[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-606)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 40343 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t606-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1020.99 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1237.54 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 516.65 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 381.65 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 636.45 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 562.88 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 43.25 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1546.42 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1274.51 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1308.54 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 43.35 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 621.32 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 488.10 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 549.98 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 868.66 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 836.37 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Error` | 178.81 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 83.76 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 484.75 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 393.68 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 182.96 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 26.57 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 142.32 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 131.87 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 30.61 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.43 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 20.46 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.51 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 22.01 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 393.89 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.35 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 221.63 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 130.97 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 258.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.87 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.41 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 121.33 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.18 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.21 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 75.84 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.79 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 229.26 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 151.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 179.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 142.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 169.39 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_sto

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ...

[murali-reddy]

GitHub user murali-reddy opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821

CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_associations.json and 
ips.json

As part of the bug 'CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple 
Public Interfaces correctly'
issue of mismatch of traffic type represented by 'nw_type' in config sent 
by management server in
ip_associations.json and how it is persisted in the ips.json data bag are 
differnet,
is addressed, however missed the change in final merge.
this bug is to add the functionality in cs_ip.py, to lower the traffic type 
sent by management server before persisting in the ips.json databag

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/murali-reddy/cloudstack 
traffic_type_in_lower_case

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1821


commit 8b4c36ef501a96742c52b4d532cc3adda25aa71b
Author: Murali Reddy 
Date:   2016-12-08T08:49:01Z

CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_associations.json and 
ips.json

As part of the bug 'CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple 
Public Interfaces correctly'
issue of mismatch of traffic type represented by 'nw_type' in config sent 
by management server in
ip_associations.json and how it is persisted in the ips.json data bag are 
differnet,
is addressed, however missed the change in final merge.
this bug is to add the functionality in cs_ip.py, to lower the traffic type 
sent by management server before persisting in the ips.json databag




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates template...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763#discussion_r91479045
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/query/QueryManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -3054,9 +3054,9 @@ private boolean isPermissible(Long accountDomainId, 
Long offeringDomainId) {
 
 boolean listAll = false;
 if (templateFilter != null && templateFilter == 
TemplateFilter.all) {
-if (caller.getType() != Account.ACCOUNT_TYPE_ADMIN) {
+if (caller.getType() == Account.ACCOUNT_TYPE_NORMAL) {
--- End diff --

@sudhansu7 what is the user is a domain admin or resource admin, the `all` 
filter was only allowed for admin?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@sudhansu7 can you share component tests results for 
`component/test_templates.py` in your env? You may need to modified expected 
exception description in this test: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/0cb60a72fea2a216b5e3f6b0d769878b76a3eb03#diff-6d5b393d9c0b364be876fbad5541b09fR652


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-351


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-352


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-353


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@pdube also amend the git commit message to include the JIRA id, such as 
`CLOUDSTACK-: one line summary`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Just manually verified the described bahaviour and it's working ok, code 
looks good as well. Let's wait for the final test run. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd I don't see any smoke testing job in Trillian about this PR, should 
we kick another one?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@rhtyd I'll restart the testing since I noticed the job failed in Trillian

```
10:06:40 PLAY [cloudstack_manager_hosts] 

10:06:41 
10:06:41 TASK [timezone : wait for ssh] 
*
10:13:24 fatal: [pr1763-t623-kvm-centos7-mgmt1 -> localhost]: FAILED! => 
{"changed": false, "elapsed": 401, "failed": true, "msg": "Timeout when waiting 
for 10.2.2.23:22"}
10:13:24 
10:13:24 NO MORE HOSTS LEFT 
*
10:13:24  [WARNING]: Could not create retry file 'deployvms.retry'. 
[Errno 2] No
```

@blueorangutan test



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1822: CLOUDSTACK-9584: Fix intermittent test failur...

