Re: [Feature Request] VM Snapshot based on KVM+Ceph

[Haijiao]

Understand the technical complexity of this feature. 

 Just curious how the other ‘stacks’ get the VM live snapshot to work,  e.g. 
Proxmox VE

 https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Live_Snapshots

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs issue #18: Removed support for Citrix XenServer

[eriweb]

Github user eriweb commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/18
  
The change LGTM, perhaps you could refer to the PR or some info about the 
change?

Also, is there a note in release notes? How should people with xenserver + 
nuage that upgrades handle it?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1480: CLOUDSTACK-9342: Site to Site VPN PFS not being set ...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
  
This does not break anything else.  I will get this merged.  Thx...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1610: packaging: Add db.X.driver=jdbc:mysql to db.properti...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
  
Thx.  I will get this merged...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1480: CLOUDSTACK-9342: Site to Site VPN PFS not being set ...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
  


### CI RESULTS

```
Tests Run: 85
  Skipped: 0
   Failed: 0
   Errors: 0
 Duration: 4h 00m 14s
```



**Associated Uploads**

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_28_19_IFRW0P:`**
* 
[dc_entries.obj](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_28_19_IFRW0P/dc_entries.obj)
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_28_19_IFRW0P/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_28_19_IFRW0P/runinfo.txt)

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_Y1ZW9L:`**
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_Y1ZW9L/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[results.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_Y1ZW9L/results.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_Y1ZW9L/runinfo.txt)

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_AGQXX8:`**
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_AGQXX8/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[results.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_AGQXX8/results.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1480/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_AGQXX8/runinfo.txt)


Uploads will be available until `2016-09-13 02:00:00 +0200 CEST`

*Comment created by [`upr comment`](https://github.com/cloudops/upr).*



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1610: packaging: Add db.X.driver=jdbc:mysql to db.properti...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
  


### CI RESULTS

```
Tests Run: 85
  Skipped: 0
   Failed: 0
   Errors: 0
 Duration: 3h 56m 40s
```



**Associated Uploads**

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_30_56_L489PO:`**
* 
[dc_entries.obj](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_30_56_L489PO/dc_entries.obj)
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_30_56_L489PO/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/DeployDataCenter__Jul_14_2016_15_30_56_L489PO/runinfo.txt)

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_885HWT:`**
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_885HWT/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[results.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_885HWT/results.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_network_885HWT/runinfo.txt)

**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_M5IZWP:`**
* 
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_M5IZWP/failed_plus_exceptions.txt)
* 
[results.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_M5IZWP/results.txt)
* 
[runinfo.txt](https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/e465abe2f9ae4478b9fff416eab61bd9/PR1610/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_vpc_routers_M5IZWP/runinfo.txt)


Uploads will be available until `2016-09-13 02:00:00 +0200 CEST`

*Comment created by [`upr comment`](https://github.com/cloudops/upr).*



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1609: [CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editin...

[pdube]

GitHub user pdube reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609

[CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editing Network ACL rule ordering

BUG: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9430

The issue occurred because all of the ACL rules get inserted before the old 
ones. Then, the cleanup deletes the duplicate rows, and leaves any new rule in 
front of the old ones.

Here is an example with a simplified iptables view for ACL
Ex: adding a rule 4
before add:
1,2,3

during add:
1',2',3',4',1,2,3

after add:
4',1,2,3

After fix:
before add:
1,2,3

during add:
1,2,3,1',2',3',4'

after add:
1',2',3',4'


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack network-acl-add-order

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1609


commit 6dd6ef0c9a30f128657de22fa8b6ea8ab5daa133
Author: Patrick Dube 
Date:   2016-07-11T19:12:41Z

Added fix for adding/editing Network ACL rule ordering




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1609: [CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editin...

[pdube]

Github user pdube closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1609: [CLOUDSTACK-9430] Added fix for adding/editing Netwo...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609
  
can you close and reopen again @pdube?  thx...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks...

[nlivens]

Github user nlivens closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks...

[nlivens]

GitHub user nlivens reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nuage VSP plugin

This is first phase of support of Shared Network in cloudstack through 
NuageVsp Network Plugin. A shared network is a type of virtual network that is 
shared between multiple accounts i.e. a shared network can be accessed by 
virtual machines that belong to many different accounts. This basic 
functionality will be supported with the below common use case:
- shared network can be used for monitoring purposes. A shared network can 
be assigned to a domain and can be used for monitoring VMs belonging to all 
accounts in that domain.

With the current implementation with NuageVsp plugin, Each shared network 
needs its unique IP address range, and can not overlap with another shared 
network. 
In VSD, it is implemented in below manner:
- In order to have tenant isolation for shared networks, we will have to 
create a Shared L3 Subnet for each shared network, and instantiate it across 
the relevant enterprises. A shared network will only exist under an enterprise 
when it is needed, so when the first VM is spinned under that ACS domain inside 
that shared network.

