date:20170330

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
Wonderful. Seeing green travis after a long time :) ð  
Thanks @nvazquez and @SudharmaJain 
merging now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
LGTM for the code changes


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1756: CLOUDSTACK-9585 UI doesn't give an option to select ...

2017-03-30 Thread jayakarteek

Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1756
  
Tested the scenario, xen tools version is visible 


![pull-1756](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/23551298/24537378/4d032de8-15ff-11e7-9a00-febdd6d6af0a.jpg)




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
Trillian test result (tid-970)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 49701 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2022-t970-vmware-55u3.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_internal_lb.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Failure` | 317.34 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 884.39 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 253.25 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 121.15 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 126.25 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Error` | 263.46 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 361.57 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 156.72 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 572.99 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 372.78 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 769.88 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 712.56 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1508.33 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 770.08 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 695.97 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1366.74 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.86 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 50.52 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.55 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 520.78 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.18 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 199.11 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 128.83 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 237.78 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 216.47 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.21 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.10 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 110.84 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 272.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.83 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.38 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 387.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 203.79 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.27 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Will Stevens

OK. Will have to test again. Maybe there was another change since I last
tested.

On Mar 30, 2017 8:59 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" 
wrote:

> It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0.
>
> [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo)
>
> [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# ifconfig |grep eth
> eth0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
> ether 1e:00:34:00:07:ce  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
> ether 52:54:00:15:5c:a7  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>
>
>
>
> On 3/30/17, 5:48 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:
>
> This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this
> 'fix'.  I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally
> having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned
> previously.
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com>
> wrote:
>
> > There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument
> > biosdevname=0
> >
> > will make all network device names reverted back to ethX
> > We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting
> > RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sergey
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Sergey Levitskiy

It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0.

[root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo)

[root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# ifconfig |grep eth
eth0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
ether 1e:00:34:00:07:ce  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
ether 52:54:00:15:5c:a7  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

On 3/30/17, 5:48 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:

This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this
'fix'.  I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally
having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned previously.

On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" 
wrote:

> There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument
> biosdevname=0
>
> will make all network device names reverted back to ethX
> We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting
> RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
>
>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Will Stevens

This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this
'fix'.  I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally
having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned previously.

On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" 
wrote:

> There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument
> biosdevname=0
>
> will make all network device names reverted back to ethX
> We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting
> RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
>
>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Sergey Levitskiy

There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument
biosdevname=0

will make all network device names reverted back to ethX
We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting RHEL/CentOS 
7 and had no issues so far.

Thanks,
Sergey

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Will Stevens

Yes. Centos 7 changed the name of the interface. There were ways to change
it prior to 7.3:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/205010/centos-7-rename-network-interface-without-rebooting

As of 7.3, the details in that thread do not work (unless you see my
comment).  This is because of this:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2592561

You will need to modify this file '/etc/udev/rules.d/90-eno-fix.rules' in
order to make the override actually work after 7.3.

Hope that helps.

On Mar 30, 2017 6:54 PM, "Syed Ahmed"  wrote:

> I tried the one you provided however, it still has the same problem
> ... DHCP doesn't seem to pick up. I also see that the interface is not
> named eth0 .. could this be the problem? I can try changing the
> network driver and see if that helps. Will report back.
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> > Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one:
> > http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova
> >
> > If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The
> only
> > templates I (can) test are the KVM ones.
> >
> > The official templates from various distros will not work properly as
> they
> > are openstack/aws focused.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> >>
> >> osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only
> >> supports OVA for VMWare
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
> >>>  I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
> >>>
> >>>  http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw
> >>>
> >>>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed 
> wrote:
> 
>   I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
>   cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!
> 
>   On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  >
>  wrote:
> >
> >  Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos
> > build
> >  cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
> >
> >
> >  On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"
> > 
> >  wrote:
> >
> >>  Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
> >>
> >>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>  FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>   Hi All,
> 
>   I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
>   somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR.
> The
>   default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
> 
>   I got the CentOS7 template from
>   http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
> >>
> >>  x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
> >>>
> >>>  vanilla-vmware.ova
> 
> 
>   Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are
> there
>   any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
>   Cloudstack?
> 
>   Thanks,
>   -Syed
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  Rafael Weingärtner
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

