[PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.64.0 to 1.64.1 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #70: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/70 Bumps [google.golang.org/grpc](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go) from 1.64.0 to 1.64.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases;>google.golang.org/grpc's releases. Release 1.64.1 Dependencies Update x/net/http2 to address https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45288;>CVE-2023-45288 (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7352;>#7352) metadata: remove String method from MD to make printing consistent (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7374;>#7374) Commits https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/4d833de0e0ea4345c2f8333f5e1d1155f93c5222;>4d833de Change version to 1.64.1 (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7381;>#7381) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/e9193a42987f93cf634aedb7c6f32d607281f8c4;>e9193a4 *: update deps (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7375;>#7375) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/ab292411ddc0f3b7a7786754d1fe05264c3021eb;>ab29241 metadata: remove String method (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7374;>#7374) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/355b9a557b63896fc569d8be1518905eabde0026;>355b9a5 Change version to 1.64.1-dev (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/7219;>#7219) See full diff in https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/compare/v1.64.0...v1.64.1;>compare view [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- Dependabot commands and options You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/network/alerts). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[ANNOUNCE] CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.1.0 Release
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.1.0 that facilitates Kubernetes deployments on Cloudstack. It allows Kubernetes to dynamically allocate IP addresses and the respective networking rules on CloudStack to ensure seamless TCP, UDP and TCP-Proxy LoadBalancer deployments on Kubernetes. This was historically part of the Kubernetes codebase which was later removed and donated to the project to allow for further maintenance of the provider plugin. # Documentation https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.html # Downloads The official source code for the v1.1.0 release can be downloaded from the downloads page: https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads#cloudstack-kubernetes-provider-release Changelog for this release can be found here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0 In addition to the official source code release, the container image is available here:: https://hub.docker.com/layers/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/v1.1.0/images/sha256-10c058968e7d2f8e55da5976336a42d88b057e75880f000d3120aa2d75649e97?context=explore
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Indeed, good work, Vishesh! On 2024-06-25 13:19, Rohit Yadav wrote: Thanks and good work Vishesh and everyone involved in the maintenance release. Regards. From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 16:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi all, After 120 hours, the vote for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 person (Rohit, Wei, Nux) +1 (non binding) 1 person (Kiran) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up and publish images on dockerhub. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Vishesh Jindal Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Looks like the vote has reached lazy consensus, @Vishesh Jindal<mailto:vishesh.jin...@shapeblue.com> could we wrap up? Regards. Rohit Yadav VP Engineering rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 17:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 as well, based on similar test to Wei's. Good job, Vishesh. On 2024-06-20 12:34, Kiran Chavala wrote: Hi Vishesh +1 I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc network tier with acl rule of default_allow 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 kubectl delete -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 kubectl apply -f https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with type=LoadBalancer. kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. The public ip is qcuired kubectl get svc NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)AGE kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP12m nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 80:31053/TCP 7m37s 5. Delete the nginx service. Public IP is released Regards Kiran From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: Hi All, I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please discard my previous email. I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For users convenience: * docker hub - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi All, I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/t
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Thanks and good work Vishesh and everyone involved in the maintenance release. Regards. From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 16:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi all, After 120 hours, the vote for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 person (Rohit, Wei, Nux) +1 (non binding) 1 person (Kiran) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up and publish images on dockerhub. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Vishesh Jindal Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Looks like the vote has reached lazy consensus, @Vishesh Jindal<mailto:vishesh.jin...@shapeblue.com> could we wrap up? Regards. Rohit Yadav VP Engineering rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 17:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 as well, based on similar test to Wei's. Good job, Vishesh. On 2024-06-20 12:34, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi Vishesh > > +1 > > I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc > network tier with acl rule of default_allow > > 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network > > 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 > > kubectl delete -f > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml > > 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 > > kubectl apply -f > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with > type=LoadBalancer. > > kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. > > The public ip is qcuired > > kubectl get svc > NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP > PORT(S)AGE > kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 > 443/TCP12m > nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > Lucian, > > The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the > docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > ____ > From: Nux > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie > deb/rpms? > > Cheers > > On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. >> Please discard my previous email. >> >> I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), >> with the following artifacts up for a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SHA: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using >> 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> For users convenience: >> * docker hub - >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags >> >> * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml >> >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Hi all, After 120 hours, the vote for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 person (Rohit, Wei, Nux) +1 (non binding) 1 person (Kiran) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up and publish images on dockerhub. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Vishesh Jindal Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Looks like the vote has reached lazy consensus, @Vishesh Jindal<mailto:vishesh.jin...@shapeblue.com> could we wrap up? Regards. Rohit Yadav VP Engineering rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 17:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 as well, based on similar test to Wei's. Good job, Vishesh. On 2024-06-20 12:34, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi Vishesh > > +1 > > I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc > network tier with acl rule of default_allow > > 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network > > 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 > > kubectl delete -f > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml > > 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 > > kubectl apply -f > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with > type=LoadBalancer. > > kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. > > The public ip is qcuired > > kubectl get svc > NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP > PORT(S)AGE > kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 > 443/TCP12m > nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > Lucian, > > The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the > docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > ____ > From: Nux > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie > deb/rpms? > > Cheers > > On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. >> Please discard my previous email. >> >> I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), >> with the following artifacts up for a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SHA: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using >> 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> For users convenience: >> * docker hub - >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags >> >> * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml >> >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Regards >> Vishesh >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Vishesh Jindal >> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM >> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; >&g
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Looks like the vote has reached lazy consensus, @Vishesh Jindal<mailto:vishesh.jin...@shapeblue.com> could we wrap up? Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 17:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 as well, based on similar test to Wei's. Good job, Vishesh. On 2024-06-20 12:34, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi Vishesh > > +1 > > I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc > network tier with acl rule of default_allow > > 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network > > 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 > > kubectl delete -f > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml > > 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 > > kubectl apply -f > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with > type=LoadBalancer. > > kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. > > The public ip is qcuired > > kubectl get svc > NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP > PORT(S)AGE > kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 > 443/TCP12m > nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > Lucian, > > The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the > docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > ____ > From: Nux > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie > deb/rpms? > > Cheers > > On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. >> Please discard my previous email. >> >> I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), >> with the following artifacts up for a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SHA: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using >> 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> For users convenience: >> * docker hub - >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags >> >> * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml >> >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Regards >> Vishesh >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Vishesh Jindal >> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM >> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; >> dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes >> Provider, with the following artifacts up for >> a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 >> >> Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 >> >> Deployment manifest: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml >> >> Docker image: >> apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 >> >> Docker image manifest digest: >> sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 >> >> You can check the changelog for the release >> here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 >> >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Regards >> Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
