date:20170224

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #815: CLOUDSTACK-8841: Storage XenMotion from XS 6.2 to XS ...

2017-02-24 Thread priyankparihar

Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815
  
HI @borisroman, I have checked few of them but this change is not reason 
for ERROR/FAILURE.  


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Vishwas Pathak

Hello CloudStack team,

My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this 
community and happy to contribute.

Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So far 
have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing for 
KVM as well.

Looking forward to work with all of you.


Regards,
Vishwas Pathak
www.accelerite.com






DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1824: CLOUDSTACK-9657: Fixed security group ipset issues w...

2017-02-24 Thread kishankavala

Github user kishankavala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824
  
Code LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #843: Security group ingress/egress issues with xenserver 6...

2017-02-24 Thread bvbharatk

Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1971: CLOUDSTACK-9726 Update state is not changed to UPDAT...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1971
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Daan Hoogland

Welcome Vishwas, have fun


daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
  
 

On 24/02/17 10:08, "Vishwas Pathak"  wrote:

Hello CloudStack team,

My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this 
community and happy to contribute.

Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So 
far have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing 
for KVM as well. 

Looking forward to work with all of you.


Regards,
Vishwas Pathak
www.accelerite.com






DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is 
the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

RE: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Vishwas Pathak

Thanks Daan...:-) 

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 3:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Introducing Vishwas

Welcome Vishwas, have fun

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands @shapeblue

On 24/02/17 10:08, "Vishwas Pathak"  wrote:

Hello CloudStack team,

My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this 
community and happy to contribute.

Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So 
far have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing 
for KVM as well. 

Looking forward to work with all of you.

Regards,
Vishwas Pathak
www.accelerite.com

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is 
the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1971: CLOUDSTACK-9726 Update state is not changed to UPDAT...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1971
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-533


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Wei ZHOU

Welcome Vishwas !

-Wei

2017-02-24 10:08 GMT+01:00 Vishwas Pathak :

> Hello CloudStack team,
>
> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform
> testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing,
> virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this
> community and happy to contribute.
>
> Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So
> far have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some
> testing for KVM as well.
>
> Looking forward to work with all of you.
>
>
> Regards,
> Vishwas Pathak
> www.accelerite.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
> liability for virus infected mails.
>

Re: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Nux!

Welcome aboard, Vishwas :-)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Vishwas Pathak" 
> To: "dev" , "users" 
> Sent: Friday, 24 February, 2017 09:08:10
> Subject: Introducing Vishwas

> Hello CloudStack team,
> 
> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
> testing
> team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
> virtualization
> and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this community and happy
> to contribute.
> 
> Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So far
> have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing for
> KVM as well.
> 
> Looking forward to work with all of you.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Vishwas Pathak
> www.accelerite.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the
> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
> Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for
> virus infected mails.

Re: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Boris Stoyanov

Welcome aboard Vishwas and have fun!

Thanks,
Boris

boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:26 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> 
> Welcome aboard, Vishwas :-)
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Vishwas Pathak" 
>> To: "dev" , "users" 
>> Sent: Friday, 24 February, 2017 09:08:10
>> Subject: Introducing Vishwas
> 
>> Hello CloudStack team,
>> 
>> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
>> testing
>> team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
>> virtualization
>> and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this community and happy
>> to contribute.
>> 
>> Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So 
>> far
>> have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing for
>> KVM as well.
>> 
>> Looking forward to work with all of you.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Vishwas Pathak
>> www.accelerite.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> DISCLAIMER
>> ==
>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the
>> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
>> for
>> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
>> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
>> Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for
>> virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1971: CLOUDSTACK-9726 Update state is not changed to UPDAT...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1971
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1971: CLOUDSTACK-9726 Update state is not changed to UPDAT...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1971
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #815: CLOUDSTACK-8841: Storage XenMotion from XS 6.2 to XS ...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-62sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #815: CLOUDSTACK-8841: Storage XenMotion from XS 6.2 to XS ...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-62sp1) 
has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1941: CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM sn...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) 
has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1941: CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM sn...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1941: CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM sn...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
  
Thanks @anshul1886, actually you seem to be right, the tests don't seem to 
be related to this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage type...

