Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Just for your information, at https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/commits/0.5.0-RC I've resumed the preparation of a new Commons RDF. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:46 AM, sebb wrote: > On 30 October 2017 at 03:26, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I started to prepare 0.4.0 release [1] at a RC branch [1]. But then I > facea > > with an unexpected problem: I have no permissions to write at the > Commons' > > dist area. > > > > That's because I shouldn't. After graduation, the Commons RDF PPMC wasn't > > never voted for full Commons PMC (I think Stian was before). > > > > I'm not asking for that now. But, how can I get rights there for > uploading > > the RC? > > I think you would need to be a member of the Commons committer group > to be able to write to the staging area, i.e. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/ > > Only PMC members can write to the release area. > > > Thanks. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/COMMONSRDF/versions/12342089 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/tree/0.4.0-RC > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > >> Sorry guys, I missed this thread. > >> > >> I'll take a look during the weekend, if nobody has jumped in before. > >> > >> On Oct 24, 2017 21:39, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > >> > >>> Maybe what is in master is enough? > >>> > >>> Gary > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > >>> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. > >>> > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging > issues > >>> > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release > and > >>> > volunteer to cut a new release. > >>> > CheersBruno > >>> > > >>> > From: Gary Gregory > >>> > To: Commons Developers List > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM > >>> > Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? > >>> > > >>> > Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... > >>> > > >>> > Gary > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hello, > >>> > > > >>> > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons > RDF. > >>> It > >>> > > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a > >>> timeframe > >>> > > for the next release? > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > Aaron > >>> > > > >>> > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >Sergio, > >>> > > > >>> > >Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a > few > >>> > > repositories in this github organization: > >>> https://github.com/trellis-ldp > >>> > > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are > found > >>> in: > >>> > > > >>> > >API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api > >>> > >SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi > >>> > >HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http > >>> > > > >>> > >Most of the components have already been released to maven > central, > >>> > > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer > >>> and > >>> > the > >>> > > persistence layer). > >>> > > > >>> > >The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that > this > >>> > > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making > use of > >>> > > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a > >>> > particular > >>> > > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use > >>> Jena > >>> > in > >>> > > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of > ZooKeeper >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
On 30 October 2017 at 03:26, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Hi, > > I started to prepare 0.4.0 release [1] at a RC branch [1]. But then I facea > with an unexpected problem: I have no permissions to write at the Commons' > dist area. > > That's because I shouldn't. After graduation, the Commons RDF PPMC wasn't > never voted for full Commons PMC (I think Stian was before). > > I'm not asking for that now. But, how can I get rights there for uploading > the RC? I think you would need to be a member of the Commons committer group to be able to write to the staging area, i.e. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/ Only PMC members can write to the release area. > Thanks. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/COMMONSRDF/versions/12342089 > [2] https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/tree/0.4.0-RC > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> Sorry guys, I missed this thread. >> >> I'll take a look during the weekend, if nobody has jumped in before. >> >> On Oct 24, 2017 21:39, "Gary Gregory" wrote: >> >>> Maybe what is in master is enough? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < >>> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. >>> > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues >>> > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and >>> > volunteer to cut a new release. >>> > CheersBruno >>> > >>> > From: Gary Gregory >>> > To: Commons Developers List >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM >>> > Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? >>> > >>> > Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... >>> > >>> > Gary >>> > >>> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hello, >>> > > >>> > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. >>> It >>> > > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a >>> timeframe >>> > > for the next release? >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Aaron >>> > > >>> > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: >>> > > >>> > >Sergio, >>> > > >>> > >Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few >>> > > repositories in this github organization: >>> https://github.com/trellis-ldp >>> > > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found >>> in: >>> > > >>> > >API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api >>> > >SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi >>> > >HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http >>> > > >>> > >Most of the components have already been released to maven central, >>> > > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer >>> and >>> > the >>> > > persistence layer). >>> > > >>> > >The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this >>> > > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of >>> > > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a >>> > particular >>> > > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use >>> Jena >>> > in >>> > > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper >>> > > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. >>> > > >>> > >Aaron >>> > > >>> > >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández >> > >>> > > wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Hi Aaron, >>> > >> >>> > >> you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' >>> d >>> > > like to >>> > >> take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. >>> Hopefully >>> > > I'll >>> > >> have some time later this week, at t
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Hi, I started to prepare 0.4.0 release [1] at a RC branch [1]. But then I facea with an unexpected problem: I have no permissions to write at the Commons' dist area. That's because I shouldn't. After graduation, the Commons RDF PPMC wasn't never voted for full Commons PMC (I think Stian was before). I'm not asking for that now. But, how can I get rights there for uploading the RC? Thanks. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/COMMONSRDF/versions/12342089 [2] https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/tree/0.4.0-RC On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Sorry guys, I missed this thread. > > I'll take a look during the weekend, if nobody has jumped in before. > > On Oct 24, 2017 21:39, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > >> Maybe what is in master is enough? >> >> Gary >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < >> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. >> > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues >> > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and >> > volunteer to cut a new release. >> > CheersBruno >> > >> > From: Gary Gregory >> > To: Commons Developers List >> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM >> > Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? >> > >> > Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... >> > >> > Gary >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. >> It >> > > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a >> timeframe >> > > for the next release? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Aaron >> > > >> > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: >> > > >> > >Sergio, >> > > >> > >Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few >> > > repositories in this github organization: >> https://github.com/trellis-ldp >> > > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found >> in: >> > > >> > >API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api >> > >SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi >> > >HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http >> > > >> > >Most of the components have already been released to maven central, >> > > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer >> and >> > the >> > > persistence layer). >> > > >> > >The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this >> > > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of >> > > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a >> > particular >> > > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use >> Jena >> > in >> > > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper >> > > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. >> > > >> > >Aaron >> > > >> > >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández > > >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Hi Aaron, >> > >> >> > >> you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' >> d >> > > like to >> > >> take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. >> Hopefully >> > > I'll >> > >> have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. >> > >> >> > >> Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons >> > > RDF-based >> > >> LDP implementation? >> > >> >> > >> Thanks. >> > >> >> > >> Cheers, >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn < >> acob...@amherst.edu> >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi! >> > >>> >> > >>> The last release of commons-rdf wa