+1 as well, based on similar test to Wei's. Good job, Vishesh. On 2024-06-20 12:34, Kiran Chavala wrote: Hi Vishesh +1 I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc network tier with acl rule of default_allow 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 kubectl delete -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 kubectl apply -f https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with type=LoadBalancer. kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. The public ip is qcuired kubectl get svc NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)AGE kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP12m nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 80:31053/TCP 7m37s 5. Delete the nginx service. Public IP is released Regards Kiran From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: Hi All, I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please discard my previous email. I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For users convenience: * docker hub - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi All, I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 Deployment manifest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Docker image: apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 Docker image manifest digest: sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 You can check the changelog for the release here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Hi Vishesh +1 I tried the same steps as Wei did, but deployed a cks cluster in a vpc network tier with acl rule of default_allow 1. Create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.28.4 and Select a vpc network 2. Delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 kubectl delete -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml 3. Install 1.1.0-rc1 kubectl apply -f https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml 4. Create nginx deployment and expose the service with type=LoadBalancer. kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment3 --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer. The public ip is qcuired kubectl get svc NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP 12m nginx-deployment3 LoadBalancer 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 80:31053/TCP 7m37s 5. Delete the nginx service. Public IP is released Regards Kiran From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: > Hi All, > > I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. > Please discard my previous email. > > I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), > with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using > 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For users convenience: > * docker hub - > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh > > > > > > From: Vishesh Jindal > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes > Provider, with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 > > Deployment manifest: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Docker image: > apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 > > Docker image manifest digest: > sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 > > You can check the changelog for the release > here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: > Hi All, > > I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. > Please discard my previous email. > > I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), > with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using > 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For users convenience: > * docker hub - > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh > > > > > > From: Vishesh Jindal > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes > Provider, with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 > > Deployment manifest: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Docker image: > apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 > > Docker image manifest digest: > sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 > > You can check the changelog for the release > here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
+1 (binding) Source code, checksum and signature OK. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 12:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 (binding) Verified via the following steps 1. create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.30.0 and weavenet 2.8.1 2. delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 kubectl delete -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml 3. install 1.1.0-rc1 kubectl apply -f https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml 4. create nginx pod and service with type=LoadBalancer. Public IP is acquired, LB rules are added 5. delete the nginx service. Public IP is released Thanks Vishesh, great job ! -Wei On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:13 AM Vishesh Jindal wrote: > > Hi All, > > I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please > discard my previous email. > > I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with > the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For users convenience: > * docker hub - > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh > > > > > > From: Vishesh Jindal > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, > with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 > > Deployment manifest: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Docker image: > apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 > > Docker image manifest digest: > sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 > > You can check the changelog for the release > here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
We don't have any deb/rpms. Since this is for use with kubernetes, we only have a docker image and kubernetes deployment manifest. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 4:03 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: > Hi All, > > I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. > Please discard my previous email. > > I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), > with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using > 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For users convenience: > * docker hub - > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh > > > > > > From: Vishesh Jindal > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes > Provider, with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 > > Deployment manifest: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Docker image: > apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 > > Docker image manifest digest: > sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 > > You can check the changelog for the release > here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
In community's interest, do we have binary packages anywhere, ie deb/rpms? Cheers On 2024-06-19 07:12, Vishesh Jindal wrote: Hi All, I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please discard my previous email. I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For users convenience: * docker hub - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi All, I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 Deployment manifest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Docker image: apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 Docker image manifest digest: sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 You can check the changelog for the release here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
+1 (binding) Verified via the following steps 1. create a CKS cluster with k8s 1.30.0 and weavenet 2.8.1 2. delete cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 1.0.0 kubectl delete -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/main/deployment.yaml 3. install 1.1.0-rc1 kubectl apply -f https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml 4. create nginx pod and service with type=LoadBalancer. Public IP is acquired, LB rules are added 5. delete the nginx service. Public IP is released Thanks Vishesh, great job ! -Wei On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:13 AM Vishesh Jindal wrote: > > Hi All, > > I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please > discard my previous email. > > I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with > the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For users convenience: > * docker hub - > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags > > * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh > > > > > > From: Vishesh Jindal > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, > with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 > > Deployment manifest: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml > > Docker image: > apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 > > Docker image manifest digest: > sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 > > You can check the changelog for the release > here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards > Vishesh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Hi All, I made a mistake and didn't create the release on dist.apache.org. Please discard my previous email. I've created a new CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Commit: 59c3e7b21c39eefb2306bb8504bcef901a9d Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-1.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For users convenience: * docker hub - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags * Kubernetes manifest for the rc release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh From: Vishesh Jindal Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:36 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi All, I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 Deployment manifest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Docker image: apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 Docker image manifest digest: sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 You can check the changelog for the release here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1
Hi All, I've created a 1.1.0 release (RC1) for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/v1.1.0-rc1 Commit: 774a144876d2c875c61becab00e0487692130302 Deployment manifest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/download/v1.1.0-rc1/deployment.yaml Docker image: apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.1.0-rc1 Docker image manifest digest: sha256:38dc0a4413657b9c88cdcb28ef330e49aee6fb972a4cbc4055a0608b9f8bf7b8 You can check the changelog for the release here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/releases/tag/v1.1.0-rc1 Vote will be open for 120 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards Vishesh
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.56.3 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #65: Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.56.3 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/65 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.28.1 to 1.33.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #63: Bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.28.1 to 1.33.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/63 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade dependencies [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache merged PR #67: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/67 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.56.3 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #65: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/65#issuecomment-2175683990 Looks like google.golang.org/grpc is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/net from 0.8.0 to 0.23.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #64: Bump golang.org/x/net from 0.8.0 to 0.23.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/64 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.28.1 to 1.33.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #63: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/63#issuecomment-2175683940 Looks like google.golang.org/protobuf is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/net from 0.8.0 to 0.23.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #64: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/64#issuecomment-2175683926 Looks like golang.org/x/net is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache closed pull request #57: Release v1.1.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/57 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0
Thanks Vishesh for volunteering and glad to see a new maintenance release for the sub-project. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 16:20 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0 Thanks Vishesh for the volunteering. There was no cloudstack-kubernetes-provider release in the past 3 years, glad to see there are some new commits in the last weeks. Great job ! no specific PRs/issues are needed for me. looking forward to the new release -Wei On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:26 AM Vishesh Jindal wrote: > > Hi all, > > Cloudstack kuberentes provider is due for a release since the last release > was in 2021. I would like to propose myself as a Release Manager for the > v1.1.0 release. > > You can check the PRs merged since the last release here: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/compare/v1.0.0...main > > Let me know if there is any specific issue/PR which needs to be addressed. If > there are no additional changes, I will cut an RC next week. > > Thanks! > Vishesh > > >
Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0
Thanks Vishesh for the volunteering. There was no cloudstack-kubernetes-provider release in the past 3 years, glad to see there are some new commits in the last weeks. Great job ! no specific PRs/issues are needed for me. looking forward to the new release -Wei On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:26 AM Vishesh Jindal wrote: > > Hi all, > > Cloudstack kuberentes provider is due for a release since the last release > was in 2021. I would like to propose myself as a Release Manager for the > v1.1.0 release. > > You can check the PRs merged since the last release here: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/compare/v1.0.0...main > > Let me know if there is any specific issue/PR which needs to be addressed. If > there are no additional changes, I will cut an RC next week. > > Thanks! > Vishesh > > >
[PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0
Hi all, Cloudstack kuberentes provider is due for a release since the last release was in 2021. I would like to propose myself as a Release Manager for the v1.1.0 release. You can check the PRs merged since the last release here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/compare/v1.0.0...main Let me know if there is any specific issue/PR which needs to be addressed. If there are no additional changes, I will cut an RC next week. Thanks! Vishesh