2017-02-24 Thread abhinandanprateek

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958#discussion_r102918123
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -508,7 +507,7 @@ public String updateConfiguration(final long userId, 
final String name, final St
 throw new InvalidParameterValueException("unable to 
find storage pool by id " + resourceId);
 }
 
if(name.equals(CapacityManager.StorageOverprovisioningFactor.key())) {
-if(pool.getPoolType() != 
StoragePoolType.NetworkFilesystem && pool.getPoolType() != 
StoragePoolType.VMFS) {
+if(pool.getPoolType().supportsOverProvisioning() ) {
--- End diff --

yep ! thanks @serg38 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread abhinandanprateek

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
@borisstoyanov a condition got inverted by the change (serg38 pointed that 
out above), it is fixed now. Can you rerun the tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@ustcweizhou changes for kvm were in new file. It is missed while 
commiting, added now. Thanks for catching. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
Thanks @abhinandanprateek, 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@nathanejohnson thank you, let me know when you're done with the changes so 
I could kick in smoke tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
@blueorangutan package



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1937: CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest I...

2017-02-24 Thread niteshsarda

Github user niteshsarda closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1937


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-534


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1958: CLOUDSTACK-5806: add presetup to storage types that ...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-535


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1842: CLOUDSTACK-9686: Fixed multiple entires for builtin ...

2017-02-24 Thread cloudmonger

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1842
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 386
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=105
 Failed=0
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-536


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@borisstoyanov unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os 
are: `centos6, centos7, ubuntu`. Supported hypervisors are: `kvm-centos6, 
kvm-centos7, kvm-ubuntu, xenserver-65sp1, xenserver-62sp1, vmware-60u2, 
vmware-55u3, vmware-51u1, vmware-50u1`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-60u2) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-537


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #843: Security group ingress/egress issues with xenserver 6...

2017-02-24 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
  
tag:mergeready


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1825: CLOUDSTACK-9660: NPE while destroying volumes during...

2017-02-24 Thread koushik-das

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1825
  
tag:mergeready


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1922: CLOUDSTACK-9757: Fixed issue in traffic from additio...

2017-02-24 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922
  
tag:mergeready


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
Jenkins and travis are failing because of its internal failures.
tag:mergeready 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1880: CLOUDSTACK-9720: [VMware] template_spool_ref table i...

2017-02-24 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
  
LGTM for code changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1907: Fix public IPs not being removed from the VR when de...

2017-02-24 Thread swill

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1907
  
This has the required reviews and both @remibergsma (sbp) and us (cloud.ca) 
have been using this fix in production.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1907: Fix public IPs not being removed from the VR when de...

2017-02-24 Thread kiwiflyer

Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1907
  
tag:mergeready


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Nathan Johnson

So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need to  
come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template based on a  
kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 / Ubuntu 10.04 .   
I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but from  
looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from  
download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this at  
least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.  Would  
this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a “blessed”  
template location?

Thanks in advance!

Nathan Johnson
R&D Engineer



618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
Nashville, TN 37211
General Office: 615-312-6000

website | blog | support

Re: Introducing Vishwas

2017-02-24 Thread Nathan Johnson

Vishwas Pathak  wrote:

> Hello CloudStack team,
>
> My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform  
> testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing,  
> virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this  
> community and happy to contribute.

Welcome Vishwas!


