Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-04-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1

-Rahul


On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:16 PM, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:

 Tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC1

 Site:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/site/index.html

 Binaries:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/staged

 [ ] +1 release it
 [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
 [ ] -1 no, do not release it because

 Votes will close on Friday 2010-04-02T22:00+2.
 Thanks
 Henrib

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-04-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe
henrib a écrit :
 Tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC1
 
 Site:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/site/index.html
 
 Binaries:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/staged
 
 [ ] +1 release it

There are some checkstyle and findbugs errors, but nothing seem too
important. So +1 but it would be nice to have this fixed for next version.

Luc

 [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
 [ ] -1 no, do not release it because
 
 Votes will close on Friday 2010-04-02T22:00+2.
 Thanks
 Henrib


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-04-01 Thread Oliver Heger
The only minor nit I found is that in the header of RELEASE-NOTES.txt it 
says Version 2.0 instead of Version 2.0.1. Not a blocker, so +1 from me.


Oliver

Am 31.03.2010 19:40, schrieb henrib:


RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 was using a non-standard pom,
RC3 is out.

JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue.

Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC3

Site:
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/site/index.html

Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/staged

[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because

Votes will close on Tuesday 2010-04-06T22:00+2.
Thanks
Henrib



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread henrib

Thank you for the review and the corrective actions.
Generating RC2.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1746534.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread henrib

RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 out.

JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue.

Tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC2

Site: 
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC2/site/index.html

Binaries: 
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC2/staged

[ ] +1 release it 
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care 
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because 

Votes will close on Tuesday 2010-04-06T22:00+2. 
Thanks 
Henrib
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1746540.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2010, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:

  RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 out.

  JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue.

  Tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC2

  Site:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC2/site/index.html

  Binaries:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC2/staged

The pom has a spurious henrib profile.

Not sure if this warrants retagging or not.

Otherwise looks OK.


  [ ] +1 release it
  [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
  [ ] -1 no, do not release it because


 Votes will close on Tuesday 2010-04-06T22:00+2.
  Thanks
  Henrib

 --
  View this message in context: 
 http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1746540.html

 Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread henrib

RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 was using a non-standard pom,
RC3 is out.

JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue. 

Tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC3

Site: 
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/site/index.html

Binaries: 
http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/staged

[ ] +1 release it 
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care 
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because 

Votes will close on Tuesday 2010-04-06T22:00+2. 
Thanks 
Henrib
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1747185.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread Jörg Schaible
henrib wrote:

 
 RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 was using a non-standard
 pom, RC3 is out.
 
 JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue.
 
 Tag:
 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-
RC3
 
 Site:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/site/index.html
 
 Binaries:
 http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/staged
 
 [ ] +1 release it
 [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
 [ ] -1 no, do not release it because

Build with my comoiler zoo from sorece tarball.

+1

- Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2010, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:

  RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 was using a non-standard pom,
  RC3 is out.


  JEXL 2.0.1 is a hotfix release correcting a blocker issue.


 Tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC3

  Site:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/site/index.html

Minor blip - refers to Jakarta Velocity - I'll fix SVN.

  Binaries:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC3/staged


  [ ] +1 release it
  [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
  [ ] -1 no, do not release it because


 Votes will close on Tuesday 2010-04-06T22:00+2.

+1

  Thanks
  Henrib

 --
  View this message in context: 
 http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1747185.html

 Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0.1

2010-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2010, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:

  Tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0_1-RC1

RAT and property check looks OK.

  Site:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/site/index.html

Main page still refers to 2.0 in body and LHS menus.

Releases page refers to nightly builds; these should not be advertised
except to developers. Should probably drop releases.html entirely, and
use downloads link only.

Not blockers.

  Binaries:
  http://people.apache.org/~henrib/jexl-2.0.1-RC1/staged

The archives appear to have been created from something other than the
SVN tag, otherwise the $Id tags would agree.

The source archive contains some .class files, which is wrong.
Probably an error in the assembly descriptors - I'll have a look.

-1 because of the above.

Otherwise looks OK.

  [ ] +1 release it
  [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
  [ ] -1 no, do not release it because

  Votes will close on Friday 2010-04-02T22:00+2.
  Thanks
  Henrib

 --
  View this message in context: 
 http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-1-tp1707491p1707491.html
  Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org