[rhtyd]

GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1822

CLOUDSTACK-9584: Fix intermittent test failure in `test_volumes`

The component/test_volume failures happen when disk offering is random 
selected to be a custom one. This fixes that.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4.9-travis-testfix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1822.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1822


commit 6ebf02454b36f09d8090ff333ae0e6738397c7e5
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2016-12-08T10:55:40Z

CLOUDSTACK-9584: Fix intermittent test failure in `test_volumes`

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[jayapalu]

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
rebased it on 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1795: CLOUDSTACK-9625:Unable to scale VM from any offering...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
  
LGTM. Merging based on test results.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1795: CLOUDSTACK-9625:Unable to scale VM from any offering...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
  
This would need one more round of tests (since last test results are quite 
old).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1805: CLOUDSTACK-9637: Template create from snapshot does ...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1805
  
LGTM, merging this based on review and tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
Merging this on discretion as other PRs are blocked, we'll wait for test 
results and revert if needed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1822: CLOUDSTACK-9584: Fix intermittent test failure in `t...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1822
  
Merging this on discretion, as other PRs are blocked by this. I'll revert 
this if Travis fails further, or work on fixing new issues.

=== TestName: test_create_volume_under_domain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 37.314s

OK



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1822: CLOUDSTACK-9584: Fix intermittent test failur...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1822


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1805: CLOUDSTACK-9637: Template create from snapsho...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1805


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
LGTM.
@borisstoyanov  can you help review this, validate the change?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1804: CLOUDSTACK-9639: Unable to create shared network wit...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1804
  
@jburwell I'll have a look. I've fixed on issue with Travis component test.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


As shared on the RC status thread, we've only few outstanding PRs that are 
critical for the 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 releases. We'll have an agreed hard 
freeze on 4.8, 4.9, and master branch at the end of the week. On Monday, 12 
December we'll cut the first set of RCs, test them and only accept blocker 
fixes on the 4.8/4.9/master branches.


Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


We've following outstanding PRs, that are assumed critical or blockers:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763 (security related)

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749 (per Mike's comment)


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 08 December 2016 00:11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,


We've now only following PRs blocking the release process to be started:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807


Along with these two PRs, we'll triage several outstanding bugfix PRs that have 
been tested and reviewed and can be merged. Following this, we'll work towards 
stabilizing the branches and then start the release process. Thank you all for 
submitting, reviewing and testing the PRs.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 05 December 2016 16:39:39
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,


We've several open PRs, I'll try to get some of them reviewed, tested and 
merged in next two days. Please help with reviewing and testing open PRs.


To avoid further delaying starting RC/voting threads, after middle of the week 
we'll only consider PR that fix any blockers (a hard freeze announcement email 
will be shared). Following satisfactory test runs, I'll help start RC voting 
process.


List of critical PRs:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659


Thanks and regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 27 November 2016 22:08:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from John's 
list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):

  * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
  * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)

Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be merged post 
4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.

I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0 release 
on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and master 
(4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.

Regards.

[1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status


All,


We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go after 
which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending from previous 
list:


* 4.10.0.0
  * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
  * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
  * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
* 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0

* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests pending)

On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with exception to 
certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots were found 
on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.

In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke tests across 
4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some component tests, 
especially identifying those that can be run against simulator and can added to 
Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a general request, if you're writing a 
new integration test that can finish rather quickly (say less than 20 mins) 
please consider adding them to smoke tests.

I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts. Thanks 
everyone.

Regards.

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
[4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue






rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeb

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-354


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed @karuturi @PaulAngus can you comment if this is in a good position to 
make into 4.9 yet? On Monday, we'll cut the first set of RCs, so if we can 
satisfactory review and test results only then this would make into 
4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0. /cc @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy 

@syed can you squash your changes and include the JIRA id in the git commit 
message. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-355


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-357


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-356


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@jayapalu can you please look into the failures if you can fix them and 
push again. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-359


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-358


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-360


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
LGTM
we have the same change in our productions.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
Trillian test result (tid-614)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31536 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1707-t614-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 917.71 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 998.58 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 148.41 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 97.47 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 158.02 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 143.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 148.20 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 95.80 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1129.83 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1094.63 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1049.14 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 62.76 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 357.30 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 357.44 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 357.34 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 527.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 445.31 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 151.17 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 261.53 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 221.42 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.82 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.36 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.36 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.30 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.18 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.23 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.68 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 713.26 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 267.48 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.52 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 130.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 45.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 120.72 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.09 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.11 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 85.51 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 171.51 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 168.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 136.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 138.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 143.59 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.87 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.00 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 245.80 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Suc

