Re: FirstFriday July 2 - Wiki migration

2004-07-02 Thread David Crossley
Are other people having trouble with editing the Wiki?
I go to UserPreferences, add name and password, login
it seems to accept me. However, when i visit a page
then i need to login again.

-- 
David Crossley



[portal] bookmarks to portlets

2004-07-02 Thread DURDINA Michal
Hi,
is there any solution how to make a bookmark in PortalEngine to JSR168 portlet?

I need to pass a parameter in the bookmark to portlet via url. I know how to do this 
with coplets (using custom bookmark event that stores parameter to coplet attributes), 
but I am not sure how to handle this within pure JSR168portlet.

1.) Is there any way how to access coplet (that wraps the portlet) attributes within 
portlet? Will input module "coplet:attributes" work?

2.) Is there any way how to send a request parameter to selected JSR168portlet via 
portal url so portlet would be able to read it using portletRequest.getParameter()? 
This would probably need to engage the same mechanism as the one that is responsible 
for portlet link generation (PortletURLProviderImpl) - but looking closer at the 
implementation I wonder if this is possible.

Thanks,
Michal



Re: CIncludeTransformer issues

2004-07-02 Thread Torsten Curdt
Having a strip-root parameter on the
CInclude transformer makes sense IMO.
I have a patch. It works only with cinclude:include tag. caching-include 
and includexml is way to much complicated for me to change it.
Could you please add it to bugzilla?
cheers
--
Torsten


Re: FirstFriday July 2 - Wiki migration

2004-07-02 Thread Steven Noels
On 02 Jul 2004, at 13:57, David Crossley wrote:
But we are currently dealing with some glitches:
* doing redirect from cocoondev.org
I already dropped Wiki notification mails coming from 
wiki.cocoondev.org.


--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org


Re: FirstFriday July 2 - Wiki migration

2004-07-02 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote:
> We are doing FirstFriday on IRC as usual
> if you care to join.
> 
> We are doing the Wiki migration at the moment.
> 
> The conversion is done. So you can go to the new wiki.
> http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday
> 
> But we are currently dealing with some glitches:
> * doing redirect from cocoondev.org
> * UserPreferences is not working on wiki.apache.org
> so you cannot log in and edit yet.

Okay go for it. Upayavira fixed the UserPreferences thing.

Start at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/
create yourself an account via UserPreferences, log in,
and you will be able to edit.

See tasks at: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday
and how to join IRC.

-- 
David Crossley



Re: FirstFriday July 2 - Wiki migration

2004-07-02 Thread David Crossley
We are doing FirstFriday on IRC as usual
if you care to join.

We are doing the Wiki migration at the moment.

The conversion is done. So you can go to the new wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday

But we are currently dealing with some glitches:
* doing redirect from cocoondev.org
* UserPreferences is not working on wiki.apache.org
so you cannot log in and edit yet.

... will report back soon.

-- 
David Crossley



Re: Why Cocoon Stops processing all Requests URI the moment one of them has an exception;CInclude

2004-07-02 Thread Arnab Sengupta

Hi Leszek,
Thanks very much for your help. We were
stuck in a very critical stage of our project and your views really helped
us.

Thanks And Best Regards,

Arnab Sengupta
IBM Global Services
Plot X1-7, Block - EP/GP, Saltlake
Kolkata - 700 091
Telephone: +91 33 23579110 extn 3460(office)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Leszek Gawron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

07/02/2004 04:09 PM



Please respond to
dev





To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


cc



Subject
Re: Why Cocoon Stops processing
all Requests URI the moment one of them has an exception;CInclude








Arnab Sengupta wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a Cocoon pipeline that takes a huge xml as input. The stucture
of 
> xml is:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Now I have an xsltc transformer taking an xsl, internally calls same

> *cocoon URI*, based on occurance of "**"
tag.
> 
> *cocoon://labData?messageNo=
> select="position()"/>*
>             
> 
> 
> 
> Now when any one of these URI's fired through CInclude gets an 
> exception, other URI's are never processed at all. I mean i am not
very 
> sure whether other URI's gets fired or they are aborted. Can someone

> please tell me what will happen, if URI fired by the occurance of
2nd 
>  gets an exception. Will the URI for 3rd Message be
fired at 
> all? Or if fired it will be aborted in middle..?
ignoreErrors attribute is only taken into account when using 
cinclude:includexml tag.

-- 
Leszek Gawron                  
                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CIncludeTransformer issues

2004-07-02 Thread Leszek Gawron
Torsten Curdt wrote:
2. If not would you accept the path that allows to do strip-root in 
CIncludeTransformer - it would also be much faster than select="/root/*"

The PATCH not the path

big +1
...see the archives:
I wanted to add this feature but
worked around due to time constraints.
Having a strip-root parameter on the
CInclude transformer makes sense IMO.
I have a patch. It works only with cinclude:include tag. caching-include and 
includexml is way to much complicated for me to change it.