I tried the one you provided however, it still has the same problem
... DHCP doesn't seem to pick up. I also see that the interface is not
named eth0 .. could this be the problem? I can try changing the
network driver and see if that helps. Will report back.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one:
> http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova
>
> If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The only
> templates I (can) test are the KVM ones.
>
> The official templates from various distros will not work properly as they
> are openstack/aws focused.
>
>
>
>
> On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>>
>> osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only
>> supports OVA for VMWare
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>>>
>>>  The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
>>>  I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
>>>
>>>  http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:

  I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
  cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!

  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
 wrote:
>
>  Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos
> build
>  cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
>
>
>  On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"
> 
>  wrote:
>
>>  Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>>
>>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed 
>>> wrote:

  Hi All,

  I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
  somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
  default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.

  I got the CentOS7 template from
  http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
>>
>>  x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
>>>
>>>  vanilla-vmware.ova


  Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
  any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
  Cloudstack?

  Thanks,
  -Syed
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Rafael Weingärtner
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Nux!

Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one:
http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova

If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The only 
templates I (can) test are the KVM ones.

The official templates from various distros will not work properly as they are 
openstack/aws focused.



On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only
>supports OVA for VMWare
>
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed 
>wrote:
>> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
>> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
>>
>> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed 
>wrote:
>>> I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
>>> cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion
> wrote:
 Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think
>centos build
 cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.


 On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"
>
 wrote:

> Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed 
>wrote:
>
> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed
> wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9
>but
> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR.
>The
> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
> > >
> > > I got the CentOS7 template from
> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
> > vanilla-vmware.ova
> > >
> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are
>there
> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
> > > Cloudstack?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Syed
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only
supports OVA for VMWare

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
>
> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>> I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
>> cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>>> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
>>> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Attachments are not forwarded with emails.

 On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:

 > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
 >
 >
 >
 > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
 > > Hi All,
 > >
 > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
 > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
 > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
 > >
 > > I got the CentOS7 template from
 > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
 x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
 > vanilla-vmware.ova
 > >
 > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
 > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
 > > Cloudstack?
 > >
 > > Thanks,
 > > -Syed
 >



 --
 Rafael Weingärtner

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.

http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
> cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
>> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
>>
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>>>
>>> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>>> > > Hi All,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
>>> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
>>> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
>>> > >
>>> > > I got the CentOS7 template from
>>> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
>>> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
>>> > vanilla-vmware.ova
>>> > >
>>> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
>>> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
>>> > > Cloudstack?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > -Syed
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
> wrote:
>
>> Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>>
>> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
>> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
>> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
>> > >
>> > > I got the CentOS7 template from
>> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
>> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
>> > vanilla-vmware.ova
>> > >
>> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
>> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
>> > > Cloudstack?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > -Syed
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion

Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.


On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
wrote:

> Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
>
> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
> > >
> > > I got the CentOS7 template from
> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/
> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
> > vanilla-vmware.ova
> > >
> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
> > > Cloudstack?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Syed
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Rafael Weingärtner

Attachments are not forwarded with emails.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:

> FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
> > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
> > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
> >
> > I got the CentOS7 template from
> > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-
> vanilla-vmware.ova
> >
> > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
> > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
> > Cloudstack?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Syed
>



-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
> somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
> default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
>
> I got the CentOS7 template from
> http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-vanilla-vmware.ova
>
> Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
> any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
> Cloudstack?
>
> Thanks,
> -Syed

Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare

2017-03-30 Thread Syed Ahmed

Hi All,

I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.

I got the CentOS7 template from
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-vanilla-vmware.ova

Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there
any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for
Cloudstack?

