Re: [beanutils] Gradle build weirdness
Ya I got it resolved, the culprit was spring boot plugin. They created their own dependency management within Gradle. The thread is updated with the cause and workaround. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Am 27.09.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Raviteja Lokineni: > > Does anyone have any fix for it or have experienced the same? > > Did you get this resolved? I just replaced the dependency in a Maven > build, and the new version was picked up immediately. So I think the > deployment to Maven central and meta data are correct. > > Oliver > > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Raviteja Lokineni < > > raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I had been using beanutils 1.9.2 as a runtime dependency in a gradle > >> build. After the release of 1.9.3 version, I've upgraded the version in > >> build.gradle but gradle somehow still picks up the older jar, although > >> there is no reference of it. > >> > >> More information on a gradle forums (didn't want to repeat the same > here): > >> https://discuss.gradle.org/t/project-dependency- > >> picks-up-a-lower-version/19747 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer > >> TD Ameritrade > >> > >> E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com > >> > >> [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] > >> <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni> > >> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [beanutils] Gradle build weirdness
Does anyone have any fix for it or have experienced the same? On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Raviteja Lokineni < raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I had been using beanutils 1.9.2 as a runtime dependency in a gradle > build. After the release of 1.9.3 version, I've upgraded the version in > build.gradle but gradle somehow still picks up the older jar, although > there is no reference of it. > > More information on a gradle forums (didn't want to repeat the same here): > https://discuss.gradle.org/t/project-dependency- > picks-up-a-lower-version/19747 > > Thanks, > -- > *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer > TD Ameritrade > > E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com > > [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] > <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni> > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
[beanutils] Gradle build weirdness
Hi all, I had been using beanutils 1.9.2 as a runtime dependency in a gradle build. After the release of 1.9.3 version, I've upgraded the version in build.gradle but gradle somehow still picks up the older jar, although there is no reference of it. More information on a gradle forums (didn't want to repeat the same here): https://discuss.gradle.org/t/project-dependency-picks-up-a-lower-version/19747 Thanks, -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3
Finally the javadocs fix: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/1 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 > > From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK. > > Builds 'mvn clean site' OK with: > > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 > 05:51:28-0800) > Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5 > Java version: 1.6.0_45, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. > Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 > OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" > > Reports OK except for some Checkstyle issue with license headers noted by > another voter. RAT OK. > > There is no Clirr report but 'mvn clirr:check' runs OK. > > TODO: Add the Clirr report. Adding PMD and FindBugs reports would be good > as well. > > Gary > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > wrote: > > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3) > > > > This should fix earlier Java 6 / Maven 3.0 build issues with RC2 and > > adds a BUILDING.txt > > > > (Tested with Centos 6, Oracle JDK 6 and Maven 3.0.4) > > > > > > SVN tag (rev 1761786): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/ > > tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/ > > > > Site: > > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/ > > > > Javadoc: > > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/apidocs/index.html > > > > API changes since 1.9.2 (japicmp): > > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/ > > japicmp-maven-plugin-report.html > > > > (Note: "Semantic Versioning: 0.0.1" indicates the API differences > > are compatible with a patch revision) > > > > RAT report: > > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/rat-report.html > > > > > > Distribution files (rev 15476) > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/ > > BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/ > > > > > > Distribution files hashes (SHA1): > > > > 4c285c2c9af35be0ea77e6ada9674e2c7b226fa6 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin. > > tar.gz > > b2e6f70aaa2ca500899cb149c919b6bbb0256f96 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin. > zip > > d9f237583ab7b8b4a4bdf55694e915b5af9e165a commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src. > > tar.gz > > cc16e32ec4acdf8a78c3cae0c7b85cec3a773190 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src. > zip > > > > > > KEYS file to check signatures: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > > > Maven artifacts: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapachecommons-1202/ > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release it. > > [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care. > > [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ... > > [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, let's say > > 2016-09-25T08:00:00Z > > > > > > > > -- > > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3
