date:20130228

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

2013-02-28 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

On 28/02/2013 11:44, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Le 28/02/2013 11:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi all,

It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related
to dependencies upgrade.

With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for
dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it
is working correctly.
The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found
an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but
the manual way, e.g.

$ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig
cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip
$ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig
cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz
$ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig
cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip
$ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig
cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz

I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need
to be sure that his own key is contained in [5].

BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ?

Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-)
Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I
can help, if you want / need.

I'm ok to do the job, if it's ok for others too ;)

Well, the ASF is a do-ocracy [7] so don't be afraid :-)

Having never done Apache releases, I'll certainly need help at some
point, but IIRC the whole process was particularly well explained on
the wiki.

Guess you are referring to [8].
I think this will also be the chance to update it in some parts, so that
releasing 2.1.13 would be easier.

Regards.

David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies?
Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but
IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may
still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think?

We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6]
into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are
known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no
reason for keep waiting.

I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice.
I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate.

Fine.

I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and
start the release process for 2.1.12.

+1
It'll be part of the release process.

Fine again.

Regards.

Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote:

Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi there,

AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a
hint

about the src/bin split?

COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the
source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks.

Do "./build.sh dist".

There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE
files for each package.

Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this
discussion there.

Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all
dependencies. I

don't know the status of it.
COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to
check. I
remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he
said
something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still
work"

See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it
than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does
have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc.

Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all".
For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible.

Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added
this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion
there.

And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know
either what

to do with it.

COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this?

See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause
of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for
everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included
some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and
just leave the workaround in-place.

I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently:
could you please take a look and reply? Thanks.

Regards.

Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote:

[...]

Hi all,
is everything tracked into JIRA [1]?

>From my POV, yes.

I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to
include or exclude from the -src package.

If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12,
wonderful!

Hello there,
how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed?

Regards.

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reo

[jira] [Commented] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

2013-02-28 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589442#comment-13589442
 ] 

Hudson commented on COCOON-2334:


Integrated in Cocoon 2.1.X #84 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Cocoon%202.1.X/84/])
[COCOON-2334] Patch applied (Revision 1451137)

 Result = SUCCESS
ilgrosso : http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=rev&rev=1451137
Files : 
* /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/ojb/build.xml
* /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/tools/src/blocks-build.xsl


> [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system
> -
>
> Key: COCOON-2334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334
> Project: Cocoon
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: - Build System: Ant
>Affects Versions: 2.1.12
>Reporter: Kai Hofmann
>Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.1.12
>
> Attachments: antSourcePatch.diff
>
>
> On my System is only jdk 7 installed, so during compiling the actual cocoon 
> 2.1 branch I got the following error:
> cocoon-block-batik-compile:
> Compiling 2 source files to 
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\blocks\batik\dest
> javac: target release 1.6 conflicts with default source release 1.7
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\tools\targets\compile-build.xml:264: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:1119: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:100: 
> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
> The patch will fix this situation by adding source="${source.vm}" to javac 
> calls.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

2013-02-28 Thread Cédric Damioli


  
  

Le 28/02/2013 11:26, Francesco
  Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On
  28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote:
  
  Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco
Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli
  wrote:
  
  Hi all,


It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333,
related to dependencies upgrade.

  
  
  With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1
  for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm
  that it is working correctly.
  
  The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't
  found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no
  option but the manual way, e.g.
  
  
  $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig
  cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip
  
  $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc
  --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz
  
  $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig
  cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip
  
  $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc
  --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz
  
  
  I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also
  need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5].
  


BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ?

  
  
  Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-)
  
  Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I
  can help, if you want / need.
  

I'm ok to do the job, if it's ok for others too ;)
Having never done Apache releases, I'll certainly need help at some
point, but IIRC the whole process was particularly well explained on
the wiki.


  
  

  David, Francesco, others, are we ok
with current dependencies?

Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest
versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too
long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed.
What do you think?

  
  
  We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from
  [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or
  bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies,
  I see no reason for keep waiting.
  

I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work
nice.

I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate.

  
  
  Fine.
  
  
  
I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA,
  move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for
  2.1.12.
  

+1

It'll be part of the release process.

  
  
  Fine again.
  
  
  Regards.
  
  
  

  Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco
Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley
  wrote:
  
  Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

Cédric Damioli wrote:
  
  Hi there,


AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you
give me a hint

about the src/bin split?

  
  COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to
  generate the
  
  source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks.
  

Do "./build.sh dist".


There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE

files for each package.

  
  
  Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this
  discussion there.
  
  
  

  Apart, there's the David issue
about upgrading all dependencies. I

don't know the status of it.

  
  COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few
  deps to check. I
  
  remember I've asked David about how to contribute on
  this an he said
  
  something like "update the JAR file an browse if

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

2013-02-28 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

On 28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi all,

It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to
dependencies upgrade.

With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for
dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is
working correctly.
The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an
easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the
manual way, e.g.

I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to
be sure that his own key is contained in [5].

BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ?

Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-)
Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I can
help, if you want / need.

