Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Parent 59 based on RC1

2023-07-24 Thread Alex Herbert 
I installed it locally from the git tag. I build the following
projects with their default mvn goal using:

Apache Maven 3.9.0 (9b58d2bad23a66be161c4664ef21ce219c2c8584)
Maven home: /usr/local/apache-maven-3
Java version: 1.8.0_362, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: en_GB, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-153-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"

RNG
Numbers
Statistics
Lang
Text

No issues found except some javadoc warnings in Text when linking to
private members. I have fixed this in master.

+1

On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 21:34, Gary Gregory  wrote:
>
> We have updated the Apache Commons POM since Apache Commons Parent 58
> was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Parent 59.
>
> Apache Commons Parent 59 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1
> (svn revision 63135)
>
> The Git tag commons-parent-59-RC1 commit for this RC is
> 86b1b6f9575219f9009cdc89ddf3f1450e9f8982 which you can browse here:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-parent.git;a=commit;h=86b1b6f9575219f9009cdc89ddf3f1450e9f8982
> You may checkout this tag using:
> git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-parent.git
> --branch commons-parent-59-RC1 commons-parent-59-RC1
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1646/org/apache/commons/commons-parent/59/
>
> These are the artifacts and their hashes:
>
> #Release SHA-512s
> #Sat Jul 22 16:24:00 EDT 2023
> commons-parent-59-bom.json=094208bc437b500fd33853d186fda8728257519ab0fe59dbfcb1d0eb96a822a9f0fbbcb103d29539dada9b2ddd7ef530197bfd2558d112e006e327931ceb35da
> commons-parent-59-bom.xml=1a7b5b636ceb6c2b1cd23a31d2b4c19f35fe7c037502e439132d86e85b367fbc173c17a7a60449a6b9073194b2c2987762a4cc54e68211a55015745bdb1a5c88
> commons-parent-59-site.xml=c6aea4f2c03920366bee23b08b046dacc09710e92c78ccd83f47cd92f89bc53abc3b8bbc7f44017ee94a2cb022ce763fe3f7d8c9aa42d571350269ba6568ca07
> commons-parent-59-src.tar.gz=71acd5fb605fa2eaede743319a7ad0aed57bfa438152a84dd284bf075807d91a4db52251c718c0d3428a80f43d0022f678ca74a784a80f14f063d1973e6ade7b
> commons-parent-59-src.zip=080f4deab4863f64f5324e4f43e25a1b7dfef96962dd4afc3227356155aa1aa7fdc314c8499777058789b0748f332b8ad91ba3d5f2b67457a494e9380204d758
> org.apache.commons_commons-parent-59.spdx.json=b9614d9c1143eb8c7f5d79c3ec19f701ba395fe903e3f18280b245e35296e0a9f4ad53eeea85e6b59c0751c85e1a6db71cf5fd5a58b0c0e6ee9da09737626657
>
> I have tested this with
>
> mvn -V -Ddoclint=none -Prelease -Ptest-deploy clean package site deploy
>
> using:
>
> Apache Maven 3.9.3 (21122926829f1ead511c958d89bd2f672198ae9f)
> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.3/libexec
> Java version: 1.8.0_372, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
> /usr/local/Cellar/openjdk@8/1.8.0+372/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "mac os x", version: "13.4.1", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
> Darwin  22.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.5.0: Thu Jun  8 22:22:22
> PDT 2023; root:xnu-8796.121.3~7/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>
> Details of changes since 58 are in the release notes:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1/site/changes-report.html
>
> Site:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1/site/index.html
> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 59 directories are
> not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed.)
>
> RAT Report:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1/site/rat-report.html
>
> KEYS:
>   https://downloads.apache.org/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gary Gregory,
> Release Manager (using key DEADBEEF)
>
> For following is intended as a helper and refresher for reviewers.
>
> Validating a release candidate
> ==
>
> These guidelines are NOT complete.
>
> Requirements: Git, Java, Maven.
>
> You can validate a release from a release candidate (RC) tag as follows.
>
> 1a) Clone and checkout the RC tag
>
> git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-parent.git
> --branch commons-parent-59-RC1 commons-parent-59-RC1
> cd commons-parent-59-RC1
>
> 1b) Download and unpack the source archive from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/59-RC1/source
>
> 2) Check Apache licenses
>
> This step is not required if the site includes a RAT report page which
> you then must check.
>
> mvn apache-rat:check
>
> 3) Check binary compatibility
>
> Older components still us

Re: [FileUpload] Major version 2

2023-07-24 Thread Eugene Grybinnyk 
+1 for 17

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 12:43 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Le sam. 22 juil. 2023 à 11:00, Gary Gregory  a
> écrit :
>
> > Java 21 is not GA.
> >
>
> FU neither and calendar looks like it can match.
>
> Main pro being to move to a more reactive programming at some point which
> could justify a 2.0 IMHO.
>
>
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023, 04:48 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd say compile low and run high.
> > > So unless there is really something you need from Java 17 or 21, why
> not
> > > compiling lower?
> > >
> > > It would open the release to be used more widely in my opinion.
> > >
> > > Now I agree that making sure it runs on java 17 and 21 at least is
> great.
> > >
> > > Le ven. 21 juil. 2023, 18:40, Glavo  a écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1 for Java 17.
> > > >
> > > > Glavo
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > > > > requirements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11,
> if
> > > not
> > > > > 17.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
> > > > > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk)
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
[image: Backbase] *Eugene Grybinnyk*
Backend Developer · R&D Business Banking · Amsterdam
+31 (0) 62 992 3609