I would like to contribute for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-497 and have started working on it. Should have something by end of day today. FYI, I would do a Github PR. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On 23 September 2016 at 09:53, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Linux distros (at least Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora <= 22 and their > > derivatives) have disabled doclint by default in OpenJDK 8 because it > > breaks a ton of unmaintained projects also packaged in these > > distributions. > > > > https://sources.debian.net/src/openjdk-8/8u102-b14.1-2/ > debian/patches/disable-doclint-by-default.diff/ > > https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/java-1.8.0- > openjdk.git/tree/disable-doclint-by-default.patch?h=f22 > > Ah, the (anti)-culprit reveals himself :) > > I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-497 on > doclint errors. > > -- it's quite a few for beanutils! :-( > > > I hope as this only happens with "mvn site" on Oracle JDK 8++ I hope > the [VOTE] can proceed.. > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3
Bump. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3) > > This should fix earlier Java 6 / Maven 3.0 build issues with RC2 and > adds a BUILDING.txt > > (Tested with Centos 6, Oracle JDK 6 and Maven 3.0.4) > > > SVN tag (rev 1761786): > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/ > tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/ > > Site: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/ > > Javadoc: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/apidocs/index.html > > API changes since 1.9.2 (japicmp): > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/ > japicmp-maven-plugin-report.html > > (Note: "Semantic Versioning: 0.0.1" indicates the API differences > are compatible with a patch revision) > > RAT report: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/rat-report.html > > > Distribution files (rev 15476) > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/ > BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/ > > > Distribution files hashes (SHA1): > > 4c285c2c9af35be0ea77e6ada9674e2c7b226fa6 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin. > tar.gz > b2e6f70aaa2ca500899cb149c919b6bbb0256f96 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.zip > d9f237583ab7b8b4a4bdf55694e915b5af9e165a commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src. > tar.gz > cc16e32ec4acdf8a78c3cae0c7b85cec3a773190 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src.zip > > > KEYS file to check signatures: > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachecommons-1202/ > > > > [ ] +1 Release it. > [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care. > [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ... > [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, let's say > 2016-09-25T08:00:00Z > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2
Why do the distribution files hashes have commons-rng? On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC2) > > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/ > tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC2/ > > Site: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc2/ > > Javadoc: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc2/apidocs/index.html > > API changes since 1.9.2 (japicmp): > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc2/japicmp.html > > RAT report: > https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc2/rat-report.html > > Distribution files (rev 15358) > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/ > BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC2/ > > > Distribution files hashes (SHA1): > > 40b7b1639eedf91b5fad5d38e6ebec01e659048f commons-rng-1.0-src.tar.gz > 6296dbabde10169d6365bda99f2af6dcc191e515 commons-rng-1.0-src.zip > a221e862c8ff970a9ca3e7fbd86c3200d1f8780a commons-rng-1.0-bin.tar.gz > 689b2bfbdb1856d4f47851d75762aab42057805a commons-rng-1.0-bin.zip > > > KEYS file to check signatures: > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachecommons-1200/ > > > [ ] +1 Release it. > [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care. > [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ... > [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, let's say > 2016-09-19T08:00:00Z > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: Another BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC?
I guess then we are good for release of RC, right? On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Sorry about the time for fixing BEANUTILS-492 - a bit of dark magic to > > go through there inside > > the bean inspectors. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-492# > > > > > > > > Now that I think it's sorted for Java 6/7/8/9 - shall I have a go at > > creating a new Release Candidate for BeanUtils 1.9.3 ? > > > > I think that was the only item holding us up. > > Gary > > > > > > > > -- > > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: Review for PR
The pull request is closed. If you like people to review and merge it: 1. It should be open 2. There should be an associated JIRA issue Thanks, Raviteja On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Utsav Oza wrote: > While surfing through the code base I encountered few spelling errors in > the comments provided alongside the code. Please review this pull request > and let me know if I am attempting anything in a wrong way or not. > > https://github.com/apache/commons-net/pull/4 > > Regards > Utsav > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3
If it's a majority win vote and if my vote counts +1 from me too. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > You can wait and ask for more reviews too... > > Gary > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger < > oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de > > wrote: > > > The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the > > following binding votes: > > > > Gary Gregory: -1 > > Jörg Schaible: +1 > > Oliver Heger: +1 > > > > Oliver > > > > Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There > > > has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve > build > > > problems on Java 1.6. > > > > > > Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration > > > (revision 14770) > > > > > > Maven artifacts are here: > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapachecommons-1197/ > > > > > > Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/ > > configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > > > > > https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/ > > changes-report.html > > > > > > Here is the tag: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/ > > CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC3 > > > (revision 1755836) > > > > > > Site: > > >https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc3/ > > > (note some links in the menu are not yet working) > > > > > > KEYS: > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > > > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000 > > > GMT 14-Aug-2016 > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Oliver > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > ----- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [configuration] Checkstyle settings
