Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

[Jochen Wiedmann]

+1


On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons CSV 1.5 (from RC1).
>
> Tag name:
>   csv-1.5-RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
> Tag URL:
>   
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-csv.git;a=commit;h=f76a1357057cd3caaf9b0904d9cc57ce384658a3
> Commit ID the tag points at:
>   f76a1357057cd3caaf9b0904d9cc57ce384658a3
>
> Site:
>   http://people.apache.org/~kinow/commons-csv-1.5-RC1/
> Distribution files (committed at revision 21311):
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/csv/
>
> Distribution files hashes (SHA1):
>   commons-csv-1.5-bin.tar.gz
>   (SHA1: 4c2a4cde27c556f808cd354807579a208fcf)
>   commons-csv-1.5-bin.zip
>   (SHA1: fea9c15a06e1f660b2bba30a5fba44a76492c02e)
>   commons-csv-1.5-src.tar.gz
>   (SHA1: e2c83f040fdfdb868184c019624d20b79113e004)
>   commons-csv-1.5-src.zip
>   (SHA1: 22f009e0e7be51c3c61fa667c02ac1822276c7b8)
>
> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
>   commons-csv-1.5-javadoc.jar
>   (SHA1: 8008b611f677b9ba06988e8102887fa4caed93b5)
>   commons-csv-1.5-sources.jar
>   (SHA1: b76c277916ffef14d63279b896b6a82252ddeb79)
>   commons-csv-1.5-test-sources.jar
>   (SHA1: f7771a23ac6ec7d5183c65146135e51f6bf2c8fb)
>   commons-csv-1.5-tests.jar
>   (SHA1: 1209d9e86a83ac06d139ea02c4331a1426051ee7)
>   commons-csv-1.5.jar
>   (SHA1: e10f140af5b82167640f254fa9d88e35ad74329c)
>   commons-csv-1.5.pom
>   (SHA1: cffa8d9814f6d711a3cb57865e65927b1f54dcb0)
>
> KEYS file to check signatures:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1257
> Please select one of the following options[1]:
>
>   [ ] +1 Release it.
>   [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
>   [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
>   [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
>
> This vote will be open at least 72 hours, i.e. until 2017-08-30T10:00:00Z 
> (this is UTC time).
> 
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Bruno
>
> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> ps: I submitted this vote e-mail before at 06:00:00 UTC, but looks like the 
> e-mail did not go through, so waited some hours before sending it again



-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

[Aaron Coburn]

Sergio,

Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few repositories 
in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp (everything is 
Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in:

API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api
SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi
HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http

Most of the components have already been released to maven central, but I'm 
still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and the persistence 
layer).

The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this 
implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of 
Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a particular RDF 
library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena in the 
implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper (Curator), 
Kafka and Beam.

Aaron

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández  wrote:
> 
> Hi Aaron,
> 
> you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to
> take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll
> have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend.
> 
> Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based
> LDP implementation?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn  wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some
>> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use --
>> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few
>> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even
>> a 0.4.0 release would be great.
>> 
>> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server
>> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf
>> provides all of the core RDF abstractions.
>> 
>> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than
>> happy to help out.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Aaron
>> 
>> acob...@apache.org
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
>> 

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi Aaron,

you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to
take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll
have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend.

Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based
LDP implementation?

Thanks.

Cheers,



On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn  wrote:

> Hi!
>
> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some
> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use --
> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few
> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even
> a 0.4.0 release would be great.
>
> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server
> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf
> provides all of the core RDF abstractions.
>
> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than
> happy to help out.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> acob...@apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

[Sergio Fernández]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn  wrote:

> Hi!
>
> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some
> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use --
> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few
> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even
> a 0.4.0 release would be great.
>
> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server
> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf
> provides all of the core RDF abstractions.
>
> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than
> happy to help out.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> acob...@apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #30: add-tests

[TheRealHaui]

Github user TheRealHaui commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/30#discussion_r139785201
  
--- Diff: 
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/jpeg/xmp/JpegXmpParserTest.java
 ---
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+/*
--- End diff --

Created #31 which contains only license header corrections.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #31: add-missing-license-headers

[TheRealHaui]

GitHub user TheRealHaui opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/31

add-missing-license-headers

Added missing license headers.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/TheRealHaui/commons-imaging 
add-missing-license-headers

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/31.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #31


commit 4468e18c5b4b1241477e5a023f22c616d42749fe
Author: Michael Hausegger 
Date:   2017-09-19T18:54:53Z

add-missing-license-headers Added missing license headers.




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [jelly] 1.x RAT check

[Gary Gregory]

FYI: The goal is to make the review process smooth and more like the other
Commons builds.

Gary

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory 
wrote:

> Thanks Rob!
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Rob Tompkins  wrote:
>
>> I'll work towards that.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> > On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Gary Gregory 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It would be nice if I could run 'mvn apache-rat:check' for the Jelly 1.x
>> > branch.
>> >
>> > Gary
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [jelly] 1.x RAT check

[Gary Gregory]

Thanks Rob!

