[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1833: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678

[pdumbre]

Github user pdumbre commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833
  
For listing of other offerings  Disk, Compute and VPC, we have to provide 
exact name and not partial one.So this fix is done for consistent behaviour of 
all list APIs


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks for all your work on this, Marco! I’m definitely looking forward to 
attending.

On 1/23/17, 12:51 PM, "Marco Sinhoreli"  wrote:

Hi Aldrey, Mike and Nicolas.

Thank you for sharing yours points of view.

Last year, as I told you all before, many companies give up to sponsor the 
CCC by budget cut due to the economic and political crisis in Brazil. We tried 
until the last time to do that but the situation was really unsustainable to 
realize the event due to lack of sponsors. We confirmed March 20-21 with the 
venue but I agree the @Will arguments about the insufficient time until the 
dates proposed and for these dates are very close to the ApacheCon NA. 

We are working very close to the University and the community members to 
bring the CCC in Brazil. Our country is quite lacking in CCC level events and 
it will be a differential for many IT people. I personally admire a lot of you 
from this community and I see a huge differential compared to the others. As 
one old saying goes, "It's better quality than quantity," and that's exactly 
what I see in each of you. I have taken this message in several places that 
have visited and shown the honesty of the Apache CloudStack project for 
businesses and users. From my side, I will do my best to get the CCC in Brazil 
and didn't disappoint you. The Brazilian market already shows improvements and 
I feel that we will have sponsors to really make an incredible CCC. 

IMHO, following Will's thoughts and considering the Mike’s recommendation, 
September is the month most recommended for the CCC. 

Considering September the CCC date, we have from our side these tasks:
1- Put the website up
2- Open the CFP 
3- Advertise to the community
4- Define the minimum and maximum event size based on budget from sponsors
5- Documents needed to visa (when applied)
6- Hotels around the venue and discounts

Please, yours comments are very appreciated!

Best regards,

Marco Sinhoreli
Managing Consultant
marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com
mobile: +55 21 98276 3636
 
Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101 – Botafogo
Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil - CEP 22250-040
office: + 55 21 2586 6390 | fax: +55 21 2586 6002
http://www.shapeblue.com/ | twitter: @shapeblue







Em [DATE], "[NAME]" <[ADDRESS]> escreveu:

>Hi,
>
>I am personally OK with the event taking place in March, August, or 
September (i.e. any of the dates you've suggested).
>
>It might be a bit tight for March if the call for participation is not yet 
open.
>
>Also, I wonder if August might be tough for a bunch of people, though, as 
they may be on vacation.
>
>Let's keep the communication flowing with regards to this event. I know I 
am very eager to attend it and I'm guessing others are, as well.
>
>Thanks!
>Mike
>
>> On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Nicolas Vazquez  
wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Marco and all,
>> 
>> Thanks for answering about this event!
>> 
>> I would like to mention some things that, from my point of view, could be
>> improved by sharing my own experience. First of all, I think there has 
been
>> lack of communication about this event. Personally, I've been looking
>> forward to attend this event since last year, and the only official
>> announcement was that event has to be rescheduled. As I needed to change
>> flight tickets dates, I needed official information about the rescheduled
>> event dates and couldn't find it on web page as it's been down or not
>> updated. Luckly, I could communicate with Shapeblue people who helped me
>> confirming the dates of the event for March so I could reschedule flight
>> tickets on time (before September 28th). I think that they had to be
>> announced last year so that everybody could be aware of new dates and had
>> time to prepare for this CCC and could attend.
>> 
>> In my opinion, I would like that event will be held on March, but, if you
>> think it should have to be rescheduled again, can you please announce it 
or
>> update web page? I know this things require extra time and effort, but I
>> think that improving communication we can have a really nice CCC in Latin
>> America.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Nicolas Vazquez
>> 
>> 2017-01-17 12:51 GMT-03:00 Marco Sinhoreli 
:
>> 
>>> Hi Will and all.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
>>> 
>>> The event day is booked but we have flexibility to change the dates.
>>> Professor Rubens Queiroz from Unicamp agrees to change the date to 3rd
>>> quarter. He suggested August or September in order to have enough time 
and
>>> to get rid of eventual overlapping with other IT event dates and 

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

[Marco Sinhoreli]

Hi Aldrey, Mike and Nicolas.

Thank you for sharing yours points of view.

Last year, as I told you all before, many companies give up to sponsor the CCC 
by budget cut due to the economic and political crisis in Brazil. We tried 
until the last time to do that but the situation was really unsustainable to 
realize the event due to lack of sponsors. We confirmed March 20-21 with the 
venue but I agree the @Will arguments about the insufficient time until the 
dates proposed and for these dates are very close to the ApacheCon NA. 