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Sorry guys, I missed this thread. I'll take a look during the weekend, if nobody has jumped in before. On Oct 24, 2017 21:39, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Maybe what is in master is enough? > > Gary > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > > > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. > > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues > > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and > > volunteer to cut a new release. > > CheersBruno > > > > From: Gary Gregory > > To: Commons Developers List > > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM > > Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? > > > > Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... > > > > Gary > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. > It > > > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a > timeframe > > > for the next release? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Aaron > > > > > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: > > > > > >Sergio, > > > > > >Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few > > > repositories in this github organization: > https://github.com/trellis-ldp > > > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found > in: > > > > > >API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api > > >SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi > > >HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http > > > > > >Most of the components have already been released to maven central, > > > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and > > the > > > persistence layer). > > > > > >The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this > > > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of > > > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a > > particular > > > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use > Jena > > in > > > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper > > > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. > > > > > >Aaron > > > > > >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Aaron, > > >> > > >> you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d > > > like to > > >> take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. > Hopefully > > > I'll > > >> have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > >> > > >> Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons > > > RDF-based > > >> LDP implementation? > > >> > > >> Thanks. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn < > acob...@amherst.edu> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi! > > >>> > > >>> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there > > > are some > > >>> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to > use > > > -- > > >>> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a > few > > >>> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, > > > but even > > >>> a 0.4.0 release would be great. > > >>> > > >>> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a > > > server > > >>> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which > commons-rdf > > >>> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > > >>> > > >>> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be > > > more than > > >>> happy to help out. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Aaron > > >>> > > >>> acob...@apache.org > > >>> > > > - > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >?B� > > > CB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[[ۜ˘\? > > > X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Maybe what is in master is enough? Gary On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and > volunteer to cut a new release. > CheersBruno > > From: Gary Gregory > To: Commons Developers List > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM > Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? > > Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... > > Gary > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It > > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe > > for the next release? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: > > > >Sergio, > > > >Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few > > repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp > > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: > > > >API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api > >SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi > >HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http > > > >Most of the components have already been released to maven central, > > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and > the > > persistence layer). > > > >The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this > > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of > > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a > particular > > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena > in > > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper > > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. > > > >Aaron > > > >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Aaron, > >> > >> you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d > > like to > >> take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully > > I'll > >> have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > >> > >> Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons > > RDF-based > >> LDP implementation? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn > > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there > > are some > >>> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use > > -- > >>> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > >>> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, > > but even > >>> a 0.4.0 release would be great. > >>> > >>> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a > > server > >>> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > >>> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > >>> > >>> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be > > more than > >>> happy to help out. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Aaron > >>> > >>> acob...@apache.org > >>> > > - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > > >?B� > > CB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[[ۜ˘\? > > X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B > > > > > > > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and volunteer to cut a new release. CheersBruno From: Gary Gregory To: Commons Developers List Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... Gary On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe > for the next release? > > Thanks, > Aaron > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: > > Sergio, > > Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few > repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: > > API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api > SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi > HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http > > Most of the components have already been released to maven central, > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and the > persistence layer). > > The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a particular > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena in > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. > > Aaron > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d > like to > > take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully > I'll > > have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > > > Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons > RDF-based > > LDP implementation? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there > are some > >> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use > -- > >> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > >> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, > but even > >> a 0.4.0 release would be great. > >> > >> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a > server > >> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > >> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > >> > >> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be > more than > >> happy to help out. