Re: [ANNOUNCE] Will Stevens as new Apache CloudStack VP

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome stuff Will! Congrats.

Ahmad E

> On May 18, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Morning Everyone,
> 
> Yesterday at the ASF board meeting, the board passed the resolution making 
> Will Stevens the new Vice President of the Apache CloudStack project.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Will on this appointment, wish him luck and bring 
> your unwavering support !
> 
> You may have noticed that Will took on RM duties for the new releases going 
> forward and has also taken a very active role to finish bringing us to github 
> based  workflow and CI. Will has some updates on that front that I am sure 
> you will all like.
> 
> -Sebastien
> Former VP CloudStack

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Simon Weller

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congratulations Simon!

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Erik Weber  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Simon Weller to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
> eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
> submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
> otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
> project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Simon
>
> --Erik
> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
>

Re: Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Rafael!

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> People,
>
> The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has
> gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him
> wisdom in his new task.
>
> ​on behalve of the PMC,​
> --
> Daan
>

Re: Introduction

[Ahmad Emneina]

Welcome Rashmi, look forward to seeing great contributions!

Ahmad E

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 9:58 PM, Rashmi Dixit <rashmi_di...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I am Rashmi Dixit and have recently joined the CloudPlatform team in 
> Accelerite. I have worked on a hybrid cloud management solution supporting 
> hypervisors such as KVM, Xen, VMware, HyperV and public clouds such as EC2. 
> My areas of interest are User Interface, networking.
> 
> I am really looking forward to contributing on CloudStack.
> 
> See you around!
> Rashmi
> 
> Rashmi Dixit
> Principal Product Engineer | CloudPlatform | www.accelerite.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
> print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of 
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any 
> liability for virus infected mails.

Re: Introduction

[Ahmad Emneina]

Welcome Bobby!

Ahmad E

> On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:21 AM, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi CloudStack, 
> 
> My name is Boris Stoyanov (Bobby) and today is my first day @ShapeBlue. I’m 
> based in Sofia, Bulgaria. I will be taking the role of Software Engineer in 
> Test, and as you may have guessed I’ll mostly focus on testing CloudStack. I 
> have about 10 years of experience in testing, which I’ve mostly spend in 
> doing test automation frameworks and deployment automation. I’m new to the 
> CloudStack business and I have a lot to learn, but I hope I’ll get up to 
> speed in short time. Looking forward to working with you! 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bobby.
> Regards,
> 
> Boris Stoyanov
> 
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue

Re: introduction

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great to see you back working on CloudStack!

Ahmad E

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:50 AM, Murali Reddy <murali.re...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Just wanted to let the community know that I have decided to work on Apache 
> CloudStack again. I have taken up a position at ShapeBlue, so you will be 
> seeing me around @dev and @users. For the new members of the community and 
> others who I have not interacted with, here is small self introduction. I 
> started my journey with CloudStack, in late 2010 as cloud.com employee. Later 
> spent 4 years till late 2014 working on various CloudStack features (EIP, 
> GSLB, NAAS, NetScaler integration, native SDN controller, distributed virtual 
> router, event bus to name few). I was working on NFV solution on OpenStack 
> over a year. I am excited to join back the community, looking forward to 
> interact with you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Murali

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

[Ahmad Emneina]

+BCC: David Nalley for possible guidance.

Apache infra stated that 'The VP' dictated the policy to not allow
'repo:status' across the board for projects. Has anyone tried to engage the
VP, in order to get them to have a closer look at this policy? It appears
to be no way to exploit that function maliciously... so hopefully they
could allow for this to be enabled.

$0.02

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Erik Weber  wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Chris Mattmann 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > >> The other thing is - is the new Cloudstack GitHub organization the
> > >> result of a subset of the PMC going off and doing this -
> > >
> > >I am not sure why you say subset. Let’s try to avoid polemics.
> >
> > I’m not trying to attack.
> >
> >
> This is not the result of people getting together and saying 'hey, we
> should fork and work somewhere else, that'd be fun!', but rather
> 'hey, we are currently unable to do what we need to do, and none of our
> attempts of getting assistance have resulted in anything. what can we do?'.
>
> On January 27th 2016, Schuberg Philis (SBP), a company with many CloudStack
> contributors/committers/pmcs, announced that they are 'jumping ship,
> forking the code and going their own way'.  (that's my wording, not theirs)
>
> Take a look at our git commit history before and after that date. Notice
> anything?
> Most, if not all, are trivial commits to fix typos, simple mistakes etc.
> and not code changes.
>
> This may be rude to everyone else, but the fact is that after 4.5 SBP
> (there are a few exceptions) has done more or less everything when it comes
> to testing code and gatekeeping the code base. And they did a very good job
> at it.
> Frankly I am surprised they even coped with it that long.
>
> Apache CloudStack now has a fork (Cosmic), that's not bound by ASF policies
> and it's lack of progress when it comes to providing the tools necessary.
>
> When (or if -- with their own governing they don't have to call it a
> specific version) SBP release an official version of Cosmic, it would
> surprise me if not a lot of CloudStack users would atleast try it out.
> I am pretty sure that I am going to.
>
> And wha-bang, there (potentially) goes your community, because there
> already is a better option out there.
>
>
>
> > I asked a simple question - how many/who in the Apache CloudStack PMC
> > is intent on using this new Cloudstack GitHub organization? Not an
> > attack, a question that I still don’t have an answer to.
> >
> >
> The answer would most likely be 'anyone and everyone'.
> Contrary to what you might believe, this is being done to /help/
> CloudStack, not hurt it. Atleast that is my intention by participating.
>
> In case you are unfamiliar with Apache CloudStack, it is a beast.
> Unlike many typical ASF projects you cannot just unpack the tarball, run
> 'make test', wait a few minutes and have it properly tested.
> Testing Apache CloudStack requires a broad variety of physical hardware,
> network appliances, storage solutions and least but most importantly pretty
> much every hypervisor that is being used out there.
>
> A subset of the test tasks we have take multiple hours to run and only
> tests a small fraction of the total codebase.
>
> Pre 4.6, the Apache CloudStack community had a little to loose discipline
> on committing to the codebase.
> Testing was optional, and hardly done.
>
> We had multiple versions that had major flaws in them, discovered right
> after release as people tried to use it -- even for the most basic
> operations.
>
> For the 4.6 release we decided that from now on, every commit would have to
> be looked through by two different persons, saying they approve it, and
> tested by a minimum of one.
>
> And it worked, the voting process improved, we released rapidly and with
> far less issues than previously (no software is bug free after all).
>
> As mentioned, we require that code changes (be it improvements, fixes or
> new features) are tested before they are allowed to be committed.
>
> Which means that anyone wanting to interact (with code) have to do it
> theirselves at the moment, and that is _NOT_ an easy task.
> Which again means that no matter how good your intention is, your PR is not
> going be merged.
> What kind of Community treatment is that?
>
>
> The way I see it there is only one solution to this -- we need better
> testing, and to automate that we need more access to GitHub.
>
> There are two ways to do that;
> 1) By being granted certain permissions to the apache/cloudstack
> repository.
> 2) By doing it somewhere else where we have those permissions.
>
> Will Stevens asked infra [1] for a small subset of permissions -- none of
> which should be any real risk for disasters, and got rejected.
> That rules out option #1.
>
> This turned out to be a long, and emotional email, please don't take any
> grunts personally -- they are not meant to be.
>
> [1] 

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

[Ahmad Emneina]

+1, this looks like a solid feature Rohit. I'd love to see where this goes
in the future... Maybe automatic power down of hosts idling, and powering
on hosts based on load demands. qq: is the ipmi simulation tied, or planned
to be tied to 'the simulator'? It would be interesting to see those tied
together. regardless... awesome work.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to propose this new feature for CloudStack, to support out-of-band
> management for CloudStack.
>
> In practice, most hosts have a out-of-band management such as iLO or iDRAC
> (that can support IPMI 2.0 for example). The idea is to allow admins to
> access this out-of-band management interface. Initially power-state related
> operations will be supported such as power on/off/reset etc. and a
> background service to synchronize the power states of the out-of-band
> management enabled hosts.
>
> Please have a look at the FS and share your feedback on the same:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Out-of-band+Management+for+CloudStack
>
> For testing this feature, I’ve created this tool/library that is a fake
> ipmi server that can be run as a standalone server/tool and also importable
> to write Marvin tests: https://github.com/bhaisaab/ipmisim
>
> Thanks and regards.
> PS. I’ll be demoing this feature in today’s CSEUG meetup in London
>
> [image: ShapeBlue] 
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect ,  ShapeBlue
> d:  * | s: +44 203 603 0540* <%7C%20s:%20+44%20203%20603%200540>  |  m:
> *+91 8826230892* <+91%208826230892>
> e:  *rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com | t: *
>   |  w:  *www.shapeblue.com*
> 
> a:  53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
> company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> a registered trademark.
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error.
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services:
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
>  | CSForge – rapid
> IaaS deployment framework 
> CloudStack Consulting  | 
> CloudStack
> Software Engineering
> 
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support
>  | CloudStack
> Bootcamp Training Courses 
>

Re: 4.9 Release Management

[Ahmad Emneina]

4.9 should only be released if it passes the CI tests... pardon the pun.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> Yes, I understand and agree with you.  On the flip side, the lack of CI has
> been a thorn in our side for a long time and the increased cadence only
> adds to this problem, so I am trying to walk a thin line here.
>
> Personally, if CI is the only thing I can contribute to ACS as the 4.9 RM,
> I will be happy with that.  It is a problem that has to be solved and
> someone has to own it.
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Paul Angus 
> wrote:
>
> > That's good enough for me (tm). you're figuring out what you need to
> > figure out. I know the feeling. :)
> >
> > We probably need to have a concensus around release cadence and stick to
> > it for a while. Otherwise we're going to lose some credibility as
> project.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Will Stevens 
> > Sent: 2 Mar 2016 20:46
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 4.9 Release Management
> >
> > I don't think I can answer that at this time.  My personal opinion is
> that
> > CI is more important than the release timeline, but others may not share
> > this opinion (as it is only my opinion).   I am full steam ahead trying
> to
> > review what we have in place and the work that different parties have
> done
> > on CI to date.  I am hoping to have a CI implementation setup in my
> > environment soon, which will enable me to better assess the current state
> > of affairs.
> >
> > There are a lot of moving parts involved and I will be the first to admit
> > that I don't have a firm grasp on everything yet, so reviewing our Marvin
> > test coverage and output is something I have not yet had a chance to
> > tackle.
> >
> > Does that answer your question well enough?  :)
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Paul Angus 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for taking up the baton Will et al.
> > >
> > > Just for clarity - given that getting CI 'done' will take some time
> > > (mainly because of the state of the Marvin Tests and Marvin output) -
> are
> > > 'we' now dropping the monthly releases?
> > >
> > >
> > > [image: ShapeBlue] 
> > > Paul Angus
> > > VP Technology ,  ShapeBlue
> > > d:  *+44 203 617 0528 | s: +44 203 603 0540*
> > > <+44%20203%20617%200528%20%7C%20s:%20+44%20203%20603%200540>  |  m:
> > > *+44 7711 418784* <+44%207711%20418784>
> > > e:  *paul.an...@shapeblue.com | t: @cloudyangus*
> > >   |  w:
> > > *www.shapeblue.com* 
> > > a:  53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK
> > > Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> > > Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
> > under
> > > license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
> > > company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> > > Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic
> of
> > > South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
> > is
> > > a registered trademark.
> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended
> > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> > or
> > > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily
> > > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> > the
> > > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based
> > > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> > sender
> > > if you believe you have received this email in error.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Paul Angus
> > VP Technology   ,   ShapeBlue
> >
> >
> > t:  @cloudyangus
> >
> > e:  paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > |  w:  www.shapeblue.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: 02 March 2016 17:15
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: 4.9 Release Management
> > >
> > > Hello Everyone,
> > > I have mentioned this in other related threads, but I wanted to make an
> > > official thread on the topic.
> > >
> > > I am nominating myself as the release manager for 4.9. Please feel free
> > to
> > > discuss if you have comments or concerns.
> > >
> > > I will not be working alone, I will be assisted by Koushik Das and
> > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rafael Weingartner

[Ahmad]

Congrats Rafael!

