Re: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1.3 Released

2003-11-16 Thread Frans Thamura 
Is it possible to make the cocoon source distribution have a complete folder. i found 
there is a blank foulder when compiling.

so, all the user, can download, build, finish, with out any new work.


Regards,

Frans Thamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Intercitra Innovation Center
+62 855 7888 699

We help you manage and control.

--
Tertarik dengan Java Open Source Integration discussion?? bergabung ke JUG Indonesia 
mailing list, untuk subscribe email aja ke [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website: http://jug-indonesia.dev.java.net

Re: NetUtils

2003-11-16 Thread Vadim Gritsenko 
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

Torsten Curdt wrote:

Running org.apache.cocoon.util.test.NetUtilsTestCase

Ok, now it works for me :)

Vadim

Re: NetUtils

2003-11-16 Thread Vadim Gritsenko 
Torsten Curdt wrote:

Who changed the NetUtils stuff lately?


Me! Like you don't following emails :)


Running org.apache.cocoon.util.test.NetUtilsTestCase
Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,06 sec
Testsuite: org.apache.cocoon.util.test.NetUtilsTestCase
Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,06 sec
Testcase: testGetPath took 0,03 sec
Testcase: testGetExtension took 0 sec
Testcase: testAbsolutize took 0 sec
Testcase: testEncodePath took 0 sec
Testcase: testRelativize took 0 sec
Testcase: testNormalize took 0,01 sec
Testcase: testDeparameterize took 0 sec
Testcase: testParameterize took 0 sec
FAILED
Test 'bar' expected: but was:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Test 'bar' 
expected: but was:



Oops :)

Vadim

NetUtils

2003-11-16 Thread Torsten Curdt 
Who changed the NetUtils stuff lately?

Running org.apache.cocoon.util.test.NetUtilsTestCase
Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,06 sec
Testsuite: org.apache.cocoon.util.test.NetUtilsTestCase
Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,06 sec
Testcase: testGetPath took 0,03 sec
Testcase: testGetExtension took 0 sec
Testcase: testAbsolutize took 0 sec
Testcase: testEncodePath took 0 sec
Testcase: testRelativize took 0 sec
Testcase: testNormalize took 0,01 sec
Testcase: testDeparameterize took 0 sec
Testcase: testParameterize took 0 sec
FAILED
Test 'bar' expected: but was:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Test 'bar' expected: 
but was:

at

cheers
--
Torsten

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/jetty/lib jetty-4.2.14.jar jetty-4.2.9.jar

2003-11-16 Thread Ugo Cei 
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
I got it from Forrest CVS. I think forrest needs to work with 1.3 too:
http://xml.apache.org/forrest/primer.html#System+requirements
If this does not work, my appologies and I will revert the changes.
I cannot test it now, I only have 1.4 on this machine, but I remember 
having thought about doing the upgrade myself (4.2.9 has a horrible bug 
in the JDBCRealm) and refrained from it since I hadn't the time to 
compile Jetty under 1.3.

	Ugo

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/jetty/lib jetty-4.2.14.jar jetty-4.2.9.jar

2003-11-16 Thread Antonio Gallardo 
Ugo Cei dijo:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>   Update jetty to 4.2.14
>
> Did you test this with Java 1.3? If I'm not mistaken, the current binary
> version of Jetty works with Java 1.4 only.

I got it from Forrest CVS. I think forrest needs to work with 1.3 too:

http://xml.apache.org/forrest/primer.html#System+requirements

If this does not work, my appologies and I will revert the changes.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/jetty/lib jetty-4.2.14.jar jetty-4.2.9.jar

2003-11-16 Thread Joerg Heinicke 
On 16.11.2003 20:00, Ugo Cei wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Update jetty to 4.2.14


Did you test this with Java 1.3? If I'm not mistaken, the current binary 
version of Jetty works with Java 1.4 only.

Ugo
A JDK requirement change on the patch level?

It should at least possible to compile Jetty with JDK below 1.4: 
http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty/doc/jdk14.html.