Thanks,
-Syed

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-607


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
Trillian test result (tid-968)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32527 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2021-t968-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 48 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 366.18 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 165.52 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.09 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 256.22 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 268.95 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 498.20 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 513.11 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1428.00 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 548.32 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 760.45 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1286.45 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 151.48 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.41 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.54 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.31 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.72 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.29 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 89.19 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.22 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 95.94 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 257.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.73 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 70.63 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 40.41 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.37 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.65 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.25 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.98 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | Success | 87.45 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.29 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.63 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.22 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.35 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.30 |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
LGTM on the code review. @borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can you kick off tests for 
this PR?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread nvazquez

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@karuturi sure, done! I rebased master and pushed, now Travis passes!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re:Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Haijiao

Thanks for you reply, Rajani,  you are doging good job !






在2017年03月30 22时15分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there
is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately,
we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more
fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more
blockers.

Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions).

~Rajani

Sent from phone.


On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread.


Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and
features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It
would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things'  a
chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even
features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) .


Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap,  16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS).




在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道:

Hello,

Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> master and it's working fine on master.
> This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> checked why they cannot co exist.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
>
> Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>
> Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
>
> If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
>
> We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> they are fixed.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> (raj...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> :
>
> > Here’s the ticket:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> nvazquez can
> > you take a look?
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski,

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Rajani Karuturi

We can wait. When do you expect the pr to be out?

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 30 Mar 2017 6:50 p.m., "Pierre-Luc Dion"  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
> We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> wrote:
>
> > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> > master and it's working fine on master.
> > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> > checked why they cannot co exist.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > Sent from phone.
> >
> >
> > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
> >
> > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
> >
> > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
> >
> > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >
> > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> > VMs isn’t working properly.
> >
> > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
> >
> > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
> >
> > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> > they are fixed.
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> > (raj...@apache.org)
> > wrote:
> >
> > We currently have the below list of blockers:
> >
> > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
> >
> > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
> >
> > ~ Rajani
> >
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
> > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sure, I can pull that code and test.
> >
> > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> > done,
> > I can move on to your PR.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> > created this
> > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> > testing it
> > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> > repeat your
> > tests on it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nicolas
> >
> > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> > :
> >
> > > Here’s the ticket:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> > >
> > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> > nvazquez can
> > > you take a look?
> > > >
> > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This does seem messed up.
> > > >
> > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
> > the tag
> > > ends up in storage_pool_details.
> > > >
> > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
> > them
> > > in storage_pool_tags.
> > > >
> > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
> > either
> > > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> > > >
> > > > It looks like we have a new table:

Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Rajani Karuturi

We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there
is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately,
we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more
fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more
blockers.

Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions).

~Rajani

Sent from phone.


On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread.


Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and
features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It
would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things'  a
chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even
features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) .


Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap,  16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS).




在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道:

Hello,

Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> master and it's working fine on master.
> This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> checked why they cannot co exist.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
>
> Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>
> Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
>
> If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
>
> We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> they are fixed.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> (raj...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> :
>
> > Here’s the ticket:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> nvazquez can
> > you take a look?
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This does seem messed up.
> > >
> > > If

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

2017-03-30 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
  
@priyankparihar Fortunately those API are already written. As per PR1767 
you can get VM details including rootdiskcontroller using listVirtualMachines 
API and listTemplates.
So if we are talking about resizing a root disk on existing VM we can 
obtain all the details upfront for
1. vmware.root.disk.controller global setting
2. vmware.root.disk.controller if it is set on VM level 
3.vmware.create.full.clone global setting
4. vmware.create.full.clone if ti s set on the storage pool where root disk 
resides
After that UI can make a determination if resizing should be allowed or not
For the case of new VM deployment with variable root disk size all options 
above can be obtaine except #4 since storage pool will be determine only during 
volume allocation. I think for that case we just use items #1-3 to determine if 
we allow variable root disk size in UI or not (for #3 we obtain 
rootdiskcontroller setting if it is set on Template level)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Haijiao

There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread.


Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and 
features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It would 
give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things'  a chance to 
help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even features back to 
4.9.x (LTS branch) .


Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap,  16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS).