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> 
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Rafael Weingartner to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
> 
> Rafael is part a hacking group in the south of Brasil and has been active
> as contributor of code and as reviewer. He had been accepted a few months
> ago but I totally forgot to make this announcement. My apologies to both
> him and the community for the tardiness of this announcement.
> 
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
> eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
> submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
> otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
> project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
> 
> Please join me in congratulating Rafael
> 
> --Daan Hoogland
> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Boris Schrijver

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Boris!

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> now the real work starts, Boris. Go get'em.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Nice job, Boris!
> >
> > On Sunday, November 8, 2015, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
> >
> > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> > > has asked Boris Schrijver to become a committer and we are pleased to
> > > announce that he has accepted.
> > >
> > > Boris is an active code contributor, tester.
> > > Helps resolving issues, reviewing PRs and testing them.
> > >
> > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> > > autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
> > > eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
> > > submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
> > > otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
> > > project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
> > >
> > > Please join me in congratulating Boris
> > >
> > > on behalf of the CloudStack PMC,
> > >
> > > ~Rajani
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > *™*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: Remi Bergsma joins the PMC

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Remi! Well deserved.

Ahmad E

 On Aug 10, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 LS,
 
 Today the PMC has invited Remi Bergsma to join its ranks. I am happy to say
 that he accepted. Please join me in congratulating Remi.
 
 ​regards,​
 -- 
 Daan

Re: [Proposal] CoreOS support

[Ahmad]

+1 looking forward to this.



 On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
 
 I would like to add CoreOS as a supported OS type to cloudstack.
 CoreOS vms can be created even now by selecting OS type as Other. There are 
 cloud providers supporting CoreOS offerings in production already.
 By making the changes mentioned at [1] I would make it easier to deploy 
 CoreOS Vms and also add UI support for providing cloud-config via userdata.
 I'll also update the documentation at [2] after making these changes.
 
 [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CoreOS
 [2] https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/booting-on-cloudstack.html

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Karen Voung as a new PMC member of CloudStack

[Ahmad Emneina]

Yay Karen! Great work, working tirelessly, on CloudStack stuffs.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations Karen :-)


 Erik

 Den torsdag 2. juli 2015 skrev John Burwell john.burw...@shapeblue.com
 følgende:

  All,
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased
  to announce that Karen Voung (karenv) has accepted our invitation to join
  the PMC.
 
  Please join me in congratulating her.
 
  On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC,
  -John Burwell
 
  ---
  John Burwell (@john_burwell)
  VP of Software Engineering, ShapeBlue
  (571) 403-2411 | +44 20 3603 0542
  http://www.shapeblue.com
 
 
 
  Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services
 
  IaaS Cloud Design  Build
  http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
  CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
  CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
  CloudStack Software Engineering
  http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
  CloudStack Infrastructure Support
  http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
  CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
  http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
 
  This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
  solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
 or
  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
 the
  intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
 sender
  if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
  company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
 a
  company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
 Blue
  Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
 Brasil
  and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd
 is
  a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
  license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer Marco Sinhoreli

[Ahmad Emneina]

Nice work Marco! Congrats.

2015-05-11 9:17 GMT-07:00 Karen Vuong karenvuon...@gmail.com:

 Congrats, Marco!

 2015-05-11 1:50 GMT-07:00 sebgoa run...@gmail.com:

  It seems we forgot to announce that Marco was made a committer, my
 sincere
  apologies
  -
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
  has asked Marco Sinhoreli  to become a committer and we are pleased to
  announce that he has accepted.
 
  Marco has done an outstanding job building the CloudStack community in
  Brazil.
 
  Parabéns por um trabalho bem feito e espero que você vai continuar a
  apoiar a comunidade da maneira que você tem feito até agora.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Marco !
 
  --Sebastien Goasguen
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
 
  
 
  O Comité de Gestão do Projeto (PMC) para Apache CloudStack
  pediu Marco Sinhoreli para se tornar um committer e temos o prazer de
  anunciar que ele aceitou.
 
  Marco tem feito um trabalho notável construção da comunidade CloudStack
 no
  Brasil.
 
  Parabéns Por Um Trabalho Bem Feito e espero Que Voce vai continuar 'uma
  APOIAR a Comunidade da Maneira Que rápido Você tem Feito Até ágora.
 
  Sendo um committer permite que muitos colaboradores a contribuir mais
  autonomamente. Para os desenvolvedores, torna-se mais fácil de submeter
 as
  alterações e
  elimina a necessidade de ter contribuições avaliação via o patch
  processo de submissão. Se as contribuições são relacionadas com
  desenvolvimento ou
  caso contrário, é um reconhecimento da participação de um contribuinte no
  projeto e compromisso com o projeto eo Caminho Apache.
 
  Por favor, se juntar a mim para parabenizar Marco
 
  --Sebastien Goasguen
  em nome da CloudStack PMC
 
  
 
  项目管理委员会（PMC）为Apache的CloudStack
  已要求马可Sinhoreli变成提交，我们很高兴地
  宣布，他已经接受了。
 
  马可已经做了出色的工作在建设社区的CloudStack在巴西。
 
  在工作祝贺做得好，希望您能继续支持社区，你目前所做的方式。
 
  作为一个提交允许许多贡献者作出更大的贡献
  自主。对于开发人员来说，它可以更容易地提交更改和
  消除了需要具有贡献经由补丁审查
  提交过程。是否捐款是发展相关或
  否则，它是一种认可，在一个贡献者的参与
  项目与承诺项目和Apache的方式。
 
  请和我一起祝贺马可
 
  --Sebastien Goasguen
  代PMC的CloudStack的
 
  
 
  ApacheのCloudStackのためのプロジェクト管理委員会（PMC）
  コミッタになるためにマルコSinhoreliに尋ねた、私たちはに満足しているしています
  彼が承認したことを発表しました。
 
  マルコは、ブラジルのCloudStackのコミュニティを構築する優れた仕事をしています。
 
  仕事おめでとうはよくやった、あなたがこれまで行ってきた方法でコミュニティを支援していきます願っています。
 
  コミッターであることは多くの貢献者が多くを貢献することができます
  自律的。開発者にとっては、それはそれが簡単に変更を提出することになり、
  パッチ経由の口コミ貢献を持ってする必要がなくなります
  提出プロセス。貢献は、開発に関連しているかどうか
  それ以外の場合は、中の寄稿者の参加の認識があります
  プロジェクトとプロジェクトとApacheの道へのコミットメント。
 
  マルコの祝福の中で私に参加してください
 
  --Sebastien Goasguen
  CloudStackのPMCの代わりに
 
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Remi Bergsma

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Remi!

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Remi Bergsma to become a committer and we are pleased to
 announce that he has accepted.

 Remi has reported and helped in investigating and solving many bugs. He has
 given talks on managing clouds on several occasions.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Remi

 --Daan Hoogland
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Gaurav Nandkumar Aradhye

[Ahmad]

Nice work Gaurav, keep it coming!



 On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:25 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri 
 srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:
 
 Congrats Gaurav! Well deserved.
 
 ~Talluri
 
 On 14/04/15 1:13 am, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Gaurav Aradhya to become a committer and we are pleased to
 announce that they have accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Gaurav
 
 -- 
 Daan
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Funs Kessen

[Ahmad Emneina]

Nice work Funs! Congrats.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

 Awesome.  Congratulations Funs!

 Regards

 Paul Angus
 Cloud Architect
 S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
 paul.an...@shapeblue.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
 Sent: 14 April 2015 09:49
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Funs Kessen

 Congrats Funs! Fun to have Funs around!

  On 14-Apr-2015, at 3:00 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  we are doomed :)
 
  On Apr 13, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Daan Hoogland
  daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
  asked Funs Kessen to become a committer and we are pleased to
  announce that they have accepted.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes
  and eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in
  the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Funs
 
 
  Congratulations Funs!
 
  --
  Erik
 

 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Pierre-Yves! Look forward to the awsapi work...

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:11 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Pierre-Yves Rischard (@pyr) to become a committer and we are
 pleased to announce that he has accepted.

 Pierre-Yves is a great developer and I hear he was named one of the top
 100 french developers.
 He has contributed several fixes to cloudstack and more recently committed
 a Kafka listener, he has a big patch pending to remove the awsapi.

 Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
 project since there is no need to go via the patch
 submission process. This should enable better productivity.
 Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management
 and to guide the direction of the project.

 Join me in congratulating pyr and pray that he does not re-write
 cloudstack in clojure :)

 -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser

[Ahmad Emneina]

Thanks for the contributions so far Rene, look forward to many more!
Congratulations.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:13 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Rene Moser to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that he has accepted.

 Rene has committed several fixes to cloudstack and is the sole author of
 the cloudstack ansible module.
 This module should make it to Ansible core quite soon

 Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
 project since there is no need to go via the patch
 submission process. This should enable better productivity.
 Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management
 and to guide the direction of the project.

 Join me in congratulating Rene and let's hope for more Ansible play books
 to deploy cloudstack and associated workloads.

 -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

[Ahmad]

Congrats Mr Yadav! Keep kicking tail.



 On Mar 27, 2015, at 1:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to
 announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
 
 Please join me in congratulating him.
 
 On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

Re: [Announce] - New VP Apache Cloudstack

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great news Sebastian, congratulations.

Thanks for all the efforts Hugo, cant believe its been a year! :D

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Giles Sirett giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

  All

 The Apache Cloudstack PMC is delighted to announce that on March 18 an ASF
 board resolution was passed to make Sebastien Goasguen the new Chair/VP of
 Apache CloudStack.



 Sebastien replaces Hugo in this role





 I’m sure you’ll all join me in wishing Sebastien all the best for the next
 12 months and also in thanking Hugo for all of his hard work over the last
 year.



 Giles






  Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Harikrishna Patnala

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome news Hari! Congrats.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Abhinandan Prateek 
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 Congrats HariP !

 -abhi


  On 10-Mar-2015, at 11:54 am, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com
 wrote:
 
  Congrats Hari.
 
  Best Regards,
  Sailaja.M
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
  Sent: 10 March 2015 11:00
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Harikrishna Patnala
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Harikrishna Patnala to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that he has accepted.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Hari.
 
 
 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/master?author=harikrishna-patnala
  Keep them coming. :)
 
  --
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC,
 
  ~Rajani

 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wilder Rodrigues

[Ahmad Emneina]

Excellent news, congrats Wilder!

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 Hey, Congratulations Wilder!

 Regards

 Paul Angus
 Cloud Architect
 S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
 paul.an...@shapeblue.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
 Sent: 01 March 2015 11:06
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wilder Rodrigues

 Congratz Wilder! Enjoy the ride :-)

 Sent from my iPhone

  On 01 Mar 2015, at 11:14, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Wilder Rodrigues to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
  that he has accepted.
 
  Keep up the good work and your contagious good spirit Wilder.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Wilder.
 
  --
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC,
  Daan
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] we need a better SSVM solution

[Ahmad Emneina]

Pauls suggestion reminds me of some awesome functionality I see in the
aftermarket android ROM community. That is 'Kitchens'[1].

A utility/site that provides functionality that allows for admins to create
customized system templates...

Giving choices of:
- OS
- kernel
- VPN server
- various other services...

Of course this is fantasy at the moment, I see the lowest barrier to entry
would be a cloud-init style utility where we can pass in commands or
scripts, like the steps to mitigate the GHOST vuln (which seems to be a few
apt commands). That would easily resolve issues where a vulnerable service
could easily be updated post boot, and propagated to all new/restarted
system vm's.

[1] http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=633246

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:55 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:

 Decent points. You think the difference between the VR/CP is different
 enough to have a second image?

  On Jan 29, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi All,
 
  I think that there are 3 things people would like to see:
 
  1. clear versioning of system vm templates, with some kind of
 compatibility matrix so they know which one(s) they can use with different
 versions of CloudStack
  2. an easy way to update the system vm template
  3. an easy(ish) way to customise system vm templates
 
  It might be worth considering have two types of template
  a. the console proxy and secondary storage template
  b. the virtual router/ VPC template.
 