Do you guys need any help in this? I can volunteer my time to help push this release, just let me know what needs to be done. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > > Le 2/08/2016 à 21:17, Oliver Heger a écrit : > > > >> Well, for me style is not that important. (We cannot even agree on a > >> common style for the Commons project.) Therefore, seeing the violations > >> in the report is sufficient for me. > > +1, the build shouldn't fail due to style issues. > > > Ok, failOnViolation is now set to false. > > Regards > Dennis > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1
+1 On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > +1 > > Am 24.07.2016 um 22:31 schrieb Oliver Heger: > > Hi all, > > > > there have been a number of bug fixes and also some new features for > > [configuration] since version 2.0 has been released. Those should be > > made available to the public. This is the vote for the 2.1 release. > > > > Configuration 2.1 RC1 is available for review here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration > > (revision 14509) > > > > Maven artifacts are here: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1186/ > > > > Details of changes since 2.0 are in the release notes: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > > > > https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc1/changes-report.html > > > > Here is the tag: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_1_RC1 > > (revision 1753948) > > > > Site: > >https://home.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.1-rc1/ > > (note some links in the menu are not yet working) > > > > KEYS: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2030 > > GMT 27-Jul 2016 > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > Thanks! > > Oliver > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [io-480] Query
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/io/IOUtils.java?rev=1753638&r1=1753637&r2=1753638&view=diff On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Rajiv Jain wrote: > Where is that change if you don't mind me asking? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 21 Jul 2016, at 21:05, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > I already updated the Javadoc with a different change and described it in > > another email. > > > > Gary > > > >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Rajiv Jain > wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> Thanks for making it clearer. So, can my first commit ( > >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14/commits/2c801149cbb6fabcef569ac301e9933b169a5fac > >> < > >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14/commits/2c801149cbb6fabcef569ac301e9933b169a5fac > >) > >> be merged? I can then close this pull request. > >> > >> The only reason, I added them in the Javadocs because someone in the > pull > >> request asked to. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rajiv > >> > >>>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 16:10, Raviteja Lokineni < > raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> @Rajiv: Gary was talking about this commit: > >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14/commits/be0477b5a571ec83d8b6554e898d3710f27bd153 > >>> > >>> BTW RuntimeException > >>> < > >> > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/RuntimeException.html> > >>> is an unchecked exception, no value in declaring them in Javadocs. > >>> > >>> and WRT the other question, deprecated meaning it will be removed later > >> in > >>> the future. It's like a informed change that people should not use it. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Raviteja > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Rajiv Jain > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Gary > >>>> > >>>> Where is this change? I cannot find it? > >>>> > >>>> In addition, would it be better to totally remove the closeQuietly() > >>>> method signature? As we are saying that it will be Deprecated, so > people > >>>> should not use it. > >>>> > >>>> Let me know your thoughts so that I will make the relevant changes. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Rajiv > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> > >>>>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 05:15, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Rajiv, > >>>>> > >>>>> I added a "[Deprecated]" to the class comment for the closeQuietly() > >> list > >>>>> item. > >>>>> > >>>>> I did not use the patch to use "Please note, that IOExceptions are > >> caught > >>>>> but any RuntimeExceptions can be thrown from the close() method." > >>>>> > >>>>> It seems to me that a RuntimeException can be thrown from the guts of > >> any > >>>>> method, especially like a close-like method, so I am not sure I see > the > >>>>> value here. > >>>>> > >>>>> Perhaps others in the community feel otherwise and I invite them to > >> make > >>>> a > >>>>> suitable change. I just do not see it needed from my POV. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you, > >>>>> Gary > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Rajiv Jain > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks Gary. I will be patient. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for replying. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rajiv > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 18 Jul 2016, at 20:56, Gary Gregory > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello Rajiv, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We are all volunteers working on a large project with many > components > >>>>>> with > >>>>>>> different levels of activity. Please be
Re: [io-480] Query
