
> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted
> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey.
>
> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
> [2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Likitha Shetty]

+1

Thanks,
Likitha

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 2:43 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Darren Brogan; Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are proposing 
the donation of gstack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on accepting the 
code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a separate repository 
like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Likitha Shetty]

+1.

Thanks,
Likitha

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 2:44 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen; Darren Brogan
Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are proposing 
the donation of ec2stack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on accepting the 
code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a separate repository 
like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

[Rajesh Battala]

+1

Tjanks
Rajesh Battala

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 2:43 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Darren Brogan; Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of gstack to apache cloudstack

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are proposing 
the donation of gstack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on accepting the 
code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a separate repository 
like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/nopping/gstack

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Rajesh Battala]

+1. Great news

Thanks
Rajesh Battala

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 2:44 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen; Darren Brogan
Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are proposing 
the donation of ec2stack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on accepting the 
code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a separate repository 
like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java => 1.7.0 whe...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-89913657
  
@ghxandsky, do you know why java => 1.7.0 is working with centos7 and not 
with centos63? The surprising thing was, on 6.3 without failing due to missing 
dependency, it installs java 1.6 even on a system which doesnt have java.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

[Suresh Sadhu]

+1. 

Regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 2:44 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen; Darren Brogan
Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of ec2stack to apache cloudstack

Hi All,

As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are proposing 
the donation of ec2stack [2].

I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on accepting the 
code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a separate repository 
like we do with cloudmonkey.

VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/g6iuceghdd37qpr7
[2] https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

Re: [DISCUSS] Allow configuring system VMs to use local storage at zone level

[Prashant Kumar Mishra]

Thanks Koushik for proposing the feature.
I would like to take up testing  for this feature ,I will be uploading
test plan shortly.

Thanks
prashant



On 2/27/15, 4:55 PM, "Koushik Das"  wrote:

>Currently it is not possible to configure system VMs to use local storage
>on a per zone basis. Since it is a global config
>(system.vm.use.local.storage), either it is enabled for all zones or
>none. The idea is to make it a zone level config.
>The current zone level setting of 'enabling local storage for user VMs'
>won't be impacted. Now there will be an additional setting for system VMs
>as well.
>
>I will create a tracking bug and FS for this.
>
>Comments?
>
>Thanks,
>Koushik
>

Re: CS project page: missing release dates

[Milamber]

On 05/04/2015 21:27, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Milamber  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/04/2015 18:03, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
 On Apr 5, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Milamber  wrote:

 Hello,

 On this page, a lot a CloudStack version are missing.
 http://projects.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html

 The doap_CloudStack.rdf file must be update on subversion cloudstack
 tree (and publish)

 in attach, the missing entries (except 4.5.0)

 Milamber

>>> Can’t you apply the patch, since you are a member ? or is that a PMC only 
>>> thing ?
>> Done.
>>
>> I've try with success to commit on Cloudstack svn tree (I suppose that
>> is my new member status).
>> I think that was a PMC task ("web site update"), the ASF member don't
>> have special rights on the management of project (pmc). I'm a special
>> case with my member + commiter CS roles :-)
> might be a good excuse to make you cloudstack PMC ?

yes, would be better for my mind, for example, with the member status, I
have access to pmc / sec lists, but I just in "read only" on my mind
because only committer (the double hats issues).

>
>
>>
 
>