Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread jan i
On 22 March 2015 at 14:35, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:

 HI Bertrand,

 Thanks for the clarification regarding
 http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html

 Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also
 explicitly
 reflect that vetoes aren't allowed when it comes to on- and ofboarding
 contributors as committer and PMC member? That would surely bring clarity.


I would be very unhappy with aren´t allowed, that is something the
individual PMCs should decide !

rgds
jan I.



 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz 
 bdelacre...@apache.org
  wrote:

  On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux
  jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
   ...Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me.
  Should
   we not amend the newcommitter page?..
 
  That would be great, I don't have time right now myself.
  -Bertrand
 



Re: ACNA Presentation Template

2015-03-22 Thread Nick Burch

On 20/03/15 19:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

ApacheCon EU 2014
http://people.apache.org/~nick/NickTemplateACEU14.odp
(this ought to have been uploaded to the Templates site too, but
apparently Linux Foundation never clarified the terms of usage for some
images that Nick included into it)


We do have permissions to upload it to the templates site - LF gave it 
on the 20th of November, once they'd had a chance to recover from the 
event and review it.


I've just tried to upload it, but after creating an account on 
templates.openoffice.org and getting a password set link, the log in 
button takes me to a page saying Drupal already installed


So, if someone who does have an account could upload the template for 
me, that'd be wonderful! (And possibly look at fixing the site too...)


Thanks
Nick



Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
 ...Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me. Should
 we not amend the newcommitter page?..

That would be great, I don't have time right now myself.
-Bertrand


RE: ACNA Presentation Template - Crunch

2015-03-22 Thread Nick Burch

On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have extracted the three background images from the ACEU14 
presentation.  They are not possible to morph.  They are JPEGs and there 
is no reasonable way to extract pieces and morph the logo and conference 
name.


I'll send you the images I used offline. They were mostly just taken from 
the ApacheCon website, with a few edits


But I will have to do it from scratch.  What I need very badly, if there 
are not already drawing components that were used for ACEU14, is the 
feather.  Just the feather.  Preferably black-and-white and a resizable 
graphic at that.


The SVG of the feather is available from the foundation site:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/

The ApacheCon North America in white with the feather outline, like the 
Europe one, is available from the LF ApacheCon site:

http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/apachecon_na_logo_w.png

Other event logos in various formats, in case they help with ideas / 
inspiration / structure / etc can be found at:

http://events.apache.org/organize/logos/

Sadly the LF haven't done us a nice two-colour image of the skyline this 
time, nor the funky Denver trees, so it'll be more work...


Nick


Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux


Le 22/03/2015 13:56, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:

...The following document https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
states:

A positive result is achieved by Consensus Approval i.e. at least 3 +1
votes and no vetoes

There are no vetoes when electing committers, that document is wrong.

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html is the canonical
document about Apache votes, it specifies vetoes only for code
commits.

-Bertrand



Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me. Should we 
not amend the newcommitter page?

Thanks

Jacques


Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread Pierre Smits
HI Bertrand,

Thanks for the clarification regarding
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html

Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also explicitly
reflect that vetoes aren't allowed when it comes to on- and ofboarding
contributors as committer and PMC member? That would surely bring clarity.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
 wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
  ...Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me.
 Should
  we not amend the newcommitter page?..

 That would be great, I don't have time right now myself.
 -Bertrand



Re: ApacheCon Twitter account

2015-03-22 Thread Rich Bowen



On 03/21/2015 01:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:

Twitter just posted the following blog post:
https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-tweetdeck-teams


Interesting! On a related subject: should we promote the usage of this
for managing all of our project @ASFxxx accounts?


It seems preferred over handing out username/password to a bunch of 
people, certainly. This way, one person (perhaps even a designated 
comdev officer?) has the main password, and can delegate to other 
people? It's an interesting idea.


--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon


Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
 ...The following document https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
 states:

 A positive result is achieved by Consensus Approval i.e. at least 3 +1
 votes and no vetoes

There are no vetoes when electing committers, that document is wrong.

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html is the canonical
document about Apache votes, it specifies vetoes only for code
commits.

-Bertrand


Re: Veto! Veto?

2015-03-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Le 22/03/2015 14:42, jan i a écrit :

On 22 March 2015 at 14:35, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:


HI Bertrand,

Thanks for the clarification regarding
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html

Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also
explicitly
reflect that vetoes aren't allowed when it comes to on- and ofboarding
contributors as committer and PMC member? That would surely bring clarity.