--
Leszek Gawron  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why Cocoon Stops processing all Requests URI the moment one of them has an exception;CInclude

2004-07-02 Thread Leszek Gawron
Arnab Sengupta wrote:
Hi All,
I have a Cocoon pipeline that takes a huge xml as input. The stucture of 
xml is:












Now I have an xsltc transformer taking an xsl, internally calls same 
*cocoon URI*, based on occurance of "**" tag.

*cocoon://labData?messageNo=*



Now when any one of these URI's fired through CInclude gets an 
exception, other URI's are never processed at all. I mean i am not very 
sure whether other URI's gets fired or they are aborted. Can someone 
please tell me what will happen, if URI fired by the occurance of 2nd 
 gets an exception. Will the URI for 3rd Message be fired at 
all? Or if fired it will be aborted in middle..?
ignoreErrors attribute is only taken into account when using 
cinclude:includexml tag.

--
Leszek Gawron  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Why Cocoon Stops processing all Requests URI the moment one of them has an exception;CInclude

2004-07-02 Thread Arnab Sengupta

Hi All,

I have a Cocoon pipeline that takes
a huge xml as input. The stucture of xml is:













Now I have an xsltc transformer taking
an xsl, internally calls same cocoon URI, based on occurance of
"" tag.

       
    cocoon://labData?messageNo=
       
    



Now when any one of these URI's fired
through CInclude gets an exception, other URI's are never processed at
all. I mean i am not very sure whether other URI's gets fired or they are
aborted. Can someone please tell me what will happen, if URI fired by the
occurance of 2nd  gets an exception. Will the URI for 3rd
Message be fired at all? Or if fired it will be aborted in middle..?

Also can anyone tell me whether CInclude
waits for response of the URL fired by it to return an xml ?

Thanks And Best Regards,

Arnab Sengupta
IBM Global Services
Plot X1-7, Block - EP/GP, Saltlake
Kolkata - 700 091
Telephone: +91 33 23579110 extn 3460(office)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SVN conversion (was Re: Overwrote/removed jakarta-commons website files)

2004-07-02 Thread Upayavira
Brian W.Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Jul 2, 2004, at 12:42 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I chatted with Fitz very recently, and he's hoping folks wait to 
adopt his
next release (coming -very- soon) of the cvs2svn tool.  He's made 
massive
improvements in the speed of conversion and resulting svn dataset.

I expect he will give a yell as soon as it's ready.  (He was actually
hacking on the last few bugs as we were chatting a week or two ago.)

While it's not 1.0 yet (a few non-correctness bugs left), it's ready.  
I'm planning on converting httpd-1.0 and cocoon next week, and then 
it's open season.

-Fitz
Above from Infrastructure. So it seems we can expect a conversion soon, 
then!

Upayavira



Re: Why has XMLForms been removed

2004-07-02 Thread Torsten Curdt
Hello,
I have just noticed that XMLForms has been removed from Cocoon. May I 
ask why? From 2.1.4 I got the impression that there is a real effort to 
include a XForms (or close to) implementation in Cocoon. But obviously, 
XForms is no longer considered to be of interest. For us, this is rather 
unfortunate, so, if possible, I'd like to know why it has been dropped.
There were several reasons. The most important ones
are:
* lack of community support - it was no community effort
* we decided to focus on a single forms framework (former woody)
IIRC also some security issues popped up. Besides
trying to implement a client side spec on the server
side has always been questionable.
...that's why we deprecated XMLForms a while ago
and moved on.
Please have a look into "forms" block. You will
find a pretty mature form handling implementation
that's been used and well supported by the cocoon
community.
You won't burn your hands again if you go for it.
Hope I summarized this correctly, folks?
cheers
--
Torsten


Why has XMLForms been removed

2004-07-02 Thread Dr. Michael N. Lipp
Hello,
I have just noticed that XMLForms has been removed from Cocoon. May I 
ask why? From 2.1.4 I got the impression that there is a real effort to 
include a XForms (or close to) implementation in Cocoon. But obviously, 
XForms is no longer considered to be of interest. For us, this is rather 
unfortunate, so, if possible, I'd like to know why it has been dropped.

Regards,
Michael


RE: [portal] Implementing Login coplet with CForms

2004-07-02 Thread Philippe Guillard
Hi,

Is there some fresh news about that topic ? I mean somebody succeded ?