Re: [PR] Release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache closed pull request #57: Release v1.1.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/57 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache opened a new pull request, #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/57 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache closed pull request #57: Release v1.1.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/57 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.56.3 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #65: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/65 Bumps [google.golang.org/grpc](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go) from 1.49.0 to 1.56.3. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases;>google.golang.org/grpc's releases. Release 1.56.3 Security server: prohibit more than MaxConcurrentStreams handlers from running at once (CVE-2023-44487) In addition to this change, applications should ensure they do not leave running tasks behind related to the RPC before returning from method handlers, or should enforce appropriate limits on any such work. Release 1.56.2 status: To fix a panic, status.FromError now returns an error with codes.Unknown when the error implements the GRPCStatus() method, and calling GRPCStatus() returns nil. (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6374;>#6374) Release 1.56.1 client: handle empty address lists correctly in addrConn.updateAddrs Release 1.56.0 New Features client: support channel idleness using WithIdleTimeout dial option (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6263;>#6263) This feature is currently disabled by default, but will be enabled with a 30 minute default in the future. client: when using pickfirst, keep channel state in TRANSIENT_FAILURE until it becomes READY (https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A62-pick-first.md;>gRFC A62) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6306;>#6306) xds: Add support for Custom LB Policies (https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A52-xds-custom-lb-policies.md;>gRFC A52) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6224;>#6224) xds: support pick_first Custom LB policy (https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A62-pick-first.md;>gRFC A62) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6314;>#6314) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6317;>#6317) client: add support for pickfirst address shuffling (https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A62-pick-first.md;>gRFC A62) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6311;>#6311) xds: Add support for String Matcher Header Matcher in RDS (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6313;>#6313) xds/outlierdetection: Add Channelz Logger to Outlier Detection LB (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6145;>#6145) Special Thanks: https://github.com/s-matyukevich;>@s-matyukevich xds: enable RLS in xDS by default (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6343;>#6343) orca: add support for application_utilization field and missing range checks on several metrics setters balancer/weightedroundrobin: add new LB policy for balancing between backends based on their load reports (https://github.com/grpc/proposal/blob/master/A58-client-side-weighted-round-robin-lb-policy.md;>gRFC A58) (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6241;>#6241) authz: add conversion of json to RBAC Audit Logging config (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6192;>#6192) authz: add support for stdout logger (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6230;>#6230 and https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6298;>#6298) authz: support customizable audit functionality for authorization policy (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6192;>#6192 https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6230;>#6230 https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6298;>#6298 https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6158;>#6158 https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6304;>#6304 and https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6225;>#6225) Bug Fixes orca: fix a race at startup of out-of-band metric subscriptions that would cause the report interval to request 0 (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6245;>#6245) xds/xdsresource: Fix Outlier Detection Config Handling and correctly set xDS Defaults (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6361;>#6361) xds/outlierdetection: Fix Outlier Detection Config Handling by setting defaults in ParseConfig() (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6361;>#6361) API Changes orca: allow a ServerMetricsProvider to be passed to the ORCA service and ServerOption (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6223;>#6223) Release 1.55.1 status: To fix a panic, status.FromError now returns an error with codes.Unknown when the error implements the GRPCStatus() method, and calling GRPCStatus() returns nil. (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6374;>#6374) Release 1.55.0 Behavior Changes xds: enable federation support by default (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/6151;>#6151) status: status.Cod
[PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp from 0.20.0 to 0.44.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #66: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/66 Bumps [go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib) from 0.20.0 to 0.44.0. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/releases;>go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp's releases. Release v0.36.2 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/sdk%2Fmetric%2Fv0.32.2;>v0.32.2 release Avoid getting a new Tracer for every RPC in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2835;>#2835) Conditionally compute message size for tracing events using proto v2 API rather than legacy v1 API in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2647;>#2647) Deprecated The Inject function in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc is deprecated. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2838;>#2838) The Extract function in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc is deprecated. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2838;>#2838) Release v0.36.1 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/metric%2Fv0.32.1;>v0.32.1 release. Release v0.36.0 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/sdk%2Fmetric%2Fv0.32.0;>v0.32.0 release. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2781;>#2781, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2756;>#2756, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2758;>#2758, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2760;>#2760, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2762;>#2762) Release v0.24.0 0.24.0 - 2021-09-21 Update dependency on the go.opentelemetry.io/otel project to v1.0.0. v0.23.0 0.23.0 - 2021-09-09 Added Add WithoutSubSpans, WithRedactedHeaders, WithoutHeaders, and WithInsecureHeaders options for otelhttptrace.NewClientTrace. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/879;>#879) Changed Split go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators module into b3, jaeger, ot modules. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/985;>#985) otelmongodb span attributes, name and span status now conform to specification. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/769;>#769) Migrated EC2 resource detector support from root module go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/aws to a separate EC2 resource detector module go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/aws/ec2 (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/1017;>#1017) Add cloud.provider and cloud.platform to AWS detectors. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/1043;>#1043) otelhttptrace.NewClientTrace now redacts known sensitive headers by default. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/879;>#879) Fixed Fix span not marked as error in otelhttp.Transport when RoundTrip fails with an error. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/950;>#950) Release v0.22.0 Added Add the zpages span processor. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/894;>#894) ... (truncated) Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md;>go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp's changelog. [1.26.0/0.51.0/0.20.0/0.6.0/0.1.0] - 2024-04-24 Added NewSDK in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config now returns a configured SDK with a valid MeterProvider. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/4804;>#4804) Changed Change the scope name for the prometheus bridge to go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/prometheus to match the package. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/5396;>#5396) Ad
[PR] Bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.28.1 to 1.33.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #63: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/63 Bumps google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.28.1 to 1.33.0. [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- Dependabot commands and options You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/network/alerts). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Bump golang.org/x/net from 0.8.0 to 0.23.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #64: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/64 Bumps [golang.org/x/net](https://github.com/golang/net) from 0.8.0 to 0.23.0. Commits https://github.com/golang/net/commit/c48da131589f122489348be5dfbcb6457640046f;>c48da13 http2: fix TestServerContinuationFlood flakes https://github.com/golang/net/commit/762b58d1cf6e0779780decad89c6c1523386638d;>762b58d http2: fix tipos in comment https://github.com/golang/net/commit/ba872109ef2dc8f1da778651bd1fd3792d0e4587;>ba87210 http2: close connections when receiving too many headers https://github.com/golang/net/commit/ebc8168ac8ac742194df729305175940790c55a2;>ebc8168 all: fix some typos https://github.com/golang/net/commit/3678185f8a652e52864c44049a9ea96b7bcc066a;>3678185 http2: make TestCanonicalHeaderCacheGrowth faster https://github.com/golang/net/commit/448c44f9287b6745f958d74aa2a17ec7761c2f13;>448c44f http2: remove clientTester https://github.com/golang/net/commit/c7877ac4213b2f859831366f5a35b353e0dc9f66;>c7877ac http2: convert the remaining clientTester tests to testClientConn https://github.com/golang/net/commit/d8870b0bf2f2426fc8d19a9332f652da5c25418f;>d8870b0 http2: use synthetic time in TestIdleConnTimeout https://github.com/golang/net/commit/d73acffdc9493532acb85777105bb4a351eea702;>d73acff http2: only set up deadline when Server.IdleTimeout is positive https://github.com/golang/net/commit/89f602b7bbf237abe0467031a18b42fc742ced08;>89f602b http2: validate client/outgoing trailers Additional commits viewable in https://github.com/golang/net/compare/v0.8.0...v0.23.0;>compare view [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- Dependabot commands and options You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/network/alerts). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] deployment.yaml: add tolerations [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 merged PR #38: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/38 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2154597439 I tested the above PR with kuberentes 1.28. It doesn't seem to be adding the zone or region labels. I assume it's because this needs some more changes in the implementation of `InstancesV2` interface. Moving this PR to milestone for next release for now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#discussion_r1629766415 ## util.go: ## @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ + +package cloudstack + +import ( + "fmt" + "regexp" + "strings" +) + +// If Instances.InstanceID or cloudprovider.GetInstanceProviderID is changed, the regexp should be changed too. +var providerIDRegexp = regexp.MustCompile(`^` + ProviderName + `://([^/]*)/([^/]+)$`) Review Comment: ```suggestion var providerIDRegexp = regexp.MustCompile(`^` + ProviderName + `://?([^/]*)/([^/]+)$`) ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2152665390 > Yes. I did change that. Before that pod was crashing due to wrong provider name. According to the pr, the providerID should have 3 slashes instead of 2. cloudstack://2d35066b should be cloudstack:///2d35066b -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2152646446 Yes. I did change that. Before that pod was crashing due to wrong provider name. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2152641282 > I am seeing the below errors after applying the changes. I am not sure about the root cause. > I launched a CKS cluster and updated the image. > ```go > E0606 13:02:31.408425 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:36.515139 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:37.025198 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:37.025248 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:37.025255 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:37.025261 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:37.025267 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:41.584449 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > E0606 13:02:46.648644 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" > ``` @vishesh92 did you change the provider name from external-cloudstack to cloudstack? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2152411619 I am seeing the below errors after applying the changes. I am not sure about the root cause. I launched a CKS cluster and updated the image. ```go E0606 13:02:31.408425 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:36.515139 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:37.025198 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:37.025248 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:37.025255 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:37.025261 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:37.025267 1 node_controller.go:249] Error getting instance metadata for node addresses: ProviderID "" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:41.584449 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" E0606 13:02:46.648644 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:149] error checking if node k8s-1273-node-18f3588c91c exists: ProviderID "cloudstack://2d35066b-a8e4-4c2a-b400-256db0a7d2cd" didn't match expected format "cloudstack://region/InstanceID" ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #54: Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/54 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #54: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/54#issuecomment-2141517078 @vishesh92 has advised to upgrade dependencies as a separate PR, closing this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/55#issuecomment-2141517381 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/55#issuecomment-2141517331 @vishesh92 has advised to upgrade dependencies as a separate PR, closing this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #55: Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/55 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #54: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/54#issuecomment-2141517160 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add github action for golangci-lint [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud merged PR #62: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/62 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-2135116093 @hrak @vishesh92 it looks this requires some other changes like https://github.com/Leaseweb/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/commit/323b493f9d35dc0b6c0f6c0910e73043aac1ded6 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Strip domain from node.Name before matching with vm names [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache merged PR #47: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/47 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add hostname annotation to set loadbalancer ingress hostname [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache merged PR #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/48 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add hostname annotation to set loadbalancer ingress hostname [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on PR #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/48#issuecomment-2125262104 @weizhouapache I am not able to reproduce the issue, but I can verify the functionality is working as expected. For why hostname is required as part of the loadbalancerStatus, check: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.27/#loadbalanceringress-v1-core -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Implement persistent volume support [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache closed issue #14: Implement persistent volume support URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/14 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Support static public ip address as a Load balancer IP [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on issue #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/51#issuecomment-2124288747 this could be implemented via annotation, for example `service.beta.kubernetes.io/cloudstack-load-balancer-external-ip` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] feat: Cluster API support [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache closed issue #37: feat: Cluster API support URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/37 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add hostname annotation to set loadbalancer ingress hostname [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/48#issuecomment-2124138528 > Did some manual testing. After this change, I have verified that the service created has external IP equal to hostname set in `service.beta.kubernetes.io/cloudstack-load-balancer-hostname`. And the same hostname is also set in the status of the service. cool, thanks @vishesh92 can you test ipvs mode if the issue can be reproduced and fixed by this change ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add hostname annotation to set loadbalancer ingress hostname [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
vishesh92 commented on PR #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/48#issuecomment-2124115258 Did some testing. After this change, I have verified that the service created has external IP equal to hostname set in `service.beta.kubernetes.io/cloudstack-load-balancer-hostname`. And the same hostname is also set in the status of the service. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Unable to auto-scale Kubernetes cluster [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on issue #52: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/52#issuecomment-2124110440 I notice @saffronjam used a regular user to deploy the CKS cluster, would it be related to the issue ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] List virtual machines with details=min,nics [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud merged PR #60: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/60 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump chart for new provider release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
hrak closed pull request #61: Bump chart for new provider release v1.1.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/61 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Bump chart for new provider release v1.1.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
hrak opened a new pull request, #61: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/61 Bump chart for new provider release v1.1.0 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] List virtual machines with details=min,nics [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #60: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/60#issuecomment-2078887527 did a quick testing, it looks ok the API command is ` 2024-04-26T08:20:25,740 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (qtp1375394559-21:[ctx-8dc8b523]) (logid:10e8a469) ===START=== 10.0.53.169 -- GET apiKey=FbdMHXgGot3JuiEmoldLwOo3ZWh4fGjSDTsLz5qXDZn05Q7CSh4ZXSFVJfNYUwWct5YBwHlLZKFVLR-NFKnLkw=listVirtualMachines=min%2Cnics=true=json=K3US18HTxZvG2pJ29nnP8N3PYRg%3D` the parameter ` (details=min%2Cnics)` is set as expected -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
DaanHoogland commented on PR #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/55#issuecomment-2078840250 shall we merge this @rohityadavcloud @vishesh92 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
kiranchavala closed issue #59: Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/59 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
kiranchavala commented on issue #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/59#issuecomment-1973090353 Closing this issue as it turned out to be a latency issue with my network -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
kiranchavala commented on issue #59:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/59#issuecomment-1972631985
@weizhouapache
4.19 release
There are no revelant logs in management server as ccm pod logs says
timeout and syncing issues
```
0301 07:08:21.326934 1 node_controller.go:245] Error getting node
addresses for node "k8s-node-18df4fc61a6": error fetching node by provider ID:
error retrieving node addresses: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listVirtualMachines==json=id2tgVgUyc7kyNVTCIvyk8FIQM8%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout, and error by node name: error
retrieving node addresses: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listVirtualMachines=k8s-node-18df4fc61a6=json=N%2BFbJah8TFPnjpUff2CtgmMa3WY%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
E0301 07:08:49.786379 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/nginx-deployment2 (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listLoadBalancerRules=a145271aedaef46d8a8f1f0288961164=true=json=bCk2Dw5rsQTW1EPw2sk3IVcBnRg%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
I0301 07:08:49.786654 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"nginx-deployment2", UID:"145271ae-daef-46d8-a8f1-f02889611641",
APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"201324", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning'
reason: 'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure
load balancer: error retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listLoadBalancerRules=a145271aedaef46d8a8f1f0288961164=true=json=bCk2Dw5rsQTW1EPw2sk3IVcBnRg%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
I0301 07:08:59.787837 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"nginx-deployment2", UID:"145271ae-daef-46d8-a8f1-f02889611641",
APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"201324", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal'
reason: 'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
E0301 07:09:29.787756 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/nginx-deployment2 (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listLoadBalancerRules=a145271aedaef46d8a8f1f0288961164=true=json=bCk2Dw5rsQTW1EPw2sk3IVcBnRg%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
I0301 07:09:29.788238 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"nginx-deployment2", UID:"145271ae-daef-46d8-a8f1-f02889611641",
APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"201324", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning'
reason: 'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure
load balancer: error retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listLoadBalancerRules=a145271aedaef46d8a8f1f0288961164=true=json=bCk2Dw5rsQTW1EPw2sk3IVcBnRg%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
I0301 07:09:37.274735 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"d122fa8c-a7d5-46d5-8dbe-558fba87f89b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"201674", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason:
'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
E0301 07:10:07.287471 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/hello-node (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.32.174:8080/client/api?apiKey=vX9-RJ1Bq0Gpl-fjTY5leRPsq01hfVeft3AGT07_5lEhFmNPQxv7IAeUkE0vzjYpRzHVLbHUXgHkMhavMbHKrg=listLoadBalancerRules=ad122fa8ca7d546d58dbe558fba87f89=true=json=f3%2FryEVsD2ylQnOZCHWuVJgrJ70%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.32.174:8080: i/o timeout
I0301 07:10:07.288338 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"d122fa8c-a7d5-46d5-8dbe-558fba87f89b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"201674", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncin
Re: [I] Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on issue #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/59#issuecomment-1972615678 @kiranchavala what's the ACS version ? any mgmt server logs ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[I] Unable to get the loadbalancer IP's in a Cloudstack vmware env [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
kiranchavala opened a new issue, #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/59
Steps to reproduce the issue
1. Create a Cloudstack environment with vmware hypervisor
2. Register the kubernetes iso
(http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/setup-1.28.4.iso)
3. Launch a K8s cluster and Wait till the cluster is in running state
4. Deploy a Kubernetes application
```
kubectl create deployment hello-node
--image=registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost:2.39 -- /agnhost netexec
--http-port=80
```
5. Expose the deployment
```
kubectl expose deploy/hello-node --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer
```
6. The public ip is in pending state
```
kubectl get svc
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)AGE
hello-node LoadBalancer 10.111.230.13180:31779/TCP 10s
kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1443/TCP13m
```
6. Check the logs from
```
kubectl logs -f cloud-controller-manager-574bcb86c-b4746 -n kube-system
```
Logs
```
tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listVirtualMachines==json=EyHmAMvkfv2dWFcHuF1nkN0dbeM%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout, and error by node name: error
retrieving node addresses: Get
http://10.0.33.196:8080/client/api?apiKey=rwdmqchJKcIEbblvkpwidbkHFdw4TxQPvAsF6gGbCqZ9Y_Ht_u1tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listVirtualMachines=vbn-node-18deb94a80c=json=sBJoU1JnfjRSqo5gDK4CSTLcnMM%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout
I0227 17:36:47.802356 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"ffe28375-8929-4d35-a8ed-fb47860c6a9b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"2737", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason:
'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
E0227 17:37:17.835369 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/hello-node (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.33.196:8080/client/api?apiKey=rwdmqchJKcIEbblvkpwidbkHFdw4TxQPvAsF6gGbCqZ9Y_Ht_u1tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listLoadBalancerRules=affe2837589294d35a8edfb47860c6a9=true=json=sA7IG%2BPIfK28UEYizdqwyXX8qpE%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout
I0227 17:37:17.835604 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"ffe28375-8929-4d35-a8ed-fb47860c6a9b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"2737", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure load
balancer: error retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.33.196:8080/client/api?apiKey=rwdmqchJKcIEbblvkpwidbkHFdw4TxQPvAsF6gGbCqZ9Y_Ht_u1tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listLoadBalancerRules=affe2837589294d35a8edfb47860c6a9=true=json=sA7IG%2BPIfK28UEYizdqwyXX8qpE%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout
I0227 17:37:22.836100 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"ffe28375-8929-4d35-a8ed-fb47860c6a9b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"2742", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason:
'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
E0227 17:37:52.836411 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/hello-node (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.33.196:8080/client/api?apiKey=rwdmqchJKcIEbblvkpwidbkHFdw4TxQPvAsF6gGbCqZ9Y_Ht_u1tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listLoadBalancerRules=affe2837589294d35a8edfb47860c6a9=true=json=sA7IG%2BPIfK28UEYizdqwyXX8qpE%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout
I0227 17:37:52.837738 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"ffe28375-8929-4d35-a8ed-fb47860c6a9b", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"2742", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure load
balancer: error retrieving load balancer rules: Get
http://10.0.33.196:8080/client/api?apiKey=rwdmqchJKcIEbblvkpwidbkHFdw4TxQPvAsF6gGbCqZ9Y_Ht_u1tCl4N_MsUZYzGdvRs4Ohv51fFyku_KMBr2w=listLoadBalancerRules=affe2837589294d35a8edfb47860c6a9=true=json=sA7IG%2BPIfK28UEYizdqwyXX8qpE%3D:
dial tcp 10.0.33.196:8080: i/o timeout
I0227 17:38:02.837331 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"default",
Name:"hello-node", UID:"ffe28375-8929-4d35-a8ed-fb47860c6a9b", APIVersion:"v1",
Resource
Re: [I] Unable to auto-scale Kubernetes cluster [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
kiranchavala commented on issue #52:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/52#issuecomment-1968230660
Hi @saffronjam
The autoscaling feature works fine on a k8s cluster deployed by CKS.