在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道:

Hello,

Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> master and it's working fine on master.
> This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> checked why they cannot co exist.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
>
> Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>
> Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
>
> If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
>
> We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> they are fixed.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> (raj...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> :
>
> > Here’s the ticket:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> nvazquez can
> > you take a look?
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This does seem messed up.
> > >
> > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
> the tag
> > ends up in storage_pool_details.
> > >
> > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
> them
> > in storage_pool_tags.
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
> either
> > fix or examine in detail

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion

Hello,

Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
> master and it's working fine on master.
> This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
> checked why they cannot co exist.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
>
> Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>
> Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
> if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
>
> If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
> (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>
> To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
> removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
> VMs isn’t working properly.
>
> On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
>
> We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
> they are fixed.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
> (raj...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
> done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> :
>
> > Here’s the ticket:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can open a ticket.
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> nvazquez can
> > you take a look?
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This does seem messed up.
> > >
> > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
> the tag
> > ends up in storage_pool_details.
> > >
> > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
> them
> > in storage_pool_tags.
> > >
> > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
> either
> > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> > >
> > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> > >
> > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
> doesn’t pick up any
> > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> > >
> > > This data used to be stored in the
> cloud.storage_pool_details
> > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
> upgrade process
> > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...

2017-03-30 Thread DaanHoogland

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
  
@karuturi I think it is easiest to just reapply and not search for the 
cause of an 8 month old PR resulting in conflicts. (if the original code has 
the right URLS in it)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not ...

2017-03-30 Thread DaanHoogland

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022#discussion_r108918688
  
--- Diff: 
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HypervisorHostHelper.java ---
@@ -1477,6 +1493,40 @@ public static String 
resolveHostNameInUrl(DatacenterMO dcMo, String url) {
 return url;
 }
 
+public static String removeOVFNetwork(final String ovfString)  {
+if (ovfString == null || ovfString.isEmpty()) {
+return ovfString;
+}
+try {
+final DocumentBuilderFactory factory = 
DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
+final Document doc = factory.newDocumentBuilder().parse(new 
ByteArrayInputStream(ovfString.getBytes()));
+final DocumentTraversal traversal = (DocumentTraversal) doc;
+final NodeIterator iterator = 
traversal.createNodeIterator(doc.getDocumentElement(), NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT, 
null, true);
+for (Node n = iterator.nextNode(); n != null; n = 
iterator.nextNode()) {
+final Element e = (Element) n;
+if ("NetworkSection".equals(e.getTagName())) {
+if (e.getParentNode() != null) {
+e.getParentNode().removeChild(e);
+}
+} else if ("rasd:Connection".equals(e.getTagName())) {
+if (e.getParentNode() != null && 
e.getParentNode().getParentNode() != null) {
+
e.getParentNode().getParentNode().removeChild(e.getParentNode());
+}
+}
+}
+final DOMSource domSource = new DOMSource(doc);
+final StringWriter writer = new StringWriter();
+final StreamResult result = new StreamResult(writer);
+final TransformerFactory tf = TransformerFactory.newInstance();
+final Transformer transformer = tf.newTransformer();
+transformer.transform(domSource, result);
+return writer.toString();
+} catch (SAXException | IOException | ParserConfigurationException 
| TransformerException e) {
+s_logger.warn("Unexpected exception caught while removing 
network elements from OVF:", e);
--- End diff --

thanks for this.
I'd log a warn without, and a debug with the stacktrace.That way an admin 
had better control on what is seen in the logs.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...

2017-03-30 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
  
code LGTM. Need to check why xenserver and KVM still have wrong urls on PR 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#issuecomment-288310796 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
I requested @sateesh-chodapuneedi for a review


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
This may be seen as a blocker for vmware dv-switch based environments where 
at the moment we cannot use the systemvmtemplates.
Pinging for review - @DaanHoogland @abhinandanprateek @borisstoyanov 
@PaulAngus @karuturi @koushik-das and others


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-606


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Rajani Karuturi

Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
master and it's working fine on master.
This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
checked why they cannot co exist.

