Re: [FileUpload] modular 2.0

[Dennis Kieselhorst]

+1 

Thanks Gary, it will be a cleaner solution.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [FileUpload] modular 2.0

[Gary Gregory]

It's not hard, it's just a touch tedious, I'll get to it this weekend.

Gary

On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 10:27 Bruno Kinoshita  wrote:

> +1 if it is not too hard to do it.
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 4:22 pm Gary Gregory,  wrote:
>
> > In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
> > servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
> > modules for these and for portlets, such that all their dependencies are
> > non-optional.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Gary
> >
>

Re: [FileUpload] modular 2.0

[Bruno Kinoshita]

+1 if it is not too hard to do it.

On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 4:22 pm Gary Gregory,  wrote:

> In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
> servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
> modules for these and for portlets, such that all their dependencies are
> non-optional.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
>

Re: [FileUpload] modular 2.0

[Maxim Solodovnik]

+1 :)


from mobile (sorry for typos ;)


On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 21:22 Gary Gregory  wrote:

> In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
> servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
> modules for these and for portlets, such that all their dependencies are
> non-optional.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
>

[FileUpload] modular 2.0

[Gary Gregory]

In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
modules for these and for portlets, such that all their dependencies are
non-optional.

Thoughts?

Gary