We are working very close to the University and the community members to bring 
the CCC in Brazil. Our country is quite lacking in CCC level events and it will 
be a differential for many IT people. I personally admire a lot of you from 
this community and I see a huge differential compared to the others. As one old 
saying goes, "It's better quality than quantity," and that's exactly what I see 
in each of you. I have taken this message in several places that have visited 
and shown the honesty of the Apache CloudStack project for businesses and 
users. From my side, I will do my best to get the CCC in Brazil and didn't 
disappoint you. The Brazilian market already shows improvements and I feel that 
we will have sponsors to really make an incredible CCC. 

IMHO, following Will's thoughts and considering the Mike’s recommendation, 
September is the month most recommended for the CCC. 

Considering September the CCC date, we have from our side these tasks:
1- Put the website up
2- Open the CFP 
3- Advertise to the community
4- Define the minimum and maximum event size based on budget from sponsors
5- Documents needed to visa (when applied)
6- Hotels around the venue and discounts

Please, yours comments are very appreciated!

Best regards,

Marco Sinhoreli
Managing Consultant
marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com
mobile: +55 21 98276 3636
 
Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101 – Botafogo
Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil - CEP 22250-040
office: + 55 21 2586 6390 | fax: +55 21 2586 6002
http://www.shapeblue.com/ | twitter: @shapeblue







Em [DATE], "[NAME]" <[ADDRESS]> escreveu:

>Hi,
>
>I am personally OK with the event taking place in March, August, or September 
>(i.e. any of the dates you've suggested).
>
>It might be a bit tight for March if the call for participation is not yet 
>open.
>
>Also, I wonder if August might be tough for a bunch of people, though, as they 
>may be on vacation.
>
>Let's keep the communication flowing with regards to this event. I know I am 
>very eager to attend it and I'm guessing others are, as well.
>
>Thanks!
>Mike
>
>> On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Nicolas Vazquez  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Marco and all,
>> 
>> Thanks for answering about this event!
>> 
>> I would like to mention some things that, from my point of view, could be
>> improved by sharing my own experience. First of all, I think there has been
>> lack of communication about this event. Personally, I've been looking
>> forward to attend this event since last year, and the only official
>> announcement was that event has to be rescheduled. As I needed to change
>> flight tickets dates, I needed official information about the rescheduled
>> event dates and couldn't find it on web page as it's been down or not
>> updated. Luckly, I could communicate with Shapeblue people who helped me
>> confirming the dates of the event for March so I could reschedule flight
>> tickets on time (before September 28th). I think that they had to be
>> announced last year so that everybody could be aware of new dates and had
>> time to prepare for this CCC and could attend.
>> 
>> In my opinion, I would like that event will be held on March, but, if you
>> think it should have to be rescheduled again, can you please announce it or
>> update web page? I know this things require extra time and effort, but I
>> think that improving communication we can have a really nice CCC in Latin
>> America.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Nicolas Vazquez
>> 
>> 2017-01-17 12:51 GMT-03:00 Marco Sinhoreli :
>> 
>>> Hi Will and all.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
>>> 
>>> The event day is booked but we have flexibility to change the dates.
>>> Professor Rubens Queiroz from Unicamp agrees to change the date to 3rd
>>> quarter. He suggested August or September in order to have enough time and
>>> to get rid of eventual overlapping with other IT event dates and to prepare
>>> our first CCC-BR. Our wish is to have an event with wide community
>>> participation and I agree with yours arguments.
>>> 
>>> The dates they have available on the 3rd quarter are:
>>> August 09th - 10th
>>> September 18th - 19th
>>> 
>>> In August there are 3 auditoriums in both days and September 3 auditoriums
>>> in 18th and 2 in 19th.
>>> 
>>> The event will be transmitted online and the videos will be recorded. ASAP
>>> we have the website with CFP online, we will communicate to you all.
>>> 
>>> I want 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1040: CLOUDSTACK-9040: Use Tomcat6 for Debian packages.

[JamesMcTavish]

Github user JamesMcTavish commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040
  
Has this been resolved?  Installing cloudstack-management 4.9.2.0 from deb 
still fails exactly the same way.  And /etc/init.d/cloudstack-management is 
still written for Tomcat6


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1915: CLOUDSTACK-9746 system-vm: logrotate config c...