Gary

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Rob Tompkins  wrote:

> I'll work towards that.
>
> -Rob
>
> > On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It would be nice if I could run 'mvn apache-rat:check' for the Jelly 1.x
> > branch.
> >
> > Gary
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [jelly] 1.x RAT check

[Rob Tompkins]

I'll work towards that.

-Rob

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Gary Gregory  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> It would be nice if I could run 'mvn apache-rat:check' for the Jelly 1.x
> branch.
> 
> Gary

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[jelly] 1.x RAT check

[Gary Gregory]

Hi All,

It would be nice if I could run 'mvn apache-rat:check' for the Jelly 1.x
branch.

Gary

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL 6.1 released!

[Hasan Diwan]

Congrats to all involved in making this happen! -- H

On 19 September 2017 at 10:51, sebb  wrote:

> Well done, and thanks for doing this.
>
> On 19 September 2017 at 09:37, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the Apache Commons Community is happy to announce the release of Apache
> Commons BCEL 6.1.
> >
> > The Byte Code Engineering Library (Apache Commons BCEL) is intended to
> give users a convenient way to analyze, create, and manipulate (binary)
> Java class files (those ending with .class). Classes are represented by
> objects which contain all the symbolic information of the given class:
> methods, fields and byte code instructions, in particular.
> >
> > Source and binary distributions are available for download from the
> Apache Commons download site:
> > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/download_bcel.cgi
> >
> > When downloading, please verify signatures using the KEYS file available
> at the above location.
> >
> > Alternatively the release can be pulled via maven:
> > 
> >   org.apache.bcel
> >   bcel
> >   6.1
> > 
> >
> > The release notes can be viewed at:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > For complete information on Commons BCEL, including instructions on how
> to submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the
> Apache Commons BCEL website:
> >
> > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Benedikt Ritter
> > on behalf of the Apache Commons community
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
OpenPGP: https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=
get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1
If you wish to request my time, please do so using http://bit.ly/
hd1ScheduleRequest.
Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a http://bit.ly/
hd1ScheduleRequest.

Sent
from my mobile device
Envoye de mon portable

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL 6.1 released!

[sebb]

Well done, and thanks for doing this.

On 19 September 2017 at 09:37, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the Apache Commons Community is happy to announce the release of Apache 
> Commons BCEL 6.1.
>
> The Byte Code Engineering Library (Apache Commons BCEL) is intended to give 
> users a convenient way to analyze, create, and manipulate (binary) Java class 
> files (those ending with .class). Classes are represented by objects which 
> contain all the symbolic information of the given class: methods, fields and 
> byte code instructions, in particular.
>
> Source and binary distributions are available for download from the Apache 
> Commons download site:
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/download_bcel.cgi
>
> When downloading, please verify signatures using the KEYS file available at 
> the above location.
>
> Alternatively the release can be pulled via maven:
> 
>   org.apache.bcel
>   bcel
>   6.1
> 
>
> The release notes can be viewed at:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> For complete information on Commons BCEL, including instructions on how to 
> submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache 
> Commons BCEL website:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/
>
> Best regards,
> Benedikt Ritter
> on behalf of the Apache Commons community
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL 6.1 released!

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hello,

the Apache Commons Community is happy to announce the release of Apache Commons 
BCEL 6.1.

The Byte Code Engineering Library (Apache Commons BCEL) is intended to give 
users a convenient way to analyze, create, and manipulate (binary) Java class 
files (those ending with .class). Classes are represented by objects which 
contain all the symbolic information of the given class: methods, fields and 
byte code instructions, in particular.

Source and binary distributions are available for download from the Apache 
Commons download site:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/download_bcel.cgi

When downloading, please verify signatures using the KEYS file available at the 
above location.

Alternatively the release can be pulled via maven:

  org.apache.bcel
  bcel
  6.1


The release notes can be viewed at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

For complete information on Commons BCEL, including instructions on how to 
submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache 
Commons BCEL website:

http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/

Best regards,
Benedikt Ritter
on behalf of the Apache Commons community


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[chain] Is anybody still interested

[Manfred Wolff]

Hi everybody

In the early 2000 I used to use commons chain very often. The approach is nice: 
Small pieces of software, well testable, configurable via XML or Spring, what 
ever.

I have an own framework, modern implemented with generics, and I wonder if the 
"commons" community is interested in. It is still part of maven repository and 
documentation is found here: 
https://mwolff.info/wiki/display/SCF/Documentation+version+1.5 (of course has 
to pimp actually I'm not a native English)

So my question is:


-  Is anybody interested?

-  Who is the best contact person to discuss?

-  What are the quality gates?

-  Does it matter?

Thanks for your ear
Manfred