DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38160] - [net] Freeze during FTP connect

2008-01-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38160.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38160





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-29 04:28 ---
Commons issues are now tracked using JIRA:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET

This issue is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-31

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34763] - [net] TelnetClient broken for binary transmissions + solution

2007-11-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34763





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-25 16:33 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
We have moved from Bugzilla to Jira for issue tracking:
http://commons.apache.org/net/issue-tracking.html

This bug can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-89



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26296] - [net] TelnetClient#disconnect() causes NullPointerException from Linux when connected to Windows 2000 Telnet Server

2007-10-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-16 04:12 ---
Three and half years past...
I am using Commons 1.4.1 but this bug still exists.
Are you planning to fix this bug at all?

I think, the best chois will be to surround bug block with 
try
{
...
}
catch(NullPointerException e)
{
throw new IOException(e.getMessage());
}

So it will be processed by programs as IOException (such it is by logic!).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26296] - [net] TelnetClient#disconnect() causes NullPointerException from Linux when connected to Windows 2000 Telnet Server

2007-10-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-16 04:47 ---
Fixed; see:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-84

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34600] - [lang] Enum.equals() is too fragile

2007-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34600.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34600





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-11 09:01 ---
*** Bug 43602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34600] - [lang] Enum.equals() is too fragile

2007-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34600.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34600


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-11 09:13 ---
Bill,

Commons now uses Jira rather than Bugzilla for issue tracking

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-22

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38688] - [net][PATCH] TelnetInputStream.read sometimes hangs if reader thread is disabled

2007-09-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38688.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38688





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-11 10:38 ---
Commons has moved its issue tracking from Bugzilla to JIRA. Please post any
comments you have regarding this issue in JIRA at:
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-3

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30391] - [dbcp] Use setQueryTimeout in combination with validationQuery to recover from network problems

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30391





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 07:54 ---
Re So we are stuck on that for another eternity

This is not necessarily so.

One situation in which a client can hang is if the database machine dies 
suddenly while the client is in the middle of a read() operation on the socket 
during the validation query processing.
In this case the validation call would hang until the TCP keepalive (often 2 
hours by default) causes the client side read() to fail.

A statment query timeout would avoid this - since the additional 
subsequent 'database roundtrip' mentioned would fail immediately because this 
new TCP activity (ie write()) would cause an immediate network error to be 
detected.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30391] - [dbcp] Use setQueryTimeout in combination with validationQuery to recover from network problems

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30391





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 09:03 ---
Apache Commons has moved its issue tracking from Bugzilla to JIRA.
Please make any comments you have on this issue at this address:
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-163

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]