[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @blueorangutan test matrix --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-444 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-445 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
Yes Marty. Regards. From: Marty Godsey Sent: 04 January 2017 05:46:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) Did the XenServer7 support make it in? Regards, Marty Godsey nSource Solutions rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 5:39 AM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) +1 (binding) Re-tested my previous tests for the RC1 vote and checked if the .DEB packages will build. Also checked the changes and based my vote on that. > Op 3 januari 2017 om 8:05 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up > for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 > Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards.
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1832: CLOUDSTACK-9652 Job framework - Cancelling async job...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832 @rhtyd I dont buy that argument. Just for the ease of revert or cherry-pick we shouldnt commit all the changes together. The revert or cherry-pick quickly becomes irrelevant as more code gets committed on top of it. I would like to commit them as is. regarding the conflicts, will resolve them as soon as I get time. right now, busy with $dayjob. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8 and Strongs...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Trillian test result (tid-759) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 56457 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1864-t759-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_affinity_groups_projects.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_affinity_groups.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_vm_iso.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_internal_lb.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_iso.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_list_ids_parameter.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_loadbalance.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_multipleips_per_nic.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_network_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_network.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_nic.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_password_server.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_primary_storage.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_router_dhcphosts.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_router_dns.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_service_offerings.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_templates.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_volumes.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_router_nics.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py Test completed. 20 look ok, 43 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_01_sys_vm_start | `Failure` | 0.07 | test_secondary_storage.py test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 16.06 | test_privategw_acl.py test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 10.92 | test_privategw_acl.py test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 10.97 | test_privategw_acl.py test_01_vpc_privategw_acl | `Failure` | 10.92 | test_privategw_acl.py test_04_extract_Iso | `Failure` | 5.12 | test_iso.py ContextSuite context=TestVpcSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py ContextSuite context=TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Error` | 10.92 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Error` | 10.93 | test_vpc_router_nics.py ContextSuite context=TestVPCRedundancy>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_redundant.py ContextSuite context=TestVolumes>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_volumes.py ContextSuite context=TestCreateVolume>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_volumes.py ContextSuite context=TestVMLifeCycle>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vm_life_cycle.py ContextSuite context=TestDeployVM>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vm_life_cycle.py ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | `Error` | 5.14 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | `Error` | 5.14 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | `Error` | 5.16 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | `Error` | 5.16 | test_ssvm.py ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_snapshots.py ContextSuite context=TestServiceOfferings>:setup | `Error` | 6.12 | test_service_offerings.py ContextSuite context=TestRouterServices>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_routers.py ContextSuite context=TestRouterDns>:setup
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 Let me provide a bit of background on this and then we can decide which way we want to correct this side effect. Here is the PR that went in a while ago that enabled CloudStack to support volume snapshots that reside on primary storage: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403 The idea being these types of snapshots are faster than the back-up-to-secondary-storage approach CloudStack does by default and they can be a lot more space efficient, as well. As part of this process, I went through and tried to identify all of the locations where we assumed a volume snapshot resided on secondary storage (and I put in code to see if it really resides there or, instead, if it's on primary storage). As we have noted, a couple places were missed and this PR (as wells as #1735) were opened to address those issues. The way this particular PR's code is written should work fine. In the case where the original primary storage has been removed, an exception will be thrown, caught, logged, and then we will default to returning secondary storage as the location (which it should be). Instead of the try/catch approach, though, it might be better if we see if dataStore is null. DataStore dataStore = dataStoreMgr.getDataStore(storagePoolId, DataStoreRole.Primary); If that comes back null, then we apparently have removed primary storage, which can only be done if your snapshots don't reside on it. If dataStore == null, return DataStoreRole.IMAGE. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
Did the XenServer7 support make it in? Regards, Marty Godsey nSource Solutions -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 5:39 AM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) +1 (binding) Re-tested my previous tests for the RC1 vote and checked if the .DEB packages will build. Also checked the changes and based my vote on that. > Op 3 januari 2017 om 8:05 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up > for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 > Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards.
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8 and Strongs...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-443 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94412144
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/ListSnapshotsCmd.java
---
@@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ public void execute() {
List snapshotResponses = new
ArrayList();
for (Snapshot snapshot : result.first()) {
SnapshotResponse snapshotResponse =
_responseGenerator.createSnapshotResponse(snapshot);
-snapshotResponse.setObjectName("snapshot");
-snapshotResponses.add(snapshotResponse);
+if (snapshotResponse != null) {
+snapshotResponse.setObjectName("snapshot");
--- End diff --
This check is added as we introduced a case in `createSnapshotResponse`
null is returned, and in that case we should skip the response
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation
I am going to try something today to see if I can try to find a way to support non-DH connections. I will let you know. On Jan 3, 2017 9:02 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > @swill thanks, looking forward to getting this in 4.10. I'm not sure > about any side-effects and regressions of the DH-group related change, I > think if it's not supported we should remove the option from UI. @jayapalu > comments? > > > --- > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket > with INFRA. > --- >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 Hi @anshul1886, We addressed the same issue along with @serg38 in PR #1735. We proposed a way to fix the problem on it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94410299
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ public String getSecondaryStorageURL(SnapshotVO
snapshot) {
List ids = getIdsListFromCmd(cmd.getId(), cmd.getIds());
Ternary
domainIdRecursiveListProject = new Ternary(cmd.getDomainId(), cmd.isRecursive(), null);
- _accountMgr.buildACLSearchParameters(caller, id,
cmd.getAccountName(), cmd.getProjectId(), permittedAccounts,
domainIdRecursiveListProject, cmd.listAll(), false);
- Long domainId = domainIdRecursiveListProject.first();
- Boolean isRecursive = domainIdRecursiveListProject.second();
- ListProjectResourcesCriteria listProjectResourcesCriteria =
domainIdRecursiveListProject.third();
+_accountMgr.buildACLSearchParameters(caller, id,
cmd.getAccountName(), cmd.getProjectId(), permittedAccounts,
domainIdRecursiveListProject, cmd.listAll(), false);
+Long domainId = domainIdRecursiveListProject.first();
+Boolean isRecursive = domainIdRecursiveListProject.second();
+ListProjectResourcesCriteria listProjectResourcesCriteria =
domainIdRecursiveListProject.third();
--- End diff --
Hi @anshul1886, at the beggining of each line there's one space added, to
be consistent with indentation
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 @swill thanks, looking forward to getting this in 4.10. I'm not sure about any side-effects and regressions of the DH-group related change, I think if it's not supported we should remove the option from UI. @jayapalu comments? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...
