Announcement: Apache CloudStack and Ceph User Day
Hello all, Firstly, thanks to all who joined the CloudStack Collaboration Conference in Paris last week. It was an amazing event, in-depth talks and great attendees. The next planned event is CloudStack and Ceph Day Netherlands, February 8th, Amsterdam, Netherlands: https://www.eventbrite.nl/e/cloudstack-and-ceph-day-netherlands-2024-tickets-700177167757 I am sending the link for registrations above! Also, we are looking for community members, who would like to make a talk at the event. If you are using Ceph and CloudStack, please ping me! Kind regards,
Re: [PR] Update SDKs [cloudstack-terraform-provider]
poddm commented on PR #71: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/71#issuecomment-1830638315 resolves https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/66 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Zonewizard [cloudstack-terraform-provider]
poddm commented on PR #67: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-1830540072 Added additional resources 1. cloudstack_vlan_ip_range 2. cloudstack_network_service_provider_state This also requires the following `cloudstack-go` change. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/75 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Docs for KVM Ingestion feature [cloudstack-documentation]
andrijapanicsb commented on code in PR #356: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/356#discussion_r1408279407 ## source/adminguide/virtual_machines/importing_unmanaging_vms.rst: ## @@ -45,7 +53,7 @@ replicated) and in the recreation of Instances which have been backed up (part o CloudStack's Backup and Recovery feature). The most complex part of importing Instances is the mapping of an unmanaged Instance's Networks to CloudStack Networks. As an operator Review Comment: ```suggestion The most complex part of importing Instances is the mapping of an unmanaged Instance's Networks to CloudStack Networks, as an operator ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Docs for KVM Ingestion feature [cloudstack-documentation]
andrijapanicsb commented on code in PR #356: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/356#discussion_r1408272479 ## source/adminguide/virtual_machines/importing_unmanaging_vms.rst: ## @@ -28,6 +34,8 @@ From ACS 4.16 onwards, importing of the unmanaged Instances can also be carried From ACS 4.15 onwards, administrators are able to unmanage guest Instances. Review Comment: ```suggestion From ACS 4.15 onwards, administrators are able to unmanage VMware-based guest Instances. ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] adding updateVlanIpRange [cloudstack-go]
poddm commented on PR #75: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/75#issuecomment-1830361100 @DaanHoogland, updated test data for createVlanIpRange, updateVlanIpRange, listVlanIpRanges and deleteVlanIpRange. ``` $ /opt/homebrew/bin/go test -timeout 30s -run ^TestVLANService$ github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v2/test -v === RUN TestVLANService === RUN TestVLANService/CreateVlanIpRange === RUN TestVLANService/DedicateGuestVlanRange === RUN TestVLANService/DeleteVlanIpRange === RUN TestVLANService/ListDedicatedGuestVlanRanges VLANService_test.go:82: Skipping as no json response is provided in testdata === RUN TestVLANService/ListVlanIpRanges === RUN TestVLANService/ReleaseDedicatedGuestVlanRange VLANService_test.go:106: Skipping as no json response is provided in testdata === RUN TestVLANService/ListGuestVlans VLANService_test.go:118: Skipping as no json response is provided in testdata === RUN TestVLANService/UpdateVlanIpRange --- PASS: TestVLANService (0.00s) --- PASS: TestVLANService/CreateVlanIpRange (0.00s) --- PASS: TestVLANService/DedicateGuestVlanRange (0.00s) --- PASS: TestVLANService/DeleteVlanIpRange (0.00s) --- SKIP: TestVLANService/ListDedicatedGuestVlanRanges (0.00s) --- PASS: TestVLANService/ListVlanIpRanges (0.00s) --- SKIP: TestVLANService/ReleaseDedicatedGuestVlanRange (0.00s) --- SKIP: TestVLANService/ListGuestVlans (0.00s) --- PASS: TestVLANService/UpdateVlanIpRange (0.00s) PASS ok github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v2/test 0.455s ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] adding updateVlanIpRange [cloudstack-go]
DaanHoogland commented on PR #75: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/75#issuecomment-1829784500 according to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/actions/runs/7012770058/job/19085665052?pr=75#step:6:943 this is not tested in the H action. Code looks good but that test needs fixing. Do you care to take the time @poddm ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador
Congratulations Daniel! From: Slavka Peleva Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 2:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador Congratulations Daniel! On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Sina Kashipazha wrote: > > Congratulations Daniel! > > > > > -- - Original Message --- > On Saturday, August 26th, 2023 at 2:31 AM, Nicolas Vazquez < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations Daniel! > > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > From: Daman Arora damans...@gmail.com > > > > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:30:38 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador > > > > > Congrats Daniel! > > > > > Regards, > > Damanpreet Arora > > 613-291-7558 > > > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 09:28, Pearl d'Silva pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Congratulations Daniel! > > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com > > > Sent: August 25, 2023 8:58 AM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador > > > > > > > Congratulations Daniel ! > > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 12:56, Daan Hoogland d...@apache.org wrote: > > > > > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT] > > > > has invited Daniel Salvador to become a PMC member and we are pleased > > > > to announce that they have accepted. > > > > > > > > > Daniel has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the > > > > project run smoothly > > > > > > > > > please join me in congratulating Daniel
Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum
Personally I'm against that, as it will dilute the community and once the mailing lists will get inactive they'll stay that way. Also github/discussions is a proprietary platform at Microsoft's whim, I think this goes against the spirit of the project as free software. That said, I'll be "voting" -0, don't want to get in the way of "progress". On 2023-11-28 09:28, Rohit Yadav wrote: All, It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing lists: https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type=code Following discussions with both technical and non-technical users from the CCC, I believe we should try this out and use it for users to discuss their ideas, questions, and problems, all that traditionally has happened on the users@ ML; while been integrating such discussions on the users@ ML. The Discussions platform could be used by developers too to get feedback from users. That said, we MUST continue to use our mailing lists for any project governance related matters such as releases related discussions, releases voting, and any form of consensus and decision making. I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied to users@ ML: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files Thoughts and feedback? Regards.
Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum
Looks pretty good, well organized, and visible, rather email lists! I hope we start seeing more and more there. There might be some users not having a github account, which might not benefit and abstain one day if we decide to fully migrate, but let’s think about that then! Great work and nice idea! Bobby. From: Rohit Yadav Date: Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 11:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum All, It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing lists: https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type=code Following discussions with both technical and non-technical users from the CCC, I believe we should try this out and use it for users to discuss their ideas, questions, and problems, all that traditionally has happened on the users@ ML; while been integrating such discussions on the users@ ML. The Discussions platform could be used by developers too to get feedback from users. That said, we MUST continue to use our mailing lists for any project governance related matters such as releases related discussions, releases voting, and any form of consensus and decision making. I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied to users@ ML: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files Thoughts and feedback? Regards.
Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum
great On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:30 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > > All, > > It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github > Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems > to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing > lists: https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type=code > > Following discussions with both technical and non-technical users from the > CCC, I believe we should try this out and use it for users to discuss their > ideas, questions, and problems, all that traditionally has happened on the > users@ ML; while been integrating such discussions on the users@ ML. The > Discussions platform could be used by developers too to get feedback from > users. > > That said, we MUST continue to use our mailing lists for any project > governance related matters such as releases related discussions, releases > voting, and any form of consensus and decision making. > > I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied to > users@ ML: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files > > Thoughts and feedback? > > > Regards. > > > -- Daan
[DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum
All, It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing lists: https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type=code Following discussions with both technical and non-technical users from the CCC, I believe we should try this out and use it for users to discuss their ideas, questions, and problems, all that traditionally has happened on the users@ ML; while been integrating such discussions on the users@ ML. The Discussions platform could be used by developers too to get feedback from users. That said, we MUST continue to use our mailing lists for any project governance related matters such as releases related discussions, releases voting, and any form of consensus and decision making. I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied to users@ ML: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files Thoughts and feedback? Regards.