Nathan Johnson
R&D Engineer
Education Networks of America

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Will Stevens

this is a hard questions.  in general, we should be setting up a mirror on
some cloudstack/apache domain and then mirror to other provided templates.

we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate 'download.cloud.com', that is
going to be going away any day now.

i don't know the right way to solve this to be honest, but if you have
ideas, i am willing to help.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Johnson  wrote:

> So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need to
> come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template based on a
> kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 / Ubuntu 10.04 .
> I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but from
> looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from
> download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this at
> least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.  Would
> this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a “blessed”
> template location?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Nathan Johnson
> R&D Engineer
>
>
>
> 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
> Nashville, TN 37211
> General Office: 615-312-6000
>
> website | blog | support
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Paul Angus

Hi Nathan,

Ideally, if you put the template location in (or use a template defined in)  
test_data.py then the actual location can be overridden by anyone testing. 

For Trillian, we've copied all of the templates that people have define to a 
local repo and then replace the URLs in test_data.py to reduce bandwidth use 
and download times.

Ie:

"bootableIso":
{
"displaytext": "Test Bootable ISO",
"name": "testISO",
"bootable": True,
"ispublic": False,
"url": "{{ marvin_images_location }}/TinyCore-current.iso",
"ostype": 'Other Linux (64-bit)',
"mode": 'HTTP_DOWNLOAD'
},

I thought that we had come up with a solution for download.cloud.com, by having 
a mirrorlist hosted in Community Apache 'space' with anyone able to out 
themselves forward as a mirror.
But I must admit I lost track of whether anyone made the requisite changes in 
code

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
Will Stevens
Sent: 24 February 2017 16:30
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Modern template hosting

this is a hard questions.  in general, we should be setting up a mirror on some 
cloudstack/apache domain and then mirror to other provided templates.

we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate 'download.cloud.com', that is 
going to be going away any day now.

i don't know the right way to solve this to be honest, but if you have ideas, i 
am willing to help.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Johnson  wrote:

> So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need 
> to come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template 
> based on a kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 / Ubuntu 
> 10.04 .
> I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but 
> from looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from 
> download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this at 
> least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.  
> Would this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a “blessed”
> template location?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Nathan Johnson
> R&D Engineer
>
>
>
> 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
> Nashville, TN 37211
> General Office: 615-312-6000
>
> website | blog | support
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1866: Advanced isolated network egress destination cidr su...

2017-02-24 Thread cloudmonger

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 387
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=100
 Failed=5
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false Failed

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failed

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Will Stevens

unfortunately the template mirror conversation got caught up in details and
nobody took the lead on implementing a solution.

citrix has been pinging me every couple months to say 'dude, we need to
remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', but i have not had the
cycles to get in and solve the problem.  the shutdown of that is imminent
right now, so we need to solve it asap.



*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Paul Angus 
wrote:

> Hi Nathan,
>
> Ideally, if you put the template location in (or use a template defined
> in)  test_data.py then the actual location can be overridden by anyone
> testing.
>
> For Trillian, we've copied all of the templates that people have define to
> a local repo and then replace the URLs in test_data.py to reduce bandwidth
> use and download times.
>
> Ie:
>
> "bootableIso":
> {
> "displaytext": "Test Bootable ISO",
> "name": "testISO",
> "bootable": True,
> "ispublic": False,
> "url": "{{ marvin_images_location
> }}/TinyCore-current.iso",
> "ostype": 'Other Linux (64-bit)',
> "mode": 'HTTP_DOWNLOAD'
> },
>
>
>
> I thought that we had come up with a solution for download.cloud.com, by
> having a mirrorlist hosted in Community Apache 'space' with anyone able to
> out themselves forward as a mirror.
> But I must admit I lost track of whether anyone made the requisite changes
> in code
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Will Stevens
> Sent: 24 February 2017 16:30
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Modern template hosting
>
> this is a hard questions.  in general, we should be setting up a mirror on
> some cloudstack/apache domain and then mirror to other provided templates.
>
> we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate 'download.cloud.com', that
> is going to be going away any day now.
>
> i don't know the right way to solve this to be honest, but if you have
> ideas, i am willing to help.
>
>
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Johnson  wrote:
>
> > So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need
> > to come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template
> > based on a kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 /
> Ubuntu 10.04 .
> > I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but
> > from looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from
> > download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this at
> > least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.
> > Would this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a “blessed”
> > template location?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Nathan Johnson
> > R&D Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> > 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
> > Nashville, TN 37211
> > General Office: 615-312-6000
> >
> > website | blog | support
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 14 devic...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
  