 
 
  Regards
 
  Paul Angus
  Cloud Architect
  S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
  paul.an...@shapeblue.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
  Sent: 29 January 2015 18:06
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] we need a better SSVM solution
 
  Interesting…
 
  Concur on having an open/standardized protocol. Something clustered like
 Serf/Consul could be attractive, but the overhead/requirements of those
 type of things usually scares me away.
 
  Having ACS act as a CA would be quite interesting for some things. It’s
 one of the reasons I’ve pondered a “hook” in the past to notify 3rd party
 upon VM creation/deletion/etc. Wonder if we could take advantage of dogtag
 or similar. All that said - setup/management of a CA is a PIA and probably
 outside scope of ACS, unless you did a “light” one similar to Puppet by
 default...
 
  An aside on that “hook” idea - something scriptable similar to (I said
 “similar to, no flames!) systemd for this could be interesting.
 
  A good portion of users would resist having an agent installed on the
 user VM, but I guess we’re in that position already, and they just wouldn’t
 get the added functionality.
 
  One user experience point: Almost every time Parallels comes out with a
 new version, I have to update their agent on my VMs, which on the Windows
 side means a reboot. That gets old, and I’ve only got a handful of win VMs
 there...
 
  Going to see if I can puppet-ize one of the SSVMs over the weekend to
 see what other thoughts come up.
 
  John
 
  On Jan 29, 2015, at 2:06 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
  Good ideas John.
 
  I’m in fact already discussing a design I’m calling it agents
 framework” (suggestions for better name are welcome!), I will try to share
 and update the spec soon that aims for this feature and refactoring work
 for ACS 4.6/master. For now, I’ve shared an architecture diagram here and
 some high level goals:
 
  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Agents+Framework
 
  Along with this, I’ve strong opinions and interests in just getting rid
 of Java based agents in systemvms (to reduce memory footprint) and replace
 the current agent-management server protocol (TCP based, which connects to
 only one management server on prt 8250 even if there are multiple
 management servers) with some interoperable protocol such as json/http,
 thrift etc that allows us to build better/scalable console proxy services
 (for example). People don’t discuss much, but virtual routers and systemvms
 are not well tested at all, we should also need efforts/infra to test these
 components with less human QA.
 
  Regards.
 
  On 29-Jan-2015, at 2:14 am, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
 
  Every time there’s an issue (security or otherwise) with the system VM
 ISOs, it’s a relative pain to fix. They’re sort of a closed system, people
 know little (relative to other ACS parts, IMHO) about their innards, and
 updating them is more difficult than it should be.
 
  I’d love to see a Better Way. I think these things could be
 dynamically built, with the option to have them connect to a configuration
 management (CM) system such as Puppet, Chef, Salt-Stack or whatever else
 floats people’s boat.
 
  One possible use case:
  * User installs new ACS system.
  * User logs into mgmt server, goes to Templates area, clicks button to
 fetch default SSVM image. UI allows 

CloudStack Set password through API

[ahmad ismail]

Hello All,

I am a cloud stack enthusiasts, and i am working with cloud stack API. The
problem i am facing is in CHANGE PASSWORD API. i have manage to
successfully change the password  till now , but when special characters
are send via API the new password doesn't work .

i am using PHP to call API.  i have tried rawurlencode , urlencode but it
doesn't work

-- 
*Best Regards *
*Ahmad Ismail*

Re: Vlan issue with ACS 4.4 and XenServer 6.2

[Ahmad Emneina]

Hey Matt, it sounds like you have a vlan trunking issue. Check the switch
port configuration for the port(s) yout hypervisors are connected to,
ensure that vlan is present.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Matthew Midgett 
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:

 In my test deployment I have 2 hypervisors with XenServer 6.2 installed. I
 am creating a private network with public Ips, so that the VR is only used
 to hand out IPs and meta data. The vlan is 501, and it has a range of
 216.249.111.2-254. What happens is that when I create new VM's and they
 spawn on the server with the VR cloud-init works and it gets the password
 and the server is good. When is spawns on the other hypervisor it can't
 connect to the VR and because of this it doesn't get its meta data. What I
 do is quickly move the VR to the other hypervisor, this allows it to get
 the
 meta data so I can login. Once this is done I can login and ping the
 gateway
 for vlan 501 but can't ping the other VM or the VR if it's not on the same
 hypervisor. I know my trunks and vlans are correct and the interfaces
 that's
 being assigned. To test this I shutdown the zone and deleted the network.
 Then I removed Vlan501 from the XenServer's and created it manually on the
 exact same nic as it was before. Then I added a ISO repo and manually
 installed 2 vms manually assigning the public ip's. It works as expected, I
 can ping the gateway and the other VM on the other hypervisor. This was to
 prove my vlan config.



 What do I do?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great work Rajani! Congratulations!!


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Praveen Buravilli 
praveen.buravi...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Rajani!!!

 Regards,
 Praveen Kumar Buravilli



 -Original Message-
 From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
 Sent: 22 July 2014 11:53
 To: CloudStack Dev
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
 she has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
 more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Rajani

 --
 Prasanna., on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

 
 Powered by BigRock.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Pierre-Luc Dion as a committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome stuff. Congrats Pierre-Luc!


On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Congratulations, Pierre-Luc :)

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro


 - Original Message -
 From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2014 12:45:36 PM
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Pierre-Luc Dion as a committer

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
 asked Pierre-Luc Dion to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that he has accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For
 developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to
 have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of
 a
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project
 and
 the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Pierre-Luc!

 PS: Nice work on the documentation

 -Sebastien, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great news, congrats Demetrius!

Ahmad

 On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:17 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
 
 Folks - this one’s a little belated - we went through the invite process 
 around the
 time of the mail issues, and somehow we didn’t send the announcement to dev@.
 I noticed while doing some housekeeping this week, and wanted to send out the
 announcement anyways just to give Demetrius the recognition. :)
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
 asked Demetrius Tsitrelis to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that he has accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. 
 For
 developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to
 have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and
 the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Demetrius!
 
 -John, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

oh dang! good stuff Amogh!


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Rayees Namathponnan 
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Amogh.

 Regards,
 Rayees

 -Original Message-
 From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
 Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 11:17 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer

 Great news. Congrats Amogh !!!

 On 02/06/14 11:14 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Amogh Vasekar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
 he has accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Amogh!
 
 -John, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great work Saksham! Congratulations.


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
wrote:

 Hearty Congratulations Saksham!

 -Original Message-
 From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that he has accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Saksham,


 -Sebastien, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Ahmad Emneina]

Oh sweet! Great job Alena!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats, Alena.


 On 4/22/14 3:44 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Alena !!!
 
 On 22/04/14 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
 he has accepted.
 
 Join me in congratulating Alena!
 
 
 -The CloudStack PMC
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great job Go! Congrats!

Ahmad

 On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@apache.org wrote:
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go 
 Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
 
 Join me in congratulating Go!
 
 
 -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Excellent news, congrats Paul!


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:

 Congrats, Paul!

 --Tuna


 On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Congrats!
 
   On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a
 committer
  on the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted,
  
   Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus,
  
   -Sebastien on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
 

Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS

[Ahmad Emneina]

I'm all for adding a bit of additional smarts to cloudstack so it can
workaround the current KVM limitations. Waiting for anything to get fixed
up stream is affecting deployments NOW, and a bit utopian. cloudstack seems
to be the lower barrier to entry on getting these scenarios addressed.


On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:

 It's hard to find root cause and fix something in libvirt, even we found
 the root cause, it's hard to push the fix into libvirt upstream, and not to
 say push into downstream, like RHEL 6 etc. For example, we already have a
 fix for the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706 for a
 few month now, there is no resolution to resolve the issue. Without the
 fix, we just simply are blocked to support newer version of KVM.

 So if community doesn't like what I proposed, then how about another way:
 I will write a new implementation of KVMStoragePool interface, which will
 be backed by java/python/shell script, it won't be enabled by default.
  It's a simple thing, don't understand why libvirt gets it done so
 complicated, and introduce a lot of pain.

  -Original Message-
  From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
  Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:35 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
 
  On 19.03.2014 19:01, Wido den Hollander wrote:
   On 03/19/2014 07:54 PM, Edison Su wrote:
   I found many times in QA's testing environment, the libvirt storage
   pool(created on NFS) is missing on the kvm host frequently, for no
   reason. It may relate to bug
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706.
   In order to fix this issue, and bug CLOUDSTACK-2729, we added a lot
   of workaround to fight with libvirt, such as, if can't find the
   storage pool, then create the same pool again etc. As the storage
   pool can be lost on kvm host at any time, it will cause a lot of
   operation errors, such as can't start vm, can't delete volume etc,
 etc.
   I want to bypass libvirt storage pool for NFS, as java itself,
   already have all the capabilities that libvirt can provide, such as
   create a file, delete a file, list a directory etc, there is no need
   to add another layer of crap here. In doing so, we won't be blocked
   by libvirt bug(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) to
   support newer version of KVM.
  
  
   -1
  
   I understand the issues which we see here, but imho the way forward is
   to fix this in libvirt instead of simply go around it.
  
   We should not try to re-invent the wheel here, but fix the root-cause.
  
   Yes, Java can do a lot, but I think libvirt can do this better.
  
   For the RBD code I also had a couple of changes go into libvirt
   recently and this NFS issue can also be fixed.
  
   Loosing NFS pools in libvirt is most of the times due to a restart of
   libvirt, they don't magically disappear from libvirt.
  
   I agree that we should be able to start the pool again even while it's
   mounted, but that's something we should fix in libvirt.
  
   Wido
 
  -1 and 100% with Wido. If libvirt gets fixed then it would save loads of
 code in
  the future and bring other benefits (think support for Xen Project via
 libvirt
  etc).
  Let's push for libvirt fix instead.
 
  My 2 cents,
  Lucian
 
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro

Re: Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

[Ahmad Emneina]

definitely documented. 4.2 install guide:

 8.2.7. Install CloudStack XenServer Support Package (CSP)
(Optional)
To enable security groups, elastic load balancing, and elastic IP on
XenServer, download and install the CloudStack XenServer Support Package
(CSP). After installing XenServer, perform the following additional steps
on each XenServer host.


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I spent the past day or so trying to figure out with various builds why I
 could not add a XenServer host when creating a Basic Zone.

 As it turns out, as Anthony noted in another e-mail today in response to my
 issue, if you are using a security-group-enabled zone or a basic zone, you
 need to switch XenServer's networking mode from OVS to bridge since
 security groups don't work on OVS.

 The moral of the story is that if you are running in such an environment,
 run the following on your XenServer host before trying to add it:

 xe-switch-network-backend bridge

 It looks like a change went in in early February and since then you could
 not successfully add a XenServer host to such a zone unless it was
 configured as specified above.

 By the way, does anyone know if this is documented?

 Thanks,

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *(tm)*

Re: Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

[Ahmad Emneina]

bummer it now forces that route :) some people just want basic w/o security
groups, where I think it doesnt matter to use the bridged backend.


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:

 definitely documented. 4.2 install guide:

  8.2.7. Install CloudStack XenServer Support Package (CSP)
 (Optional)
 To enable security groups, elastic load balancing, and elastic IP on
 XenServer, download and install the CloudStack XenServer Support Package
 (CSP). After installing XenServer, perform the following additional steps
 on each XenServer host.


 On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I spent the past day or so trying to figure out with various builds why I
 could not add a XenServer host when creating a Basic Zone.

 As it turns out, as Anthony noted in another e-mail today in response to
 my
 issue, if you are using a security-group-enabled zone or a basic zone, you
 need to switch XenServer's networking mode from OVS to bridge since
 security groups don't work on OVS.

 The moral of the story is that if you are running in such an environment,
 run the following on your XenServer host before trying to add it:

 xe-switch-network-backend bridge

 It looks like a change went in in early February and since then you could
 not successfully add a XenServer host to such a zone unless it was
 configured as specified above.

 By the way, does anyone know if this is documented?

 Thanks,

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *(tm)*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Ahmad Emneina]

whoa, great news. Congrats Mike!


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Mike

  -Original Message-
  From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has
  accepted.
 
  Join me in congratulating Mike!
 
  -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

[Ahmad Emneina]

b! Not Mark Hinkle! :P awesome news man, congrats!


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
 asked Mark Hinkle to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
 that they have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For
 developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to
 have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of
 a
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project
 and
 the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Mark!