@Rajiv: Gary was talking about this commit: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14/commits/be0477b5a571ec83d8b6554e898d3710f27bd153 BTW RuntimeException <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/RuntimeException.html> is an unchecked exception, no value in declaring them in Javadocs. and WRT the other question, deprecated meaning it will be removed later in the future. It's like a informed change that people should not use it. Thanks, Raviteja On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Rajiv Jain wrote: > Hi Gary > > Where is this change? I cannot find it? > > In addition, would it be better to totally remove the closeQuietly() > method signature? As we are saying that it will be Deprecated, so people > should not use it. > > Let me know your thoughts so that I will make the relevant changes. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Rajiv > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 21 Jul 2016, at 05:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Hi Rajiv, > > > > I added a "[Deprecated]" to the class comment for the closeQuietly() list > > item. > > > > I did not use the patch to use "Please note, that IOExceptions are caught > > but any RuntimeExceptions can be thrown from the close() method." > > > > It seems to me that a RuntimeException can be thrown from the guts of any > > method, especially like a close-like method, so I am not sure I see the > > value here. > > > > Perhaps others in the community feel otherwise and I invite them to make > a > > suitable change. I just do not see it needed from my POV. > > > > Thank you, > > Gary > > > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Rajiv Jain > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks Gary. I will be patient. > >> > >> Thanks for replying. > >> > >> Rajiv > >> > >>> On 18 Jul 2016, at 20:56, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Rajiv, > >>> > >>> We are all volunteers working on a large project with many components > >> with > >>> different levels of activity. Please be patient. Hopefully someone will > >>> take a look at your request soon. > >>> > >>> Gary > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Rajiv Jain >>> <mailto:rajiv...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I have been working on the Apache Maven project as a contributor > >> recently. > >>>> I don’t know whether it is any different for Apache Commons IO. > >>>> > >>>> The procedure for Apache Maven contributions are: > >>>> > >>>> a) Choose a Jira ticket to work on > >>>> b) Fork the project > >>>> 3) Make changes > >>>> 4) Apply a pull request > >>>> > >>>> For the issues that I have worked on, pull requests are reviewed. > >>>> > >>>> A few days ago, I worked on the Commons IO for IO-480 and removed some > >>>> Java documentation within the class files but no one has reviewed it. > >> Is it > >>>> the same process or have I missed something? The pull request is > located > >>>> here: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14 < > >>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14 < > >> https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/14>> > >>>> > >>>> In addition, if I would like to work on Apache Commons project where > is > >>>> the best place I can start. As, I looked at the Jira tickets and there > >> are > >>>> in open state and when looking into the code they have already been > >> fixed. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Rajiv > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com> | > >> ggreg...@apache.org <mailto:ggreg...@apache.org> > >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/ <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>> > >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/ < > >> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>> > >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/ < > >> http://www.manning.com/templier/>> > >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com < > >> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> > >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> > >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory> > > > > > > > > -- > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: Is JIRA down?
Oh cool, thanks for the info. On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:46 AM, sebb wrote: > Seems OK now. > > In future, please note that system problems are usually noted here: > > http://status.apache.org/ > > Note that have been ongoing temporary JIRA connectivity issues. > So it's always worth trying again after a while. > > > > On 24 June 2016 at 19:49, Raviteja Lokineni > wrote: > > I am getting a HTTP 500 when trying to access issues.apache.org > > > > -- > > *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer > > TD Ameritrade > > > > E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com > > > > [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] > > <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Is JIRA down?
I am getting a HTTP 500 when trying to access issues.apache.org -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TD Ameritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
Re: [configuration] Please review pull request for CONFIGURATION-634
Any commons-configuration developers around the place? On Jun 23, 2016 10:41 AM, "Raviteja Lokineni" wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for bugging too much guys. > > Someone please review my pull request > https://github.com/apache/commons-configuration/pull/3 > > JIRA link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-634 > > This issue is a blocker in my project and stops me from proceeding into > the production. > > Thanks, > -- > *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer > TDAmeritrade > > E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com > > [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] > <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni> > >
[configuration] Please review pull request for CONFIGURATION-634
Hi, Sorry for bugging too much guys. Someone please review my pull request https://github.com/apache/commons-configuration/pull/3 JIRA link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-634 This issue is a blocker in my project and stops me from proceeding into the production. Thanks, -- *Raviteja Lokineni* | Business Intelligence Developer TDAmeritrade E: raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com [image: View Raviteja Lokineni's profile on LinkedIn] <http://in.linkedin.com/in/ravitejalokineni>
