Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Vadim Gritsenko  reverycodes.com> writes:

> >> ... I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
> >> already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?...
> > 
> > I think that's what http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1795
> > does - some assembly required probably.
> 
> IIUC, this thing is already in svn and called "fop-ng".

It's another implementation. fop-ng was done on the CocoonGT last year by
Jeremias and Lars as far as I remember.

Joerg



Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

On 9/28/07, Robby Pelssers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


... I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?...


I think that's what http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1795
does - some assembly required probably.


IIUC, this thing is already in svn and called "fop-ng".

Vadim


Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Robby Pelssers wrote:

Hi Vadim,

I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?


It _should_ work fine with it, even with 2.1.9.

Vadim



Cheers,
Robby 




-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Verzonden: donderdag, september 2007 19:18

Aan: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

Robby Pelssers wrote:

Hi,

I regularly seem to have problems because the current distributed 
version of apache fop processor (fop-0.5.20.jar) does not support a 
lot of needed attributes like for instance "linefeed-treatment".


http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-block-sect
io
n

How difficult/easy would it be to use a newer version (0.93 or 0.94)?
Is it only a matter of replacing the jar with a newer jar or do I run 
into problems in that case?


Easy: just use fop-ng block. You also have to update your fop config
file, if you are using it.

Vadim




Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 9/28/07, Robby Pelssers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>... I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
> already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?...

I think that's what http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1795
does - some assembly required probably.

-Bertrand


Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke

On 28.09.2007 5:05 Uhr, Robby Pelssers wrote:


I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?


So far it should still be pretty straight-forward to use a 2.2 block in 
2.1 as long as it has not been converted to Spring yet. There are 
probably some differences in directory structures, but they should be 
easy to figure out. You are also not the first one asking for FOP 0.9.x 
in Cocoon 2.1, so you might repeat your question on the users list (or 
search the archives).


Joerg


RE: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-28 Thread Robby Pelssers
Hi Vadim,

I forgot to mention we are working with cocoon-2.1.10.  Did somebody
already try to use a newer version of FOP for this cocoon version?

Cheers,
Robby 



-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Verzonden: donderdag, september 2007 19:18
Aan: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

Robby Pelssers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I regularly seem to have problems because the current distributed 
> version of apache fop processor (fop-0.5.20.jar) does not support a 
> lot of needed attributes like for instance "linefeed-treatment".
> 
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-block-sect
> io
> n
> 
> How difficult/easy would it be to use a newer version (0.93 or 0.94)?
> Is it only a matter of replacing the jar with a newer jar or do I run 
> into problems in that case?

Easy: just use fop-ng block. You also have to update your fop config
file, if you are using it.

Vadim


Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Robby Pelssers wrote:

Hi,

I regularly seem to have problems because the current distributed
version of apache fop processor (fop-0.5.20.jar) does not support a lot
of needed attributes like for instance "linefeed-treatment".

http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-block-sectio
n

How difficult/easy would it be to use a newer version (0.93 or 0.94)?
Is it only a matter of replacing the jar with a newer jar or do I run
into problems in that case?


Easy: just use fop-ng block. You also have to update your fop config file, if 
you are using it.


Vadim