Github user lmrv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 Hi @pdion891 Good news. It's nice that the build work fine. I am waiting for your confirmation about the licence terms to modify my work. Antoine. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 @rhtyd @swill @jburwell, Does any of you would know if the header file is correct, for .po files? I think the copyright line must be removed, ``` # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE. # Copyright (C) # This file is distributed under the same license as the Apache CloudStack Administration Documentation package. # ``` And should be replace by something like this: ``` # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one # or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file # distributed with this work for additional information # regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file # to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the # "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance # with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, # software distributed under the License is distributed on an # "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY # KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the # specific language governing permissions and limitations # under the License. ``` Am I right or it's ok in the current state ? Thanks, --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41 Hi @lmrv, I've built the site in FR and reviewing the doc... So far I've only found a minor issue: header of .po files are improper, it should be the apache2 license. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation
I will do a final round of testing in the next couple days and squash the commits as you asked. Sorry for the delay. It has been running in prod for the last month or so and it is going well. Strongswan does not support leaving the DH group empty. Should I remove that as an option from the UI and make that required? On Jan 3, 2017 1:00 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > @swill @jayapalu updates on this, is this good to go? > > > --- > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket > with INFRA. > --- >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1887: schema: Fix upgrade issue for 4.9.1.0->4.9.2.0
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1887 Merged this based on discretion and manual tests. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
+1 (binding) Re-tested my previous tests for the RC1 vote and checked if the .DEB packages will build. Also checked the changes and based my vote on that. > Op 3 januari 2017 om 8:05 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 > Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards.
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
It's ok now. Thanks. On 03/01/2017 08:36, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Bruno, Can you try again now? Regards. From: Milamber Sent: 03 January 2017 13:42:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) Hello, The 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 branch and the commit seems doesn't exists? ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:10 $ git remote -v apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (fetch) apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (push) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (fetch) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (push) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (fetch) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (push) ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:10 $ git pull apache Already up-to-date. ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:11 $ git checkout 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 error: pathspec '4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228' did not match any file(s) known to git. ?-1 ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:11 $ git checkout dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f fatal: reference is not a tree: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Milamber On 03/01/2017 07:05, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards. rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Maximum number of site-to-site VPNs on Cloudstack
Hi Pierre-Luc, Noted, many thanks for your reply. Cheers. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi, > > It's per VPC or Guest Network, basically 8 per Virtual Router. We've > tested up to 4 on our side so far without issues. > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Cloud List wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > On below documentation: > > > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack- > > administration/en/4.8/networking/site_to_site_vpn.html > > > > It says that CloudStack supports creating up to 8 VPN connections. May I > > know if it's 8 VPN connections per VPC, or globally within a Cloudstack > > cluster or zone? > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > Cheers. > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
Hi Bruno, Can you try again now? Regards. From: Milamber Sent: 03 January 2017 13:42:14 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2) Hello, The 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 branch and the commit seems doesn't exists? ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:10 $ git remote -v apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (fetch) apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (push) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (fetch) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (push) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (fetch) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (push) ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:10 $ git pull apache Already up-to-date. ? ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:11 $ git checkout 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 error: pathspec '4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228' did not match any file(s) known to git. ?-1 ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|?] 08:11 $ git checkout dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f fatal: reference is not a tree: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Milamber On 03/01/2017 07:05, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 > Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards. > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-442 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-441 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-440 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)
Hello, The 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 branch and the commit seems doesn't exists? ✔ ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|✔] 08:10 $ git remote -v apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (fetch) apachehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git (push) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (fetch) originhttps://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack.git (push) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (fetch) upstreamhttps://github.com/apache/cloudstack (push) ✔ ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|✔] 08:10 $ git pull apache Already up-to-date. ✔ ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|✔] 08:11 $ git checkout 4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 error: pathspec '4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228' did not match any file(s) known to git. ✘-1 ~/CloudStack/cloudstack-dev [master|✔] 08:11 $ git checkout dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f fatal: reference is not a tree: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Milamber On 03/01/2017 07:05, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards.
