Fwd: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

2020-11-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Please don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's
simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution.

TY,
Gary

-- Forwarded message -
From: 
Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25
Subject: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)
To: comm...@commons.apache.org 


This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

kinow pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-functor.git.


from 1e3145b  Merge pull request #10 from
apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-changes-plugin-2.12.1
 add 0c94e8d  Bump maven-pmd-plugin from 3.13.0 to 3.14.0
 new 9b217ed  Merge pull request #13 from
apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-pmd-plugin-3.14.0

The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails.  The revisions
listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.


Summary of changes:
 pom.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


[commons-bsf] Question(s)

2020-11-24 Thread Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
Just noticed that there was some activity on GitHub related to BSF (e.g.
 (updating to JUnit 4.13.1),
 (dependabot), and the like), but 
I cannot find any
discussions about it in dev@commons or in user@commons so wondering about this.

Regarding BSF 2.4 it would be important to have a Java minimum requirement that 
allows for using it
in rather old Java runtime environments so I would be a little bit preoccupied 
if the policy is to
upgrade the dependencies to the latest versions such that e.g. BSF 2.4 could 
not be deployed against
e.g. Java 1.6/6 anymore.

So seeking information about where discussions/decisions took place or should 
take place w.r.t. BSF?

---rony

P.S.: Also it would be interesting to learn whether there is a demand for 
creating a BSF 2.5 release?

P.P.S.: Readying a script taglib that allows scripts in any script language 
using the Apache Commons
BSF 2.4 to be used for creating web pages (and in this context even allowing 
servlets to be
implemented with scripts), testing currently against Tomcat 9 ("javax.") and 
Tomcat 10 ("jakarta.").
Tests being developed and carried out for [BSF4]ooRexx and Groovy (also PHP 
using the JSR-223
sibling script taglib).



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [commons-bsf] Question(s)

2020-11-24 Thread Gary Gregory
There has been lots of talk around Dependabot on the dev ML in the last few
months. The current issue is that we want all robot emails off the dev ML
and on to another probably new list.

WRT Java 6, I would say forget it from my POV and interest. I am trying to
move all components to Java 8, which is the oldest Java LTS release.

Remember that no one will force an app onto a new version, it's up to the
app.

It's not clear to me if we have even interest for a BSF release. It looks
like the last functional commit was from 2014, not a great sign...

Any thoughts folks?

Gary

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 10:15 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) 
wrote:

> Just noticed that there was some activity on GitHub related to BSF (e.g.
>  (updating to JUnit 4.13.1),
>  (dependabot), and the
> like), but I cannot find any
> discussions about it in dev@commons or in user@commons so wondering about
> this.
>
> Regarding BSF 2.4 it would be important to have a Java minimum requirement
> that allows for using it
> in rather old Java runtime environments so I would be a little bit
> preoccupied if the policy is to
> upgrade the dependencies to the latest versions such that e.g. BSF 2.4
> could not be deployed against
> e.g. Java 1.6/6 anymore.
>
> So seeking information about where discussions/decisions took place or
> should take place w.r.t. BSF?
>
> ---rony
>
> P.S.: Also it would be interesting to learn whether there is a demand for
> creating a BSF 2.5 release?
>
> P.P.S.: Readying a script taglib that allows scripts in any script
> language using the Apache Commons
> BSF 2.4 to be used for creating web pages (and in this context even
> allowing servlets to be
> implemented with scripts), testing currently against Tomcat 9 ("javax.")
> and Tomcat 10 ("jakarta.").
> Tests being developed and carried out for [BSF4]ooRexx and Groovy (also
> PHP using the JSR-223
> sibling script taglib).
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

2020-11-24 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
 I left a comment when merging in Git (thought it would appear in here, but it 
didn't, sorry). [functor] has not been released yet. So I thought it wouldn't 
be necessary to have an entry in changes.xml as we are not updating from 
version X to Y.

On Tuesday, 24 November 2020, 1:53:36 pm UTC, Gary Gregory 
 wrote:  
 
 Please don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's
simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution.

TY,
Gary

-- Forwarded message -
From: 
Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25
Subject: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)
To: comm...@commons.apache.org 


This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

kinow pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-functor.git.


    from 1e3145b  Merge pull request #10 from
apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-changes-plugin-2.12.1
    add 0c94e8d  Bump maven-pmd-plugin from 3.13.0 to 3.14.0
    new 9b217ed  Merge pull request #13 from
apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-pmd-plugin-3.14.0

The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails.  The revisions
listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.


Summary of changes:
 pom.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

2020-11-24 Thread Gary Gregory
If a component has not been released yet,  then, yes, it makes sense to not
track these changes. Thank you for clarifying.

Gary

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 14:55 Bruno P. Kinoshita  wrote:

>  I left a comment when merging in Git (thought it would appear in here,
> but it didn't, sorry). [functor] has not been released yet. So I thought it
> wouldn't be necessary to have an entry in changes.xml as we are not
> updating from version X to Y.
>
> On Tuesday, 24 November 2020, 1:53:36 pm UTC, Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Please don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's
> simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution.
>
> TY,
> Gary
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: 
> Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25
> Subject: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)
> To: comm...@commons.apache.org 
>
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> kinow pushed a change to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-functor.git.
>
>
> from 1e3145b  Merge pull request #10 from
>
> apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-changes-plugin-2.12.1
> add 0c94e8d  Bump maven-pmd-plugin from 3.13.0 to 3.14.0
> new 9b217ed  Merge pull request #13 from
> apache/dependabot/maven/org.apache.maven.plugins-maven-pmd-plugin-3.14.0
>
> The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
> repository and will be described in separate emails.  The revisions
> listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
> been added to this reference.
>
>
> Summary of changes:
>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>


Hello Apache Commons :)

2020-11-24 Thread Kanak Sony
Hey all,

I am very new to OSS Contribution and would like to help. Is there
anything that I can start with and pick up?

--
Thanks,
Kanak