Re: One initiator, two responders
Sorry, mea culpa ;) - Original Message - From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: Re: One initiator, two responders > On Monday 15 August 2005 20:57, Maciej Gawinecki wrote: > > FIPA Specification > > Google reports; > * Foreign Investment Promotion Agency - Sell Thy Country > * Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents - For King and Country > * Festival International de Programmes Audiovisuels - See your Country > * Freedom of Information and Privacy Association - Fear your Country > * International Federation of Agricultural Producers - Eat your Country > > And I would be curious to know how this relates to Cocoon, other than they all > need websites :o) > > > Cheers > Niclas > > >
One initiator, two responders
Hello, FIPA Specification, when talking about protocols and communication act, states the Initiator (Agent A1) send REQUEST to Responder (Agent A2) and them Responder sends back e.g. AGREE+INFORM or just INFORM. So we have: A1->A2->A1. Imagine the situation, where A2 passes request to another Agent (A3). To make communication shorter lets draw it in the following way: A1-(request)-->A2--(reqeust)--->A3--(inform)-->A1. Does it fulfill FIPA specification? Don't we loose warrancy of delivering response in some point? TIA, Maciej Gawinecki
XUL to HTML transformer
Hello, I'm designing web application for different medias, and thus why I'm looking for any XUL to HTML transforming template (probably XSL(T)). Do you know any? Does Cocoon support it? Thus could be reasonable solution for browser which cannot render XUL pages. TIA, Maciej Gawinecki