On Oct 8, 2004, at 3:43 PM, WHIRLYCOTT wrote:
I'm one of the authors of Whirlycache
(http://whirlycache.dev.java.net/) and I'm looking at providing a
Store implementation so that it can be used in Cocoon. Is it correct
that the only interface that we need to implement is
org.apache.excalibur.store.Store?
Any other thoughts on this would be welcome.
One thing that would be beneficial for Cocoon would be to change the
singleton nature of CacheManager.
I would turn CacheManager into a regular class that can have its
configuration passed in (as either the parsed Map or a custom object to
hold the configuration).
Then Cocoon can load the CacheManaager as a component (and integrate
configuration into cocoon.xconf w/o having to put configuration in a
separate file).
The Store implementation would then depend upon the CacheManager and
just load a named cache.
To preserve the existing behavior, I'd suggest a SingletonCacheManager
implementation that does the existing behavior of loading a
configuration file from the classpath.
It might also be useful to remove the dependency upon commons-logging
and use a monitor approach
(http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/AvalonNoLogging).
If changes like this are amiable to the Whirlycache team, I'd be more
than willing to develop patches.
-pete
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