Joerg

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/tools/jetty/lib jetty-4.2.14.jar jetty-4.2.9.jar

2003-11-16 Thread Ugo Cei 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Update jetty to 4.2.14
Did you test this with Java 1.3? If I'm not mistaken, the current binary 
version of Jetty works with Java 1.4 only.

	Ugo

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/scratchpad/java/org/apache/cocoon/ant UriType.java

2003-11-16 Thread Vadim Gritsenko 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

vgritsenko2003/11/15 16:52:08

 Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/environment/commandline
   CommandLineRequest.java FileSavingEnvironment.java
   LinkSamplingEnvironment.java
  src/java/org/apache/cocoon/util NetUtils.java
  src/blocks/scratchpad/java/org/apache/cocoon/ant
   UriType.java
 Log:
 Modify NetUtils to allow parsing of multivalue request parameters.
 

Upayavira,

Can you test CLI that it did not broke? ;-)

Vadim

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13479] - Cocoon fails to compile sitemap and XSP in JBoss 3.0.3 with embedded Tomcat 4.1.12 and 4.0.5

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13479

Cocoon fails to compile sitemap and XSP in JBoss 3.0.3 with embedded Tomcat 4.1.12 and 
4.0.5





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-16 16:26 ---
It is still a bug with 2.0.4 or even better with 2.1.3?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23615] - XSLTC doesn't work with nodeset functions

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23615

XSLTC doesn't work with nodeset functions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|xsltc doesn't work with |XSLTC doesn't work with
   |nodeset functions   |nodeset functions

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19138] - [PATCH] Made SQLTransformer paginatable

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19138

[PATCH] Made SQLTransformer paginatable

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[Contrib]/[Patch] Made  |[PATCH] Made SQLTransformer
   |SQLTransformer paginatable. |paginatable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24180] - [WOODY] Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display the form

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24180

[WOODY] Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display the 
form

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Minor   |Enhancement
 OS/Version|Windows XP  |All
   Priority|Other   |Low
Summary|[RFE] - WOODY: Test the |[WOODY] Test the presence of
   |presence of all required|all required fields in the
   |fields in the template  |template before display the
   |before display the form |form



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-16 16:19 ---
Speaking strictly with the current implementation. This bug will be a good idea.
Of course it will make good a little slower because of the check of this. Maybe
a parameter switch in the configuration of the component for debuging pupose is
a better idea in that way you will be able to "turn On" the requested validation
while you are developing and "turn off" in production for better performance.

Is this good idea?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24180] - [RFE] - WOODY: Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display the form

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24180

[RFE] - WOODY: Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display 
the form

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[WOODY] Test the presence of|[RFE] - WOODY: Test the
   |all required fields in the  |presence of all required
   |template before display the |fields in the template
   |form|before display the form



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-16 16:16 ---
I changed the name of the bug because it is more a RFE than a bug.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24180] - [WOODY] Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display the form

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24180

[WOODY] Test the presence of all required fields in the template before display the 
form

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|woody : test the presence of|[WOODY] Test the presence of
   |all the required fields in  |all required fields in the
   |the template before display |template before display the
   |the form|form



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-16 16:15 ---
Speaking strictly with the current implementation. This bug will be a good idea.
Of course it will make good a little slower because of the check of this. Maybe
a parameter switch in the configuration of the component for debuging pupose is
a better idea in that way you will be able to "turn On" the requested validation
while you are developing and "turn off" in production for better performance.

Is this good idea?

Bug report for Cocoon 2 [2003/11/16]