PR contents:
1) Support for shared networks with tenant isolation on master with Nuage 
VSP SDN Plugin.
2) Marvin test coverage for shared networks on master with Nuage VSP SDN 
Plugin.
3) Enhancements on our exiting Marvin test code (nuagevsp plugins 
directory).
4) PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance with our Marvin test code.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack nuage_vsp_shared_networks

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1579


commit 22fb8acf90d12925790375738f74c7c1ec4f6e63
Author: Eric Waegeman 
Date:   2016-05-26T09:37:52Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 57117e05a0e46a9f49b8065f9a7704a2eaeb86d3
Author: Rahul Singal 
Date:   2016-07-01T13:22:50Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Marvin tests for Internal DNS verification with NuageVsp

commit 62b48f93118665288e3229180078448bb7aab3d5
Author: Nick Livens 
Date:   2016-04-28T14:24:50Z

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 596a4332a5e51f766e2b2519125864b9b745dbef
Author: rahul singal 
Date:   2016-06-01T15:31:24Z

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Marvin tests for shared networks verification with 
NuageVsp

commit ea3a72da6836b63d5b1d4ccf9aa6faf7c0492fd3
Author: Nick Livens 
Date:   2016-07-01T14:14:55Z

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nuage VSP plugin

Phase 2: Public Access

commit d66de5e8c0a5bc854557f8465dc3ed954b38e3f2
Author: Frank Maximus 
Date:   2016-06-22T13:22:25Z

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nuage VSP plugin

Phase 2: Public Access

commit 5d41ba44d5455fe6fce3040367955fcbd96fab2b
Author: Rahul Singal 
Date:   2016-07-01T14:20:58Z

CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Marvin tests for shared networks verification with 
NuageVsp

Phase 2: Public Access




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay featur...

[nlivens]

Github user nlivens closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay featur...

[nlivens]

GitHub user nlivens reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Source & Static NAT to 
underlay) in Nuage VSP plugin

Support for underlay features (Source & Static NAT to underlay) with Nuage 
VSP SDN Plugin including Marvin test coverage for corresponding Source & Static 
NAT features on master. Moreover, our Marvin tests are written in such a way 
that they can validate our supported feature set with both Nuage VSP SDN 
platform's overlay and underlay infra.

PR contents:
1) Support for Source NAT to underlay feature on master with Nuage VSP SDN 
Plugin.
2) Support for Static NAT to underlay feature on master with Nuage VSP SDN 
Plugin.
3) Marvin test coverage for Source & Static NAT to underlay on master with 
Nuage VSP SDN Plugin.
4) Enhancements on our exiting Marvin test code (nuagevsp plugins 
directory).
5) PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance with our Marvin test code.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack nuage_vsp_pat_fip2ul

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1580


commit 22fb8acf90d12925790375738f74c7c1ec4f6e63
Author: Eric Waegeman 
Date:   2016-05-26T09:37:52Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Support for Internal DNS in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 57117e05a0e46a9f49b8065f9a7704a2eaeb86d3
Author: Rahul Singal 
Date:   2016-07-01T13:22:50Z

CLOUDSTACK-9401 : Marvin tests for Internal DNS verification with NuageVsp

commit fd5f61c4776fb2404177df1108445a4e8809daae
Author: Nick Livens 
Date:   2016-06-15T09:04:21Z

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Source & Static NAT to 
underlay) in Nuage VSP plugin

commit 315e341a893872b0eecfb737cc659e699dde1eae
Author: Prashanth Manthena 
Date:   2016-05-26T10:48:02Z

CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Marvin tests for Source NAT and Static NAT including 
PAT/FIP2UL features with NuageVsp




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: VMware compatibility

[Jeff Hair]

I forgot about the VMware SDK. Yes, that also has to be updated.

Regarding the guest OS mappings: If the are not there, no matter what the
template is, the code will wind up always picking "Other" to send to
VMware. It's not really noticeable with Linux, but Windows templates will
have issues (at least that's our experience). Once the mappings are in
place, it will send the right guest OS type to VMware and the drivers etc
will be correct.

*Jeff Hair*
Technical Lead and Software Developer

Tel: (+354) 415 0200
j...@greenqloud.com
www.greenqloud.com

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@accelerite.com> wrote:

