Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2015-07-27 Thread Wido den Hollander


On 27-07-15 11:52, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 gogogo
 

The PR is out there: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/625

 On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 Hi,

 It has been quite some time and this feature hasn't merged yet.

 I created a issue for this:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8677

 The code is ready to merge and is in the reporter [0] branch on the
 Git repo.

 Even if the VM isn't ready, I would like to merge this feature into 4.6
 and get a VERY CLEAR doc into the Release Notes.

 Without Infra to send stats to, it seems like this feature is worthless,
 but it isn't. Since we got the code running, so as soon as we get
 call-home.cloudstack.org online we are good.

 Merging would just be sending a PR, before I do so, any objections?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter

 On 01-12-14 14:08, Wido den Hollander wrote:
 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter

 
 
 


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2015-07-27 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi,

It has been quite some time and this feature hasn't merged yet.

I created a issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8677

The code is ready to merge and is in the reporter [0] branch on the
Git repo.

Even if the VM isn't ready, I would like to merge this feature into 4.6
and get a VERY CLEAR doc into the Release Notes.

Without Infra to send stats to, it seems like this feature is worthless,
but it isn't. Since we got the code running, so as soon as we get
call-home.cloudstack.org online we are good.

Merging would just be sending a PR, before I do so, any objections?

Wido

[0]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter

On 01-12-14 14:08, Wido den Hollander wrote:
 Hello,
 
 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
 
 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.
 
 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
 
 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)
 
 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.
 
 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
 
 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.
 
 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.
 
 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
 
 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.
 
 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.
 
 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
 
 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.
 
 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.
 
 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.
 
 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
 
 Wido
 
 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter
 


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2015-07-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
gogogo

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 Hi,

 It has been quite some time and this feature hasn't merged yet.

 I created a issue for this:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8677

 The code is ready to merge and is in the reporter [0] branch on the
 Git repo.

 Even if the VM isn't ready, I would like to merge this feature into 4.6
 and get a VERY CLEAR doc into the Release Notes.

 Without Infra to send stats to, it seems like this feature is worthless,
 but it isn't. Since we got the code running, so as soon as we get
 call-home.cloudstack.org online we are good.

 Merging would just be sending a PR, before I do so, any objections?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter

 On 01-12-14 14:08, Wido den Hollander wrote:
 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter




-- 
Daan


RE: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-12 Thread Giles Sirett
Hi Wido

I recently had a thought on this.

Although I would be loathed that anybody has to register ACS when they use 
it, it would be good if we could differentiate between  production deployments 
and lab/bench deployments.
From the marketing perspective, we've got this crazy situation where we KNOW 
that there are many 100's of people running ACS but still only 70 people told 
us about their use in the last survey.
The problem is, if we don’t differentiate between prod/lab - then the data you 
collect will be padded with people running it in their home labs.

I'm not sure how we can go about doing this. The simplest thing would be a 
global setting, but where would the incentive be for people to change that 
setting when they put something into production ?

Another approach, which some may think controversial, would be that we do an 
about  screen/page that allows people to change this setting.
This screen could display a summary of version, #pods, clusters,etc (all the 
standard stuff people need to find out about their system) - so it would be 
useful for people
It could also contain info on how to join/access the community/ML's for support 
and (most controversially)  it could give people the option to put in some 
basic company information if they wished.
I totally understand that the last bit may be a thought too far some some people


Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com




-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: 01 December 2014 18:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack



On 12/01/2014 06:40 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
 +1

 Wido, will the statistics be accessible online for everyone (like
 real-time) or will the PMC release aggregated data periodically?


I was thinking to keep the data PMC-only to start with and indeed release 
aggregated data periodically.

 On Monday 01 December 2014 06:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous
 information about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information,
 but that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open
 Source, so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in
 the Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack.
 We want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used
 so that we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn
 on again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in
 the reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in
 a ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will
 NOT be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are
 submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is
 hashed using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in
 deployments and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
 =refs/heads/reporter

 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=rep
 orter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff55
 20855;hb=reporter



 --
 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue
 and our range of CloudStack related

[DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hello,

As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
about a CloudStack deployment.

