[VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?
If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. Thoughts? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:16, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. Thoughts? +1 but not a blocker Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:15 PM, sebb wrote: If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. Thoughts? While that would be a good thing to do I certainly wouldn't want to require that. Ralph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