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
Sure @rhtyd 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-617)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32807 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t617-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 937.83 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 977.97 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 148.51 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 102.81 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 153.32 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 219.68 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 183.61 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 95.78 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1236.06 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1023.87 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1139.49 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 96.38 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 342.14 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 302.06 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 422.83 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 472.68 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 460.36 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 151.14 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 261.78 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 286.73 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.80 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.43 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.28 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.34 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.25 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.16 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.71 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 774.07 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 282.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 45.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.63 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 130.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 60.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 135.87 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.29 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 55.38 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 169.06 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 106.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 139.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.99 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.49 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.18 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 249.51 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Su

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-361


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-362


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
Ok will do, thanks


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Trillian test result (tid-615)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 37304 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1810-t615-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1136.24 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1051.84 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 438.50 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 335.98 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 386.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 385.76 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 65.85 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 121.74 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1424.86 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1384.86 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 71.33 | 
test_password_server.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Failure` | 
207.30 | test_internal_lb.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 670.56 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 585.43 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 609.87 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 810.91 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 525.05 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Error` | 127.13 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | `Error` | 330.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 86.15 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 494.46 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 176.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 35.92 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 65.63 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.35 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.86 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 537.75 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.24 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 194.68 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 166.89 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 165.23 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 30.39 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 217.32 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 25.75 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 156.46 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 207.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 239.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.52 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 177.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 209.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_01

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-618)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 39074 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t618-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 9 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1190.31 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1160.57 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 481.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 325.09 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 381.43 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 518.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 423.88 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 37.94 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 121.74 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 272.92 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1383.11 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 68.89 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 701.96 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 530.79 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 604.60 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 850.83 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 577.82 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_reboot_router | `Error` | 5.16 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | `Error` | 131.20 | test_routers.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 53.15 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestPortForwarding>:setup | `Error` | 723.56 | 
test_network.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 620.07 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 499.60 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 171.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 26.29 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 70.77 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 110.39 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.59 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.44 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.86 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 520.71 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.23 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 220.22 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 161.77 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.74 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 288.32 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.97 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 81.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 353.86 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.79 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 172.37 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 237.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 234.30 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.88 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 161.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 214.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-616)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 41021 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t616-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1055.21 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1065.38 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 432.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 254.47 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 270.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 368.84 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 436.74 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 43.41 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1700.34 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1219.30 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1231.37 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 43.75 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 724.15 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 460.36 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 801.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestVpcSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 1768.95 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 740.27 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 83.98 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_nic | `Error` | 402.82 | test_nic.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 525.49 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 430.92 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 162.11 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.00 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 96.66 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 97.84 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 35.83 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.41 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.37 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.80 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.95 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 438.20 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.32 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 176.66 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.93 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 380.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 15.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.48 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.60 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 161.87 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.10 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.13 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.24 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.28 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.22 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 91.51 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 257.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 271.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 111.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 159.91 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 132.67 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 240.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.39 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.14 | test_ssvm.py
test

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd We seem to have consistently more tests failing lately


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
Trillian test result (tid-622)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27762 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1821-t622-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 869.05 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 412.06 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 180.04 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.34 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 251.07 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 276.93 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 558.53 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 533.00 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1340.36 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 599.28 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1310.36 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.53 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.38 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.47 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.18 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.38 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 41.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 101.49 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.15 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 45.56 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 193.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.74 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 134.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 144.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.72 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.93 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.16 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.16 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.23 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.44 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.40 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.23 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.07 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.76 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.61 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.03 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.55 | test_route

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722#discussion_r91569719
  
--- Diff: 
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
 ---
@@ -260,11 +260,15 @@ public boolean deleteSnapshot(Long snapshotId) {
 boolean result = deleteSnapshotChain(snapshotOnImage);
 obj.processEvent(Snapshot.Event.OperationSucceeded);
 if (result) {
-//snapshot is deleted on backup storage, need to delete it 
on primary storage
-SnapshotDataStoreVO snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotStoreDao.findBySnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
-if (snapshotOnPrimary != null) {
-snapshotOnPrimary.setState(State.Destroyed);
-snapshotStoreDao.update(snapshotOnPrimary.getId(), 
snapshotOnPrimary);
+SnapshotInfo snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotDataFactory.getSnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
--- End diff --

