Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-04-09 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Updated the FS  for  new implementation of ACL Deny rules.

 Thanks,
Jayapal

On 01-Apr-2013, at 9:57 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi  
wrote:

> Thanks for the commnets.
> I will consider the ACL deny rules and update the FS.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal
>> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:49 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Abhinandan Prateek; Kishan Kavala
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway
>> 
>> This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can
>> you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs?
>> 
>> On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature.
>>> 
>>> On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway.
>>>> This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps.
>>>> 
>>>> Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private
>>>> gateway.
>>>> Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the
>>>> private gateway.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Jira Id:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-768
>>>> 
>>>> FS:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ACLs+on+priv
>> ate
>>>> +GW
>>>> 
>>>> Please provide your comments on the above FS.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jayapal
>>>> 
>>> 
> 



RE: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-31 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Thanks for the commnets.
I will consider the ACL deny rules and update the FS.

Thanks,
Jayapal

> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Abhinandan Prateek; Kishan Kavala
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway
> 
> This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can
> you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs?
> 
> On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
> 
> wrote:
> 
> >+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature.
> >
> >On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway.
> >>This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps.
> >>
> >>Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private
> >>gateway.
> >>Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the
> >>private gateway.
> >>
> >>
> >>Jira Id:
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-768
> >>
> >>FS:
> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ACLs+on+priv
> ate
> >>+GW
> >>
> >>Please provide your comments on the above FS.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Jayapal
> >>
> >



Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-29 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can
you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs?

On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" 
wrote:

>+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature.
>
>On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
> wrote:
>
>>I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway.
>>This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps.
>>
>>Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private
>>gateway.
>>Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private
>>gateway.
>>
>>
>>Jira Id:
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-768
>>
>>FS:
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ACLs+on+private+GW
>>
>>Please provide your comments on the above FS.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jayapal
>>
>



Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-28 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature.

On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
 wrote:

>I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway.
>This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps.
>
>Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private
>gateway.
>Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private
>gateway.
>
>
>Jira Id:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-768
>
>FS:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ACLs+on+private+GW
>
>Please provide your comments on the above FS.
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>