[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Cocoon - Apache Cocoon [build root] - Build Def:

2008-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Online report : 
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=106128&projectId=51

Build statistics:
 State: Failed
 Previous State: Failed
 Started at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 10:40:39 -0700
 Finished at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 10:53:04 -0700
 Total time: 12m 24s
 Build Trigger: Schedule
 Build Number: 310
 Exit code: 1
 Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
 Operating system : Linux(unknown)
 Java Home version : 
 java version "1.4.2_15"

 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_15-b02)
 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_15-b02, mixed mode)
   
 Builder version :

 Maven version: 2.0.8
 Java version: 1.4.2_15
 OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.20-16-server" arch: "i386" Family: 
"unix"
   


SCM Changes:

Changed: felixk @ Sat 2 Aug 2008 09:57:07 -0700
Comment: Improve build performance, remove not needed and no longer existing 
repositories.
Files changed:
 /cocoon/trunk/tools/sitemaptags2daisy/pom.xml ( 682014 )


Dependencies Changes:

No dependencies changed



Build Defintion:

POM filename: pom.xml
Goals: clean install   
Arguments: --batch-mode -P allblocks,it

Build Fresh: false
Always Build: false
Default Build Definition: true
Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
Profile Name: Java 1.4, Large Memory
Description: 



Test Summary:

Tests: 373
Failures: 0
Total time: 138.21498






Some questions about site document generation

2008-08-02 Thread Felix Knecht

Hi

First I need to say that I'm not that familiar with the doc generation - just 
in case some questions are OT or just rubbish.

- Nightly-docs vs. dev-docs:
[1] has a note saying "There is a second job which builds the docs once a day too. In addition to the first one it adds 
a couple of reports (Findbugs, SVN reports, etc.). See http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/";
Is this really working? Comparing i.e. the summary of a page would say something else [2][3]. Are the dev-docs really 
run once a day?


- Monitoring nightly-/dev-docs generation
Does it exists? I've never seen such a mail on a list (dev/private/user) or 
hasn't it failed ever?

- sitemaptags2daisy
This scripts is used to update daisy with annotations made in java classes. As I've found multiple page not updated I 
also doubt that this script is run on a regularly base when generating nigthly-/dev-docs.

Does the docs generation also run this script?
Why is it a script and not a maven plugin (historical reasons/technical 
reasons/...)?

- Site 'responsible'
[4] still has a banner for ApacheCon Europe 08 (April 2008). Do we have people feeling responsible about keeping the 
site (at least [4], I'm not talking about technical documentation of C2.x)) up to date?


Regards
Felix


[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/1418_1_1.html
[2] 
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/nightly-docs/2.2/core-modules/core/2.2/890_1_1.html
[3] 
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/2.2/core-modules/core/2.2/890_1_1.html
[4] http://cocoon.apache.org/


[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Cocoon - Apache Cocoon [build root] - Build Def:

2008-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Online report : 
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=105998&projectId=51

Build statistics:
 State: Failed
 Previous State: Error
 Started at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 03:30:01 -0700
 Finished at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 03:39:51 -0700
 Total time: 9m 50s
 Build Trigger: Schedule
 Build Number: 310
 Exit code: 1
 Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
 Operating system : Linux(unknown)
 Java Home version : 
 java version "1.4.2_15"

 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_15-b02)
 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_15-b02, mixed mode)
   
 Builder version :

 Maven version: 2.0.8
 Java version: 1.4.2_15
 OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.20-16-server" arch: "i386" Family: 
"unix"
   


SCM Changes:

No files changed


Dependencies Changes:

No dependencies changed



Build Defintion:

POM filename: pom.xml
Goals: clean install   
Arguments: --batch-mode -P allblocks,it

Build Fresh: false
Always Build: false
Default Build Definition: true
Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
Profile Name: Java 1.4, Large Memory
Description: 



Test Summary:

Tests: 373
Failures: 0
Total time: 134.11697






Re: Cocoon-jms-sample requires Java >= 1.5

2008-08-02 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski

Peter Hunsberger pisze:

But when switching the version why don't switch to 1.6 (I think it's
on MacOSX now also available). Otherwise we have to switch again in
1 year or so (see
http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html). EOL for 1.5
is  October 2009.

WDYT?



There might be people who can't run 1.6 yet.  In particular we know some 
people are still stuck on old versions of Websphere and similar.  We've 
had this discussion before and I'm on the side that we can't support 
legacy code forever.  However, I do feel that a jump to 1.6 might be a 
bit premature. We just had this discussion internally over the last 
couple of weeks and we found several 1.6 incompatibilities forcing us to 
stay on 1.5 for the moment.  If we do have a need to move to 1.6 in the 
future it shouldn't be that much of an issue to change at that point?



Technically, switching to new Java version is not that hard, things that you 
need to do are:
1. Change required Java version in our parent pom.
2. Change profile in Continuum so it uses Java 1.5
3. Upgrade Java used on cocoon.zones.apache.org.
4ยท Announce this fact to our users.

In the past, it proven to be more social issue that some people were blocking decision about 
changing required Java version. At this moment, I don't see any kind of that effect (it looks like 
every one agrees on the need of change) so I don't think we need to exploit this situation for 
switching to Java 1.6 immediately.


I agree with Peter's arguments that there should be no hurry. On the other hand, I agree with Felix 
that we'll need to switch to 1.6 in a year but provided there are no people blocking this decision 
and we have more frequent releases of Cocoon Core I prefer gradual steps.



If there is anyone who wants to add something to this discussion I think it's a perfect time to 
speak out now. Otherwise, I would like to call a vote next week so we can make a formal decision.


--
Grzegorz Kossakowski


[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Cocoon - Apache Cocoon [build root] - Build Def:

2008-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Online report : 
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=105773&projectId=51

Build statistics:
 State: Error
 Previous State: Failed
 Started at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 00:15:31 -0700
 Finished at: Sat 2 Aug 2008 00:16:47 -0700
 Total time: 1m 15s
 Build Trigger: Schedule
 Build Number: 0
 Exit code: 0
 Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
 Operating system : Linux(unknown)
 Java Home version : 
 java version "1.4.2_15"

 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_15-b02)
 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_15-b02, mixed mode)
   
 Builder version :

 Maven version: 2.0.8
 Java version: 1.4.2_15
 OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.20-16-server" arch: "i386" Family: 
"unix"
   


SCM Changes:

No files changed


Dependencies Changes:

No dependencies changed



Build Defintion:

POM filename: pom.xml
Goals: clean install   
Arguments: --batch-mode -P allblocks,it

Build Fresh: false
Always Build: false
Default Build Definition: true
Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
Profile Name: Java 1.4, Large Memory
Description: 



Test Summary:

Tests: 0
Failures: 0
Total time: 0.0


Build Error:

Provider message: The svn command failed.
Command output: 
---

svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk': could not connect to server 
(http://svn.apache.org)
---