~Rajani

Sent from phone.

On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" 
wrote:

Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?

On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:

Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)

If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #883: CLOUDSTACK-8906: /var/log/cloud/ doesn't get logrotat...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883
  
@jayakarteek Thanks for testing. I have made the respective code changes. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread NuxRo

Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
Hi,

I'll remove the NICs. Thanks for the notification.
I assume I'll have to do the same for all my templates as I am using the 
same script to generate the ova.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...

2017-03-30 Thread DaanHoogland

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
  
LGTM
@kishankavala did you check what went wrong with the kvm template. 
@karuturi reported that and it was probably some auto-conflict-resolution.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgra...

2017-03-30 Thread kishankavala

GitHub user kishankavala opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023

BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path for LXC and OVM

`mysql> select id,unique_name,name,type,url,updated,created from 
vm_template where type='SYSTEM';

++-+---++---+-+-+
| id | unique_name | name  | type   | url   

| updated | created |

++-+---++---+-+-+
|  1 | routing-1   | SystemVM Template (XenServer) | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-xen.vhd.bz2
| NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 |
|  3 | routing-3   | SystemVM Template (KVM)   | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
  | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 |
|  8 | routing-8   | SystemVM Template (vSphere)   | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-vmware.ova
 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 |
|  9 | routing-9   | SystemVM Template (HyperV)| SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-hyperv.vhd.zip
 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 |
| 10 | routing-10  | SystemVM Template (LXC)   | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
  | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:54:13 |
| 12 | routing-12  | SystemVM Template (Ovm3)  | SYSTEM | 
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-ovm.raw.bz2
| NULL| 2017-03-30 15:55:58 |

++-+---++---+-+-+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)
`

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9808

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2023


commit 4795cba0ec86c2e4ffd2da959414deeb15a2c532
Author: Kishan Kavala 
Date:   2017-03-30T11:45:46Z

BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path for LXC and OVM




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #883: CLOUDSTACK-8906: /var/log/cloud/ doesn't get logrotat...

2017-03-30 Thread jayakarteek

Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883
  
Test results;
when I executed the setupxenserver.sh file , following is the output
iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?).
mv: invalid option -- n
Try `mv --help' for more information.
success

mv -n option is provided in line 52



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
LGTM on the code changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...

2017-03-30 Thread sudhansu7

Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
  
@serg38 
Added changes for failure case. If migration fails the old pod id will be 
restored.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

2017-03-30 Thread priyankparihar

Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
  
>I'm happy that you agree with my comments, as far as resizing root disk 
for runnign VM, I think checking both full.clone and root.disk.controller 
global settings puts us in a good position to make the option available or not. 
By any chance if the user has made a change and changed the RootDiskController, 
he would be notified with exception and that would ring a bell to him. I think 
Cloudstack brings an abstraction when using hypervisors and it's generally good 
for the product when users use more CloudStack features instead of relying on 
the Hypervisor to get work done.

@serg38, @pdube  and @sateesh-chodapuneedi. Should i write additional API 
for extracting all these details in case of running VM or is there any 
alternative to achieve this functionality ?  What is your opinion ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Daan Hoogland

Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9?

On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such):

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849

It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a look at it and see 
what’s going on there.

The gist is you can’t live migrate a VM from one cluster to another in the 
same datacenter (using either NFS or iSCSI as shared storage) (which I think 
you should be able to do with VMware in CloudStack).

On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left.   Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to 
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
>

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Daan Hoogland

Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?

On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:

Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)

If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

2017-03-30 Thread priyankparihar

Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
  
Hi @borisstoyanov,
>Here are some recommendations that would make user experience better. What 
I'm suggesting is to implement 2 standalone checks.
Check if vmware.create.full.clone is true.
Check if vmware.root.disk.controller is true.

>These checks should be performed 
>When adding instance
This could be done, soon UI will be updated.


>when resizing a running instance
I think for this we should rely on Hypervisor. Because currently, we do not 
have API  for extracting certain details (like root disk controller of running 
VM's Disk).