2003-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 5978|Ass|Nor|2002-01-23|Java SecurityManager java.lang.RuntimePermission c|
| 6200|New|Maj|2002-02-03|Parser failure with validate=true when processing |
| 9916|New|Enh|2002-06-17|javax.xml.transform.Transformer accepts object par|
|10203|Opn|Enh|2002-06-25|Docs referenced by XSLT's document() are not inclu|
|10827|New|Nor|2002-07-15|ESQL  doesn't support namespaces|
|11716|New|Nor|2002-08-15| is formatting sensitive   |
|13479|New|Maj|2002-10-10|Cocoon fails to compile sitemap and XSP in JBoss 3|
|13904|New|Nor|2002-10-23|FilterTransformer: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception|
|14074|New|Nor|2002-10-29|Previously reported tar bug - isn't (well, it is b|
|14327|New|Nor|2002-11-07|JSPReader: make the output encoding configurable. |
|15302|Ass|Nor|2002-12-12|XSPUtil.relativeFilename() returns differents resu|
|15316|Opn|Nor|2002-12-12|FOP does not resolve relative paths   |
|15614|Opn|Min|2002-12-22|Some documentation is inaccurate by version   |
|15841|New|Nor|2003-01-07|xsp:attribute handled incorrectly |
|16537|New|Nor|2003-01-29|[PATCH] fixed redirect under JRun 3.1 |
|16545|New|Min|2003-01-29|Logicsheet embedded in used-defined logicsheet doe|
|16710|New|Maj|2003-02-03|SQLTransformer.Query.serializeRow forces lower cas|
|17594|New|Nor|2003-03-03|WebSphere redirect bug|
|17771|New|Nor|2003-03-07|[PATCH] new logging category never set when using |
|17924|New|Nor|2003-03-12|Cached resources don't have Expires-Header|
|17984|New|Enh|2003-03-14|SQLTransformer only handles nested or sequential q|
|18003|New|Nor|2003-03-14|JSPReader & JSPGenerator: NPE when adding context-|
|18116|New|Min|2003-03-18|VelocityGenerator  child elements don't |
|19138|New|Enh|2003-04-18|[Contrib]/[Patch] Made SQLTransformer paginatable.|
|19641|New|Nor|2003-05-05|[PATCH] HSSFSerializer Support for FreezePane |
|20190|New|Maj|2003-05-23|JSPs in external subsite fail |
|20508|New|Nor|2003-06-05|[PATCH] Namespace cleanup in HTMLSerializer   |
|20631|New|Nor|2003-06-10|[PATCH] Support for transactions in SQLTransformer|
|20640|New|Maj|2003-06-10|Pages keep reloading with Cocoon 2.04 |
|20736|New|Maj|2003-06-13|JXForms validator rejects null value for numeric f|
|21107|New|Maj|2003-06-26|possible sitemap reload locking issue |
|21177|New|Nor|2003-06-30|a crash in the name() function of the xslt, when u|
|21301|New|Maj|2003-07-03|esql:get-xml error: Could not find Component (role|
|21536|Opn|Enh|2003-07-12|[PATCH] 2 new generators: MultiPartPosted XML and |
|22132|New|Nor|2003-08-05|Cannot use redirect-to after submit jxform|
|22400|New|Enh|2003-08-13|SQLTransformer to optionally preserve case of colu|
|22842|New|Nor|2003-08-30|flow: importPackage/importClass problems creating |
|23002|New|Nor|2003-09-08|HSSF Serializer does not process  are sometim|
|23901|New|Nor|2003-10-17|[PATCH] [woody], adding  and moving l|
|23921|New|Enh|2003-10-19|[PATCH] New ReadDOMTransformer/WriteDOMTransformer|
|23939|New|Nor|2003-10-20|document('relative-URI') seems to resolve wrongly |
|24135|Ass|Min|2003-10-26|carselector sample: reloading page puts old values|
|24180|New|Min|2003-10-28|woody : test the presence of all the required fiel|
|24289|New|Nor|2003-10-31|MultipartParser cannot handle multibyte character |
|24319|New|Nor|2003-11-01|[PATCH] Template-based web site   |
|24389|New|Enh|2003-11-04|[PATCH] New ResourceLoadAction|
|24390|New|Enh|2003-11-04|[PATCH] New StaticStringModule|
|24391|New|Nor|2003-11-04|[PATCH] wsinclude and htmlinclude transformers|
|24402|New|Enh|2003-11-04|[PATCH] XML posting from SourceWritingTransformer |
|24433|New|Nor|2003-11-05|JXTemplate generator does not handle format-number|
|24457|New|Nor|2003-11-06|Xalan/XSLT using UTF-8: Incorrect SAXException: At|
|24489|New|Nor|2003-11-07|DummyBugForTesting