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Aaron > >> > >> acob...@apache.org > >> > - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > ?B� > CB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[[ۜ˘\? > X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B > > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... Gary On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe > for the next release? > > Thanks, > Aaron > > On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: > > Sergio, > > Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few > repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp > (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: > > API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api > SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi > HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http > > Most of the components have already been released to maven central, > but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and the > persistence layer). > > The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this > implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of > Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a particular > RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena in > the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper > (Curator), Kafka and Beam. > > Aaron > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d > like to > > take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully > I'll > > have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > > > Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons > RDF-based > > LDP implementation? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there > are some > >> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use > -- > >> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > >> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, > but even > >> a 0.4.0 release would be great. > >> > >> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a > server > >> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > >> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > >> > >> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be > more than > >> happy to help out. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Aaron > >> > >> acob...@apache.org > >> > - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > ?B� > CB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[[ۜ˘\? > X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B > > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Hello, I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe for the next release? Thanks, Aaron On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: Sergio, Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http Most of the components have already been released to maven central, but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and the persistence layer). The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a particular RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena in the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper (Curator), Kafka and Beam. Aaron > On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to > take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll > have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based > LDP implementation? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some >> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- >> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few >> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even >> a 0.4.0 release would be great. >> >> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server >> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf >> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. >> >> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than >> happy to help out. >> >> Thanks, >> Aaron >> >> acob...@apache.org >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> ?B�CB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[[ۜ˘\?X�?K�ܙ�B
Re: RDF Commons release?
Hi Gary, I already replied it: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a6ff6e7823f6982afe3e6b13a53567aeb91320e58b1aafbb7c1a3e3d@ Maybe trying to correctly label the subject I actually broke the thread. Sorry. On Oct 5, 2017 16:25, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Would anyone closely associated with Commons RDF care to comment? > > Gary > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are > some > > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- > > especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > > unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but > even > > a 0.4.0 release would be great. > > > > As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server > > implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > > provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > > > > Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than > > happy to help out. > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > acob...@apache.org > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
Re: RDF Commons release?
Would anyone closely associated with Commons RDF care to comment? Gary On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hi! > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- > especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even > a 0.4.0 release would be great. > > As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server > implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > > Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than > happy to help out. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > acob...@apache.org > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Sergio, Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api SPI: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-spi HTTP layer: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-http Most of the components have already been released to maven central, but I'm still working on a few of them (particularly the HTTP layer and the persistence layer). The main difference between this and, say, Marmotta, is that this implementation is designed to scale horizontally. And by making use of Commons-RDF, the interfaces of this LDP server aren't tied to a particular RDF library implementation -- e.g. Jena or RDF4J -- though I do use Jena in the implementation code. I am also making significant use of ZooKeeper (Curator), Kafka and Beam. Aaron > On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to > take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll > have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. > > Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based > LDP implementation? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some >> nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- >> especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few >> unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even >> a 0.4.0 release would be great. >> >> As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server >> implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf >> provides all of the core RDF abstractions. >> >> Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than >> happy to help out. >> >> Thanks, >> Aaron >> >> acob...@apache.org >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >>
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
Hi Aaron, you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based LDP implementation? Thanks. Cheers, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hi! > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- > especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even > a 0.4.0 release would be great. > > As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server > implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > > Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than > happy to help out. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > acob...@apache.org > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
Re: [RDF] Commons release?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hi! > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- > especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few > unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even > a 0.4.0 release would be great. > > As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server > implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf > provides all of the core RDF abstractions. > > Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than > happy to help out. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > acob...@apache.org > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
RDF Commons release?
Hi! The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even a 0.4.0 release would be great. As a little background, over the last several months I've built a server implementation of the W3C Linked Data Platform in which commons-rdf provides all of the core RDF abstractions. Would it be possible to move forward with a release? I would be more than happy to help out. Thanks, Aaron acob...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org