Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

2023-09-06 Thread Nux
Thanks Wei, that's unfortunate, but hey, good thing it got caught in 
time.


Regards

On 2023-09-06 09:19, Wei ZHOU wrote:

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Unfortunately Rohit found a critical issue that live migration failed
between kvm hosts with local storage pools:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7942
We have proposed a fix: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7945

I will create RC3 when the fix is verified and merged. The issue 
impacts

kvm hosts with local storage only.

-Wei


On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 09:39, Wei ZHOU  wrote:


Hi all,

I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC2, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230901T0817
Commit: 0e7f7d42f0ec68a360fafa7de21ea06577ed032c

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
following

location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)



Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

2023-09-06 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
Thank you Wei.

Regards,
Harikrishna

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 1:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , users 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)
Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Unfortunately Rohit found a critical issue that live migration failed
between kvm hosts with local storage pools:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7942
We have proposed a fix: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7945

I will create RC3 when the fix is verified and merged. The issue impacts
kvm hosts with local storage only.

-Wei



 

On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 09:39, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC2, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230901T0817
> Commit: 0e7f7d42f0ec68a360fafa7de21ea06577ed032c
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

2023-09-06 Thread Rohit Yadav
Thanks Wei.



Regards.


From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 13:49
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; users 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Unfortunately Rohit found a critical issue that live migration failed
between kvm hosts with local storage pools:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7942
We have proposed a fix: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7945

I will create RC3 when the fix is verified and merged. The issue impacts
kvm hosts with local storage only.

-Wei



 

On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 09:39, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC2, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230901T0817
> Commit: 0e7f7d42f0ec68a360fafa7de21ea06577ed032c
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #333: storage: add multiple local storages on kvm

2023-09-06 Thread via GitHub


blueorangutan commented on PR #333:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/333#issuecomment-1707890350

   QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/333. 
(QA-JID 115)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #333: storage: add multiple local storages on kvm

2023-09-06 Thread via GitHub


blueorangutan commented on PR #333:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/333#issuecomment-1707888937

   @weizhouapache a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll 
keep you posted as I make progress.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] weizhouapache commented on pull request #333: storage: add multiple local storages on kvm

2023-09-06 Thread via GitHub


weizhouapache commented on PR #333:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/333#issuecomment-1707888399

   
   @blueorangutan docbuild
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

2023-09-06 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Unfortunately Rohit found a critical issue that live migration failed
between kvm hosts with local storage pools:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7942
We have proposed a fix: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7945

I will create RC3 when the fix is verified and merged. The issue impacts
kvm hosts with local storage only.

-Wei


On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 09:39, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC2, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230901T0817
> Commit: 0e7f7d42f0ec68a360fafa7de21ea06577ed032c
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


Can I use KVM local storage for user vm

2023-09-06 Thread Technology Mail

*Hi,*

My setup is AlmaLinux8, all are working fine using mgmt+nfs, but I have 
8 NVME disk (every disk size 1.8TB) mount on kvm server, so I want to 
use all disk as user vm storage disk separately.


*My idea is :* When setup zone then using enable local storage. But this 
settings is only for one disk or all kvm server disk.


But I have 8 disk, so how to trace mgmt server my all 8 disk separately. 
For example, I want 5 user vm for disk 1, another 5 user vm use disk 2, 
as like another user vm disk 3...etc.


which process can I use this disk? give me some idea please ...

--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*



*Facebook  | Twitter 
 | YouTube 
 | LinkedIn 
*


*Address : *116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road

Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh

*Mob :* +88 01716915504

*Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com

*Web :* www.technologyrss.com