Trillian test result (tid-894)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26990 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1953-t894-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 320.55 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.04 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 144.79 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 56.15 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 215.46 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 253.84 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 480.33 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 481.57 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1387.50 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 526.87 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 738.73 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1233.63 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.56 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 151.63 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.49 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 151.54 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.74 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.24 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.38 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 84.12 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.05 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.20 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.60 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 232.61 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.54 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.96 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.87 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 70.66 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.11 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 30.53 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 133.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.45 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.98 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 210.42 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.31 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 25.26 | test_routers.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1971: CLOUDSTACK-9726 Update state is not changed to UPDAT...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1971
  
Trillian test result (tid-891)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32576 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1971-t891-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 349.03 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 863.17 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 314.00 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.04 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.96 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 244.90 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 288.23 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 523.34 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 500.56 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1325.16 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1284.43 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.30 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.07 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.12 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.24 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.59 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 150.90 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.00 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 124.05 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 714.12 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.15 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.69 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 158.75 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 262.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 55.40 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.07 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 25.25 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.63 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.92 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.35 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.09 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 3

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #815: CLOUDSTACK-8841: Storage XenMotion from XS 6.2 to XS ...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815
  
Trillian test result (tid-892)
Environment: xenserver-62sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36791 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr815-t892-xenserver-62sp1.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 513.56 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1354.95 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 539.37 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 691.26 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 295.44 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 141.18 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 521.67 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 293.51 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 674.51 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 591.55 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 572.13 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.49 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 85.65 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 100.72 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.23 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.19 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.61 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 392.16 | test_volumes.py
test_change_service_offering_for_vm_with_snapshots | Success | 403.58 | 
test_vm_snapshots.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.13 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 186.16 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 226.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 60.76 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.82 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.18 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.08 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 50.37 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 201.82 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 289.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 146.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 148.91 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 141.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 174.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 15.94 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 123.91 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1935: CLOUDSTACK-9764: Delete domain failure due to Accoun...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935
  
Trillian test result (tid-896)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32396 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1935-t896-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 363.77 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 345.94 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.04 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 141.33 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 56.08 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 231.05 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 258.91 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 531.86 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 521.44 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1407.93 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 537.92 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 755.43 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 151.68 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.42 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.56 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.35 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 145.71 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 146.22 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.37 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 84.13 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.25 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.20 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 95.69 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 232.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.52 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.90 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.94 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.90 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 50.55 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.13 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 30.36 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.39 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 138.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 163.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.30 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.27 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.58 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.33

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1867: CLOUDSTACK-9706: Added snapshots cleanup in start an...

2017-02-24 Thread cloudmonger

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 388
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failing since 2 
runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Chiradeep Vittal

I noticed that Ubuntu provides daily builds, including VHDs. Perhaps we
could point the default templates to their URL? Anyone willing to quickly
try out their images to see if they work on ACS?