[serbaut]

GitHub user serbaut opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915

CLOUDSTACK-9746 system-vm: logrotate config causes critical failures

* rotate both daily and by size by using maxsize in stead of size
* decrease the max size to 10M and reduce the number of kept files to a 
maximum of 5

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/serbaut/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9746

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1915


commit de9c0ab0a4cf31f097c9f7e7039add4240a62ac9
Author: Joakim Sernbrant 
Date:   2017-01-23T11:13:15Z

CLOUDSTACK-9746 system-vm: logrotate config causes critical failures

* rotate both daily and by size by using maxsize in stead of size
* decrease the max size to 10M and reduce the number of kept files to a 
maximum of 5




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1894: CLOUDSTACK-9700 Allow user to Register/Copy template...

[rashmidixit]

Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1894
  
Attaching new screens for the changes made here.


![copytemplate-withsearchzone](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22205048/27f14e6a-e19b-11e6-8ba3-e0d4d8e7993a.PNG)

![registertemplate-multiselect](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22205050/27f24ac2-e19b-11e6-9a38-a1fc7cc62b92.PNG)

![registertemplate-multiselect-error](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22205049/27f20738-e19b-11e6-8741-864d7a66691b.PNG)

![copytemplate-multiplezones](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22205051/27f2761e-e19b-11e6-931a-55aba29ef0ad.PNG)



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1889: CLOUDSTACK-9718: Revamp the dropdown showing ...

[rashmidixit]

Github user rashmidixit commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889#discussion_r97313518
  
--- Diff: ui/scripts/ui-custom/migrate.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
--- End diff --

@koushik-das I have provided screen shots in JIRA. Attaching them here as 
well.

![migrateinstance-seehosts-search](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22204992/fdfacbae-e19a-11e6-9c7b-59a0776c68e0.PNG)

![migrateinstance-seehosts](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13415006/22204993/fdfaf232-e19a-11e6-8ea9-1af368f1f6d7.PNG)




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 21 januari 2017 om 23:50 schreef Wido den Hollander :
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Op 21 jan. 2017 om 22:59 heeft Syed Ahmed  het 
> > volgende geschreven:
> > 
> > Exposing this via an API would be tricky but it can definitely be added as
> > a cluster-wide or a global setting in my opinion. By enabling that, all the
> > instances would be using VirtIO SCSI. Is there a reason you'd want some
> > instances to use VirtIIO and others to use VirtIO SCSI?
> > 
> 
> Even a global setting would be a bit of work and hacky as well.
> 
> I do not see any reason to keep VirtIO, it os just that devices will be named 
> sdX instead of vdX in the guest.

To add, the Qemu wiki [0] says:

"A virtio storage interface for efficient I/O that overcomes virtio-blk 
limitations and supports advanced SCSI hardware."

At OpenStack [1] they also say:

"It has been designed to replace virtio-blk, increase it's performance and 
improve scalability."

So it seems that VirtIO is there to be removed. I'd say switch to VirtIO SCSI 
at version 5.X? :)

Wido

[0]: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/VirtioSCSI
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtVirtioScsi

> 
> That might break existing Instances when not using labels or UUIDs in the 
> Instance when mounting.
> 
> Wido
> 
> > 
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Simon Weller  wrote:
> >> 
> >> For the record, we've been looking into this as well.
> >> Has anyone tried it with Windows VMs before? The standard virtio driver
> >> doesn't support spanned disks and that's something we'd really like to
> >> enable for our customers.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Simon Weller/615-312-6068 <(615)%20312-6068>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> *From:* Wido den Hollander [w...@widodh.nl]
> >> *Received:* Saturday, 21 Jan 2017, 2:56PM
> >> *To:* Syed Ahmed [sah...@cloudops.com]; dev@cloudstack.apache.org [
> >> dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
> >> *Subject:* Re: Adding VirtIO SCSI to KVM hypervisors
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> Op 21 januari 2017 om 16:15 schreef Syed Ahmed :
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Wido,
> >>> 
> >>> Were you thinking of adding this as a global setting? I can see why it
> >> will
> >>> be useful. I'm happy to review any ideas you might have around this.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Well, not really. We don't have any structure for this in place right now
> >> to define what type of driver/disk we present to a guest.
> >> 
> >> See my answer below.
> >> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Syed
> >>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 04:46 Laszlo Hornyak 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
>  Hi Wido,
>  
>  If I understand correctly from the documentation and your examples,
> >> virtio
>  provides virtio interface to the guest while virtio-scsi provides scsi
>  interface, therefore an IaaS service should not replace it without user
>  request / approval. It would be probably better to let the user set
> >> what
>  kind of IO interface the VM needs.
>  
> >> 
> >> You'd say, but we already do those. Some Operating Systems get a IDE disk,
> >> others a SCSI disk and when Linux guest support it according to our
> >> database we use VirtIO.
> >> 
> >> CloudStack has no way of telling how to present a volume to a guest. I
> >> think it would be a bit to much to just make that configurable. That would
> >> mean extra database entries, API calls. A bit overkill imho in this case.
> >> 
> >> VirtIO SCSI is supported by all Linux distributions for a very long time.
> >> 
> >> Wido
> >> 
>  Best regards,
>  Laszlo
>  
>  On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Wido den Hollander 
>  wrote:
>  
> > Hi,
> > 
> > VirtIO SCSI [0] has been supported a while now by Linux and all
> >> kernels,
> > but inside CloudStack we are not using it. There is a issue for this
> >> [1].
> > 
> > It would bring more (theoretical) performance to VMs, but one of the
> > motivators (for me) is that we can support TRIM/DISCARD [2].
> > 
> > This would allow for RBD images on Ceph to shrink, but it can also
> >> give
> > back free space on QCOW2 images if quests run fstrim. Something all
>  modern
> > distributions all do weekly in a CRON.
> > 
> > Now, it is simple to swap VirtIO for VirtIO SCSI. This would however
> >> mean
> > that disks inside VMs are then called /dev/sdX instead of /dev/vdX.
> > 
> > For GRUB and such this is no problems. This usually work on UUIDs
> >> and/or
> > labels, but for static mounts on /dev/vdb1 for example things break.
> > 
> > We currently don't have any configuration method on how we want to
>  present
> > a disk to a guest, so when attaching a volume we can't say that we
> >> want
>  to
> > use a different driver. If we think that a Operating System supports
>  VirtIO
> > we use that driver in KVM.
> > 
> > Any suggestion on how to add VirtIO SCSI support?
> > 
> 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #837: CLOUDSTACK-8855 Improve Error Message for Host Alert ...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 267
 Hypervisor vmware
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=24
 Failed=45
 Skipped=4

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py

 * test_deployvm_userdata Failed

 * test_deployvm_userdata_post Failed

* test_affinity_groups_projects.py

 * test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project Failed

* test_vm_snapshots.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestVmSnapshot>:setup Failing since 2 runs

* test_scale_vm.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestScaleVm>:setup Failing since 7 runs

* test_service_offerings.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestServiceOfferings>:setup Failing since 19 runs

* test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py

 * test_02_routervm_iptables_policies Failed

 * test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies Failed

* test_loadbalance.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestLoadBalance>:setup Failed

* test_routers.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestRouterServices>:setup Failing since 3 runs

* test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestResetVmOnReboot>:setup Failing since 6 runs

* test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py

 * test_deployvm_firstfit Failed

 * test_deployvm_userconcentrated Failed

 * test_deployvm_userdispersing Failed

* test_network.py

 * test_delete_account Failed

 * ContextSuite context=TestPortForwarding>:setup Failed

 * test_reboot_router Failed

 * test_releaseIP Failed

 * ContextSuite context=TestRouterRules>:setup Failed

* test_router_dns.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestRouterDns>:setup Failed

* test_deploy_vm_iso.py

 * test_deploy_vm_from_iso Failed

* test_list_ids_parameter.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup Failing since 8 runs

* test_multipleips_per_nic.py

 * test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove Failed

* test_affinity_groups.py

 * test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup Failed

* test_network_acl.py

 * test_network_acl Failed

* test_volumes.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestCreateVolume>:setup Failing since 4 runs

 * ContextSuite context=TestVolumes>:setup Failing since 3 runs

* test_ssvm.py

 * test_03_ssvm_internals Failed

 * test_04_cpvm_internals Failed

 * test_05_stop_ssvm Failed

 * test_06_stop_cpvm Failed

 * test_07_reboot_ssvm Failed

 * test_08_reboot_cpvm Failed

 * test_09_destroy_ssvm Failed

 * test_10_destroy_cpvm Failed

* test_nic.py

 * test_01_nic Failed

* test_secondary_storage.py

 * test_01_sys_vm_start Failed

* test_nested_virtualization.py

 * test_nested_virtualization_vmware Failed

* test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm.py

 * test_3d_gpu_support Failed

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * ContextSuite context=TestVMLifeCycle>:setup Failing since 5 runs

* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false Failed

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failing since 4 
runs

 * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failing since 
4 runs

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failing since 4 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_regions.py
test_pvlan.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---