Yes it should be updated in this case as well. It is taken care


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722#discussion_r91570095
  
--- Diff: 
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
 ---
@@ -260,11 +260,15 @@ public boolean deleteSnapshot(Long snapshotId) {
 boolean result = deleteSnapshotChain(snapshotOnImage);
 obj.processEvent(Snapshot.Event.OperationSucceeded);
 if (result) {
-//snapshot is deleted on backup storage, need to delete it 
on primary storage
-SnapshotDataStoreVO snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotStoreDao.findBySnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
-if (snapshotOnPrimary != null) {
-snapshotOnPrimary.setState(State.Destroyed);
-snapshotStoreDao.update(snapshotOnPrimary.getId(), 
snapshotOnPrimary);
+SnapshotInfo snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotDataFactory.getSnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
+if(snapshotSvr.deleteSnapshot(snapshotOnPrimary)) {
--- End diff --

If the db state is set to 'destroyed', it would no longer visible in the ui 
and entry would be left behind in primary. Leaving it as is keeps the option of 
manual cleanup 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1758: CLOUDSTACK-9588: Add Load Balancer functionality in ...

[rajesh-battala]

Github user rajesh-battala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
  
ok. if you find that page is not used then please feel free to remove it.
Having that page will confuse the Admin for create Firewall rules

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Nitin Kumar Maharana <
notificati...@github.com> wrote:

> @rajesh-battala  : I went through the
> video but couldn't observe working on the add load balancer part. He
> touched the egress rules part. BTW, the tab was added in this commit
> 196e36d
> 
.
> I looked at the code change as well, which is very similar to what we do 
in
> case of load balancing section with an IP address.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
> 

> .
>



-- 
Thanks
Rajesh Battala



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-363


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[pdube]

Github user pdube closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[pdube]

GitHub user pdube reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820

CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage by setting a default 
role when not found

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9656

This is a workaround to avoid NPE when using the usage server with Projects

To reproduce bug:

Create project
Add account to project
Create VM within that project
Run the usage server

Same steps to test resolution

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-9656-usage-exception

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1820


commit b7ac7fd2a3eddbe66c36a83b80ae6be303c01bc4
Author: Patrick Dube 
Date:   2016-12-07T19:39:28Z

Preventing autoboxing NPE by setting a default role when not found




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Trillian test result (tid-625)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26317 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1763-t625-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_extract_Iso | `Error` | 5.92 | test_iso.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 135.27 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.77 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 272.31 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 298.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 618.04 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 517.90 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1446.17 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 568.61 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 761.93 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1316.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.81 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.57 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.53 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.32 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.39 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.84 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 683.52 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 279.61 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 36.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.99 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 126.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.93 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.34 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.09 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 61.13 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 134.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.33 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 210.20 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.21 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.21 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.28 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 55.66 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 40.48 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.19 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.74 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 65.68 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.10 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.58 | test_routers.py
test_router_dhcphosts | S

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
![screen shot 2016-12-08 at 8 29 24 
pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13551960/21022364/10c60274-bd85-11e6-9637-b496eb7e0467.png)
I've deployed and verified the changes. LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Master Skip Tests

[Will Stevens]

Hey Guys,
I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.

Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
(Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(main:) thread started
2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(Thread-1:) before
2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(main:) testing wakeup
2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
(Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(Thread-1:) after
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec -
in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
(main:) Encryption Type: null
2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
(main:) Encryption Type: file
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec -
in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
provider BC
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: null
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
at
com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(RSAHelperTest.java:38)
...
Failed tests:
  RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA:38 null

Is this a known issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@rhtyd Changed the PR to be against 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[sateesh-chodapuneedi]

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
Code LGTM 👍 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Patrick Dube]

Same error on 4.9

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
> but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
>
> Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) thread started
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) before
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) testing wakeup
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) after
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec -
> in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: null
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: file
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec -
> in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> provider BC
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> 0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: null
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> RSAHelperTest.java:38)
> ...
> Failed tests:
>   RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA:38 null
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Merging this based on code review and test results.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
LGTM, verified manually. Merging this based on usage related tests. 
Trillian smoke tests don't cover usage server to the extent of changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
LGTM. Thanks @borisstoyanov for helping with the verification. Merging this 
since this is a pure UI change, no trillian tests are required.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch typ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates template...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@serg38 yes, a blocker has been fixed now by @murali-reddy . You can see 
#1821 most tests (except rvr/vpc tests which are known to cause intermittent 
failures) are passing now. I'll rekick tests now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@jayapalu can you change PR's base branch to 4.9 as well? How 
blocking/critical is this PR?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@murali-reddy  can you help review this, thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@rhtyd Thanks for the speedy responses


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---