What is your opinion ? 





---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2012: CLOUDSTACK-9842: Unable to map root volume usage to ...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2012
  
LGTM for the code changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #899: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-8921 snapshot_store_ref table shoul...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
  
@yvsubhash your template related changes are not relevant to the issue 
fixed. Please remove the changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-605


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
  
@NuxRo hi Lucian, I tested your Macchinina template as well: 
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/macchinina-vmware.ova It too 
has network/nics defined so it fails to deploy on dvswitch-based vmware 
environments (with no vswitches). Can you please regenerate the ova without the 
defined nics/networks?

@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@nvazquez PR #2019 is merged. Can you force push and kick travis again?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2019: CLOUDSTACK-9851 travis CI build failure after...

2017-03-30 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2019: CLOUDSTACK-9851 travis CI build failure after merge ...

2017-03-30 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019
  
merging now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not ...

2017-03-30 Thread rhtyd

GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022

CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include network details

This removes nic/network specific details while exporting the 
systemvmtemplate for vmware (ova file). Having this causes the ssvms to not 
deploy in dvswitch-based vmware environments that have no vswitch portgroups 
(dummy etc). Tested this on a local Trillian env.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 
4.9-systemvm-fix-vmware-portgroups

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2022


commit 49a132fdf9a8e97922a4f2e6435c8fb07fea6076
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2017-03-30T06:09:43Z

appliance: remove nic related rules while exporting ssvm ova

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Rajani Karuturi

Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)

If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been
removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system
VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi
(raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is
done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >> previous mail.
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for...

2017-03-30 Thread cloudsadhu

Github user cloudsadhu commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r108862410
  
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,36 +134,46 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
 # 2. root disk has new size per listVolumes
 # 3. Rejects non-supported hypervisor types
 """
-if(self.hypervisor.lower() == 'kvm'):
-newrootsize = (self.template.size >> 30) + 2
-self.virtual_machine = VirtualMachine.create(
-self.apiclient,
-self.testdata["virtual_machine"],
-accountid=self.account.name,
-zoneid=self.zone.id,
-domainid=self.account.domainid,
-serviceofferingid=self.service_offering.id,
-templateid=self.template.id,
-rootdisksize=newrootsize
+
+
+newrootsize = (self.template.size >> 30) + 2
+if(self.hypervisor.lower() == 'kvm' or self.hypervisor.lower() ==
+'xenserver'or self.hypervisor.lower() == 'vmware'  ):
+
+if self.hypervisor=="vmware":
+self.virtual_machine = VirtualMachine.create(
+self.apiclient, self.services["virtual_machine"],
+zoneid=self.zone.id,
+accountid=self.account.name,
+domainid=self.domain.id,
+serviceofferingid=self.services_offering_vmware.id,
+templateid=self.template.id
+)
+
--- End diff --

sorry thats my  bad  will add the missing parameter and will post results.
if condition is added to address vm deployment in right  storage pool.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-604


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Daan Hoogland

To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is 
blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly.

On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left.   Are we close to release the RC2 ?


CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - 
Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland









在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...

2017-03-30 Thread borisstoyanov

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the primary...

2017-03-30 Thread SudharmaJain

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722
  
LGTM for the code changes. @yvsubhash please change the base branch to 4.9.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Tutkowski, Mike

This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such):

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849

It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a look at it and see 
what’s going on there.

The gist is you can’t live migrate a VM from one cluster to another in the same 
datacenter (using either NFS or iSCSI as shared storage) (which I think you 
should be able to do with VMware in CloudStack).

On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

Seems only one blocker left.   Are we close to release the RC2 ?

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - 
Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers.

Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-30 Thread Haijiao

Seems only one blocker left.   Are we close to release the RC2 ?


CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan 
Hoogland - Daan Hoogland









在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:

We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >> previous mail.
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
> already.
> >> Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Koushik Das 
> >> Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >> Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
> >>
> >> -Koushik
> >>
> >> On 03/03/17, 1:58

74 matches

Mail list logo