[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard
rhtyd commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/7#issuecomment-549441371 @iceteabottle that's good idea as well, so basically show features templates? However, per the old CloudStack templates have a sort order so I don't know if that would break anything esp. in env with large number of templates. cc @PaulAngus @svenvogel ? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] iceteabottle commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard
iceteabottle commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/7#issuecomment-549421284 > Nice @iceteabottle - do you think instead we could have an explicit tab of featured templates (use the star icon), rest looks great! Thanks. Maybe I could pin the featured above instead of breaking the OS tabs logic. What do you think, @rhtyd ? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard
rhtyd commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/7#issuecomment-549406169 Nice @iceteabottle - do you think instead we could have an explicit tab of featured templates (use the star icon), rest looks great! This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] iceteabottle commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard
iceteabottle commented on issue #7: [WIP] Feature/vm wizard URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/7#issuecomment-549403949 I updated the tagging of the isos. ![Bildschirmfoto 2019-11-04 um 16 21 26](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13260952/68132606-48aee000-ff1f-11e9-83fc-79f233d14791.png) I plan to apply this tagging also for the template selection. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[PRIMATE][SIG] Meeting notes (4 Nov 2019)
All, We had our first Primate SIG meeting, here are the meeting notes and summary of actions: Information and Discuss: * Introductions - Bobby, Gabriel, Paul, Rohit, Rudi, Shiv, Sven * High-level project updates discussed (same as last week, no major changes) * Technical preview project/progress board: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/projects/1 * Full end to end demo discussed towards the end of the call Actions and agreements: * QA automation discussion: Travis integration/usage, R and explore unit testing * Shiv/Indiqus - manual QA resource availability possible (half-month - Nov & Dec) - initial QA round * Rudi/Indiqus - Focus on an action plan for QA automation testing and CI/CD pipeline, propose an action plan by next call, and a QA resource from Indiqus to start cursory manual testing (TBD) * Sven/EWerk to conduct planning and get back on resourcing, roughly one (part-time) dev available in next 2-3 months * Florian/EWerk to continue work on VM deployment wizard for next 2 weeks, to pick next tasks after that * Gabriel/PCExtreme proposed a live demo of Primate on PR for manual verification/testing, to discuss with Wido for resource donation (VMs) for hosting the git-bot and live running preview service (Paul shared similar example on the CloudStack docs repo, where a bot builds and gives link on each PR of a built docs env) * Gabriel and Rudi to collaborate towards the per PR review/live preview setup (CI/CD) * Rohit-Anurag/ShapeBlue - continue to work on zone deployment and attempt completion in next two weeks, along with help towards PR review, testing etc. * Bobby/ShapeBlue - manual QA (unavailable for next 2 week, may commence in a month's time) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue https://www.shapeblue.com rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
Re: Virtual machines volume lock manager
We have similar discussion before actually. see PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2722 and PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2984 We have made similar changes as describe in PR 2722. It caused duplicated vms. The change in PR 2984 (same behavior in old cloudstack versions) is not ideal for us. -Wei On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 13:46, Andrija Panic wrote: > true, true... Forgot these cases while I was running KVM. > > Check if that VM is using a compute offering which is marked as "HA > enabled" - and if YES< then Wei is 100% right (you can confirm this from > logs - checking for info on starting that VM on specific hypervisor etc) > THough, IF doing live migration, I assume it should play fair/nice with HA > and HA should not kick in. > > Wei can you confirm if these 2 play together nice ^^^ ? > > Cheers > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 13:11, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > Hi Rakesh, > > > > The duplicated VM is not caused by migration, but by HA. > > > > -Wei > > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:31, Rakesh Venkatesh < > www.rakeshv@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrija > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply. > > > > > > Im using 4.7 version of ACS. Qemu version 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.40 > > > > > > Im not sure if ACS job failed or libvirt job as I didnt see into logs. > > > Yes the vm will be in paused state during migration but after the > failed > > > migration, the same vm was in "running" state on two different > > hypervisors. > > > We wrote a script to find out how duplicated vm's are running and found > > out > > > that more than 5 vm's had this issue. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:42 PM Andrija Panic > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I've been running KVM public cloud up to recently and have never seen > > > such > > > > behaviour. > > > > > > > > What versions (ACS, qemu, libvrit) are you running? > > > > > > > > How does the migration fail - ACS job - or libvirt job? > > > > destination VM is by default always in PAUSED state, until the > > migration > > > is > > > > finished - only then the destination VM (on the new host) will get > > > RUNNING, > > > > while previously pausing the original VM (on the old host). > > > > > > > > i,e. > > > > phase1 source vm RUNNING, destination vm PAUSED (RAM content > being > > > > copied over... takes time...) > > > > phase2 source vm PAUSED, destination vm PAUSED (last bits of RAM > > > > content are migrated) > > > > phase3 source vm destroyed, destination VM RUNNING. > > > > > > > > Andrija > > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:26, Rakesh Venkatesh < > > > www.rakeshv@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently we have seen cases where when the Vm migration fails, > > > cloudstack > > > > > ends up running two instances of the same VM on different > > hypervisors. > > > > The > > > > > state will be "running" and not any other transition state. This > will > > > of > > > > > course lead to corruption of disk. Does CloudStack has any option > of > > > > volume > > > > > locking so that two instances of the same VM wont be running? > > > > > Anyone else has faced this issue and found some solution to fix it? > > > > > > > > > > We are thinking of using "virtlockd" of libvirt or implementing > > custom > > > > lock > > > > > mechanisms. There are some pros and cons of the both the solutions > > and > > > i > > > > > want your feedback before proceeding further. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks and regards > > > > > Rakesh venkatesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Andrija Panić > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks and regards > > > Rakesh venkatesh > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrija Panić >
[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd commented on issue #9: Several minor fixes
rhtyd commented on issue #9: Several minor fixes URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/9#issuecomment-549290986 Thanks @shwstppr I'll proceed with merging, per the guideline of at least a single lgtm. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd merged pull request #9: Several minor fixes
rhtyd merged pull request #9: Several minor fixes URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/9 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services