 --Chip,
 on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

Re: Weird IP address allocation in 4.3

[Ahmad Emneina]

blasted vlans and the trunks they rhode in on! :) glad all is well.


On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 I asked one of our IT guys to look into this. He determined a port was in
 the wrong VLAN and that's how my VM got an IP address from a different DHCP
 server.

 No CloudStack issue here. :)

 Thanks


 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 That is an interesting possibility. Thanks, guys


 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.comwrote:

 Mike, you might have another machine serving up DHCP on that network. If
 thats the case get it to ignore cloudstack assigned mac addresses (06
 prefix).


 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  Hi Jayapal,
 
  That table has 8 rows and includes IP addresses from 192.168.128.23 to
  192.168.128.30 (which should be correct).
 
  Thanks
 
 
  On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi 
  jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
 
   Hi Mike,
  
   Can you please check the db table user_ip_address to see what are
 the ips
   addresses are there.
   IP will be picked from this table.
  
   Thanks,
   Jayapal
  
   On 23-Jan-2014, at 10:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
  
Slight correction (this may have been obvious from one of my screen
   shots):
The VM with the address outside of the range I gave to CloudStack
 is
  in a
XenServer cluster.
   
   
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
   
The IP address that CloudStack says is assigned to VM i-2-11-VM
(192.168.128.28) does not appear to be assigned to any VM in the
  system
(user or system VM).
   
   
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
   
Hi,
   
I was wondering if someone who deals with networking in
 CloudStack
   might
know something about this.
   
I have a development setup with one zone, one pod, and three
 clusters
(one VMware, one XenServer, and one KVM).
   
The IP addresses I've given to CloudStack span from
 192.168.128.20 to
192.168.128.30 (just 11 addresses).
   
http://i.imgur.com/3SAn98W.png
   
http://i.imgur.com/cZ1pLun.png
Somehow one of my VMs was assigned the IP address 192.168.128.118
(outside of the range above).
   
http://imgur.com/TeRMEf9
The zone is using basic networking.
   
The issue is in my VMware cluster (two hosts in this cluster).
   
Thanks!
   
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
   http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
*™*
   
   
   
   
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
   http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
*™*
   
   
   
   
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
*™*
  
  
 
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the
  cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*
 




 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the 
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*




 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the 
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: Weird IP address allocation in 4.3

[Ahmad Emneina]

Mike, you might have another machine serving up DHCP on that network. If
thats the case get it to ignore cloudstack assigned mac addresses (06
prefix).


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi Jayapal,

 That table has 8 rows and includes IP addresses from 192.168.128.23 to
 192.168.128.30 (which should be correct).

 Thanks


 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi 
 jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:

  Hi Mike,
 
  Can you please check the db table user_ip_address to see what are the ips
  addresses are there.
  IP will be picked from this table.
 
  Thanks,
  Jayapal
 
  On 23-Jan-2014, at 10:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
   Slight correction (this may have been obvious from one of my screen
  shots):
   The VM with the address outside of the range I gave to CloudStack is
 in a
   XenServer cluster.
  
  
   On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
   The IP address that CloudStack says is assigned to VM i-2-11-VM
   (192.168.128.28) does not appear to be assigned to any VM in the
 system
   (user or system VM).
  
  
   On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
   Hi,
  
   I was wondering if someone who deals with networking in CloudStack
  might
   know something about this.
  
   I have a development setup with one zone, one pod, and three clusters
   (one VMware, one XenServer, and one KVM).
  
   The IP addresses I've given to CloudStack span from 192.168.128.20 to
   192.168.128.30 (just 11 addresses).
  
   http://i.imgur.com/3SAn98W.png
  
   http://i.imgur.com/cZ1pLun.png
   Somehow one of my VMs was assigned the IP address 192.168.128.118
   (outside of the range above).
  
   http://imgur.com/TeRMEf9
   The zone is using basic networking.
  
   The issue is in my VMware cluster (two hosts in this cluster).
  
   Thanks!
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
   *™*
  
  
  
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
   *™*
  
  
  
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the
   cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
   *™*
 
 


 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

[Ahmad Emneina]

Good work Sanjay!


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote:

 Well Done Sanjay :)

 -Original Message-
 From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
 Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:23 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
 they have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Sanjay!

 --David,
 on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

Re: ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Giles Sirett

[Ahmad Emneina]

Long overdue, congrats Giles!

Ahmad

 On Dec 2, 2013, at 8:06 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Giles 
 Sirett 
 to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. 
 For
 developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to
 have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and
 the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Giles!
 
 —
 John Burwell,
 on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Nguyen Anh Tu

[Ahmad Emneina]

:D Many congrats Nguyen!


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:

 Congrats Tuna :-)


 On 5 November 2013 08:14, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thanks all,
 
  I learned too much from GSoC to now to become a committer. Glad to work
  globally with all of you guys.
 
  Special thanks to Sebastien Goasguen, Ian Duffy, Hugo Trippaers, and Daan
  Hoogland, you all help me a lot...
 
  Go ahead, Apache CloudStack.
 
  Regards,
 
 
  2013/11/4 Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
 
   Congrats Nguyen!
  
   On 04-Nov-2013, at 5:42 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nlmailto:
   h...@trippaers.nl
wrote:
  
   Congrats Tuna :-)
  
  
   Cheers,
  
   Hugo
  
   On 4 nov. 2013, at 11:12, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 mailto:
   daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   welcome Nguyen.
  
   On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
   mailto:run...@gmail.com wrote:
   Well done Nguyen !
  
   -Sebastien
  
   On 4 Nov 2013, at 09:33, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.orgmailto:
   t...@apache.org wrote:
  
   The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
   Nguyen
   Anh Tu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they
  have
   accepted.
  
   Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
   autonomously. For
   developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the
 need
  to
   have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
   contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition
  of
   a
   contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the
 project
   and
   the Apache Way.
  
   Please join me in congratulating Nguyen!
  
   --
   Prasanna.,
   on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
  
   
   Powered by BigRock.comhttp://BigRock.com
  
  
  
  
 
 
  --
 
  N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OCCI Interface

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome work Isaac, Seb, et al! Sweet addition to the dialects CloudStack
speaks.


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal 
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:

 Awesome

 On 11/5/13 5:06 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am pleased to announce an OGF OCCI interface to CloudStack.
 
 Isaac Chiang contributed back to our ruby client and forked rOCCI-server
 to make this happen. Many thanks to him.
 
 I wrote about it here:
 http://buildacloud.org/blog/296-occi-interface-to-cloudstack.html
 
 OCCI is one of the two cloud standards (with CIMI from DMTF).
 It is very important for CloudStack has it finally brings an official
 industry standard API to our software.
 
 If you want to help with CIMI, ping me.
 
 Cheers,
 
 -Sebastien

Re: why system.vm.use.local.storage?

[Ahmad Emneina]

you might not have shared local storage in your cloud. so having to add
shared storage for the sole purpose of supporting system vm's would be
painful.


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Darren Shepherd 
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage?  Why would
 somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage?  I'm guessing the idea
 here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure
 situation?  But don't we just recreate the systemvm?

 Darren

Re: why system.vm.use.local.storage?

[Ahmad Emneina]

'shared local storage' should be read as shared storage :)


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:

 you might not have shared local storage in your cloud. so having to add
 shared storage for the sole purpose of supporting system vm's would be
 painful.


 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Darren Shepherd 
 darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage?  Why would
 somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage?  I'm guessing the idea
 here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure
 situation?  But don't we just recreate the systemvm?

 Darren

Re: why system.vm.use.local.storage?

[Ahmad Emneina]

I agree, it was probably an afterthought. I was just justifying the desired
effect not the flag/workaround.


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Darren Shepherd 
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just find it annoying setting up a zone with local storage that I have
 to turn this setting on.  If I have no shared storage, then system VMs
 won't deploy with out this parameter.  It's just seems like a useless
 setting that might have been added because there is something else in the
 system that isn't working right.

 Darren

  On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Kelcey Jamison Damage 
 kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
 
  That's a good point. I know the system VMs are auto created if the
 system is aware of their state being either 'Destroyed', 'Expunged'. If the
 state is 'Starting', or 'Started'/'Running' then no actions are taken.
 
  In your scenario, the system VM would still be 'Started' in the database
 even though communication is lost to the host, so no automatic action would
 be taken.
 
  - Original Message -
 
  From: Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:47:41 AM
  Subject: why system.vm.use.local.storage?
 
  Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage? Why would
  somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage? I'm guessing the idea
  here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure
  situation? But don't we just recreate the systemvm?
 
  Darren
 

Re: why system.vm.use.local.storage?

[Ahmad Emneina]

basic networks dont really require that level of flexibility. Sure you
suffer a small dns/dhcp outage... So it definitely depends on the purpose
of the cloud, and services its going to provide. We cant negate the
flexibility local storage system vm's provides.


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:

 Well, certainly you don't want system vms using local storage by
 default. How would you live migrate them for host maintenance? I
 assume you mean that when you set up a zone and check 'local storage',
 and it pops up the big long thing stating make sure you set the
 system vms to local as well in the global config, that pop up should
 not exist and happen by default. But the user has already selected
 local storage in that case.

 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
  I agree, it was probably an afterthought. I was just justifying the
 desired
  effect not the flag/workaround.
 
 
  On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Darren Shepherd 
  darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I just find it annoying setting up a zone with local storage that I have
  to turn this setting on.  If I have no shared storage, then system VMs
  won't deploy with out this parameter.  It's just seems like a useless
  setting that might have been added because there is something else in
 the
  system that isn't working right.
 
  Darren
 
   On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Kelcey Jamison Damage 
  kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
  
   That's a good point. I know the system VMs are auto created if the
  system is aware of their state being either 'Destroyed', 'Expunged'. If
 the
  state is 'Starting', or 'Started'/'Running' then no actions are taken.
  
   In your scenario, the system VM would still be 'Started' in the
 database
  even though communication is lost to the host, so no automatic action
 would
  be taken.
  
   - Original Message -
  
   From: Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:47:41 AM
   Subject: why system.vm.use.local.storage?
  
   Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage? Why
 would
   somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage? I'm guessing the
 idea
   here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host
 failure
   situation? But don't we just recreate the systemvm?
  
   Darren
  
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

[Ahmad Emneina]

Nice work Girish!


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan 
sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Girish!!

 -Original Message-
 From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

 Congratz, Girish

 -Original Message-
 From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
 To: CloudStack Dev
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Girish Shilamkar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
 they have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Girish!

 --
 Prasanna.,
 on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

 
 Powered by BigRock.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

[Ahmad Emneina]

Woohooo!!! Congrats Sowmya!


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan 
sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Sowmya!

 -Original Message-
 From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

 Congrats Sowmya!

 On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:

  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Sowmya Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
  that they have accepted.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Sowmya!
 
  --
  Prasanna.,
  on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
 
  
  Powered by BigRock.com
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Animesh. Your contributions to 4.2 were tremendous... Looking
forward to more great things!
On Oct 21, 2013 12:06 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they
 have accepted.

 Join me in congratulating Animesh!

 -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

[Ahmad Emneina]

+1


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote:

 +1

 -Original Message-
 From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
 Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 11:42 PM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache
 CloudStack

 As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of
 source for an RDP client.  After donation, the client would be integrated
 with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs.

 The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/

 [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg

 I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on
 accepting the code into the project.  I suggest that it be accepted into a
 branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes
 prior to a master branch merge.

 VOTING will be left open for 72 hours.

 This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are
 binding.


 DL

Re: System VM template caching

[Ahmad Emneina]

there might be a more sound way than swapping the template on secondary
storage and hacking the db. I figure one should be able to register the
template, via the documented route... wait for download to succeed, upgrade
the binary bits. then when the system vm's fail to launch. delete the
cached template on primary storage. That should be enough to trigger a new
system vm propagated to the primary storage. I find it hard to believe this
passed QA...


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:39 AM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com 
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:

 This process you mention for registering as a user VM I can't find in the
 upgrade guide. Do you have a link?

 The work around works because CloudStack defaults to re-download the
 system template is it is in NOT_DOWNLOADED status. How ever the database
 never gets updated for the life of the build.

 CS is designed it seems to only ever have a single unaltered template_id
 '3' record. And I guess the template download script just overwrites the
 sane GUID filename.