It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
- Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
- Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
- Primary storage (Type and provider)
- Zones (Network type and providers)
- Instances (Number and types)

This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
that will be Management Server information.

The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
implications it might have.

I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
(master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
Release Notes that this has been added.

Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
again.

On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
CloudStack deployments.

It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

For 'production' I want to have
https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
and see how they grow or shrink.

Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
surrounding it might be the hardest part.

What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

Wido

[0]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
[1]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Sebastien Goasguen

On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:

 Hello,
 
 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
 
 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.
 
 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
 
 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)
 
 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.
 
 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
 
 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.
 
 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.
 
 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
 
 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.
 
 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.
 
 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
 
 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.
 
 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.
 
 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.
 
 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
 

We should ask users@ as well.

I am +1 on this, 

 Wido
 
 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter



Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Erik Weber
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:

  Hello,
 
  As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
  about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
  everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
 
  That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
  management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
  about a CloudStack deployment.
 
  It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
 
  By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
  - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
  - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
  - Primary storage (Type and provider)
  - Zones (Network type and providers)
  - Instances (Number and types)
 
  This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
  that will be Management Server information.
 
  The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
  so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
 
  I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
  implications it might have.
 
  I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
  (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
  Release Notes that this has been added.
 
  Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
  want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
  we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
 
  Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
  again.
 
  On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
  reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
  ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
  CloudStack deployments.
 
  It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
  be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
 
  For 'production' I want to have
  https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are
 submitted.
 
  For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
  the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
  using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
  and see how they grow or shrink.
 
  Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
  surrounding it might be the hardest part.
 
  What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
  feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
 

 We should ask users@ as well.

 I am +1 on this,



As a cloudstack user I don't have any problem with this, +1.

-- 
Erik


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Andrija Panic
+1

On 1 December 2014 at 14:31, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 
   Hello,
  
   As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
   about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
   everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
  
   That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
   management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
   about a CloudStack deployment.
  
   It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
  
   By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
   - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
   - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
   - Primary storage (Type and provider)
   - Zones (Network type and providers)
   - Instances (Number and types)
  
   This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
   that will be Management Server information.
  
   The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
   so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
  
   I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
   implications it might have.
  
   I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
   (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in
 the
   Release Notes that this has been added.
  
   Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
   want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so
 that
   we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
  
   Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn
 on
   again.
  
   On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in
 the
   reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
   ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
   CloudStack deployments.
  
   It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will
 NOT
   be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
  
   For 'production' I want to have
   https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are
  submitted.
  
   For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
   the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
   using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
   and see how they grow or shrink.
  
   Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
   surrounding it might be the hardest part.
  
   What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
   feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
  
 
  We should ask users@ as well.
 
  I am +1 on this,



 As a cloudstack user I don't have any problem with this, +1.

 --
 Erik




-- 

Andrija Panić


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Wido den Hollander


On 12/01/2014 02:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
 
 On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 
 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 
 We should ask users@ as well.
 

Yes, that is probably a good idea. First I'd like to have the politics
set before we take it to users.

In the end I'd like to see a VOTE coming up for this feature to go into
CloudStack.

Wido

 I am +1 on this, 
 
 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter
 


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Nux!
+1, good job!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02
 Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

 Hello,
 
 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
 
 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.
 
 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
 
 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)
 
 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.
 
 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
 
 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.
 
 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.
 
 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
 
 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.
 
 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.
 
 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
 
 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.
 
 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.
 
 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.
 
 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
 
 Wido
 
 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Wido den Hollander


On 12/01/2014 04:00 PM, Nux! wrote:
 In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the release 
 notes, as well as visible in the UI.
 

But where do we display this in the UI? I don't think we have a
mechanism to show a one-time message after a upgrade. Do we?

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:52:35
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack
 
 +1, good job!

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02
 Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Nux!
Hm, after an upgrade it might be tricky. Perhaps display it here somehow 
http://img.nux.ro/3hH-callhome.png
Perhaps some UI/javascript specialist can help us here ...