Regards,

Phil

On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 03:33, Alex Romayev wrote:
> --- Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alex Romayev wrote:
> > > 
> > > Ok, I'm a bit confused and not sure where to
> > start.
> > > 
> > > This is what I'm trying to achieve.  I'd like to
> > replace 
> > > portal login form with CForm (using actions, not
> > flow), to 
> > > use its validation.  So the most interesting use
> > case is:
> > > 
> > > 1. User does not enter username/password 2. The
> > form is 
> > > re-displayed with error messages 3. User enters
> > correct 
> > > username/password 4. The form calls do-login url,
> > which then 
> > > redirects to "portal" using authentication-fw.
> > > 
> > > Questions.
> > > 
> > > 1. Initially I assumed that if I just configured
> > the coplet 
> > > with handleParameters = true, CForms would have
> > access to 
> > > request parameters.  Not true.  Does this mean
> > that 
> > > handleParameters only works in conjunction with 
> > > html-event-link transformer?
> > > 
> > Yes (unfortunately I think).
> 
> :-(  I actually find that having request parameters
> directly available to coplets would simplify things
> quite a bit in general.  However, come to think of it,
> it probably wouldn't have helped my case, since I
> would still need to do the redirect to do-login inside
> my portlet pipeline. 
> 
> > 
> > > 2. I switched to using html-even-link trasformer 
> > > configuration.  Now could get through steps 1-3. 
> > > However, in step 4, calling do-login results in
> > portal being 
> > > displayed *inside* my login coplet.  I've looked
> > at 
> > > HTMLEventLinkTransformer code, and it makes
> > external = 
> > > true/false distinction only for links, not for
> > forms.  At the 
> > > same time, event if it did, I don't see how it
> > would work in 
> > > my case anyway, since in step
> > > 2 I would need to have external=true and in step
> > 4, external= 
> > > false for the same form?  Am I making sense here
> > at all?
> > > 
> > Yes, makes sense to me :)
> > 
> > > Seems like I'm just missing some basic
> > information, but ATM 
> > > completely lost :-)
> > > 
> > Hmm, no the problem is that your call to do-login
> > happens inside
> > the coplet. So it's the content of your coplet that
> > you change
> > with the call - not the whole portal itself.
> > I'm not sure if this is possible at all - at least I
> > don't see
> > a solution right now (which doesn't mean that there
> > isn't).
> 
> I've been thinking about this for a while, let me see
> if I can collect my thoughts and make a separate post
> on this topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> > For the current login coplet in the demo portal we
> > used a "hack".
> > The form is not processed by the coplet itself but
> > directly in
> > the sitemap *before* the portal is rendered. This
> > allows us
> > to do what you need. You could do the evaluation
> > before the
> > portal is rendered and put some error messages in
> > the session
> > and retrieve it later on when your coplet is
> > rendered.
> > 
> > HTH
> > Carsten
> > 
> 
> 



Re: Compile error: JMSEventMessageListener

2004-07-02 Thread Unico Hommes
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Cocoon developers,
I get a compile error with the current HEAD:
D:\Development\src\apache\cocoon-2.1-cvs\src\blocks\eventcache\java\org\apache\cocoon\caching\impl\JMSEventMessageListener.java:90: 
cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : method getLogger ()
location: class org.apache.cocoon.caching.impl.JMSEventMessageListener

Is this related to the latest JMS changes?
Yes, the eventcache block now depends on JMS to build.
--
Unico


Compile error: JMSEventMessageListener

2004-07-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hi Cocoon developers,
I get a compile error with the current HEAD:
D:\Development\src\apache\cocoon-2.1-cvs\src\blocks\eventcache\java\org\apache\cocoon\caching\impl\JMSEventMessageListener.java:90: 
cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : method getLogger ()
location: class org.apache.cocoon.caching.impl.JMSEventMessageListener

Is this related to the latest JMS changes?
Thanks in advance!
-- Andreas
Here's my local.blocks.properties:
#include.block.authentication-fw=false
#dependency: fop needs batik
#include.block.batik=false
include.block.bsf=false
#include.block.chaperon=false
#include.block.databases=false
#include.block.deli=false
include.block.linotype=false
#include.block.fop=false
#include.block.hsqldb=false
#include.block.html=false
include.block.itext=false
include.block.jfor=false
include.block.jms=false
include.block.jsp=false
include.block.jxforms=false
#include.block.linkrewriter=false
include.block.lucene=false
#include.block.naming=false
include.block.paranoid=false
include.block.php=false
include.block.poi=false
include.block.portal-fw=false
#include.block.profiler=false
include.block.python=false
#dependency: authentication-fw needs session-fw
#include.block.session-fw=false
#dependency: webdav needs slide
include.block.slide=false
include.block.swf=false
include.block.velocity=false
include.block.web3=false
# TODO: Including the xmldb block might cause a conflict with the 
patched xmldb libraries lib/xmldb-common-2003-09-02.jar and 
lib/xmldb-xupdate-2003-10-14.jar
include.block.xmldb=false

# Unstable blocks 
--

# unstable blocks are currently under development and do not guarantee the
# contracts they expose (API, xml schema, properties, behavior) will remain
# constant in time. Developers are not committed to back-compatibility 
just yet.
# This doesn't necessarily mean the blocks implementation is unstable or
# the code can't be trusted for production, but use with care and watch
# its development as thing might change over time before they are marked
# stable.

include.block.apples=false
include.block.asciiart=false
include.block.axis=false
#dependency: scratchpad needs cron
include.block.cron=false
#include.block.eventcache=false
include.block.javaflow=false
include.block.mail=false
include.block.midi=false
include.block.ojb=false
include.block.petstore=false
include.block.portal=false
include.block.precept=false
#include.block.proxy=false
include.block.qdox=false
include.block.repository=false
include.block.scratchpad=false
include.block.serializers=false
include.block.slop=false
include.block.stx=false
include.block.taglib=false
include.block.webdav=false
include.block.woody=false

# Deprecated blocks 


# Although these blocks are stable they have been deprecated in favour 
of other
# blocks.

include.block.xmlform=false