 Seems like a solution that could be handled in a better way.

 Either way, this is what has been working for us in the community.

 Sent from my HTC

 - Reply message -
 From: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: System VM template caching
 Date: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 9:30 AM

 Are you sure about this ? I thought we needed to register them as user vm
 and that the upgrade would convert them to systemVM automatically

 -Sebastien

 On 9 Oct 2013, at 17:22, kel...@backbonetechnology.com
 kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:

  I was able to create a work around and several community builders tested
 it out for me and it works.
 
  I will not submit to docs as it's a hack, but I have updated the JIRA
 ticket.
 
  Work around can be found at:
 
 
 http://cloud.kelceydamage.com/cloudfire/blog/2013/10/08/conquering-the-cloudstack-4-2-dragon-kvm/
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Kelcey
 
  Sent from my HTC
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: System VM template caching
  Date: Tue, Oct 8, 2013 9:49 PM
 
  This seems similar to a problem I had on 4.3 Master with System VM
 creation. If it is the same problem you can check from API command
 ListTemplateCommand(), from CloudMonkey and see if it returns a bogus
 cached value. Then you know it is the same problem.
  -Soheil
 
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201309.mbox/%3c6717ec2e5a665a40a5af626d7d4fa90625e2e...@x2008mb1.infoblox.com%3E
 
  
  From: Kelcey Jamison Damage [kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:19 PM
  To: Cloud Dev
  Subject: [ACS 4.2][Upgrade Issue] System VM template caching
 
  Hi,
 
  Several of us in the community have found that with the 4.2 upgrade,
 when we download and install the latest system VM template, CloudStack
 refuses to use this template for new system VM creation. CloudStack appears
 to be usin a cached or master-clone variant of the old template.
 
  This is causing may KVM+ 4.2 users to have broken clouds, A bug report
 has been filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4826
 
  My question is: Does anyone know where this cached template is stored?
 when CloudStack goes to make a new system VM, where does it look first for
 the template? We have observed through testing that this is no secondary
 storage.
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Kelcey Damage | Infrastructure Systems Architect
  Strategy | Automation | Cloud Computing | Technology Development
 
  Backbone Technology, Inc
  604-331-1152 ext. 114

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daan Hoogland

[Ahmad Emneina]

there is no exit for you now! cloudstack for life!!! Congrats Daan.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congrats Daan

  -Original Message-
  From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:48 AM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daan Hoogland
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Daan Hoogland to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they
  have accepted.
 
  Join me in congratulating Daan!
 
  -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

[Ahmad Emneina]

awesome stuff Rajesh! congrats.


On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.comwrote:

 Congratulations Rajesh!

  -Original Message-
  From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013 9:00 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Rajesh Battala to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
  they have accepted.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously.
  For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the
 need to
  have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether
  contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition
 of a
  contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project
 and
  the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Rajesh!
 
  -chip
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: community testing

[Ahmad Emneina]

I think there are jenkins slaves that run the nicera plugins on/at Schuberg
Philis housed infrastructure. The Citrix jenkins nodes also runs as slaves
that connect back to the apache owned/controlled jenkins. No reason why
testing infra need be so consolidated, it just so happens no one is putting
their hardware where their mouth is.

I also assume if your marvin tests get accepted upstream, they'll be
included in the nightly runs/reports. Prasanna correct me if I'm wrong.


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:

 CloudStack Dev,
 I was emailed about some of the testing questions I brought up
 over the last few threads, and a few things were pointed out to me
 that I think we should try to remedy.  Primarily, that the testing
 environment is owned by Citrix, the QA team is primarily Citrix-run,
 and the testing done is focused on the use models that Citrix
 develops.
 I've been assured that the test infrastructure is for everyone,
 and I'm not at all trying to say that there's a problem with Citrix
 focusing their work on their own interests, but I'm not sure that
 anyone outside of Citrix really knows how to add their own stuff to
 this testing infrastructure (perhaps for lack of trying, I don't
 know).
 I haven't really put together enough thought to know how to tackle
 this, but my gut tells me that we need some sort of community-owned
 testing roll-up, where everyone can do their own testing in whatever
 infrastructure and submit hourly, daily, weekly results. If my test
 fits into the Citrix test infrastructure and I can figure out how to
 get it there, great. If not, I can roll my own and integrate it via
 some API. For example the SolidFire guys may wan to run automated
 regression testing. That probably won't be doable in the Citrix
 infrastructure, but they may want to script a daily
 git-pull/build/deploy zone/create volume and it seems logical that
 we'd want to support it.
 Thoughts? Anyone have experience with such things? Can we have a
 master/slave scenario with Jenkins? Perhaps the Citrix environment
 already supports something like this via Jenkins API?

Re: Java process not running in KVM SSVM

[Ahmad Emneina]

should be in /var/log/cloud or just /var/log and look for a file called
cloud.log or cloud.out


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Thanks, Alena

 I'm not familiar with debugging SSVM. Can you tell me where the log is
 located?


 On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk 
 alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:

  Mike, did you check the log inside the SSVM? It should print out the
  exception stack trace with the reason why java process failed to start.
 
  -alena.
 
  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 
  dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:39 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
  dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Marcus
  Sorensen shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com
  Subject: Java process not running in KVM SSVM
 
  Hi,
 
  I'm having a bit of trouble with the KVM SSVM.
 
  The KVM CPVM reads as VM and Agent states Up; however, SSVM has a dash
 for
  Agent state (its VM state is Up).
 
  On the SSVM, I ran /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh and got back
 the
  following message:
 
  ERROR: Java process not running.  Try restarting the SSVM.
 
  I restarted the VM and re-ran ssvm-check.sh (after still seeing a dash
 for
  the Agent state) and received the same error message.
 
  I'm running on master. I installed the KVM system template this way:
 
  sudo
 
 
 /home/mtutkowski/cloudstack/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
  -m /mnt/secondary -u
 
 
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2-h
  kvm -F
 
  Any thoughts on this?
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the
  cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*
 
 


 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Ilya Musayev

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Mr Musayev!


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:51 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Ilya Musayev to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have
 accepted.

 Join me in congratulating Ilya,

 -The CloudStack PMC

Re: documentation/wiki is a mess

[Ahmad Emneina]

I think prasanna hit the nail on the head. I'm sure there are features
there no one knows about, or ever will...
+1 for developers documenting what features/functions are abound.



On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath 
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote:

 Hi,

 We do not have a doc team as such :-)

 We have a set of doc contributors that so far have not worked as a team.
 Probably, we should think about  aligning the doc efforts and having a
 process and style guide in place.

 If the FS is good enough, we need not trouble the code committers to write
 own docs is what I feel.

 Regards
 -Radhika

 -Original Message-
 From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:34 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: documentation/wiki is a mess

 On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:10:28AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote:
 
  The state of documentation of an open source projects says a lot about
  the community that develops it...
 

 Esp. for XML documentation: I say we write our own docs if we want our
 feature to be used. Or it dies a natural death in quiet isolation with no
 one ever using it. Docs team can handle the editing and organizing bits.
 That should go for Wikis too. If you want the wiki to be useful then write
 it, organize it and maintain it. Don't just put it there to fill a
 template. It'll never recieve any love.

 --
 Prasanna.,

 
 Powered by BigRock.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Kirk Kosinski

[Ahmad Emneina]

Well deserved Kirk. Always sold advice coming from your direction.

Ahmad

On Aug 28, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:44:35PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Kirk
 Kosinski to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has
 accepted.
 
 Congrats Kirk!

Re: New Committer: Daan Hoogland

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Daan! There's no escape now. :p


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:

 Great Job Daan!


 On 28 August 2013 16:07, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:

  yayaya, congratulation Daan! Great job...
 
 
  2013/8/28 Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com
 
   Congrats Daan. Keep up the good work :)
  
   On 28/08/13 7:29 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
 wrote:
  
   The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
   has asked Daan Hoogland to become a committer and we are pleased to
   announce that he has accepted!
   
   Daan's been quite active on the dev list, working on not just the code
   but also helping us keep tabs on our responsiveness to questions
   (something
   that we always need to be mindful of).
   
   Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
   autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
   eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
   submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
   otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
   project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
   
   Please join me in congratulating Daan!
   
   -chip
   on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
  
  
 
 
  --
 
  N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
 

Re: New Committer: Daan Hoogland

[Ahmad Emneina]

hehehe either way! the community benefits. :)


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks all,

 I'm sure you mean there is no escape from me for cloudstack now Ahmad :P

 On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
  Congrats Daan! There's no escape now. :p
 
 
  On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
 
  Great Job Daan!
 
 
  On 28 August 2013 16:07, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   yayaya, congratulation Daan! Great job...
  
  
   2013/8/28 Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com
  
Congrats Daan. Keep up the good work :)
   
On 28/08/13 7:29 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
  wrote:
   
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Daan Hoogland to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted!

Daan's been quite active on the dev list, working on not just the
 code
but also helping us keep tabs on our responsiveness to questions
(something
that we always need to be mindful of).

Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes
 and
eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
submission process. Whether contributions are development-related
 or
otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in
 the
project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

Please join me in congratulating Daan!

-chip
on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
   
   
  
  
   --
  
   N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
  
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy

[Ahmad Emneina]

wooohooo! congrats Ian!


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased
 to announce that he has accepted.

 Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
 project since there is no need to go via the patch
 submission process. This should enable better productivity.

 Please join us in congratulating Ian !

 PS: Ian did an outstanding job as a Google Summer of Code student
 developing a new and improved LDAP plugin

Re: CloudStack distros

[Ahmad Emneina]

CloudSand... http://www.cloudsand.com/


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Todd Pigram t...@toddpigram.com wrote:

 Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and
 CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong.


 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
 david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:

  Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
  besides CloudPlatform.
 
  Anybody have some insight in that space?
 
  Thanks.
 
 
  David La Motta
  Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
  Direct: 1.919.476.5042
 
 
 

Re: Help with VMware CS Env

[Ahmad Emneina]

secondary storage have the templates seeded? I've seen this happen before
if its not. Total red herring of a message :p


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 I can manually start up a VM on the nested ESX instance, so it appears
 there is some configuration problem perhaps in my CS install, but I'm not
 sure what it could be.

 I've never actually been successful running system VMs on ESX in the past.
 I've always had to add a XenServer host and run the system VMs on it.


 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I have a single node I'm developing on. It is running ESX. On top of ESX,
  I have Ubuntu 12.04 for CloudStack development (including running the
 CSMS
  and serving as a secondary-storage location for system VM templates,
 etc.).
  The one host I have in my CS install is running ESX (nested under my
 other
  ESX).
 
  It looks like this:
 
  ESX (on hardware)
  - ESX (nested, used as host in CS)
  - vCenter Server
  - Ubuntu (CSMS, secondary storage)
 
  I keep getting an InsufficientServerCapacityException, but I'm not sure
  why. I should have plenty of CPU, memory, and storage space on all VMs.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
 http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*
 



 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: Help with VMware CS Env

[Ahmad Emneina]

doesnt sound right. whats the output of mount? Cloudstack will mount the ss
to something more cryptic than /mnt


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 It looks like it is seeded properly.

 I even made sure to make the /mnt directory on the CSMS 777 (via chmod)
 (and all of its subdirectories and files). It looks like the CSMS copies
 the files here (to /mnt). Not sure why.


 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:

 secondary storage have the templates seeded? I've seen this happen before
 if its not. Total red herring of a message :p


 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  I can manually start up a VM on the nested ESX instance, so it appears
  there is some configuration problem perhaps in my CS install, but I'm
 not
  sure what it could be.
 
  I've never actually been successful running system VMs on ESX in the
 past.
  I've always had to add a XenServer host and run the system VMs on it.
 
 
  On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   I have a single node I'm developing on. It is running ESX. On top of
 ESX,
   I have Ubuntu 12.04 for CloudStack development (including running the
  CSMS
   and serving as a secondary-storage location for system VM templates,
  etc.).
   The one host I have in my CS install is running ESX (nested under my
  other
   ESX).
  