https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> unfortunately the template mirror conversation got caught up in details and
> nobody took the lead on implementing a solution.
>
> citrix has been pinging me every couple months to say 'dude, we need to
> remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', but i have not had the
> cycles to get in and solve the problem.  the shutdown of that is imminent
> right now, so we need to solve it asap.
>
>
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Paul Angus 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nathan,
> >
> > Ideally, if you put the template location in (or use a template defined
> > in)  test_data.py then the actual location can be overridden by anyone
> > testing.
> >
> > For Trillian, we've copied all of the templates that people have define
> to
> > a local repo and then replace the URLs in test_data.py to reduce
> bandwidth
> > use and download times.
> >
> > Ie:
> >
> > "bootableIso":
> > {
> > "displaytext": "Test Bootable ISO",
> > "name": "testISO",
> > "bootable": True,
> > "ispublic": False,
> > "url": "{{ marvin_images_location
> > }}/TinyCore-current.iso",
> > "ostype": 'Other Linux (64-bit)',
> > "mode": 'HTTP_DOWNLOAD'
> > },
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought that we had come up with a solution for download.cloud.com, by
> > having a mirrorlist hosted in Community Apache 'space' with anyone able
> to
> > out themselves forward as a mirror.
> > But I must admit I lost track of whether anyone made the requisite
> changes
> > in code
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Paul Angus
> >
> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> > Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > Sent: 24 February 2017 16:30
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Modern template hosting
> >
> > this is a hard questions.  in general, we should be setting up a mirror
> on
> > some cloudstack/apache domain and then mirror to other provided
> templates.
> >
> > we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate 'download.cloud.com', that
> > is going to be going away any day now.
> >
> > i don't know the right way to solve this to be honest, but if you have
> > ideas, i am willing to help.
> >
> >
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > 
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Johnson 
> wrote:
> >
> > > So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need
> > > to come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template
> > > based on a kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 /
> > Ubuntu 10.04 .
> > > I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but
> > > from looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from
> > > download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this at
> > > least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.
> > > Would this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a
> “blessed”
> > > template location?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > Nathan Johnson
> > > R&D Engineer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
> > > Nashville, TN 37211
> > > General Office: 615-312-6000
> > >
> > > website | blog | support
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-02-24 Thread Chiradeep Vittal

Also CentOS KVM images can be obtained here:
http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/

If these work, then the only question is where to host the systemvm images.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal 
wrote:

> I noticed that Ubuntu provides daily builds, including VHDs. Perhaps we
> could point the default templates to their URL? Anyone willing to quickly
> try out their images to see if they work on ACS?
>
> https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
>
>> unfortunately the template mirror conversation got caught up in details
>> and
>> nobody took the lead on implementing a solution.
>>
>> citrix has been pinging me every couple months to say 'dude, we need to
>> remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', but i have not had the
>> cycles to get in and solve the problem.  the shutdown of that is imminent
>> right now, so we need to solve it asap.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> 
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Paul Angus 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Nathan,
>> >
>> > Ideally, if you put the template location in (or use a template defined
>> > in)  test_data.py then the actual location can be overridden by anyone
>> > testing.
>> >
>> > For Trillian, we've copied all of the templates that people have define
>> to
>> > a local repo and then replace the URLs in test_data.py to reduce
>> bandwidth
>> > use and download times.
>> >
>> > Ie:
>> >
>> > "bootableIso":
>> > {
>> > "displaytext": "Test Bootable ISO",
>> > "name": "testISO",
>> > "bootable": True,
>> > "ispublic": False,
>> > "url": "{{ marvin_images_location
>> > }}/TinyCore-current.iso",
>> > "ostype": 'Other Linux (64-bit)',
>> > "mode": 'HTTP_DOWNLOAD'
>> > },
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I thought that we had come up with a solution for download.cloud.com,
>> by
>> > having a mirrorlist hosted in Community Apache 'space' with anyone able
>> to
>> > out themselves forward as a mirror.
>> > But I must admit I lost track of whether anyone made the requisite
>> changes
>> > in code
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Paul Angus
>> >
>> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> > www.shapeblue.com
>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> > @shapeblue
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
>> > Behalf Of Will Stevens
>> > Sent: 24 February 2017 16:30
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Modern template hosting
>> >
>> > this is a hard questions.  in general, we should be setting up a mirror
>> on
>> > some cloudstack/apache domain and then mirror to other provided
>> templates.
>> >
>> > we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate 'download.cloud.com', that
>> > is going to be going away any day now.
>> >
>> > i don't know the right way to solve this to be honest, but if you have
>> > ideas, i am willing to help.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *Will STEVENS*
>> > Lead Developer
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Johnson 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m in a situation where I need
>> > > to come up with a Marvin component test that depends on a template
>> > > based on a kernel that’s relatively new, i.e., newer than Centos 5.3 /
>> > Ubuntu 10.04 .
>> > > I see openvm.eu has a suitable template (Ubuntu 16.0.4 for KVM), but
>> > > from looking at the thread "Migrating CloudStack content from
>> > > download.cloud.com” it looks like there is resistance to using this
>> at
>> > > least for hosting system vm templates over concerns of neutrality.
>> > > Would this be suitable for a component test?  If not, what is a
>> “blessed”
>> > > template location?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks in advance!
>> > >
>> > > Nathan Johnson
>> > > R&D Engineer
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12
>> > > Nashville, TN 37211
>> > > General Office: 615-312-6000
>> > >
>> > > website | blog | support
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
Trillian test result (tid-895)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 43388 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1873-t895-vmware-60u2.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 813.33 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 70.84 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 75.94 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 341.75 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 186.88 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 568.89 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 350.35 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 694.44 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 597.79 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1508.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 704.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 619.57 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1306.33 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.75 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 40.42 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.23 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.18 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 48.90 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 509.64 | test_volumes.py
test_change_service_offering_for_vm_with_snapshots | Success | 537.08 | 
test_vm_snapshots.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.21 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 225.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 176.48 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.64 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 257.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.86 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 56.00 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 5.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 206.47 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 10.20 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 105.79 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.49 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 188.44 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 203.69 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 61.33 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 116.84 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1873: CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use...