Please find the steps that i have followed
After you enable autoscaling on the cluster
Make sure the autoscaling pod is deployed in the cluster
```
kubectl get pods -A
NAMESPACE NAME
READY STATUSRESTARTS AGE
kube-systemcluster-autoscaler-8d8894d6c-q8r4h 1/1
Running 0 19m
```
Before scaling
```
➜ ~ k get nodes -A
NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION
gh-control-18debd77e18 Readycontrol-plane 10h v1.28.4
gh-node-18debd8440c Ready 10h v1.28.4
```
Deploy a application
`kubectl create deployment hello-node
--image=registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost:2.39 -- /agnhost netexec
--http-port=80`
```
➜ ~ k get pods -A
NAMESPACE NAME
READY STATUSRESTARTS AGE
defaulthello-node-7c6c5fb9d8-bgd69 1/1
Running 0 10h
```
Scale the application
`kubectl scale --replicas=150 deployment/hello-node`
logs from the autoscaler pod
```
I0228 04:51:46.798087 1 reflector.go:536]
/home/djumani/lab/autoscaler/cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go:356:
Watch close - *v1.StatefulSet total 9 items received
I0228 04:51:51.244004 1 static_autoscaler.go:235] Starting main loop
I0228 04:51:51.244382 1 client.go:169] NewAPIRequest API request
URL:http://10.0.34.2:8080/client/api?apiKey=***=listKubernetesClusters=14b42c5d-e7e6-4c41-b638-5facb98b0a93=json=***
I0228 04:51:51.279721 1 client.go:175] NewAPIRequest response status
code:200
I0228 04:51:51.280798 1 cloudstack_manager.go:88] Got cluster :
&{14b42c5d-e7e6-4c41-b638-5facb98b0a93 gh 2 3 1 1 [0xc0013bfad0 0xc0013bfb00]
map[gh-control-18debd77e18:0xc0013bfad0 gh-node-18debd8440c:0xc0013bfb00]}
W0228 04:51:51.292009 1 clusterstate.go:590] Failed to get nodegroup
for dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139: Unable to find node
dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139 in cluster
W0228 04:51:51.292052 1 clusterstate.go:590] Failed to get nodegroup
for facdd040-53fe-4984-8654-c186a7cdde9b: Unable to find node
facdd040-53fe-4984-8654-c186a7cdde9b in cluster
I0228 04:51:51.292095 1 static_autoscaler.go:341] 2 unregistered nodes
present
I0228 04:51:51.292105 1 static_autoscaler.go:624] Removing
unregistered node dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139
W0228 04:51:51.292126 1 static_autoscaler.go:627] Failed to get node
group for dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139: Unable to find node
dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139 in cluster
W0228 04:51:51.292137 1 static_autoscaler.go:346] Failed to remove
unregistered nodes: Unable to find node dc95f481-15a3-4629-bb78-055fbe4a7139 in
cluster
I0228 04:51:51.292569 1 filter_out_schedulable.go:65] Filtering out
schedulables
I0228 04:51:51.292590 1 filter_out_schedulable.go:137] Filtered out 0
pods using hints
I0228 04:51:51.624523 1 filter_out_schedulable.go:175] 44 pods were
kept as unschedulable based on caching
I0228 04:51:51.624568 1 filter_out_schedulable.go:176] 0 pods marked
as unschedulable can be scheduled.
I0228 04:51:51.624667 1 filter_out_schedulable.go:87] No schedulable
pods
I0228 04:51:51.870314 1 static_autoscaler.go:480] Calculating unneeded
nodes
I0228 04:51:51.870353 1 pre_filtering_processor.go:66] Skipping
gh-control-18debd77e18 - node group min size reached
I0228 04:51:51.870361 1 pre_filtering_processor.go:66] Skipping
gh-node-18debd8440c - node group min size reached
I0228 04:51:51.870413 1 static_autoscaler.go:534] Scale down status:
unneededOnly=false lastScaleUpTime=2024-02-27 17:39:33.032517071 + UTC
m=-3594.093061754 lastScaleDownDeleteTime=2024-02-27 17:39:33.032517071 +
UTC m=-3594.093061754 lastScaleDownFailTime=2024-02-27 17:39:33.032517071 +
UTC m=-3594.093061754 scaleDownForbidden=false isDeleteInProgress=false
scaleDownInCooldown=false
I0228 04:52:22.258545 1 scale_up.go:468] Best option to resize:
14b42c5d-e7e6-4c41-b638-5facb98b0a93
I0228 04:52:22.258602 1 scale_up.go:472] Estimated 1 nodes needed in
14b42c5d-e7e6-4c41-b638-5facb98b0a93
I0228 04:52:22.266675 1 scale_up.go:595] Final scale-up plan:
[{14b42c5d-e7e6-4c41-
[I] help with manual installation [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
Dav-11 opened a new issue, #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/58
Hello,
I have installed a new cluster using [RKE2](https://docs.rke2.io/) and
cilium as CNI.
I followed the installation guide and deployed both the controller
(https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/deployment.yaml)
and
[traefik-ingress-controller.yml](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/traefik-ingress-controller.yml).
But the load balancer resource is in pending state:
```
kubectl -n traefik get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)
AGE
traefik LoadBalancer 10.43.184.45
80:30836/TCP,443:30387/TCP 8h
```
The controller logs report this:
```
E0207 07:44:58.325932 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
traefik/traefik (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: could not find
network
I0207 07:44:58.326064 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"traefik", Name:"traefik",
UID:"4759be13-4f20-41df-a491-fa51efa1bb10", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"44762", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure load
balancer: could not find network
I0207 07:49:58.326490 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"traefik", Name:"traefik",
UID:"4759be13-4f20-41df-a491-fa51efa1bb10", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"44762", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason:
'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
I0207 07:49:58.326878 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"traefik", Name:"traefik",
UID:"4759be13-4f20-41df-a491-fa51efa1bb10", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"44762", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'UnAvailableLoadBalancer' There are no available nodes for LoadBalancer
E0207 07:49:59.889606 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
traefik/traefik (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: could not find
network
I0207 07:49:59.889676 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"traefik", Name:"traefik",
UID:"4759be13-4f20-41df-a491-fa51efa1bb10", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"44762", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason:
'SyncLoadBalancerFailed' Error syncing load balancer: failed to ensure load
balancer: could not find network
I0207 07:54:59.890211 1 event.go:278]
Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Service", Namespace:"traefik", Name:"traefik",
UID:"4759be13-4f20-41df-a491-fa51efa1bb10", APIVersion:"v1",
ResourceVersion:"44762", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Normal' reason:
'EnsuringLoadBalancer' Ensuring load balancer
```
If I trigger the node labels generation by using
```
kubectl taint nodes
node.cloudprovider.kubernetes.io/uninitialized=true:NoSchedule
```
I get errors:
```
I0207 08:10:24.487510 1 node_controller.go:325] Initializing node
mynode0.mydomain.example with cloud provider
E0207 08:10:24.526907 1 node_controller.go:370] failed to initialize
node mynode0.mydomain.example at cloudprovider: error fetching node by provider
ID: instance not found, and error by node name: instance not found
```
The cluster is running inside three VMs using an isolated network with the
kubernetes network offering.
Can you please help me understanding what went wrong ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] NSX: (temp fix) Skip adding firewall rules for CKS Clusters on VPC tiers [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
Pearl1594 commented on PR #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/56#issuecomment-1900806045 Thank you so much @weizhouapache for testing!!! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] NSX: (temp fix) Skip adding firewall rules for CKS Clusters on VPC tiers [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache merged PR #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/56 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] NSX: (temp fix) Skip adding firewall rules for CKS Clusters on VPC tiers [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/56#issuecomment-1900804889 @Pearl1594 tested ok ``` root@cks-vpc-control-18d21c9d231:~# kubectl get svc NAMETYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1443/TCP 4h26m nginx-service LoadBalancer 10.107.131.221 10.0.53.175 80:31387/TCP 2m4s ```  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] NSX: (temp fix) Skip adding firewall rules for CKS Clusters on VPC tiers [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
weizhouapache commented on PR #56:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/56#issuecomment-1900486299
@Pearl1594
I tested with CKS cluster deployment and nginx deployment/service.
without this change
```
E0119 13:23:09.742798 1 controller.go:244] error processing service
default/nginx-service (will retry): failed to ensure load balancer: error
creating new firewall rule for public IP cd17cbc3-538a-439b-b7a0-4f493d8443f5,
proto tcp, port 80, allowed [0.0.0.0/0]: CloudStack API error 431
(CSExceptionErrorCode: ): There is no new provider for IP 10.0.53.175 of
service Firewall!
```
with this change, it crashed at line 166
```
I0119 14:05:45.321563 1 event.go:294] "Event occurred"
object="default/nginx-service" fieldPath="" kind="Service" apiVersion="v1"
type="Normal" reason="EnsuringLoadBalancer" message="Ensuring load balancer"
E0119 14:05:52.775883 1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid
memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory
address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 299 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1d8c880?, 0x33f2140})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75
+0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xc0007756e0?})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49
+0x75
panic({0x1d8c880, 0x33f2140})
/usr/local/go/src/runtime/panic.go:884 +0x212
github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v2/cloudstack.(*NetworkService).GetNetworkByID(0xc00041dce0,
{0xc0005cdb30, 0x24}, {0xc12fc0, 0x1, 0x50?})
/go/pkg/mod/github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v2@v2.15.0/cloudstack/NetworkService.go:3557
+0x1b6
github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.(*CSCloud).EnsureLoadBalancer(0xc0004a7980,
{0xc00068f800?, 0x21fca68?}, {0x20f7fd6, 0xa}, 0xc0007b6000, {0xc12db8,
0x1, 0x1})
/go/src/github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/cloudstack_loadbalancer.go:166
+0x1543
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).ensureLoadBalancer(0xc00044d260,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240}, 0x20f1674?)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:459
+0x117
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).syncLoadBalancerIfNeeded(0xc00044d260,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240}, 0xc0007b6000, {0xc5cd08, 0x15})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:414
+0x6cc
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).processServiceCreateOrUpdate(0xc00044d260,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240}, 0xc0007b6000, {0xc5cd08, 0x15})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:346
+0x146
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).syncService(0xc00044d260,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240}, {0xc5cd08, 0x15})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:887
+0x257
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem(0xc00044d260,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:304
+0x127
k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).worker(0xc0008e0600?,
{0x23f4d70, 0xc00065e240})
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:283
+0x39
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntilWithContext.func1()
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:190 +0x25
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x603c86b68e?)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:157 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0x0?, {0x23d9960,
0xc0008e0600}, 0x1, 0xc00066a300)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:158 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x2fea4e8bf0db330b?,
0x3b9aca00, 0x0, 0xe2?, 0x714083b09f70d83c?)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:135 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntilWithContext({0x23f4d70,
0xc00065e240}, 0xc00068e7c0, 0xac5c70001ad37c31?, 0x255bd85d5287fd9c?, 0xe2?)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:190 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.UntilWithContext({0x23f4d70?,
0xc00065e240?}, 0x0?, 0x0?)
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.24.12/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:101 +0x2b
created by k8s.io/cloud-provider/controllers/service.(*Controller).Run
/go/pkg/mod/k8s.io/cloud-provider@v0.24.12/controllers/service/controller.go:241
+0x246
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[recovered]
panic: runtime error: in
[PR] NSX: (temp fix) Skip adding firewall rules for CKS Clusters on VPC tiers [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
Pearl1594 opened a new pull request, #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/56 Currently CKP does not setup NetworkACLs for CKS clusters on VPC tiers, and fails to add Firewall rules - as Firewall isn't supported on VPCs. This is a partial fix, to skip setting up Firewall rules if the network doesn't support the service. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/55 Bumps [golang.org/x/crypto](https://github.com/golang/crypto) from 0.1.0 to 0.17.0. Commits https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/9d2ee975ef9fe627bf0a6f01c1f69e8ef1d4f05d;>9d2ee97 ssh: implement strict KEX protocol changes https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/4e5a26183ecb4f9a0f85c8f8dbe7982885435436;>4e5a261 ssh: close net.Conn on all NewServerConn errors https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/152cdb1503ebc13bc0fbb68f92ee189ebf9e3d00;>152cdb1 x509roots/fallback: update bundle https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/fdfe1f8531a1adcc300c8eba98cb372044826d62;>fdfe1f8 ssh: defer channel window adjustment https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b8ffc16e10063067bac0e15c6d7f7995937503ce;>b8ffc16 blake2b: drop Go 1.6, Go 1.8 compatibility https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/7e6fbd82c804e1760feb603fe21caecb0af0a124;>7e6fbd8 ssh: wrap errors from client handshake https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/bda2f3f5cfce3f27039acccd823693f6d67c2a74;>bda2f3f argon2: avoid clobbering BP https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/325b735346247f48971d2b37d24dd180a35f391f;>325b735 ssh/test: skip TestSSHCLIAuth on Windows https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/1eadac50a566dfaa1b603ca15e8ad3cbd1c77b20;>1eadac5 go.mod: update golang.org/x dependencies https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b2d7c26edb17864f117d8b0ee73c1843bcc6090f;>b2d7c26 ssh: add (*Client).DialContext method Additional commits viewable in https://github.com/golang/crypto/compare/v0.1.0...v0.17.0;>compare view [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- Dependabot commands and options You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/network/alerts). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
DaanHoogland commented on PR #54: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/54#issuecomment-1807618196 Seems to work, should we allow this one @joschi36 @onitake @hrak ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Bump go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #54: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/54 Bumps [go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib) from 0.20.0 to 0.46.0. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/releases;>go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc's releases. Release v0.36.2 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/sdk%2Fmetric%2Fv0.32.2;>v0.32.2 release Avoid getting a new Tracer for every RPC in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2835;>#2835) Conditionally compute message size for tracing events using proto v2 API rather than legacy v1 API in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2647;>#2647) Deprecated The Inject function in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc is deprecated. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2838;>#2838) The Extract function in go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc is deprecated. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2838;>#2838) Release v0.36.1 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/metric%2Fv0.32.1;>v0.32.1 release. Release v0.36.0 Changed Upgrade dependencies of the OpenTelemetry Go Metric SDK to use the new https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/releases/tag/sdk%2Fmetric%2Fv0.32.0;>v0.32.0 release. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2781;>#2781, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2756;>#2756, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2758;>#2758, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2760;>#2760, https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/2762;>#2762) Release v0.24.0 0.24.0 - 2021-09-21 Update dependency on the go.opentelemetry.io/otel project to v1.0.0. v0.23.0 0.23.0 - 2021-09-09 Added Add WithoutSubSpans, WithRedactedHeaders, WithoutHeaders, and WithInsecureHeaders options for otelhttptrace.NewClientTrace. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/879;>#879) Changed Split go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators module into b3, jaeger, ot modules. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/985;>#985) otelmongodb span attributes, name and span status now conform to specification. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/769;>#769) Migrated EC2 resource detector support from root module go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/aws to a separate EC2 resource detector module go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/aws/ec2 (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/1017;>#1017) Add cloud.provider and cloud.platform to AWS detectors. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/1043;>#1043) otelhttptrace.NewClientTrace now redacts known sensitive headers by default. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/879;>#879) Fixed Fix span not marked as error in otelhttp.Transport when RoundTrip fails with an error. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/950;>#950) Release v0.22.0 Added Add the zpages span processor. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/894;>#894) ... (truncated) Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md;>go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc's changelog. [1.21.0/0.46.0/0.15.0/0.1.0] - 2023-11-10 Added Add go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/samplers/jaegerremote.WithSamplingStrategyFetcher which sets custom fetcher implementation. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/4045;>#4045) Add go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config package that includes configuration models generated via go-jsonschema. (https://redirect.github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/issues/4376;
Re: [I] LB IP cannot be created when Kubernetes is in VPC [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
FilipBB commented on issue #53: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/53#issuecomment-1802525577 I ran into this as well, thank you for the workaround @mierea -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump github.com/emicklei/go-restful from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #45: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/45#issuecomment-1792298792 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump github.com/emicklei/go-restful from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #45: Bump github.com/emicklei/go-restful from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/45 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.53.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/50#issuecomment-1792298695 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.53.0 [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #50: Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.53.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/50 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rohityadavcloud commented on issue #52: Unable to auto-scale Kubernetes cluster
rohityadavcloud commented on issue #52: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/52#issuecomment-1668091677 cc @Pearl1594 @weizhouapache @DaanHoogland pl help triage when you've time @saffronjam this looks like an issue with k8s autoscaler (https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/cloudstack/README.md) or with CKS (upstream https://github.com/apache/cloudstack) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] saffronjam opened a new issue, #52: Unable to auto-scale Kubernetes cluster
saffronjam opened a new issue, #52: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/52 Hi! I am unable to auto-scale Kubernetes clusters. As I understand, it create a "cluster-autoscaler" deployment that decides whether to scale or not. However, it does not seem to work, since it logs multiple errors and warnings in the pod, even though it is a completely clean cluster. Normal scaling seems to work just fine. # Setup A "default" CloudStack setup running KVMs. ## Settings (relevant) - Cloud kubernetes service enabled **true** - Cloud kubernetes cluster experimental features enabled **true** - Cloud kubernetes cluster max size **50** The nodes uses the following service offering: - 2 CPU x 2.05 Ghz - 2048 MB memory - 8 GB root disk # Replicate 1. Create a new cluster using Kubernets 1.24 ISO found here: http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/ 2. Enable forced auto-scaling Since the cluster starts with only one worker node, auto-scaling with 3-5 nodes should trigger an upscale (I assume)  4. Check the logs for cluster-autoscaler in the Kubernetes cluster Some notable entries: ``` E0807 14:41:30.317148 1 reflector.go:138] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Failed to watch *v1.CSIDriver: failed to list *v1.CSIDriver: csidrivers.storage.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:kube-system:cluster-autoscaler" cannot list resource "csidrivers" in API group "storage.k8s.io" at the cluster scope E0807 14:41:32.388828 1 reflector.go:138] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Failed to watch *v1beta1.CSIStorageCapacity: failed to list *v1beta1.CSIStorageCapacity: csistoragecapacities.storage.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:kube-system:cluster-autoscaler" cannot list resource "csistoragecapacities" in API group "storage.k8s.io" at the cluster scope ``` Even though I have not edited anything myself, it is a clean CKS cluster ``` W0807 14:41:43.251280 1 clusterstate.go:590] Failed to get nodegroup for 6a4c91a3-9694-4596-9ddd-dc86e60136ff: Unable to find node 6a4c91a3-9694-4596-9ddd-dc86e60136ff in cluster W0807 14:41:43.251361 1 clusterstate.go:590] Failed to get nodegroup for bd0b855f-6dc6-4678-9bea-b52329333024: Unable to find node bd0b855f-6dc6-4678-9bea-b52329333024 in cluster I0807 14:57:06.667061 1 static_autoscaler.go:341] 2 unregistered nodes present ``` The entire log: [logs-from-cluster-autoscaler-in-cluster-autoscaler-5bf887ddd8-hxg2g.log](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/files/12281530/logs-from-cluster-autoscaler-in-cluster-autoscaler-5bf887ddd8-hxg2g.log) Please tell me if you need more logs to look at, or if I should try some other configuration. Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] kiranchavala opened a new issue, #51: Support static public ip address as a Load balancer IP
kiranchavala opened a new issue, #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/51 ISSUE TYPE * Enhancement request COMPONENT NAME Component: Kubernetes/Networking CLOUDSTACK VERSION Cloudstack 4.18 SUMMARY Support static public ip address as a Load balancer IP STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Deploy Kubernetes cluster on Cloudstack 2. Create a deployment for example a nginx deployment ``` apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: nginx-deployment spec: selector: matchLabels: app: nginx replicas: 2 # tells deployment to run 2 pods matching the template template: metadata: labels: app: nginx spec: containers: - name: nginx image: nginx:1.14.2 ports: - containerPort: 80 ``` 3. Expose the deployment as a loadbalancer service `kubectl expose deploy/nginx-deployment --port=80 --type=LoadBalancer` 4. Cloudstack then randomly allocated a public ip as external ip ``` ❯ kubectl get svc nginx-deployment NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE nginx-deployment LoadBalancer 10.109.88.98 10.0.54.8380:32739/TCP 4m24s ``` 5. Suppose a user wants a specific public ip as a loadbalancer ip Currently it's not possible even if we manually edit the service.yaml, cloudstack again allocates a random public ip ``` apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: creationTimestamp: "2023-07-25T04:31:03Z" finalizers: - service.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-cleanup name: nginx-deployment namespace: default resourceVersion: "995303" uid: 224691be-fa86-4b07-938c-c86d948b99fb spec: allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: true clusterIP: 10.109.88.98 clusterIPs: - 10.109.88.98 externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster internalTrafficPolicy: Cluster ipFamilies: - IPv4 ipFamilyPolicy: SingleStack ports: - nodePort: 32739 port: 80 protocol: TCP targetPort: 80 selector: app: nginx sessionAffinity: None type: LoadBalancer status: apiVersion: v1 loadBalancer: apiVersion: v1 ingress: - ip: 10.0.54.83 ``` EXPECTED RESULTS Cloudstack should allocate the specified public ip address ACTUAL RESULTS Clodudstack is allocating a radom public ip address -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #50: Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.49.0 to 1.53.0
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/50 Bumps [google.golang.org/grpc](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go) from 1.49.0 to 1.53.0. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases;>google.golang.org/grpc's releases. Release 1.53.0 API Changes balancer: support injection of per-call metadata from LB policies (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5853;>#5853) resolver: remove deprecated field resolver.Target.Endpoint and replace with resolver.Target.Endpoint() (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5852;>#5852) Special Thanks: https://github.com/kylejb;>@kylejb New Features xds/ringhash: introduce GRPC_RING_HASH_CAP environment variable to override the maximum ring size. (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5884;>#5884) rls: propagate headers received in RLS response to backends (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5883;>#5883) Bug Fixes transport: drain client transport when streamID approaches MaxStreamID (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5889;>#5889) server: after GracefulStop, ensure connections are closed when final RPC completes (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5968;>#5968) server: fix a few issues where grpc server uses RST_STREAM for non-HTTP/2 errors (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5893;>#5893) xdsclient: fix race which can happen when multiple load reporting calls are made at the same time. (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5927;>#5927) rls: fix a data race involving the LRU cache (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5925;>#5925) xds: fix panic involving double close of channel in xDS transport (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5959;>#5959) gcp/observability: update method name validation (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5951;>#5951) Documentation credentials/oauth: mark NewOauthAccess as deprecated (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5882;>#5882) Special Thanks: https://github.com/buzzsurfr;>@buzzsurfr Release 1.52.3 Bug Fixes Fix user-agent version Release 1.52.2 Bug Fixes xds: fix panic involving double close of channel in xDS transport (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5959;>#5959) Release 1.52.1 Bug Fixes grpclb: rename grpclbstate package back to state (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5963;>#5963) Release 1.52.0 New Features xdsclient: log node ID with verbosity INFO (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5860;>#5860) ringhash: impose cap on max_ring_size to reduce possibility of OOMs (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5801;>#5801) Behavior Changes ... (truncated) Commits https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/dba26e15a07f43875ccf806a2dd6cbcbc1c12eab;>dba26e1 Change version to 1.53.0 (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5983;>#5983) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/2a1e9348ff7b5d9f4b5039e84e6c9873b5b3e26e;>2a1e934 server: after GracefulStop, ensure connections are closed when final RPC comp... https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/e2d69aa076dd070e3668784c4dc8bcf7131b3f67;>e2d69aa tests: fix spelling of variable (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5966;>#5966) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/a6376c9893f56fc3819bee9ef5d71f55cc2d38dd;>a6376c9 xds/resolver: cleanup tests to use real xDS client 3/n (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5953;>#5953) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/bf8fc46fa6eb913e4ed0f6dee6c6a7b75e85fbf0;>bf8fc46 xds/resolver: cleanup tests to use real xDS client 5/n (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5955;>#5955) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/3930549b38c0fc4cd94a95efccf7cef5f90515fd;>3930549 resolver: replace resolver.Target.Endpoint field with Endpoint() method (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5852;>#5852) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/894816c487f8dd48fc971c45a7c5baa4b86ef7de;>894816c grpclb: rename grpclbstate package back to state (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5962;>#5962) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/e5a0237a46a5f95fa571624929be10c7afebb180;>e5a0237 encoding: fix duplicate compressor names (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5958;>#5958) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/4adb2a7a00d8b62df5ea34d520fe3ca13bffd31a;>4adb2a7 xds/resolver: cleanup tests to use real xDS client 2/n (https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/5952;>#5952) https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/commit/52a8392f374b8cd60e176b67925a7f8c1605d014;>52a8392
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rohityadavcloud merged pull request #49: Fix spelling
rohityadavcloud merged PR #49: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/49 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] weizhouapache closed pull request #32: Update Kubernetes version to 1.20.6
weizhouapache closed pull request #32: Update Kubernetes version to 1.20.6 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak commented on pull request #32: Update Kubernetes version to 1.20.6