   It looks like this:
  
   ESX (on hardware)
   - ESX (nested, used as host in CS)
   - vCenter Server
   - Ubuntu (CSMS, secondary storage)
  
   I keep getting an InsufficientServerCapacityException, but I'm not
 sure
   why. I should have plenty of CPU, memory, and storage space on all
 VMs.
  
   Thanks!
   Mike
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
   *™*
  
 
 
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the
  cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*
 




 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the 
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: System VMs not running

[Ahmad Emneina]

this usually indicates that you missed the step where you prep vhd-util on
the hypervisor.


On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:

 The step worked fine after seeding system VM into secondary storage
 location.

 However, i see the next error:

 WARN  [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-446:) Catch Exception
 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on
 host:21318624-cfd9-412d-aeb4-b1418424f287 for template: nfs://
 10.10.171.155/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/ due to
 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: *can not create vdi in sr
 *
 b45c8c85-4e55-983c-cb16-4c2f2356951c
 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr
 b45c8c85-4e55-983c-cb16-4c2f2356951c
 at

 com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage(CitrixResourceBase.java:2707)

 ...

 2013-08-23 09:46:12,815 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (secstorage-1:null)
 Seq 12-90517578: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 268749071320359, via: 12, Ver:
 v1, Flags: 100111, [{storage.*PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand*

 :{localPath:/mnt/15370e0e-c8ae-32bb-94e1-74f1fad0cce3,poolUuid:15370e0e-c8ae-32bb-94e1-74f1fad0cce3,poolId:211,primaryPool:{id:211,uuid:15370e0e-c8ae-32bb-94e1-74f1fad0cce3,host:10.10.171.155,path:/export/primary,port:2049,type:NetworkFilesystem},secondaryStorageUrl:nfs://
 10.10.171.155/export/secondary,primaryStorageUrl:nfs://
 10.10.171.155/export/primary,url:nfs://
 10.10.171.155/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/
 ,format:VHD,accountId:1,name:routing-1,wait:10800}}]
 }

 ...

 2013-08-23 09:46:15,077 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
 (DirectAgent-72:null) Seq 12-90517578: Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
 268749071320359, via: 12, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{storage.*

 PrimaryStorageDownloadAnswer*:{templateSize:0,result:false,details:Catch
 Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on
 host:21318624-cfd9-412d-aeb4-b1418424f287 for template: nfs://
 10.10.171.155/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/ due to
 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr
 b45c8c85-4e55-983c-cb16-4c2f2356951c,wait:0}}] }

 Have i missed any other step for configuring primary  secondary storage.

 Regards,
 Amit
 *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/


 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Harikrishna Patnala 
 harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:

  Please follow the link to seed the system template
 
 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template
 
  -Harikrishna
  On 22-Aug-2013, at 5:08 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com
   wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   I have not seeded the secondary storage with system vm template.
  
   The directory ../template/tmpl/1/1 is not present.
  
  
   Regards,
   Amit
   *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
  
  
   On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Devdeep Singh 
 devdeep.si...@citrix.com
  wrote:
  
   Did you seed the secondary storage with the systemvm template before
   starting the setup? If not, can you check if under your secondary
  storage
   the ../template/tmpl/1/1 directory is present?
  
   Regards,
   Devdeep
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com]
   Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:50 PM
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Subject: System VMs not running
  
   Hi folks,
  
   I am running CloudStack 4.1.1.  running the NFS share on the same
 box
  as
   CloudStack management server (CentOS 6). The hypervisor is a separate
  Xen
   server.
  
   I am not able to get the system vms in a running state.
   We had not downloaded the vhd-util initially but it has been
 downloaded
   now.
   The management server has been restarted  appropriate rpcbind, nfs
   services started. The configuration was redone from scratch. However,
  we
   are
   stuck with below error always.
  
   com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can't mount
   10.10.171.155:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1
   to /var/run/cloud_mount/2cc7d1a3-130b-4ae9-9381-5f8ec6bf751a
 at
   com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
   copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage(CitrixResourceBase.java:2707)
  
   ..
   2013-08-22 16:30:52,866 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (secstorage-
   1:null) Seq 12-749863191: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId:
 268749071320359,
   via: 12,
   Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{storage.*PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand*
   :{localPath:/mnt/15370e0e-c8ae-32bb-94e1-
   74f1fad0cce3,poolUuid:15370e0e-c8ae-32bb-94e1-
  
  74f1fad0cce3,poolId:211,primaryPool:{id:211,uuid:15370e0e-c8ae-
   32bb-94e1-
  
  
 
 74f1fad0cce3,host:10.10.171.155,path:/export/primary,port:2049,
   type:NetworkFilesystem},secondaryStorageUrl:nfs://
   10.10.171.155/export/secondary,primaryStorageUrl:nfs://
   10.10.171.155/export/primary,url:nfs://
   10.10.171.155/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/
  ,format:VHD,acco
   

Re: Question about GUI refresh logic

[Ahmad Emneina]

I would imagine that pane to refresh every so often, reflecting against the
view. meaning after a vm is expunged, it should disappear from that view.


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:

 Mike,

 expunging is not a reply to an api call, destroying is. I have been
 wondering about this as well but I think I just came up with the
 answer (cs gurus:}?)

 regards,

 On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm curious when I should expect the GUI to refresh and when I should be
  expected to manually do so.
 
  For example, after I destroy a VM, the GUI refreshes to tell me the VM's
 in
  the destroyed state.
 
  However, to see when the VM is actually expunged, I have to refresh
  manually by clicking on the Instance tab.
 
  Is that expected behavior?
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the
  cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*

Re: Template Folder Path (KVM/Libvirt)

[Ahmad Emneina]

just dawned on me, you might have to forget the storage pools (if no vm's
are running) on the hosts. Then reconnect the kvm agents (by restarting the
service on the hosts or from cloudstack- force reconnect command). they
should get programmed correctly!


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Marty Sweet msweet2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've hit a problem that I have been chewing on for the past few hours. A
 few months ago I changed the local storage path naming convention (examples
 below) and updated the corresponding records in the cloudstack database
 manually. This works great until old templates are used. I understand I
 could use symlinks to resolve this issue but I would prefer to have a sane
 dataset and a cleaner setup :)

 -- My Physical Volumes --
 /mount/msa0-enc0-vm0 (OLD /mount/enc0-vm)
 /mount/msa0-enc0-vm1
 /mount/msa0-enc1-vm0 (OLD /mount/enc1-vm)
 /mount/msa0-enc1-vm1
 /mount/msa0-enc2-vm0

 In the database there is no mention of /mount/enc0-vm or /mount/enc1-vm,
 from doing a global search on all content (and by dumping the database
 and grepping the output). However, libvirt still manages
 to receive commands to add these templates.

 virStorageBackendFileSystemRefresh:889 : internal error cannot probe
 backing volume info: /mount/enc1-vm/a0932ff2-e97c-446a-85f2-42ad0fb2cab7
 virStorageBackendProbeTarget:118 : internal error cannot probe backing
 volume format: /mount/enc0-vm/8dc8d179-ac43-4475-812a-3bcc3e5d7b43

 These UUID Paths do correspond to templates within the '*
 template_spool_ref' *table which then *presumably *are linked to
 `storage_pool` to pick out the folder 'path'? although this should give the
 correct, new mappings. I can rule out a storage pool issue within libvirt
 as I resolved that issue when I changed the naming convention and have
 rechecked it.

 Unlike VM `volumes`, templates don't seem to possess a folder 'path', the
 only possible field I can assume is `vm_template.checksum`, which is
 obviously questionable, but would explain why a plain text search for the
 old volumes is returning no results.

 So my question is: How does CS compose template paths and from what parts
 within the cloudstack database? If these are encrypted (as I am assuming
 the folder path is somewhere, what is the best way to change these values).

 Thanks in advance,
 Marty Sweet (Rapid2214)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

[Ahmad Emneina]

Way to go Vijay! Congrats.

Ahmad

On Aug 10, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:

 Hearty Congratulations 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] 
 Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:31 AM
 To: CloudStack Dev
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Vijay 
 Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they 
 have accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. 
 For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need 
 to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether 
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a 
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and 
 the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Vijay!
 
 --
 Prasanna.,
 on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
 
 
 Powered by BigRock.com
 

Re: Network Problem

[Ahmad Emneina]

Next thing to do would be to sniff the traffic... Where's it failing to 
traverse?

Ahmad

On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com 
wrote:

 I disabled it.
 
 Le 30/07/2013 17:58, Ahmad Emneina a écrit :
 guest os firewall?
 
 
 On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Schneider 
 thomas.schnei...@euskill.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I created a Security Group that allow all traffic by default in both way.
 I can ssh to a VM, but when I install LAMP I can't reach the web server.
 Do you have an idea of the problem ?
 
 Regards
 
 
 Le 30/07/2013 03:11, Jijun a écrit :
 Hi ,
 Basic Network will setup the security group, and it will deny all the
 inbound traffic and allow outbound traffic.
 
 you should manually add some ingress rules.
 
 offical document:
 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Installation_Guide/security-groups.html
 
 
 On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Thomas Schneider wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have setup cloudstack and it work fine, I can launch VM etc...
 But the problem is I can only SSH to the VM from the host on which she
 is running.
 When I am in the vm I can ping exernal network and download package to
 setup lamp for example.
 
 I'm in basic network mode
 My config is:
 
 mgmt srv: 10.10.10.20
 host1: 10.10.10.30
 host2: 10.10.10.31
 nfs for storage 10.10.10.100
 
 pod pool 10.10.10.110 - 150
 guest pool 10.10.10.200 -250
 
 and my network config on the host in /etc/init.d/networking/interface
 is:
 ---
 auto p49p1
 iface p49p1 inet manual
 
 auto cloudbr0
 iface cloudbr0 inet static
 bridge_ports p49p1
 address 10.10.10.31
 netmask 255.255.255.0
 network 10.10.10.0
 broadcast 10.10.10.255
 gateway 10.10.10.254
 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if
 installed
 dns-nameservers 10.1.1.2
 ---
 
 I also with to use OpenVSwitch but I didn't found a lot of documentation
 for configuring in basic nework mode on ubuntu.
 
 Tkanks for your Help.
 
 Best Regards,
 
 --
 *Thomas Schneider*
 
 
 -- 
 *Thomas Schneider*
 Directeur des Opérations
 Euskill SARL
 Web: www.euskill.com
 Mobile: +33 (0)6 19 26 47 76
 Mail: thomas.schnei...@euskill.com
 5 rue de Phalsbourg
 F-67000 Strasbourg

Re: Proofreading of our procedure to cleanly re-create vrouters and restart CloudStack on a running VMware cluster after an interruption

[Ahmad Emneina]

Hey Guillaume, not sure why you have to manually edit the db. After an
upgrade. Assuming you followed the steps in the release notes, you could
make the api call to rebootrouter on all the routers and that should do the
trick of recreating them properly.
On Jul 25, 2013 12:13 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ahmad, Alena, you might have some thoughts on Guillaume's email below ?

 -sebastien

 On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Fraysse Guillaume gfraysse...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hello everyone,
 
  We had an unexpected problem on our infrastructure while we were
  upgrading CloudStack from 2.2.13 to 4.1 which led us to stop
  CloudStack before being able to finalize the update.We still have the
  vrouters to update but have a production platform that is a bit messy.
  We're trying to find out how to finish he upgrade of the vrouters and
  restart CloudStack when the VMware cluster has lived his life in the
  meantime and some VM are in different states that when CLoudStack was
  stopped.
 
  Here is the procedure we are testing in a preproduction environment,
  any advice/comment would be greatly appreciated as this is a risky
  operation to perform on our production environment:
 
  * Removing all vRouters from vCenter
 
  * Updating vRouters states to « Stopped » in CloudStack database :
  mysql update vm_instance set state = 'Stopped' where state 
  'Expunging' and type = 'DomainRouter';
 
  * Get the list of all vms :
  mysql select id, instance_name, state from vm_instance where state 
  'Expunging' and type = 'User';
 
  * Updating table vm_instance to set the correct states and hosts of
  vms. Example of SQL query :
  mysql update vm_instance set state = 'Running', host_id = 17,
  last_host_id = 17 where id = 43;
 
  * Restarting CloudStack
 
  * Restarting all networks with « cleanup » option via CloudStack API.
  Example of HTTP request :
  $ curl
 http://cloudstack:8096/?command=restartNetwork\cleanup=true\response=json\id=227
 
  This procedure seems to be working except for a little detail : we see
  that we use more Management IP adresses than expected, like they are
  not de-allocated, could it be a side effect of the procedure ?
 