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 15:05:55
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

 On 12/01/2014 04:00 PM, Nux! wrote:
 In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the release 
 notes,
 as well as visible in the UI.
 
 
 But where do we display this in the UI? I don't think we have a
 mechanism to show a one-time message after a upgrade. Do we?
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:52:35
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack
 
 +1, good job!

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02
 Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are 
 submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter


RE: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Matthew Midgett
1+ from a user

-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack



On 12/01/2014 04:12 PM, Nux! wrote:
 Hm, after an upgrade it might be tricky. Perhaps display it here 
 somehow http://img.nux.ro/3hH-callhome.png
 Perhaps some UI/javascript specialist can help us here ...
 

Good idea. In that Menu we probably need a Call-Home link pointing to 
http://cloudstack.apache.org/callhome.html (doesn't exist yet!)

Wido

 Lucian
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 15:05:55
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for 
 CloudStack
 
 On 12/01/2014 04:00 PM, Nux! wrote:
 In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the 
 release notes, as well as visible in the UI.


 But where do we display this in the UI? I don't think we have a 
 mechanism to show a one-time message after a upgrade. Do we?

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:52:35
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for 
 CloudStack

 +1, good job!

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02
 Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for 
 CloudStack

 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information 
 on about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but 
 not everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the 
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous 
 information about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, 
 but that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open 
 Source, so end-users can always exactly see how the information was 
 compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible 
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 
 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit 
 in the Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using 
 CloudStack. We want a little bit of information on how CloudStack 
 is being used so that we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never 
 turn on again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found 
 in the reporter directory) which stores all the incoming 
 information in a ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can 
 be gathered on CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which 
 will NOT be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are 
 submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row 
 in the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that 
 is hashed using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes 
 in deployments and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics 
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for 
 this feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlo
 g;h=refs/heads/reporter
 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=
 reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460
 cfff5520855;hb=reporter



Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Rohit Yadav

+1

Wido, will the statistics be accessible online for everyone (like
real-time) or will the PMC release aggregated data periodically?

On Monday 01 December 2014 06:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:

Hello,

As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
about a CloudStack deployment.

It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
- Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
- Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
- Primary storage (Type and provider)
- Zones (Network type and providers)
- Instances (Number and types)

This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
that will be Management Server information.

The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
implications it might have.

I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
(master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
Release Notes that this has been added.

Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
again.

On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
CloudStack deployments.

It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

For 'production' I want to have
https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are submitted.

For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
and see how they grow or shrink.

Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
surrounding it might be the hardest part.

What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

Wido

[0]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
[1]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England  Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.


Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

2014-12-01 Thread Wido den Hollander


On 12/01/2014 06:40 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
 +1
 
 Wido, will the statistics be accessible online for everyone (like
 real-time) or will the PMC release aggregated data periodically?
 

I was thinking to keep the data PMC-only to start with and indeed
release aggregated data periodically.

 On Monday 01 December 2014 06:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
 Hello,

 As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
 about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
 everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.

 That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
 management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
 about a CloudStack deployment.

 It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]

 By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
 - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
 - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
 - Primary storage (Type and provider)
 - Zones (Network type and providers)
 - Instances (Number and types)

 This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
 that will be Management Server information.

 The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
 so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.

 I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
 implications it might have.

 I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
 (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
 Release Notes that this has been added.

 Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
 want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
 we can use this to make CloudStack even better.

 Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
 again.

 On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
 reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
 ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
 CloudStack deployments.

 It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
 be the endpoint when this is merged into master.

 For 'production' I want to have
 https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are
 submitted.

 For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
 the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
 using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
 and see how they grow or shrink.

 Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
 surrounding it might be the hardest part.

 What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
 feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?

 Wido

 [0]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter

 [1]:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter


 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
 
 IaaS Cloud Design 
 Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software
 Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
 
 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
 intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
 Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
 not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
 If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither
 take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
 Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
 error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England  Wales.
 ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is
 operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
 Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
 under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
 registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license
 from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.