> Hi Will/Rohit,
>
> Cloudstack was supporting addition of VMware vCenter 6.0 datacenter (and
> ESXi 6.0 hosts in it) to the Zone since the merge of PR <
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/806>, which fixed the
> underlying issues. The current VMware API build version is 6.0 and the SDK
> points to the VMware-vSphere-SDK-6.0.0, Build Number: 3634981 (vSphere 6.0
> U2 Management SDK). I see incorrect download link provided at
> "deps/install-non-oss.sh”, which should be "
> https://my.vmware.com/group/vmware/get-download?downloadGroup=MNGMTSDK60U2”
> instead of "https://my.vmware.com VMware-vSphere-SDK-6.0.0-3634981.zip”,
> for that SDK. Shall I create a PR with this change Or Let Pierre-Luc
> correct this?
>
> Listed below are the VMware SDKs for 6.0.0 and 6.0U2. I’ve tested with SDK
> 6.0.0 and didn’t find any issues. Shall we go with 6.0.0 or the latest
> 6.0U2?
>
> 6.0.0 =>
>
>
>
> https://my.vmware.com/group/vmware/get-download?downloadGroup=MNGMTSDK600
> File: VMware-vSphere-SDK-6.0.0-2561048.zip
> Product: vSphere 6.0 Management SDK
> Version: 6.0.0
> Release Date: 2015-03-12
> Build Number: 2561048
>
>
>
> 6.0U2 (Latest) =>
> https://my.vmware.com/group/vmware/get-download?downloadGroup=MNGMTSDK60U2
> File: VMware-vSphere-SDK-6.0.0-3634981.zip
> Product: vSphere 6.0 U2 Management SDK
> Version: 6.0U2
> Release Date: 2016-03-15
> Build Number: 3634981
>
>
>
>
>
> I’m not sure on the Guest OS mappings, which I’ll check and let you know.
>
> Thanks,
> Suresh
>
>
>
> On 09/07/16 12:40 pm, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Will,
> >
> >Yes while we don't have VMware 6.0 official listed as a supported
> >hypervisor, I've reports from some users who have claim that it works for
> >them in their environment. We have not confirmed that it works for all
> >major environment permutations (basic zone with/without SG, with/without
> >local disks; advanced zone with/without SG, advanced zone with shared
> >networks).
> >
> >Provided that vmware sdk and APIs are still backwards compatible, the
> >current vmware plugin should work with VMware 6.0, but we require a set of
> >tests to conclude that it actually *works* and maybe then we can update
> the
> >list of supported hypervisors in CloudStack admin/release docs.
> >
> >Regards.
> >
> >On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
> >
> >> ​Maybe I am not understanding this correctly:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1569
> >>
> >> Can I get some clarification on this?
> >>
> >> I understand that we will have to add the OS mapping manually for the
> 6.0
> >> version, but this PR is a good reference for how to do it:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/956
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> Lead Developer
> >>
> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Jeff Hair  wrote:
> >>
> >>> 6.0 is not officially supported, though we have found that it will
> work.
> >>> But there are no guest OS mappings, for example. It's easy enough to
> just
> >>> copy the 5.5 mappings over to 6.0 in the
> >>> guest_os/guest_os_hypervisor_mapping tables. So I'd say it would not
> >>> officially be supported in 4.9.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Will Stevens  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Sorry for the mass mails.  I am talking about 4.9 obviously...
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Will Stevens <
> williamstev...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > For that matter, is there any other changes to this page?
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.8.0/compat.html
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Will Stevens <
> >>> williamstev...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Pierre-Luc is on vacation so I can't ask him.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Rohit, below is what is currently in the docs for VMware
> >>> compatibility.
> >>> > >> I believe that 6.0 is also not supported, can you confirm that and
> >>> the
> >>> > >> details that should be in the docs?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> -  VMware versions 5.0 Update 3a, 5.1 Update 2a, and 5.5 Update 2
> >>> > 

Re: XenServer 7

[Erik Weber]

For clarity, is the correct to assume that you'll upstream this to ACS?

-- 
Erik

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Raja Pullela 
wrote:

> Hi Erik
>
> BVT – build verification tests or smoke tests are the test automation
> scripts we have in cloudstack repo.
> We will run these tests first and see if anything is broken.  For any
> failures, we will create bugs.
> IMO, since 4.9 is out, the next version should have the support for XS 7.0.
> Are you look at anything specific feature/functionality in XS 7.0?  can
> you share what it is ?
>
> Best,
> Raja Pullela
> Senior Manager, Product Development
> Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite
> 2055, Laurelwood Road,  Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
> Phone: 1-408-216-7010
>
> On 7/13/16, 11:58 AM, "Erik Weber"  wrote:
>
> Would you mind elaborating a bit what that means?
>
> Does it mean that you have already done some fixing to get it to work and
> will start testing it?
> Or that you plan on testing it now, to figure out what needs fixing?
> Or something else?
>
> I'm trying to figure out when I can expect to use ACS (or a commercial
> distribution) with XS7
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Raja Pullela  >
> wrote:
>
> > we are going to use XS7 for our testing and will be running BVTs/smoke
> > tests against the same.
> >
> > Best,
> > Raja Pullela
> > Senior Manager, Product Development
> > Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite
> > 2055, Laurelwood Road,  Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
> > Phone: 1-408-216-7010
> >
> > On 7/12/16, 2:17 PM, "Erik Weber"  wrote:
> >
> > I'm interested in knowing more about any efforts as well, there are
> several
> > things in XS7 that we really want to use.
> >
> > --
> > Erik
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Paul Angus 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone here working on XenServer 7 support for CloudStack?
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Paul Angus
> > >
> > >
> > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER
> > ==
> > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> > the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> > only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read,
> retain,
> > copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> > this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept
> any
> > liability for virus infected mails.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
> liability for virus infected mails.
>