  If you see any problem in this procedure or any problem it might lead
  us to, your help would be appreciated.
 
  Best regards,
  Guillaume

Re: [Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

[Ahmad Emneina]

it looks like this is meant to enable routing between two different guest
isolated networks. Also suggests the ability to allow natted traffic
through another accounts network. I'd like to know more as to why someone
would want this, I dont see how the natting would work since the CIDR for
both networks are identical (forgive the ignorance here).


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi guys,
 
  I write a proposal about implementing routing method for guest networks
  using VLAN isolation. At the moment, they can reach each other due to
  interVLAN routing in VPC model, but can not in Guest network model. So
 the
  key point is make some static routes between them, including iptables
 rules
  for filtering ports and protocols. Please take a look on my proposal,
 link
  below.
 
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Routing+between+Guest+networks
 

 Isn't this exactly the case that VPC is designed to solve?
 What's the benefit of doing this? If we did this, would we continue using
 VPC?

 --David

Re: New user - Introduction

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome, the more fixes the better. Welcome!!


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:19 AM, René Diepstraten
r...@renediepstraten.nlwrote:

 Hi everyone.

 Since I have joined the mailing list, I'd like to say hello and introduce
 myself.
 My name is Rene Diepstraten, am a system administrator and the company I
 work for ( PCextreme ) uses Apache CloudStack.

 I'd like to contribute here and there with my skills in python and bash,
 and perhaps learn some java.
 A few small patches that I wrote have been accepted into Master, and I'd
 like to contribute more to this great project in the future.

 Best regards,

 Rene Diepstraten

Re: Another ISO Question

[Ahmad Emneina]

The vm wont deploy. There wont be any hosts found that overlap with the
correct tagged storage.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi,

 When trying to kick a VM off based on an ISO, I see you have to pick the
 Compute Offering and the Disk Offering (as opposed to just picking a
 Compute Offering for a template).

 What happens if the Compute Offering and Disk Offering you select have
 incompatible Storage Tags?

 Thanks!

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: Another ISO Question

[Ahmad Emneina]

Let me defer to +Prachi, she knows the tagging system better than I.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 OK, thanks.

 I wasn't sure if we were maybe only honoring the Storage Tags of the
 Compute Offering or the Disk Offering, but it sounds like we essentially
 are taking the subset of the two, if any.


 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:

 The vm wont deploy. There wont be any hosts found that overlap with the
 correct tagged storage.


 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  Hi,
 
  When trying to kick a VM off based on an ISO, I see you have to pick the
  Compute Offering and the Disk Offering (as opposed to just picking a
  Compute Offering for a template).
 
  What happens if the Compute Offering and Disk Offering you select have
  incompatible Storage Tags?
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the
  cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
  *™*
 




 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the 
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: System VM

[Ahmad Emneina]

That seems to be the latest stable release for the KVM template (according
to the 4.1 install docs). You can also get bleeding edge templates from:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master, say if youre
interested in ipv6 support and other features that didnt make it into
'-stable'.


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.comwrote:

 Hello,

 I'm curious, is this the most recent up to date system VM for download for
 KVM?


 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2

Re: Using VMware from CloudStack

[Ahmad Emneina]

one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds the cluster as a
unit (which maps to the vmware dc/cluster). I believe at the cluster
addition phase, is where you should be prompted for credentials. Give that
a try, see if you get any miles out of that.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I've been primarily working on the 4.2 branch as of late and was setting up
 a VMware cluster for the first time in a while.

 I noticed from an error message that before I can set up a cluster based on
 VMware that I must add the VMware Datacenter to the Zone. I went ahead and
 did this.

 I then came back to the Add Cluster dialog and am wondering why at this
 point we ask for the vCenter host, username, password, and datacenter. It
 would seem I already filled in this info when I associated the VMware
 Datacenter to the Zone. Am I missing something here?

 Thanks for filling me in on this!

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: Tiny template for ESX?

[Ahmad Emneina]

short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
which can be downloaded from:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

its around 50 megs :)


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudStack on a host in an ESX
 cluster.

 Do we have a tiny template similar to the one we use for XenServer that I
 might be able to leverage?

 Thanks!

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the
 cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
 *™*

Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic

[Ahmad Emneina]

why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an
issue, and fixing that.


On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote:

 Hello,

 Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round
 robin is working or not.
 It is seen that often LBing is not perfect round robin. If first request
 goes to one vm the next does not always go to second,
 when there are just two vms added to LB rule.

 I vaguely recall discussing this with Prasanna where he suggested removing
 these test cases. Prasanna, please correct me if I am wrong.

 Regards,
 Girish

Re: Advanced Network Errors

[Ahmad Emneina]

can you resend the link, the paste id is broken.


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.comwrote:

 Hello gang, I appreciate the help I've had thus far; I am toying with
 advanced network on my test server, however; setting it up, to what I
 believe is correct, I am presented with the errors you'll find here:
 http://pastebin.com/mspH3fZ9

 Anyone know how to resolve this?

 - M.

Re: system VMS stuck in 'Starting' state.

[Ahmad Emneina]

In the case below, the ID is the ID column/reference and not uuid.

Ahmad

On Jun 27, 2013, at 12:25 PM, France mailingli...@isg.si wrote:

 Just do a select * and look at the data. I found mine by name.
 Everything else should be clear to you then.
 If not, learn basic SQL.
 
 On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
 
 Is ‘ID’ the UUID, the long string of letters/numbers. If not, how would I 
 get the correct ID?
 
 
 
 - Maurice
 On Jun 27, 2013, at 3:16 AM, France mailingli...@isg.si wrote:
 
 Your assumptions are correct.
 
 I've done it like this. Ofcourse you must select appropriate status:
 use cloud
 update vm_instance set state='Running' where id='293';
 
 Regards,
 F.
 
 On 27/6/13 9:30 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
 Hello,
 
 How can I manipulate the database to tell CS that the system VMS are 
 stopped and not 'Starting' along with that; once stopped I can then either 
 restart them and or destroy and let then system recreate, correct?
 
 

Re: Console Proxy VM failed to start

[Ahmad Emneina]

Hey Maurice can you post more logs before the error below. You might want to 
post them outside of email, to a site like pastebin.com.

Ahmad

On Jun 27, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I have finally got both system VM's 'Stopped', however, the secondary storage 
 is running without issue. Whereas, the console proxy will not start, this is 
 from the logs.
 
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,192 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] 
 (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: lunder.daoenix.com, 
 hostId: 9 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,192 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] 
 (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable 
 hosts
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,193 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,193 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,193 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for this 
 VM under any clusters, returning. 
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,196 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with 
 event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id 
 before state transition: 9
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,199 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) Hosts's actual total CPU: 36256 and CPU after applying 
 overprovisioning: 36256
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,199 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) release cpu from host: 9, old used: 1000,reserved: 0, 
 actual total: 36256, total with overprovisioning: 36256; new used: 
 500,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,199 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) release mem from host: 9, old used: 
 1342177280,reserved: 0, total: 25186906112; new used: 268435456,reserved:0; 
 movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse
 2013-06-27 14:36:52,201 WARN  [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
 (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
 com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
 deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-40-VM]Scope=interface 
 com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
 at 
 com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728)
 at 
 com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:471)
 at 
 com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:464)
 at 
 com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:632)
 at 
 com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1166)
 at 
 com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1989)
 at 
 com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:175)
 at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:111)
 at 
 com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
 at 
 com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
 at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
 at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
 at 
 java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
 at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
 at 
 java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
 at 
 java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
 at 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
 at 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
 
 
 I am not well with reading the logs, what is this trying to tell me? 

Re: Can Hypervisors have multiple image formats?

[Ahmad Emneina]

I would love to see multiple image formats opened up for hypervisors. Live
Wido said... KVM alone can support a myriad of image formats. Using ceph
requires an import of qcow2 and a conversion of that to RAW on every deploy
is incredibly slow/wasteful/painful to endure.


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:



 On 06/26/2013 02:43 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:

 Judging by StorageManagerImpl.**getHypervisorTypeFromFormat, each format
 can only be used by one Hypervisor type.

 The reason I ask, is that Hyper-V 2012 supports a legacy disk image type
 called 'VHD' in addition to 'VHDX'.  It's straightforward to add VHDX to
 the  ImageFormat enum, but less straightforward when it comes to adding a
 VHD image type.


 That is odd indeed. Any insight on this would be welcome, since I know
 that slowly QCOW3 is being worked on, so at some point we will want to
 support QCOW2 and QCOW3 for KVM.

 Other then QCOW2, with RBD (Ceph) you have to use RAW since it's native
 RBD. So simply assuming that with KVM it will always be QCOW2 isn't a safe
 bet.

 Wido


  Any guidance would be most welcome.


 E.g. from StorageManagerImpl.java

  @Override
  public HypervisorType getHypervisorTypeFromFormat(**ImageFormat
 format) {

  if (format == null) {
  return HypervisorType.None;
  }

  if (format == ImageFormat.VHD) {
  return HypervisorType.XenServer;
  } else if (format == ImageFormat.OVA) {
  return HypervisorType.VMware;
  } else if (format == ImageFormat.QCOW2) {
  return HypervisorType.KVM;
  } else if (format == ImageFormat.RAW) {
  return HypervisorType.Ovm;
  } else {
  return HypervisorType.None;
  }
  }

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Moving cloudmonkey to its own repository, have its own release process

[Ahmad Emneina]

+1 to lazine

Ahmad

On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:53 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:

 +1 to the proposal and lazy consensus
 
 On Jun 25, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
 
 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 01:00 PM, David Nalley wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers
 chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
 +1 - reasonable plan.  I'm not sure we need a vote though.  Let's
 use lazy consensus on this one.
 
 Folks - you can see the plan.  Shout if you disagree in any way.
 
 Agreed with lazy consensus for the move.
 I would like some explicit reviews of the repo.
 I'd really like to get this writable and a release generated.
 
 +1 to lazy consensus. (oh, wait...)
 
 Best,
 
 jzb
 -- 
 Joe Brockmeier
 j...@zonker.net
 Twitter: @jzb
 http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mike Tutkowski

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesome stuff Mike. Excellent work getting solid fire in while the storage 
refactor was going on! Well deserved sir.

Ahmad

On Jun 19, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:

 
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Mike 
 Tutkowski to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have 
 accepted.
 
 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. 
 For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need 
 to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether 
 contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a 
 contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and 
 the Apache Way.
 
 Please join me in congratulating Mike!
 
 --Alex
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: Automation analysis improvement

[Ahmad Emneina]

I'm +1 on this. I feel global setting (relating to expunge and cleanup) should 
be set to aggressively expunge deleted resources, then delete the user 
resources... before deleting the account. That way we can verify garbage 
collection of resources is working properly.

Ahmad

On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com 
wrote:

 +1
 
 On 6/14/13 8:54 AM, Rayees Namathponnan rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com
 wrote:
 
 Many of the automation test cases are not tearing down the  account
 properly; due to this resources are not getting released and followed
 test cases getting failed during VM deployment itself.
 
 During automation run accounts are created with random number without any
 reference for test case (eg : test-N5QD8N), and it's hard to identify
 which test case not tearing down the account after complete the test.
 
 Here my suggestion; we should create account name with test case name
 (eg : test- VPCOffering-N5QD8N)
 
 Any thoughts ?
 
 Regards,
 Rayees
 

Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members

[Ahmad Emneina]

Rightly earned... Congrats guys.

Ahmad

On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations to Chip and David for being elected members of the ASF:
 
 https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_welcomes2
 
 -Sebastien

Re: Contributing as a non-committer

[Ahmad Emneina]

Is there a carrier pigeon plugin for git yet?

Ahmad

On Jun 11, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 I've got an etch-a-sketch, will that work?
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul Angus
 S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
 paul.an...@shapeblue.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
 Sent: 11 June 2013 16:35
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Contributing as a non-committer
 
 On Mon, Jun 10, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
 Forget about eclipse for now :) just use vi :)
 
 Why don't we just go back to ed?
 