2017-02-24 Thread cloudmonger

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 389
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_non_contigiousvlan.py

 * test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1972: CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest I...

2017-02-24 Thread niteshsarda

GitHub user niteshsarda opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1972

CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest IP fails with error VM nic Ip 
x.x.x.x is mapped to load balancing rule

ISSUE

Releasing secondary guest IP fails with error VM nic Ip x.x.x.x is mapped 
to load balancing rule

REPRO STEPS

Create two isolated guest networks with same CIDR
Deploy VMs on both networks
Acquire secondary IP on NICs of both VMs and make sure they have the same 
value, user can input the IP address.
Configure Loadbalancing rule on one of the secondary IP address and try 
releasing the other secondary IP address.
The operation would fail
EXPECTED BEHAVIOR

Secondary IP address should be released if there are no LB rules associated 
with it.

ACTUAL BEHAVIOR

Not releasing secondary IP address even if there are no LB rules associated 
with it.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack ReleaseSecondaryIP

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1972.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1972


commit 2362335662085a5f23570fb7bdc90a8409add38c
Author: Nitesh Sarda 
Date:   2017-02-24T13:40:29Z

CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest IP fails with error VM nic Ip 
x.x.x.x is mapped to load balancing rule




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1937: CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest IP fails...

2017-02-24 Thread niteshsarda

Github user niteshsarda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1937
  
@ustcweizhou : I have created a new PR for this issue 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1972 .

Please check. Also, I have incorporated all the comments which you have 
provided in this PR in the new PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1972: CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest I...

2017-02-24 Thread ustcweizhou

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1972#discussion_r103072546
  
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerDaoImpl.java 
---
@@ -75,4 +84,40 @@ protected LoadBalancerDaoImpl() {
 return listBy(sc);
 }
 
+@Override
+public boolean isLoadBalancerRulesMappedToVmGuestIp(long instanceId, 
String instanceIp, long networkId, FirewallRule.Purpose purpose)
+{
+SearchBuilder lbVmMapSearch = 
_loadBalancerVMMapDao.createSearchBuilder();
+lbVmMapSearch.and("instanceIp", 
lbVmMapSearch.entity().getInstanceIp(),SearchCriteria.Op.EQ);
+lbVmMapSearch.and("instanceId", 
lbVmMapSearch.entity().getInstanceId(), SearchCriteria.Op.EQ);
+
+SearchBuilder firewallRuleIdSearch = 
_firewallRulesDao.createSearchBuilder();
--- End diff --

You might know LoadBalancerVO extends FirewallRuleVO, you can use 
LoadBalancerVO instead.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

71 matches

Mail list logo