hrak commented on PR #32: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-1535795139 This PR can be closed (already merged as part of #44 ) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak commented on pull request #45: Bump github.com/emicklei/go-restful from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible
hrak commented on PR #45: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/45#issuecomment-1535783273 this is a indirect dependency pulled in by kube apiserver 1.24.x. It can be solved by updating the provider to depend on 1.25 instead. This may not be a bad idea since 1.24 is EOL now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak opened a new pull request, #47: Strip domain from node.Name before matching with vm names
hrak opened a new pull request, #47: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/47 Kubernetes node.Name can contain a FQDN instead of just a hostname in some setups. This PR makes sure to strip the domain part before trying to match with VM names from the CS API, since CloudStack does not have the concept of FQDN VM names. It also adds some sanity checking in case verifyHosts is about to return an empty hostIDs array or empty networkID (this is how i ran into this issue) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak commented on pull request #46: Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing
hrak commented on PR #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46#issuecomment-1535771035 I realize that these changes should probably be reflected in the README. Will address that shortly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak opened a new pull request, #46: Fix providerID handling + label sanitizing
hrak opened a new pull request, #46: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/46 This PR changes the way the CloudStack Cloud Controller Manager handles kubelet providerID into a more standardized way that is more common around several other CCM's like the Openstack or vSphere one. The changes were needed to make node labels work again. The providerID is configured by either setting the kubelet command line flag `--provider-id` (deprecated) or using the `providerID` setting in [kubelet config yaml](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/config-api/kubelet-config.v1beta1/). The format of the value is `://region/instance-id` so in case of CloudStack for a platform without region f.e. : `cloudstack:///4e7689bc-99ea-43d8-8c37-5ff511c01665`. It also implements the two interface methods `InstanceShutdownByProviderID` and `InstanceShutdown`. And it fixes the way node labels are sanitized. The old regex approach would in some cases strip off allowed characters, for example zone name `Development-Internal` would turn into `DevelopmentInternal`, although the `-` is allowed in label values. The new approach converts all chars that are not allowed in a label value to underscores: `Development-Internal` -> `Development-Internal` `Small Instance (4 GB / 2 CPU)` -> `Small_Instance__4_GB___2_CPU` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #45: Bump github.com/emicklei/go-restful from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #45: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/45 Bumps [github.com/emicklei/go-restful](https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful) from 2.9.5+incompatible to 2.16.0+incompatible. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/blob/v3/CHANGES.md;>github.com/emicklei/go-restful's changelog. Change history of go-restful [v3.10.2] - 2023-03-09 introduced MergePathStrategy to be able to revert behaviour of path concatenation to 3.9.0 see comment in Readme how to customize this behaviour. [v3.10.1] - 2022-11-19 fix broken 3.10.0 by using path package for joining paths [v3.10.0] - 2022-10-11 - BROKEN changed tokenizer to match std route match behavior; do not trimright the path (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/511;>#511) Add MIME_ZIP (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/512;>#512) Add MIME_ZIP and HEADER_ContentDisposition (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/513;>#513) Changed how to get query parameter issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/510;>#510 [v3.9.0] - 2022-07-21 add support for http.Handler implementations to work as FilterFunction, issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/504;>#504 (thanks to https://github.com/ggicci;>https://github.com/ggicci) [v3.8.0] - 2022-06-06 use exact matching of allowed domain entries, issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/489;>#489 (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/493;>#493) this changes fixes [security] Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key by changing the behaviour of the AllowedDomains setting in the CORS filter. To support the previous behaviour, the CORS filter type now has a AllowedDomainFunc callback mechanism which is called when a simple domain match fails. add test and fix for POST without body and Content-type, issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/492;>#492 (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/496;>#496) [Minor] Bad practice to have a mix of Receiver types. (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/491;>#491) [v3.7.2] - 2021-11-24 restored FilterChain (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/482;>#482 by SVilgelm) [v3.7.1] - 2021-10-04 fix problem with contentEncodingEnabled setting (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/479;>#479) [v3.7.0] - 2021-09-24 feat(parameter): adds additional openapi mappings (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/478;>#478) [v3.6.0] - 2021-09-18 add support for vendor extensions (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/477;>#477 thx erraggy) [v3.5.2] - 2021-07-14 ... (truncated) Commits https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/ac666c045e035603f2704c98c59e979fccbfa94f;>ac666c0 update changes https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/926662532deb450272956c7bc573978464aae74e;>9266625 use exact matching of allowed domain entries, issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/489;>#489 (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/493;>#493) (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/503;>#503) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/d9c71e118c95f152ff2e0d884d7504aa726d3618;>d9c71e1 support multipart/form-data (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/502;>#502) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/1e8c63ce7906ee023956e8068ce4c54d634c2d2b;>1e8c63c add access to Route from Request, issue https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/459;>#459 (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/462;>#462) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/0d68a53f8da6e2fcdf2ba7ffd90305ee037e5467;>0d68a53 fix typo (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/465;>#465) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/a22b51de949f628f359177cff8d8975261b3292f;>a22b51d add check for wildcard (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/463;>#463) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/8dd9eb88e2526fab4b4768e46d6b75e72d471fb9;>8dd9eb8 update chg https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/e5d317549b87950b816947cbba10142378c328e6;>e5d3175 add options shortcut (https://redirect.github.com/emicklei/go-restful/issues/455;>#455) https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/1f7f1def5cb588c5bd7e8b9e23b1df771a749c7f;>1f7f1de fix link to example https://github.com/emicklei/go-restful/commit/601692bdb9017788c3b10d573c5b4473eba505bc;>601692b examples use v3 Additional commits viewable in https://github.com/emicklei/go-
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rohityadavcloud merged pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
rohityadavcloud merged PR #44: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rohityadavcloud commented on pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #44: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44#issuecomment-1508288264 Thanks @RolphH @hrak I'll merge this based on your tests and feedback. Pl do followup with other changes you think we need for the codebase. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak commented on pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
hrak commented on PR #44:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44#issuecomment-1508127314
> We are running this without any issues so far on Cloudstack 4.17. We have
some more changes in the pipeline once this is merged.
Well, maybe i should clarify: The part that works is the
loadbalancer/firewall rules part. Most of the logic surrounding instance
metadata is broken ever since this was turned into and external cloud provider.
`GetZone` assumes this is running inside kubelet and that hostname=instance
hostname, but it isn't, since the provider runs in a pod, causing it to try to
look up the instance based on the pod hostname:
```
I0414 07:08:41.827320 1 cloudstack.go:175] GetZone called from
/go/src/github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/cloudstack_instances.go#198
E0414 07:08:41.874064 1 node_controller.go:220] error syncing
'k8s-mgmt-cp-dev-02': failed to get instance metadata for node
k8s-mgmt-cp-dev-02: could not find instance for retrieving the zone: No match
found for cloud-controller-manager-789b9fb546-dg46l: &{Count:0
VirtualMachines:[]}, requeuing
```
Then there are issues with ProviderID, since the provider is currently
called `external-cloudstack` and should probably be called `cloudstack`, so the
[logic
here](https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider/blob/322c087411fe027de06291c6ad974ed7bcbf2eea/cloud.go#L114)
matches the kubelet arguments `--cloud-provider=external
--provider-id=cloudstack:///8411c37d-8d63-4920-8cb2-01fa512c3377` in the same
way that this works for f.e. the Openstack CCM.
I am working on fixes for all these issues but i would really like to get
this in first.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] hrak commented on pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
hrak commented on PR #44: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44#issuecomment-1506928795 > @davidjumani could you have a quick look and help merge it. > > @RolphH @hrak could you advise what testing you’ve done against any/various versions of CloudStack? We are running this without any issues so far on Cloudstack 4.17. We have some more changes in the pipeline once this is merged. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rohityadavcloud commented on pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #44: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44#issuecomment-1506914074 @davidjumani could you have a quick look and help merge it. @RolphH @hrak could you advise what testing you’ve done against any/various versions of CloudStack? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] RolphH commented on pull request #44: Update to Kubernetes 1.24.12 + Use Go 1.19
RolphH commented on PR #44: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/44#issuecomment-1506845292 @rohityadavcloud can you help getting this one merged? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