 +1
 
 Alex - do you want to start the vote? ;-)
 
 Best,
 
 jzb
 --
 Joe Brockmeier
 j...@zonker.net
 Twitter: @jzb
 http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
 
 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
 its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
 believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
 incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated 
 under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell

[Ahmad Emneina]

Awesomesauce. Thanks for the work so far and congrats.
On Jun 4, 2013 2:35 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:

 The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
 he has accepted.  Congrats John!

 -chip

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

[Ahmad Emneina]

can you check the output of /var/log/cloud/cloud.out when adding the iso.
Also if youre adding the iso from an internal web server, make sure you
have secstorage.allowed.internal.sites set to the internal ip or range of
where you host those images.


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:25 PM, La Motta, David
david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:

 Ok, so I took a gander at some of the suggestions on that page, and though
 I feel I am close… I am not there yet.  Just so you all have a bit of
 context how my environment is setup:

 I am running MS in a CentOS 6.4 VM, inside XS 61.
 Cluster XS is another 6.1 VM
 MS has a public and private (vlan) IP address
 vlan itself can't access outside world (though MS can via the public IP)

 When I add my ISO, the MS console still continues to spit out:

 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (129221@qtp-1329125626-10:)
 There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://
 172.20.39.74/SnapCreator_secondary

 Both SSVM and proxy VM are running in XS, I can ssh to SSVM and execute
 commands per the troubleshooting guide.

 Things that I have done since the series of messages on this thread:

 1. Blew away the DB
 2. Started with a clean Cluster XS.
 3. MS iptables disabled
 4. Added secstorage.allowed.internal.sites value to have my vlan CIDR (
 172.20.39.0/24) and public network CIDR (10.63.172.0/24)
 5. Changed host value for the MS to be the vlan IP address instead of the
 public address
 6. Ran ssvm-check.sh and it stops short at not being able to hit DNS
 (expected, because the vlan can't connect to the 'net)
 7. Ran service cloud status and it came back fine, everything seems to be
 running a-ok.
 8. Primary and secondary storage remain intact on the storage controller.


 Setup zone, pod, cluster, host, primary  secondary storage.  System VMs
 are up and running.  DB says:

 mysql select name,status,type from host;
 +--++--+
 | name | status | type |
 +--++--+
 | XenServer-CS | Up | Routing  |
 | nfs://172.20.39.74/SnapCreator_secondary | Alert  | SecondaryStorage |
 +--++--+
 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 mysql select url,download_state,error_str from template_host_ref;

 +-++---+
 | url
 | download_state | error_str |

 +-++---+
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2| 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2  | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova  | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2| 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2  | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://172.20.39.51/software/linux/ubuntu/ubuntu-12.04.1-desktop-i386.iso  | 
 NOT_DOWNLOADED | NULL  |

 +-++---+
 6 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 root@s-1-VM:/# tail -20 /var/log/cloud.log
 Thu May 30 18:02:28 UTC 2013 Enable service cloud = 1
 Thu May 30 18:39:21 UTC 2013 Executing cloud-early-config
 Thu May 30 18:39:22 UTC 2013 Detected that we are running inside xen-domU
 guest
 Thu May 30 18:39:24 UTC 2013 Setting up secondary storage system vm
 Thu May 30 18:39:24 UTC 2013 checking that eth0 has IP
 Thu May 30 18:39:25 UTC 2013 checking that eth1 has IP
 Thu May 30 18:39:25 UTC 2013 checking that eth2 has IP
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 checking that eth3 has IP
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 Successfully setup storage network with
 STORAGE_IP:172.20.39.6, STORAGE_NETMASK:255.255.255.0, STORAGE_CIDR:
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 Setting up apache web server
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 cloud: disable rp_filter
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 disable rpfilter
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 cloud: enable_fwding = 0
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 enable_fwding = 0
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 Enable service haproxy = 0
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 Enable service dnsmasq = 0
 Thu May 30 18:39:34 UTC 2013 Enable service cloud-passwd-srvr = 0
 Thu May 30 18:39:35 UTC 2013 Enable service cloud = 1
 Thu May 30 18:47:35 UTC 2013 User stops cloud.comhttp://cloud.com
 service
 Thu May 30 19:04:13 UTC 2013 User stops cloud.comhttp://cloud.com
 service

 (I ran a service cloud restart a couple of times, per troubleshooting
 instructions)

 I am at a loss, but happy to try anything else…



 David La Motta
 

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

[Ahmad Emneina]

did you restart the management service after modifying that global param?
it's required. It will then add an exception to the ssvm's firewall, to
allow for that traffic.


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:34 PM, La Motta, David
david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:

  Nothing in cloud.out--I have some old messages which don't make me feel
 that great about things, but a tail -f on the file keeps it static when I
 attempt to add the ISO.  The old messages are:

  18:47:27,229  WARN NioConnection:110 - Unable to connect to remote: is
 there a server running on port 8250

  I have tried secstorage.allowed.internal.sites with
 172.20.39.0/24,10.63.172.0/24 and 172.20.39.0 and 172.20.39.51 to no
 avail.  The SSVM can ping 172.20.39.51 without a prob.

  Now something strange that I just noticed.  I can wget from SSVM to my
 internal web server and pull down whatever (actually, the CS login page)
 from http://172.20.39.51:8080   but   I get a connection refused from
 http://172.20.39.51:80

  *sigh*


 *David La Motta*
 Technical Marketing Engineer
  Citrix Solutions

 *NetApp*
 919.476.5042
 dlamo...@netapp.com



  On May 30, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 can you check the output of /var/log/cloud/cloud.out when adding the iso.
 Also if youre adding the iso from an internal web server, make sure you
 have secstorage.allowed.internal.sites set to the internal ip or range of
 where you host those images.


 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:25 PM, La Motta, David
 david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:

 Ok, so I took a gander at some of the suggestions on that page, and though
 I feel I am close… I am not there yet.  Just so you all have a bit of
 context how my environment is setup:

 I am running MS in a CentOS 6.4 VM, inside XS 61.
 Cluster XS is another 6.1 VM
 MS has a public and private (vlan) IP address
 vlan itself can't access outside world (though MS can via the public IP)

 When I add my ISO, the MS console still continues to spit out:

 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (129221@qtp-1329125626-10
 :)
 There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://
 172.20.39.74/SnapCreator_secondary

 Both SSVM and proxy VM are running in XS, I can ssh to SSVM and execute
 commands per the troubleshooting guide.

 Things that I have done since the series of messages on this thread:

 1. Blew away the DB
 2. Started with a clean Cluster XS.
 3. MS iptables disabled
 4. Added secstorage.allowed.internal.sites value to have my vlan CIDR (
 172.20.39.0/24) and public network CIDR (10.63.172.0/24)
 5. Changed host value for the MS to be the vlan IP address instead of the
 public address
 6. Ran ssvm-check.sh and it stops short at not being able to hit DNS
 (expected, because the vlan can't connect to the 'net)
 7. Ran service cloud status and it came back fine, everything seems to be
 running a-ok.
 8. Primary and secondary storage remain intact on the storage controller.


 Setup zone, pod, cluster, host, primary  secondary storage.  System VMs
 are up and running.  DB says:

 mysql select name,status,type from host;
 +--++--+
 | name | status | type |
 +--++--+
 | XenServer-CS | Up | Routing  |
 | nfs://172.20.39.74/SnapCreator_secondary | Alert  | SecondaryStorage |
 +--++--+
 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 mysql select url,download_state,error_str from template_host_ref;


 +-++---+
 | url
| download_state | error_str |


 +-++---+
 |

 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2|DOWNLOADED
  | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2 | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |

 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2|DOWNLOADED
  | NULL  |
 |
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2 | 
 DOWNLOADED | NULL  |
 |
 http://172.20.39.51/software/linux/ubuntu/ubuntu-12.04.1-desktop-i386.iso | 
 NOT_DOWNLOADED | NULL  |


 +-++---+
 6 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 root@s-1-VM:/# tail -20 /var/log/cloud.log
 Thu May 30 18:02:28 UTC 2013 Enable service cloud = 1
 Thu May 30 18:39:21 UTC 2013 Executing cloud-early-config
 Thu May 30 18:39:22 UTC 2013 Detected that we are running inside xen-domU
 guest
 Thu May 30 18:39:24 UTC 2013 Setting up secondary

Re: cloudstack

[Ahmad Emneina]

what do you get in your management-server.log (on the management server)
and the agent.log (kvm host)? Feel free to paste them to
paste.cloudstack.org and share the link, that should help troubleshoot.


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:52 AM, ahmed mohiuddin ahmeds...@gmail.comwrote:

 when i try to add a kvm host, i get unable to add host error
 i'm try cloudstack on VMs

 setup is two VMs with centOS 6.4
 one is running as management server and other is configured as host
 i m unable to add any host in the cloudstack web ui
 please help
 installation was done according to the guide presented on cloudstack
 website.

 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Quick_Install_Guide/index.html

Re: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go

[Ahmad Emneina]

also, when trying to add the iso, can you capture the output in the ssvms'
cloud.out or cloud.log (cant remember which). It would be interesting to
see whats happening on the ssvm side of things.


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:

 Can you try:
 select status from host where type = 'SecondaryStorageVM';
 in db?

 Make sure the agent in ssvm can connect back to mgt serer.

  -Original Message-
  From: La Motta, David [mailto:david.lamo...@netapp.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:28 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: 4.2 snapshot: setting up ISOs - no go
 
  So my 4.2 instance is up and running, system VMs are running (secondary
  storage VM and console proxy VM), primary and secondary storage are up
  on NFS... all things considered and at a glance, things look good.
  However,
  when I try to add an ISO so that I can provision a VM, I am getting:
 
  WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (1018141210@qtp-
  2013781391-38:) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage
  host nfs://172.20.39.74/SnapCreator_secondary
 
  Which is throwing me off, because the secondary storage VM seems to be
  up and happy.  I can see it on XenCenter alive and well, too.  When I go
  through the ISO registration wizard, registration seems to be successful
 in
  the UI, since the ISOs get added to the templates table--except I get the
  warning in the console above.
 
  If I try to add another secondary storage, I get:
 
  ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (126087@qtp-2013781391-40:) unhandled
  exception executing api command: addSecondaryStorage
  com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Cannot transit agent
  status with event AgentDisconnected for host 9, mangement server id is
  271423992217301,Unable to transition to a new state from Creating via
  AgentDisconnected at
  com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.agentStatusTransitTo(Agent
  ManagerImpl.java:1436)
 
 
  When in doubt, reboot, right?  So I shutdown my CS mgmt server and
  XenServer host and tried again.  I even added more secondary storage
  without anything in it (the first NFS volume had the system VM template
 on
  it).  Still, I get the same behavior as described above:  the UI says
 the ISO was
  added, but the log file warns about the lack of a secondary storage VM.
 
  If I attempt to go through the instance provisioning wizard, long and
 behold,
  the ISO is not listed in the My ISOs tab.
 
 
  There is also something strange that I've noticed (slightly off topic):
 if I have
  primary storage allocated and resize the underlying volume on the storage
  controller, CS doesn't see the new size.  Is there any way to force that
 to take
  place from the UI?  Clicking on refresh did nothing about it.
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 
  David La Motta
  Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix
 
  NetApp
  919.476.5042
  dlamo...@netapp.commailto:dlamo...@netapp.com
 
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan

[Ahmad Emneina]

wooohooo! Awesome work Sangeetha!!!


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:



  -Original Message-
  From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
  Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:19 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
  Sangeetha Hariharan  to become a committer and we are pleased to
  announce that they have accepted.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Sangeetha!
 
  --Alex
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
 [Animesh] Congratulations Sangeetha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

[Ahmad Emneina]

Excellent work Venkata Swamy!!!


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to
 announce that they have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Venkata!

 -chip
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou

[Ahmad Emneina]

Congrats Wei!


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Wei Zhou to become a committer and we are pleased to
 announce that they have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Wei!

 -chip
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

[Ahmad Emneina]

Woohooo, congrats Sailaja.


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.comwrote:

 Congrats Sailaja !:)


 -Original Message-
 From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:51 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Sailaja Mada to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they
 have accepted.

 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission
 process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is
 a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and
 commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Sailaja!

 -chip
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC