On 2023/12/13 14:00:09 Cédric Damioli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the
> general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and
> 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now.
>
> If I try to summarize what have been said, refocusing on a single
> product would give the project a chance to 1) provide a clear upgrade
> path to existing 2.1 users and 2) gather renewed interest.
> For the still many existing 2.1 users, this would give a clear signal
> that it's time to consider other options.
>
> It's now time to formally vote:
>
[X] +1 accept (retire and officially stop the maintenance of 2.1/3.0
> branches, only keeping 2.x)
> [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are
> required to pass.
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
+1 to retire and officially stop the maintenance of 2.1/3.0
branches, only keeping 2.x
Peter Hunsberger
> Best regards,
> Cédric
>