We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into
"Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known
affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for
keep waiting.

I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice.
I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate.

Fine.

I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and
start the release process for 2.1.12.

+1
It'll be part of the release process.

Fine again.

Regards.

Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote:

Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi there,

AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint
about the src/bin split?

COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the
source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks.

Do "./build.sh dist".

There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE
files for each package.

Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion
there.

Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I
don't know the status of it.

COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I
remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said
something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work"

See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it
than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does
have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc.

Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all".
For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible.

Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this
also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there.

And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either
what

to do with it.

COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this?

I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently:
could you please take a look and reply? Thanks.

Regards.

Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote:

[...]

Hi all,
is everything tracked into JIRA [1]?

>From my POV, yes.

I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to
include or exclude from the -src package.

If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12,
wonderful!

Hello there,
how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed?

Regards.

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC

[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt
[3]
http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results

[4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
[5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS
[6]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://peo

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

2013-02-28 Thread Cédric Damioli

Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi all,

It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to
dependencies upgrade.

With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist
packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is
working correctly.
The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an
easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the
manual way, e.g.

I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to
be sure that his own key is contained in [5].

BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ?

We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into
"Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known
affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for
keep waiting.

I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice.
I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate.

I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and
start the release process for 2.1.12.

+1
It'll be part of the release process.

Cédric

Regards.

Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote:

Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi there,

AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint
about the src/bin split?

COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the
source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks.

Do "./build.sh dist".

There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE
files for each package.

Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion
there.

Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I
don't know the status of it.

See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it
than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does
have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc.

Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all".
For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible.

Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this
also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there.

And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either
what

to do with it.

COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this?

I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently:
could you please take a look and reply? Thanks.

Regards.

Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote:

[...]

Hi all,
is everything tracked into JIRA [1]?

>From my POV, yes.

I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to
include or exclude from the -src package.

If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12,
wonderful!

Hello there,
how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed?

Regards.

[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt
[3]
http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results

[4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
[5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS
[6]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt

--
Cédric Damioli
Ametys CMS
http://www.ametys.org
http://www.anyware-services.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

2013-02-28 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi all,

It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to
dependencies upgrade.

With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist
packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working
correctly.
The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an
easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the
manual way, e.g.

I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be
sure that his own key is contained in [5].

We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into
"Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known
affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep
waiting.

I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start
the release process for 2.1.12.

Regards.

Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote:

Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi there,

AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint
about the src/bin split?

COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the
source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks.

Do "./build.sh dist".

There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE
files for each package.

Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion
there.

Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I
don't know the status of it.

See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it
than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does
have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc.

Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all".
For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible.

Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this
also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there.

And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what
to do with it.

COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this?

I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently:
could you please take a look and reply? Thanks.

Regards.

Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :

On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote:

[...]

Hi all,
is everything tracked into JIRA [1]?

>From my POV, yes.

I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to
include or exclude from the -src package.

If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful!

Hello there,
how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed?

Regards.

[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt
[3]
http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results

[4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
[5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS
[6]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

[jira] [Closed] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

2013-02-28 Thread JIRA


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Francesco Chicchiriccò closed COCOON-2334.
--

Resolution: Fixed

Patch applied, thanks!
http://svn.apache.org/r1451137

> [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system
> -
>
> Key: COCOON-2334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334
> Project: Cocoon
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: - Build System: Ant
>Affects Versions: 2.1.12
>Reporter: Kai Hofmann
>Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.1.12
>
> Attachments: antSourcePatch.diff
>
>
> On my System is only jdk 7 installed, so during compiling the actual cocoon 
> 2.1 branch I got the following error:
> cocoon-block-batik-compile:
> Compiling 2 source files to 
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\blocks\batik\dest
> javac: target release 1.6 conflicts with default source release 1.7
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\tools\targets\compile-build.xml:264: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:1119: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:100: 
> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
> The patch will fix this situation by adding source="${source.vm}" to javac 
> calls.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Assigned] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

2013-02-28 Thread JIRA


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Francesco Chicchiriccò reassigned COCOON-2334:
--

Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò

> [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system
> -
>
> Key: COCOON-2334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2334
> Project: Cocoon
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: - Build System: Ant
>Affects Versions: 2.1.12
>Reporter: Kai Hofmann
>Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.1.12
>
> Attachments: antSourcePatch.diff
>
>
> On my System is only jdk 7 installed, so during compiling the actual cocoon 
> 2.1 branch I got the following error:
> cocoon-block-batik-compile:
> Compiling 2 source files to 
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\blocks\batik\dest
> javac: target release 1.6 conflicts with default source release 1.7
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\tools\targets\compile-build.xml:264: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:1119: The 
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\work\eclipse\Cocoon2_1_branch\build\cocoon\temp\blocks-build.xml:100: 
> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
> The patch will fix this situation by adding source="${source.vm}" to javac 
> calls.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

[jira] [Commented] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12

[jira] [Closed] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

[jira] [Assigned] (COCOON-2334) [PATCH] cocoon 2.1 branch (head) build system

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information