I would be very unhappy with aren´t allowed, that is something the
individual PMCs should decide !


Yes indeed that's PMCs 's remit; we just need to clarify the ASF default.

Jacques



rgds
jan I.



Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz 
bdelacre...@apache.org

wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

...Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me.

Should

we not amend the newcommitter page?..

That would be great, I don't have time right now myself.
-Bertrand



Re: ACNA Presentation Template

2015-03-22 Thread Nick Burch

Hi All

I've had a go at updating my Budapest template for Austin, draft so far 
available at:

http://people.apache.org/~nick/Draft_ACNA15_Template_Nick.odp

I know there was a bit of feedback on the Budapest ones about visability / 
contrast, so advice on if these need changes before offering them out for 
use would be greatly received!


(Thanks to Martha Zumack for the photos of Austin, which she has kindly 
said can be used for the templates)


Nick


RE: ACNA Presentation Template - Crunch

2015-03-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Thanks Nick,

I received the files from you.

I don't know about backgrounds.  It may end up being plain, or extra credit 
once I have anything workable with the essential parts. 

I notice that the ACNA14 slides have a Linux Foundation credit on them.  I 
would think this is appropriate for ACNA15 also.  Is that correct?

Thanks for the other links.  That is very helpful.

 - Dennis

PS: Having thoughts about developer dogfood and how AOO is a stranger in a 
strange land.

-Original Message-
From: Nick Burch [mailto:n...@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 06:01
To: Dennis E. Hamilton
Cc: dev@community.apache.org; 'Melissa Warnkin'
Subject: RE: ACNA Presentation Template - Crunch

On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
 I have extracted the three background images from the ACEU14 
 presentation.  They are not possible to morph.  They are JPEGs and there 
 is no reasonable way to extract pieces and morph the logo and conference 
 name.

I'll send you the images I used offline. They were mostly just taken from 
the ApacheCon website, with a few edits

 But I will have to do it from scratch.  What I need very badly, if there 
 are not already drawing components that were used for ACEU14, is the 
 feather.  Just the feather.  Preferably black-and-white and a resizable 
 graphic at that.

The SVG of the feather is available from the foundation site:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/

The ApacheCon North America in white with the feather outline, like the 
Europe one, is available from the LF ApacheCon site:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/apachecon_na_logo_w.png

Other event logos in various formats, in case they help with ideas / 
inspiration / structure / etc can be found at:
http://events.apache.org/organize/logos/

Sadly the LF haven't done us a nice two-colour image of the skyline this 
time, nor the funky Denver trees, so it'll be more work...

Nick



RE: ACNA Presentation Template

2015-03-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Thanks Nick, those are great!

I consider the problem solved.

In anticipation of the next AC-anywhere, I want to help turn this (and the 
previous two under Linux Foundation) into a form that can be 
repurposed/reused/customized along with information on how to do it and the 
resources/skills that are required.  

Removing the crunch requirement is great.

 - Dennis,
   Now having learned what some folks consider simple requests 
   (and solutions) around here.

-Original Message-
From: Nick Burch [mailto:n...@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 07:48
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ACNA Presentation Template

Hi All

I've had a go at updating my Budapest template for Austin, draft so far 
available at:
http://people.apache.org/~nick/Draft_ACNA15_Template_Nick.odp

[ ... ]



Re: ACNA Presentation Template

2015-03-22 Thread Shawn McKinney


 On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I've had a go at updating my Budapest template for Austin, draft so far 
 available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~nick/Draft_ACNA15_Template_Nick.odp
 
 I know there was a bit of feedback on the Budapest ones about visability / 
 contrast, so advice on if these need changes before offering them out for use 
 would be greatly received!
 
 (Thanks to Martha Zumack for the photos of Austin, which she has kindly said 
 can be used for the templates)


Those Texas backgrounds look really nice.  Thanks for pulling this together 
Nick!  And thanks to the others who pitched in to help!

Shawn 

gtk requirements for builds?

2015-03-22 Thread Kay Schenk
GTK is enabled by default for our builds.

I don't see this listed as a build requirement for either Windows or
Mac, however. So, should this build flag be changed to non-enabled
generally and only enabled for Linux?

-- 
-
MzK

“What is the point of being alive if you don't
 at least  try to do something remarkable?”
   -- John Green, An Abundance of Katherines